U.S. Senate Incumbents

NameTermsStatePartyPositionLeadershipPosition ScoreVote ScoreLeadership ScoreCarbon FeeCarbon Fee ScoreClimate CalculationSourcesSupport/Oppose RoeVote [Expanding Dirty and Dangerous Offshore Drilling]Vote [Build Back Better Budget Resolution]Vote [Eliminating Safeguards on Fossil Fuel Production]Vote [Repealing Assault on Methane Pollution Safeguards]Vote [Inflation Reduction Act]
Bennet, Michael 2Colorado DSenator Michael Bennet understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. According to his climate change plan on his website, Senator Bennet states, "Climate change is a global crisis that we must confront now... We need bold action and enduring solutions. America’s Climate Change Plan will reduce emissions in line with the most aggressive targets set by the world’s scientists and achieve 100 percent clean, net-zero emissions as soon as possible, and no later than 2050." However, Senator Bennet "believes in an all-of-the-above strategy that transitions Colorado to cleaner sources of energy while growing the economy... He has fought to retain wind and solar tax credits and led bipartisan legislation to clean up coal emission from plants and expand the market for liquefied natural gas." "All of the above,” requires the continued burning of fossil fuels.Senator Michael Bennet website and position papers advocate for climate action but not as a top priority issue. According to his website, Senator Bennet "knows climate change is not a problem we can push off to the next generation... Increasing carbon pollution is threatening the health of our children. Michael believes in a comprehensive approach to combat climate change that includes common sense actions to reduce carbon pollution." However, according to 'Inside Climate News,' "The problem he faces is squaring that with an ambivalent record on fossil fuels. His support for Keystone was not an anomaly: Bennet has been supportive of fossil fuel development generally, especially natural gas, such as his support for the Jordan Cove pipeline and natural gas export terminal project in Oregon. In a 2017 op-ed in USA Today, Bennet wrote that saying no to responsible production of natural gas—which emits half the carbon of the dirtiest coal and is the cleanest fossil fuel—surrenders progress for purity.” "All of the above,” requires the continued burning of fossil fuels.7510075Senator Michael Bennet has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. According to the 'Washington Post,' when asked "Would you support setting a price on carbon, such as with a carbon tax or cap-and-trade?," Senator Bennet stated, "There are a variety of tools we can use to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. I think we should include the country in making that decision, rather than making it from Washington” and was placed under the "Open To It" section of the article. However, according to 'Politico,' "Bennet’s [climate] plan aims to put the nation on a path to net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 or earlier, but it does not outline specific policies such as a carbon tax or clean energy mandates." Senator Bennet voted against S.Amdt.928 to (S.Con.Res.11), which would have established a deficit-neutral reserve fund to protect the United States from an energy tax.5075https://michaelbennet.com/climateplan/ https://www.bennet.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/clean-energy https://www.bennet.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/climate-change-environment https://insideclimatenews.org/news/24062019/michael-bennet-climate-change-global-warming-election-2020-candidate-profile/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/policy-2020/climate-change/carbon-tax/ https://www.politico.com/story/2019/05/20/michael-bennett-2020-election-climate-change-1334407 https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=114&session=1&vote=00103 https://www.bennet.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2022/6/bennet-statement-on-supreme-court-s-decision-to-overturn-roe-v-wadeSupports RoeN/APro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Blumenthal, Richard 2Connecticut DSenator Richard Blumenthal understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. According to his website, Senator Blumenthal stated, "I support efforts to end wasteful and unnecessary tax subsidies for oil and gas companies and agree we should redirect that money to support the development of clean, renewable sources of energy... Protecting the environment and addressing climate change will always remain a top priority. Anyone who questions whether Congress must act on these issues needs not look beyond the recent rash of unprecedented severe weather events that have devastated communities across the country." However, according to the 'Yale Center for Business and the Environment,' "The Senator stated that while fracking presents potential perils, which necessitate safeguards, the potential for more natural gas is a real opportunity."According to the 'Yale Daily News,' regarding the Green New Deal, it stated "the bill has 11 co-sponsors in the Senate, including... Blumenthal." Senator Blumenthal further stated, "Climate change is an existential crisis... This resolution affirms our commitment to developing a long overdue, comprehensive plan to tackle the devastating effects of climate change, create thousands of high-paying jobs in the renewable energy sector, and address the disparities in communities disproportionately affected by pollution." Senator Blumenthal also makes prominent public statements on the issue. According to 'Westchester and Fairfield County Business Journals,' Senator Blumenthal stated, "staying in the [Paris Climate] accord is essential to an American commitment to preserving the environment, clean air, and water, but most of all, saving the planet from the continuing effect of climate change and global warming.” Senator Blumenthal makes climate change a top priority issue. According to 'Congress.gov,' Senator Blumenthal cosponsored a bill titled, "A joint resolution calling on the United States and Congress to take immediate action to address the challenge of climate change." Senator Richard Blumenthal has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. 75100100Senator Richard Blumenthal supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. Senator Blumenthal voted against S.Amdt.928 to (S.Con.Res.11), which would have established a deficit-neutral reserve fund to protect the United States from an energy tax.7587.5https://www.blumenthal.senate.gov/issues/energy-and-the-environment https://cbey.yale.edu/our-stories/senator-blumenthal-shares-thoughts-on-climate-change https://yaledailynews.com/blog/2019/02/15/ct-senators-embrace-green-new-deal/ https://westfaironline.com/89910/richard-blumenthal-exiting-paris-climate-accord-cost-ct-jobs/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-joint-resolution/9?s=1&r=2 https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=114&session=1&vote=00103 https://www.blumenthal.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/blumenthal-statement-on-the-supreme-court-overruling-roe-eliminating-the-right-to-an-abortionSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Boozman, John 2Arkansas RSenator John Boozman disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2013 article in 'The Guardian,' Senator Boozman stated, "Well I think that we've got perhaps climate change going on. The question is what's causing it. Is man causing it, or, you know, is this a cycle that happens throughout the years, throughout the ages. And you can look back some of the previous times when there was no industrialization, you had these different ages, ice ages, and things warming and things. That's the question."In a 2014 YouTube video titled "EPW Committee Reviews President's Climate Regulation Plan" on Senator Boozman's YouTube channel, he states, "the question is not whether greenhouse gases trap heat, they do, the question is whether current climate science can predict and adequately explain the complexity of climate change." Also, according to his website, Senator Boozman states, "I had the opportunity to visit the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, our nation’s largest untapped field of oil... I have supported opening this area up to energy production... I am onboard with an ‘all-of-the-above’ approach for a long term solution to our energy needs. However, a real ‘all-of-the-above’ approach would include increased drilling at home." “All of the above,” requires the continued burning of fossil fuels. Senator John Boozman demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 000Senator John Boozman makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Senator was a co-sponsor of (S. Res 472) a 2016 resolution, which would have expressed the sense of the Senate that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the economy of the United States.00https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/jul/29/climate-committee-republicans https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZiCmKRrAZok&feature=youtu.be https://www.boozman.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2012/4/paying-the-price-for-defeated-oil-and-gas-exploration-opportunity https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-resolution/472/cosponsors?r=56&s=1&searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.ky3.com/2022/06/24/arkansas-lawmakers-react-roe-v-wade-decision/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Crapo, Mike 4Idaho RSenator Mike Crapo disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to 'Vice,' Senator Crapo stated, "While there is no dispute over the fact that the Earth's climate has changed many times over the planet's history, the underlying cause of these climactic shifts is ultimately not well-understood and is a matter of vigorous debate." Also, according to his website, Senator Crapo stated, "In order to meet our growing energy demands, our nation must pursue energy from many sources, not just traditional fossil fuels like oil, petroleum or natural gas. Hydroelectric, nuclear, geothermal, solar and other alternative energies are important to supporting our nation’s ability to meet its needs and provide for its energy independence."According to his website, Senator Crapo stated, "The debate over climate change has raged for many years. Natural factors such as solar activity, volcanic eruptions and orbital changes have affected the Earth's climate, resulting in both ice ages and periods of warming as far back as current technology can measure." Senator Mike Crapo demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.000Senator Mike Crapo opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. Senator Crapo voted for S.Amdt.928 to (S.Con.Res.11), which would have established a deficit-neutral reserve fund to protect the United States from an energy tax. 256.25https://www.vice.com/en/article/ez3pkk/idahos-climate-change-deniers https://www.crapo.senate.gov/issues/energy?latest=253 http://web.archive.org/web/20130221211520/http:/www.crapo.senate.gov/issues/energy/ClimateChange.cfm https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=114&session=1&vote=00103 https://twitter.com/MikeCrapo/status/1540357378910130177Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Duckworth, Tammy 1Illinois DSenator Tammy Duckworth understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. According to her website, Senator Duckworth stated, "The truth is that climate change is real, and climate change is here. We can’t ignore it any longer: The Midwest is flooding and the West Coast is burning. Coastlines are sinking while temperatures are soaring. And worldwide, instability is rising as farmland keeps dying... That’s one reason why this work is so important, and why I was so glad to join my colleagues on Wednesday to announce the Senate Democrats’ new Special Committee on the Climate Crisis."According to her website, "Senator Duckworth believes that climate change poses grave national security, public health and economic threats to our nation that Congress must swiftly address. Already, Illinois and states across the country are witnessing more frequent and severe weather events that not only affect growing seasons, increase heat waves and intensify floods—they can also wipe out entire communities." Senator Duckworth also makes prominent public statements on the issue. According to her Twitter page, @SenDuckworth, Senator Duckworth stated, "Climate change is one of the gravest environmental, economic and national security threats of our time. We’re already experiencing its devastating effects across our country. I’m glad to join @SenatorCarper in intro'ing this resolution calling on Congress to take immediate action" when referring to a climate bill she supports. Senator Duckworth makes climate change a top priority issue. According to 'Congress.gov,' Senator Duckworth cosponsored a bill titled, A joint resolution calling on the United States and Congress to take immediate action to address the challenge of climate change (S.J.Res.9). Senator Tammy Duckworth has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. 100100100Senator Tammy Duckworth publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. According to 'Congress.gov,' Senator Duckworth cosponsored a bill titled, American Opportunity Carbon Fee Act of 2019 (S.1128) that "imposes fees on carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions." Also, Senator Duckworth was not in Congress to vote on S.Amdt.928 to (S.Con.Res.11), which would have established a deficit-neutral reserve fund to protect the United States from an energy tax. 100100https://www.duckworth.senate.gov/news/in-the-news/senator-tammy-duckworth-on-climate-change-and-national-security https://www.duckworth.senate.gov/about-tammy/issues/environment-energy-and-great-lakes https://twitter.com/SenDuckworth/status/1100804445565263873 https://www.congress.gov/member/tammy-duckworth/D000622?q={%22senate-committee%22:%22Environment+and+Public+Works%22}&searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/1128 https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=114&session=1&vote=00103 https://www.duckworth.senate.gov/news/press-releases/duckworth-responds-to-dangerous-outrageous-supreme-court-decision-to-overturn-roe-v-wade-taking-away-constitutional-rights-for-millionsSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Grassley, Chuck 7Iowa RSenator Chuck Grassley does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to 'Grist,' when asked "are you convinced greenhouse gas emissions cause climate change and are a threat to human health?" Senator Grassley stated, "I’d be foolish if I didn’t give it some consideration because there’s a massive amount of scientists that feel that it does. But there’s also an increasing number of scientists that have doubt about it. And so, not being a scientist, I don’t know exactly where to say only those things that are really quantifiable, and temperature has risen. But the scientific aspect that I still reserving judgment on is the extent to which it’s manmade or natural... I’m a reasonable guy, just not quite convinced." However, according to an interview from the YouTube channel, 'Highway Walkers Media,' Senator Grassley stated, "I'm not a climate change denier. I can read temperatures and they've gone up one and a half or two percentage points the last 100 years. No, there's climate change going on for sure."According to his website, when discussing the Green New Deal, Senator Grassley stated, "And, of course, since no crisis should be allowed to go to waste, every aspect of the progressive agenda must be implemented to fend off the threat of climate change." Senator Chuck Grassley demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 2500Senator Chuck Grassley opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. Senator Grassley voted for S.Amdt.928 to (S.Con.Res.11), which would have established a deficit-neutral reserve fund to protect the United States from an energy tax. 2512.5https://grist.org/article/2009-08-26-chuck-grassley-does-not-believe-in-the-threat-of-anthropogenic-c/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRJFA6b3n9c https://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/news-releases/grassley-green-new-deal-0 https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=114&session=1&vote=00103 https://www.thegazette.com/staff-columnists/grassley-played-a-prominent-role-in-ending-roe/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Hassan, Maggie 1New HampshireDSenator Maggie Hassan understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Senator's 'Natural Resources, Clean Energy & Climate Change' page, she states, “From the White Mountains to the Seacoast, to our pristine lakes and forests – New Hampshire’s natural resources are essential to our economy, our environment, and our way of life. I will continue to do everything in my power to take real action to combat the harmful impacts of climate change and to fight back against efforts to undermine critical environmental health and safety protections.” On this page it also states that "Senator Hassan believes that it is long past time to address the existential threat posed by climate change, and she will keep pushing Congress to take real action. The Senator supports bold initiatives, such as creating a national target of 50 percent clean and carbon-free electricity by 2030, as well as strengthening the clean energy sector and making buildings more energy efficient."Senator Hassan understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2020 press release, Senator Hassan called for Facebook to stop the spread of climate change misinformation, stating, "Denial or misrepresentation of scientific facts regarding climate change puts millions of individuals’ lives at risk. The scientific consensus is clear: global warming and climate change are real, and they are caused by humans. Especially given Facebook’s massive reach, we urge you to review your current fact-checking procedures and reassess how climate change posts are reviewed.” Senator Hassan also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release condemning President Trump's withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, the Senator stated, "The President’s decision to move ahead with withdrawing from the Paris Climate Agreement threatens the long-term health and security of our people, our economy, and our planet. We need immediate and cooperative action across the globe to protect future generations from the worst impacts of climate change, which the President is making more difficult." The Senator makes climate change a top priority issue. Senator Hassan was an original co-sponsor of the Clean Energy Act (S. 3269), which aimed to put the United States on a path to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. Senator Maggie Hassan has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action.100100100U.S. Senator Maggie Hassan opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. According to an article published on the 'Concord Monitor,' "both candidates oppose a carbon tax and and support the Environmental Protection Agency plan to cut carbon emissions." This quote is referring to Hassan when she was a Senate challenger running up against incumbent Ayotte in 2016. Senator Hassan was not in Congress to vote on S.Amdt.928 to (S.Con.Res.11), which would have established a deficit-neutral reserve fund to protect the United States from an energy tax.2581.25https://www.hassan.senate.gov/about/priorities/natural-resources-clean-energy-and-climate-change https://www.hassan.senate.gov/news/press-releases/senator-hassan-leads-colleagues-in-calling-on-facebook-to-stop-spread-of-climate-change-disinformation-on-its-platform https://www.hassan.senate.gov/news/press-releases/shaheen-hassan-introduce-legislation-to-reduce-emissions-and-bolster-the-clean-energy-economy- https://www.hassan.senate.gov/news/press-releases/senator-hassan-statement-on-president-trump-moving-forward-with-withdrawal-from-the-paris-climate-agreement https://www.concordmonitor.com/Hassan-and-ayotte-differ-on-major-issues-in-us-senate-race-5730963 https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=114&session=1&vote=00103 https://www.hassan.senate.gov/news/press-releases/senator-hassan-underlines-the-dangerous-consequences-of-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Hoeven, John 2North DakotaRSenator John Hoeven disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to an article published by 'U.S. News' in 2015, "A subsequent amendment from Sen. John Hoeven, (R-N.D.), was edited to say not only that climate change was real, but that it’s being caused by human activity. That amendment fell one vote short of the 60 needed to continue on in the Senate, with a count of 59-40 and a decisive “no” vote coming from Hoeven himself."According to an article updated by 'Earth Forums' in 2019, Senator Hoeven stated, "Well, the science shows that there's warming. There's different opinions of exactly what's causing it." According to a 2017 press release featured on the Senator's website, it states, "As written, the Paris Climate Accord was not fair for America. It requires the United States to reduce carbon emissions but does not require the same from countries like China, Russia and India." Senator John Hoeven demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 000Senator John Hoeven makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Senator was a co-sponsored of (S. Res 472) which would have expressed the sense of the Senate that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the economy of the United States.00https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2015/01/21/senate-climate-change-is-real-human-role-up-for-debate https://www.hoeven.senate.gov/news/news-releases/hoeven-statement-on-the-us-withdrawal-from-the-paris-climate-agreement https://www.earthforums.com/forums/forum/environment/congress-on-climate-change/north-dakota/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-resolution/472/cosponsors?r=88&s=1&searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.grandforksherald.com/news/local/sen-john-hoeven-favors-apparent-court-decision-on-abortion-sen-amy-klobuchar-says-itll-push-women-to-voteOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Johnson, Ron 2WisconsinRSenator Ron Johnson disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2016 article published by 'Huff Post,' the Senator stated, "Climate has already changed, always will. I’m just not an alarmist. We will adapt... How many people are moving up toward the Antarctica, or the Arctic? Most people move down to Texas or Florida, where it’s a little bit warmer... The jury’s out...The models have not been predictive. They were predicting much higher temperatures, and that hasn’t panned out yet.” Senator Ron Johnson demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. According to a 2016 article by 'Huff Post, Senator Johnson stated, "'Mankind has actually flourished in warmer temperatures... just think the question always is what is the cost versus the benefit of anything we do to try and clean up our environment... I’m highly concerned about the climate alarmists that are going to spend a lot of money and have no impact whatsoever on the climate but have a great deal of harm on our economy." In addition, according to a 2019 article published by 'The Badger Herald,' the Senator stated, "The climate has always been changing and we shouldn’t be worried about fraction degree increases... If I were you, if I were young, I wouldn’t worry about climate change." 000Senator Ron Johnson opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. Senator Johnson voted for S.Amdt.928 to (S.Con.Res.11), which would have established a deficit-neutral reserve fund to protect the United States from an energy tax.256.25https://www.ronjohnson.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/agriculture https://www.huffpost.com/entry/ron-johnson-climate-change_n_580e5039e4b0a03911ee05e9?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAANIVJSBRygDa_FcEHOAylh4fLHI12Zs0TGjRuJJQmglA2lrXjYX4gccZA_Er4Br5knNTY_sScssLvl0Z04zFJAFkXCFyW1gNR7dfrxP7fG45tpt1SJXlnU7j_GlcxkkHyJvPk1ht5MvaoOguz53dZy-H3Hi0ddXApdTZ5BMW1zJd https://badgerherald.com/news/2019/10/03/u-s-senator-ron-johnson-says-democratic-candidate-proposals-are-jaw-dropping/ https://www.congress.gov/amendment/114th-congress/senate-amendment/928?s=a&r=1 https://www.ronjohnson.senate.gov/2022/7/victory-for-lifeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Kelly, Mark0ArizonaDSenator Mark Kelly understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. According to the League of Conservation Voters, "In the Senate, Kelly will be a fierce defender of science-based approaches to tackling the climate crisis and a staunch advocate for making the investments we need to create family-sustaining jobs and a safer, cleaner future." On his campaign website, Senator Kelly states "Mark has seen the planet change from space, and wanting to stop that and protect our state and our planet is part of what inspired him to run. Mark knows that if we harness the power of American ingenuity and determination, we can mitigate the risks of climate change."Senator Mark Kelly has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a Facebook post in 2019, Senator Kelly advocated for his petition telling "Congress that we need immediate action on climate action," saying that "The fact is, our planet is sending us a message we cannot ignore. The climate is warming at an alarming rate and we’re already seeing the effects here in Arizona." The senator also makes prominent public statements on the issue. From an October 2021 interview with White Mountain Independent, "Regarding energy and climate change, Senator Kelly recognizes the role that traditional fossil fuels play in the production of electricity and the creation of jobs in Arizona. He also sees Arizona’s drought and wildfire conditions being made worse by the effects of climate change." Later, Senator Mark Kelly states " He also supports investments in and deployment of renewable energy technology as an opportunity to create jobs in Arizona’s rural communities that are transitioning away from utilizing coal for electricity generation." The senator makes climate change a top priority issue. According to Senator Kelly's website, "The U.S. Senate passed the bipartisan Growing Climate Solutions Act—legislation cosponsored by Arizona Senators Mark Kelly and Kyrsten Sinema that increases economic opportunities for Arizona farmers while creating a cleaner environment." The Growing Climate Solutions Act "establishes programs at the U.S. Department of Agriculture and helps break down barriers for farmers, ranchers, and foresters interested in participating in voluntary environmental credit markets so they can be rewarded for climate-smart practices."10080100Senator Mark Kelly has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5082.5https://www.lcv.org/member/mark-kelly/ https://markkelly.com/the-mission/ https://www.kelly.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/senate-passes-sen-kelly-shaped-inflation-reduction-act-to-lower-health-care-and-energy-costs-for-arizonans/ https://www.azcc.gov/news/2022/01/27/arizona-electric-utilities-voluntarily-commit-to-100-clean-energy https://www.kelly.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/senate-passes-kelly-and-sinema-backed-bipartisan-bill-increasing-opportunities-for-arizona-farmers/ https://twitter.com/captmarkkelly/status/1492556058111275009Supports RoeAnti ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Kennedy, John Neely 1Louisiana RSenator John Neely Kennedy disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2018 article published in 'The Washington Post,' Senator Kennedy was quoted on global warming stating, “I’ve seen many persuasive arguments that it’s just a continuation of the warming up from the Little Ice Age.”Senator John Neely Kennedy demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. The Senator was quoted in a 2016 article in the 'The Advocate' stating that he, "believes that global temperatures are rising but said the evidence does not clearly explain why." 000Senator John Neely Kennedy makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. According to an article published in 'The Advocate,' Senator Kennedy stated, "I support energy conservation, nuclear energy and encouraging technology to burn clean burning coal... I don’t support an energy tax. If it’s such a swell idea, let China go first." Senator Kennedy was not in Congress to vote against a S.Amdt.928 to (S.Con.Res.11), which would have established a deficit-neutral reserve fund to protect the United States from an energy tax.00https://www.kennedy.senate.gov/public/priorities https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/paloma/the-energy-202/2018/12/03/the-energy-202-senate-republicans-are-sounding-more-and-more-like-trump-on-climate-change/5c0437761b326b60d12800d4/ https://www.theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/news/politics/elections/article_349f95d2-78e5-11e6-91b8-8f76fd380d99.html https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=114&session=1&vote=00103 https://twitter.com/johnkennedyla/status/1465989813128122371?lang=enOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Lankford, James 2Oklahoma RSenator James Lankford disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2014 'Mother Jones,' article, Senator Lankford, "called global warming a “myth.” He also... voted to prevent the Pentagon from considering the national security impacts of global warming, even though top Defense Department officials have repeatedly issued warnings that climate change could worsen conflicts around the world."According to 'Business Insider,' Senator Lankford stated, "This whole global warming myth will be exposed as what it really is — a way of control more than anything else." Also, according to 'The Hill,' "A group of Republican senators is calling for an investigation into National Science Foundation (NSF) grants designed to educate meteorologists about climate change, saying the program has moved beyond science and into political action... James Lankford... requested the probe in a letter Wednesday to the NSF inspector general, saying the grants are 'not science – it is propagandizing.'" Senator James Lankford demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 000Senator James Lankford makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Senator was a co-sponsor of (S. Res 472) a 2016 resolution, which would have expressed the sense of the Senate that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the economy of the United States. 00https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/11/meet-new-climate-denier-caucus/ https://www.businessinsider.com/climate-change-and-republicans-congress-global-warming-2019-2#oklahoma-28 https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/393421-gop-senators-call-for-probe-into-federal-grants-on-climate-change https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-resolution/472/cosponsors?r=56&s=1&searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.lankford.senate.gov/news/press-releases/lankford-overjoyed-the-supreme-court-chose-lifeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Lee, Mike 2UtahRSenator Mike Lee disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2019 article published by 'CNN,' "Utah Sen. Mike Lee on Tuesday called babies and families the solution to climate change in response to a Democratic plan to overhaul the economy through the Green New Deal proposal"...'"The solution to climate change is not this un-serious resolution that we’re considering this week in the Senate, but rather the serious business of human flourishing,' Lee said. 'The solution to so many of our problems, at all times and in all places, is to fall in love, get married and have some kids.'"..."Lee argued that, because climate change is an engineering challenge, it will be best solved through American families and increasing the US population."According to a 2019 article published by the 'HuffPost' in Senator Lee's speech about The Green New Deal, he stated, "'I’m not immediately afraid of what carbon emissions unaddressed might do to our environment in the near future, or our civilization or our planet in the next few years,' Lee said during a Senate debate. 'I’m mostly afraid of not being able to get through this speech with a straight face.'" In a 2019 'Vogue' article it was stated that, "In 2011, for example, when Lee voted to limit the EPA’s ability to regulate greenhouse gases. Or in 2017, when he urged Donald Trump to abandon the Paris Agreement." Additionally, according to an article published by 'The Guardian,' Senator Mike Lee received $253,415 of contributions from oil, gas, and coal interests in recent election cycles. Senator Mike Lee demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 000Senator Mike Lee makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. Senator Lee was a co-sponsor of (S. Res 472) a 2016 resolution, which would have expressed the sense of the Senate that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the economy of the United States.00https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/26/politics/mike-lee-green-new-deal/index.html https://www.huffpost.com/entry/mike-lee-green-new-deal_n_5c9a64aae4b072a7f6006c44 https://www.vogue.com/article/mike-lee-green-new-deal-resolution-climate-change-babies https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jun/01/republican-senators-paris-climate-deal-energy-donations https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-resolution/472/cosponsors?r=88&s=1&searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.lee.senate.gov/2022/6/senator-mike-lee-s-statement-on-historic-win-for-lifeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Masto, Catherine Cortez1NevadaDSenator Catherine Cortez Masto understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2019 press release on climate change innovation, the Senator stated, "We cannot put off solutions to carbon and other greenhouse gas emissions, and we can’t ignore the effects of climate change, visible all around us. It’s up to us, working in close collaboration—the way we have right here in Tahoe for more than two decades—to come up with innovative approaches to climate."Senator Cortez Masto understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. According to a 2019 press release discussing four bills introduced by Senator Cortez Masto that would invest in clean transportation infrastructure on public lands, the Senator stated, "These bills provide the economic incentives for companies, state and local governments to invest in this critical infrastructure that strengthens America’s clean energy future, creates jobs and combats climate change.” Senator Cortez Masto also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a Senate floor speech posted on her Facebook page, Cortez Masto stated, "You don't have to look far to see that our climate is changing...it's a serious crisis that must be met with serious action." Senator Cortez Masto makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 'Medium' blog post advocating against the environmental injustices, her constituents face the Senator wrote, "I want to make sure the voices of every community in Nevada are heard. That’s why I’m working on legislation that reflects the conversations I’ve had with Nevadans who want a healthier environment. My Renew America’s Schools Act will improve the health of Nevada’s communities by using more zero-emission school buses and enhancing air quality in classrooms. I’m also proud to support the Clean Energy for America Act, which would reduce carbon pollution over the next decade, and the Climate Change Health Protection and Promotion Act, which would develop research and a national action plan to address public health challenges posed by climate change." 100100100Senator Catherine Cortez Masto has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Senator was not in Congress to vote on S.Amdt.928 to (S.Con.Res.11), which would have established a deficit-neutral reserve fund to protect the United States from an energy tax.5087.5https://www.facebook.com/1283446251699112/videos/2290752034323930/ https://www.cortezmasto.senate.gov/news/press-releases/cortez-masto-at-lake-tahoe-summit-climate-change-innovation-is-up-to-us https://www.cortezmasto.senate.gov/news/press-releases/cortez-masto-introduces-legislative-package-to-promote-cleaner-vehicles-fight-climate-change https://medium.com/@SenatorCortezMasto/black-americans-are-leading-the-way-in-fighting-for-environmental-justice-42d59b7d74ec https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=114&session=1&vote=00103 https://www.cortezmasto.senate.gov/news/press-releases/cortez-masto-statement-on-the-49th-anniversary-of-roe-v-wade-Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Moran, Jerry 2Kansas RSenator Jerry Moran disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to 'Wired,' Senator Moran "voted against" an amendment stating that "human activities contribute to climate change." Also, according to 'Earth Forums,' Senator Moran "is against regulations designed to reduce greenhouse gases to curb global warming and climate change. He considers such measures to be part of a war on coal."According to 'OnTheIssues,' Senator Moran "Voted NO on enforcing limits on CO2 global warming pollution, Voted NO on tax incentives for renewable energy, Voted NO on removing oil & gas exploration subsidies, and Voted YES on authorizing construction of new oil refineries." Also, according to 'Vice,' when referring to legislation that would prohibit the EPA from moving forward with new regulations to control greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act, Senator Moran stated, "It is wrong for the Administration to move forward with these standards while Congress is currently debating the merits of climate change legislation... The Clean Air Act was never intended to regulate greenhouse gases. If allowed to become effective, these regulations would prove more costly for U.S. businesses and consumers than the Waxman/Markey Cap and Trade bill that I opposed in June." Senator Jerry Moran demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.000Senator Jerry Moran opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. Senator Moran was not in voted for S.Amdt.928 to (S.Con.Res.11), which would have established a deficit-neutral reserve fund to protect the United States from an energy tax. 256.25https://www.wired.com/2015/01/senators-dont-believe-human-caused-climate-change/ https://www.earthforums.com/forums/forum/environment/congress-on-climate-change/kansas/ https://www.ontheissues.org/International/Jerry_Moran_Energy_+_Oil.htm https://www.vice.com/en/article/pg5k8k/kansass-climate-change-deniers https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=114&session=1&vote=00103 https://www.moran.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2022/6/supreme-court-ruling-on-roe-v-wadeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Murkowski, Lisa 3Alaska RSenator Lisa Murkowski agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to 'Eos,' a source for news and perspectives about Earth and space science, Senator Murkowski stated that the impact of climate change in her state “is real, it is happening, it is now, and almost none of these changes are for the better for us... emissions must be reduced... when the Arctic starts to thaw, that is not good for the planet." Also, according to the 'American Association for the Advancement of Science,' a nonprofit organization, Senator Murkowski stated, "we’ll be working to advance cleaner energy technologies that can help reduce greenhouse gas emissions." However, on her campaign website, Senator Murkowski it states, "Greater production of everything from oil, natural gas, and coal to hydropower, wind, solar, and biomass will create new jobs and economic opportunities... A firm believer that 'energy is good,' Senator Murkowski is a strong proponent of ‘all of the above’ policies.'" "All of the above,” requires the continued burning of fossil fuels.According to a 2020 'E&E News,' article, an environment-focused online news organization, Senator Murkowski "added that she's still striving to put the energy package she developed with Energy and Natural Resources ranking member Joe Manchin... on the floor by the end of this year... she said the energy package could be a "perfect base to begin next year." Also, according to the 'Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources,' Senator Murkowski stated, "As more renewables come online and the mix of baseload power changes, we must focus on maintaining grid reliability and resiliency. We also must keep energy affordable, while working to advance cleaner energy technologies that can help reduce greenhouse gas emissions.” However, according to E&E News, "Murkowski said achieving net-zero emissions by 2050 — a target scientists have set to avoid the worst effects of climate change — is a stretch goal." Senator Lisa Murkowski supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it.50050Senator Lisa Murkowski opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. According to 'E&E News,' an environment-focused online news organization, Senator Murkowski stated, "carbon pricing is worth putting on the table if Congress looks to craft a climate bill next year... I do think that can be and that should be one of the options that is on the table for discussion, in terms of how you can move policies forward." However, Senator Murkowski voted for S.Amdt.928 to (S.Con.Res.11), which would have established a deficit-neutral reserve fund to protect the United States from an energy tax.2531.25https://eos.org/articles/sen-murkowski-warns-about-the-impact-of-climate-change https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2019/03/us-senate-republicans-hold-rare-climate-hearing-and-more-might-be-coming https://www.murkowski.senate.gov/issues/issues-and-priorities/energy https://www.eenews.net/eedaily/stories/1063716797 https://www.energy.senate.gov/2019/3/murkowski-climate-change-is-a-policy-priority https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=114&session=1&vote=00103 https://www.murkowski.senate.gov/press/release/-murkowski-reiterates-strong-support-for-codification-of-roe-v-wade-Supports RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Murray, Patty 5WashingtonDSenator Patty Murray understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. According to the 'Climate Change' page on her website, it states, "Our nation is faced with a growing global demand for energy, a heavy reliance on fossil fuels, record-high energy prices, and environmental concerns regarding energy use. Washington state families are struggling with energy costs in these tough economic times, but also want a more diversified national energy policy that lessens our dependence on foreign oil and encourages cleaner forms of energy to help combat global warming. The Pacific Northwest has much to lose from climate change, including increasingly severe storms and rising sea levels. Global warming also negatively impacts forest, coastal, and salmon habitats, and economically-important farmland, as well as human health."In 2019 Senator Murray joined 25 other Senators in a letter to President Trump urging him to reconsider withdrawing from the Paris Agreement. The letter stated, “As the second largest global emitter of greenhouse gases, and the largest historical emitter, it is imperative that the United States assume our rightful place as a global leader in the fight to combat climate change, yet with this action you are ceding American leadership to other nations at great political and economic costs.” According to a 2018 press release regarding a report from the United Nations’ scientific panel on climate change, Murray stated "It’s no longer acceptable to treat climate change like a problem for future generations to solve. The devastating effects of climate change are here... The United States, with our economic strength and unmatched scientific know-how, can and absolutely should be a leader in what must be a global all-hands-on-deck effort." Senator Murray’s website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 10010075Senator Patty Murray supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. Senator Murray voted against S.Amdt.928 to (S.Con.Res.11), which would have established a deficit-neutral reserve fund to protect the United States from an energy tax.7587.5https://www.murray.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/climatechange https://www.murray.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/mobile/newsreleases?ID=960915C3-8B96-41BB-B778-F640E85759D2 https://www.murray.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/newsroom?ID=3B6956BB-CC4E-4BBC-8D5F-6F4E3918169B https://www.congress.gov/amendment/114th-congress/senate-amendment/928?s=a&r=1 https://www.murray.senate.gov/senator-murray-statement-on-scotus-overturning-roe-and-republicans-decades-long-effort-to-end-abortion-rights/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Padilla, Alex0CaliforniaDSenator Alex Padilla understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a March 2021 press release on his website, "Senator Padilla spoke about the importance of building back better to protect our communities and address the climate crisis, including implementing climate resilient infrastructure across the nation saying, 'We have additional challenges nowadays that are absolutely undeniable challenges posed by climate change. […] We need to address the resiliency given extreme weather that is impacting every region of the country in different ways.'” Senator Alex Padilla has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. According to an August 2021 press release on his website, "U.S. Senator Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) delivered a forceful speech calling on the Senate to act on the latest alarming report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) detailing the shortening window of time to act before the planet becomes inhospitable for future generations." Senator Padilla also makes prominent public statements on the issue. From a Youtube video posted by Forbes Breaking News, the senator spoke at the California Academy of Sciences, stating that "...we can slow the pace of climate change and even bring down temperatures by the middle of this century. But our path to avert a climate catastrophe is narrowing each and every day. So let me be clear, climate cannot be on the chopping block in this or any budget. We cannot afford to leave these problems to be dealt with another day. We need to act boldly and tackle this crisis head on. Across the country, across industries, and truly around the world we need to end our dependence on fossil fuels." Senator Alex Padilla makes climate change a top priority issue. From a November 2021 press release on his website, "In March 2021, Senators Padilla and Feinstein sent a letter to President Biden asking him to reinstate California’s authority to set greenhouse gas and zero-emission vehicle standards and follow California’s lead by setting a date by which all new cars and passenger trucks sold are zero-emission vehicles. In July, the Senators also sent a letter to President Joe Biden pushing the Administration to revise the nitrogen oxide (NOx) emission standards for on-highway heavy-duty trucks, which have not been revised in 20 years." On November 5, 2021, "...U.S. Senators Alex Padilla and Dianne Feinstein (both D-Calif.) joined a bicameral effort to urge Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Michael Regan to strengthen new greenhouse gas emission vehicle standards. In a letter to Administrator Regan, the lawmakers call for EPA to adopt the most stringent of the proposed alternatives for the vehicle greenhouse gas emissions standard rulemaking for passenger cars and light trucks for Model Years 2023-2026."100100100Senator Alex Padilla publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. In an August 2021 tweet, the senator writes "Simply put: the best way to ensure a full and rapid transition to a clean energy future is to put a cost on carbon."100100https://www.padilla.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/padilla-our-nation-is-facing-undeniable-challenges-when-it-comes-to-climate-change/ https://www.padilla.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/padilla-calls-for-bold-action-to-tackle-climate-change-following-ipcc-report/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_ozR7e2DQ4 https://www.padilla.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/padilla-feinstein-urge-epa-for-more-stringent-greenhouse-gas-emission-vehicle-standards/ https://twitter.com/alexpadilla4ca/status/1428502044286013445 https://www.padilla.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/padilla-denounces-supreme-court-decision-overturning-roe-v-wade%EF%BF%BC/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Paul, Rand 2Kentucky RSenator Rand Paul disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2014 article in 'The Hill,' Senator Paul "said in a recent interview that the science behind climate change is 'not conclusive,' calling people who tie extreme weather to a changing climate ignorant." Also, according to the 'Washington Post,' "Paul said the earth goes through periods of time when the climate changes, but he’s 'not sure anybody exactly knows why... The earth’s 4.5 billion years old, and you’re going to say that we had four hurricanes and so it proves a theory?'"According to 'Vox,' Senator Paul stated, "While I do think man may have a role in our climate, I think nature also has a role. The planet's 4.5 billion years old. We've been through geologic age through geologic age. We've had times when the temperature’s been warmer, we’ve had times when the temperature’s been colder, we’ve had times when the carbon in the atmosphere has been higher." Also, according to the the 'Courier Journal,' when referring to climate change, Senator Paul stated, "No @AOC the world will not end in 12 years but we must, absolutely must do something, over the next 500 million years." Senator Rand Paul demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 000Senator Rand Paul makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. According to 'Grist,' Senator "Paul has voted to strip the EPA of its legal authority... to prevent Congress from placing any tax or fee on carbon pollution." Also, the Senator was a co-sponsor of (S. Res 472) a 2016 resolution, which would have expressed the sense of the Senate that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the economy of the United States.00https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/204235-paul-science-behind-climate-change-not-conclusive https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2014/05/12/where-the-2016-gop-contenders-stand-on-climate-change/ https://www.vox.com/2015/11/11/9714770/rand-paul-climate-change https://www.courier-journal.com/story/news/politics/rand-paul/2020/01/15/rand-paul-jabs-aoc-over-climate-change/4476115002/ https://grist.org/politics/rand-paul-is-no-moderate-on-climate-change/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-resolution/472/cosponsors?r=56&s=1&searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.paul.senate.gov/issues/advocating-sanctity-lifeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Rubio, Marco 2Florida RSenator Marco Rubio does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2016 'CNN,' article, Senator Rubio stated, "humans are contributing to what's happening in our climate, there's no consensus on how much of the changes that are going on are due to human activity." However, according to a 2019 'South Florida Sun Sentinel,' article, Senator Rubio stated, "climate change is an issue that the state currently faces, and that it must be addressed by real solutions... People can have a debate about what we can do about climate change and the causes, but the bottom line is that the rising of sea levels is immeasurable in Florida... So, if you represent South Florida or live in South Florida, it's really not something you can ignore."According to a 2019 op-ed he wrote for 'USA Today,' Senator Rubio stated, "The world is not going to end in 12 years as some climate alarmists claim, but I can tell you Florida will be forced to continue making adjustments in the coming decades because of the changing climate... The good news is these problems are manageable... Americans, particularly Floridians, are right to be concerned about the changing climate. But they are also right to be concerned about a regressive overreaction." However, according to his website, Senator Rubio stated, "Changes in our climate, such as the rise of sea levels, are measurable facts. Many communities in Florida are already dealing with the consequences of these changes and will have to adapt to and mitigate against their impact for decades to come... I look forward to working with my colleagues to find real and responsible solutions in a bipartisan way.” Senator Marco Rubio does demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.2500Senator Marco Rubio makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. According to the 'Herald-Tribune,' Senator Rubio stated, "Attempting to reverse engineer the U.S. economy to absolve our past climate sins — either through a carbon tax or some ‘Green New Deal’ scheme — will fail." The Senator was a co-sponsor of (S. Res 472) a 2016 resolution, which would have expressed the sense of the Senate that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the economy of the United States.06.25https://www.cnn.com/2016/03/11/politics/marco-rubio-climate-change/index.html https://www.sun-sentinel.com/opinion/commentary/fl-op-com-reams-rubio-climate-change-national-spotlight-20191125-h7aihtql35gubbjwcf2lkksr6u-story.html https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2019/08/19/rubio-on-climate-change-we-should-choose-adaptive-solutions-column/2019310001/ https://www.rubio.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2020/2/rubio-joins-bipartisan-senate-climate-solutions-caucus https://www.heraldtribune.com/news/20190819/marco-rubio-calls-climate-change-a-real-problem-but-rejects-aggressive-efforts-to-curb-emissions https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-resolution/472/cosponsors?r=56&s=1&searchResultViewType=expanded https://endcitizensunited.org/latest-news/press-releases/marco-rubio-supports-decision-to-overturn-roe-v-wade-to-take-away-our-fundamental-freedoms-and-right-to-privacy/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Schatz, Brian 2Hawaii DSenator Brian Schatz understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. According to 'Honolulu Civil Beat,' "Hawaii Sen. Brian Schatz is at the forefront of Democrats’ push to make climate change a top priority in American politics should his party retake power in Washington after the November elections... The proposal seeks to achieve net-zero global emissions by 2050, spur economic growth by increasing annual federal spending on climate initiatives to 2% of gross domestic product and create at least 10 million new jobs." Also, according to 'Congress.gov,' Senator Schatz cosponsored a bill titled, A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that climate change is real and that the National Science Foundation should engage on the communication of sound climate change science to the public (S.Res.573). According to his website, when discussing a Democratic special committee on the climate crisis he chairs, Senator Brian Schatz stated, “In order to take bold action, we need a broad coalition. We have put together a group of people who are leading on climate in different ways. And that is going to be the foundation for our success... With this group, we have the necessary pieces to take this issue seriously — to make real inquiries and real analysis. We are treating this like the planetary emergency it is." Senator Schatz also makes prominent public statements on the issue. According to 'Vox,' Senator Schatz stated, "When it comes to climate action, the question is not whether we can afford to pay for it; it’s how much it will cost us if we don’t take action. I do not think it is credible any longer to imagine, after a $2 trillion tax cut and several trillion dollars spent in necessary Covid relief money, that we couldn’t come up with the money to solve a planetary crisis." Senator Schatz makes climate change a top priority issue. According to 'Congress.gov,' Senator Schatz cosponsored a bill titled, A joint resolution calling on the United States and Congress to take immediate action to address the challenge of climate change (S.J.Res.9). Senator Brian Schatz has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. 100100100Senator Brian Schatz publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. According to Senator Sheldon Whitehouse's website, Senator Schatz stated, "A price on carbon pollution is one of the best options we have for bipartisan action, and it is one of the best options we have for tackling climate change... By putting a price on pollution, our bill provides a market-based solution for dealing with the planetary emergency that is climate change.” Also, Senator Schatz voted against S.Amdt.928 to (S.Con.Res.11), which would have established a deficit-neutral reserve fund to protect the United States from an energy tax. 100100https://www.civilbeat.org/2020/08/schatz-dems-poised-to-roll-out-big-bold-climate-legislation/ https://www.congress.gov/member/brian-schatz/S001194?q={%22subject%22:%22Environmental+Protection%22}&searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.schatz.senate.gov/press-releases/schatz-to-chair-newly-launched-senate-democratic-special-committee-on-the-climate-crisis https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/21396261/senate-climate-change-committee-report-brian-schatz-koch-industries https://www.whitehouse.senate.gov/news/release/whitehouse-schatz-heinrich-gillibrand-introduce-updated-carbon-fee https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=114&session=1&vote=00103 https://www.schatz.senate.gov/news/press-releases/schatz-statement-on-supreme-court-decision-to-overturn-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Schumer, Chuck 4New YorkDSenator Chuck Schumer understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. According to a press release featured on the 'Senate Democrats' website regarding the Climate Committee's New Report on climate action, Senator Schumer stated, “The climate crisis is not some distant threat. It is here now, and it will be catastrophic if we don’t strike back immediately. Over the next few decades, climate change will affect every part of American life: our health, our economy, our national security, even our geography. Democrats are committed to working—decisively and aggressively—to avoid the steep human and economic costs of a worsening climate crisis, and to guide the transition to a low carbon economy." Senator Chuck Schumer has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2020 article published by 'The Hill,' Senator Schumer stated, “When Democrats retake the majority in the Senate, we will unify to move swiftly on legislation to tackle the climate crisis. Passing climate legislation will be a top priority for Senate Democrats and for me." Senator Schumer also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 'Politico' article documenting Senator Schumer's thoughts on New York State's Climate and Community Protection Act, which mandates carbon emissions reductions from all sectors of New York's economy by 40% by 2030, and 85% by 2050, the Senator stated, "Passage of the CCPA would position New York to lead the national debate on how we can tackle climate change and would offer an example for other states to follow — on how to do so while also building a more just and equitable economy." Senator Schumer makes climate change a top priority issue. In 2019, the Senator introduced the Clean Cars For America Proposal, which would have resulted in "63 million less carbon-emitting cars on the road" according to a press release. The press release also stated that the, "Initiative would accelerate the critical transition to net-zero carbon emissions by mid-century by making electric vehicles and charging infrastructure accessible to all Americans, regardless of where they live and work, and would firmly establish the United States as the global leader in electric vehicle and battery manufacturing."100100100Senator Chuck Schumer supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. According to an article published by the 'Washington Examiner,' "Sen. Chuck Schumer said he thinks Congress could pass legislation to impose a fee on carbon emissions if Democrats win back the Senate and presidential frontrunner Hillary Clinton takes the White House in 2016...The New York Democrat said he envisions Republicans would push for a value-added tax in that scenario to shore up federal revenues, but that Democrats would reject it, calling it 'regressive.' But Schumer, who is in line to take over as the Senate Democratic leader after Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid retires in 2016, said a carbon tax is a type of value-added tax his party would support." Senator Schumer voted against S.Amdt.928 to (S.Con.Res.11), which would have established a deficit-neutral reserve fund to protect the United States from an energy. 7593.75https://www.democrats.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/senate-democrats-climate-committee-releases-new-report-on-climate-action-plan-to-build-clean-economy-for-american-people https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/513597-senate-democrats-map-out-climate-change-strategy https://www.politico.com/states/new-york/albany/story/2019/05/21/schumer-backs-aggressive-new-york-climate-change-bill-1025380 https://www.democrats.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/leader-schumer-unveils-new-clean-cars-for-america-climate-proposal-a-transformative-plan-to-reduce-number-of-carbon-emitting-cars-on-the-road-create-jobs-and-accelerate-transition-net-zero-carbon-emissions- https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tag/hillary-clinton?source=%2Fschumer-carbon-tax-doable-with-democratic-senate-hillary-as-president https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=114&session=1&vote=00103Supports Roe
Scott, Tim 2South Carolina RSenator Tim Scott disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to 'The Post and Courier,' "In 2015, amid the debate over the Keystone XL pipeline, Democrats offered an amendment stating that global warming was real and that human activity "significantly” contributes to climate change. Republicans countered with a similar amendment, omitting the word “significantly.”... Scott voted no on both."According to a 2017 'Vice,' article, Senator Scott "Voted in support of S.J. Res. 24, a "resolution of disapproval" under the Congressional Review Act that would nullify the Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Power Plan—the first nation-wide limit on greenhouse gas emissions from power plants, and key climate change policy." Also, according to 'Stacker,' Senator Scott's "record is among the Senate’s most staunchly anti-environment and staunchly pro-energy industry. Scott was a vocal proponent of President Trump’s decision to withdraw from the Paris Climate Accord." Senator Tim Scott demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.000Senator Tim Scott makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Senator was a co-sponsor of (S. Res 472) a 2016 resolution, which would have expressed the sense of the Senate that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the economy of the United States. 00https://www.postandcourier.com/opinion/commentary/tim-scott-stands-as-s-c-s-friendly-face-of-anti-environmentalism/article_a7e451dc-4d37-11e7-a352-2fbef725e04f.html https://www.vice.com/en/article/ez3axa/south-carolinas-climate-change-deniers https://stacker.com/stories/4483/where-50-political-leaders-stand-climate-policy?page=3 https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-resolution/472/cosponsors?r=56&s=1&searchResultViewType=expanded https://abcnews4.com/news/local/roe-v-wade-south-carolina-abortions-fetal-heartbeat-act-supreme-court-decision-scotus-senator-tim-scott-congressman-jim-clyburn-wcivOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Thune, John 3South Dakota RSenator John Thune agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2014 'Fox News,' interview, Senator Thune stated "climate change is occurring, it's always occurring... there are a number of factors that contribute to that including human activity the question is what are we going to do about it and at what cost."According to a 2019 'Rapid City Journal,' article, Senator Thune stated, "'While there are numerous approaches to reducing emissions and addressing climate change, I share CCL’s [Citizens' Climate Lobby] goal of boosting innovation and bolstering American energy security'... Thune added that he has been an advocate for wind energy development, increased blending of biofuels, and sustained hydroelectric power on the Missouri River during his time in Congress." Senator John Thune does not oppose climate action. 50025Senator John Thune makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Senator was a co-sponsor of (S. Res 472) a 2016 resolution, which would have expressed the sense of the Senate that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the economy of the United States.018.75https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z05ryIAoQy0 https://rapidcityjournal.com/news/local/local-climate-activists-score-meeting-with-thune/article_47cf6778-ebcd-541a-b50a-a913f6263356.html https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-resolution/472/cosponsors?r=56&s=1&searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.thune.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases?ID=C143CC3D-D55C-4DA2-8E26-BE34D85CA070Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Van Hollen, Chris 1Maryland DSenator Chris Van Hollen understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Senator's 'Environment' page, it states, "Protecting the environment is not just about the future of our planet—it’s also about creating jobs, supporting a healthy economy, and providing a good quality of life for Marylanders and Americans across the country. Senator Van Hollen is a leader in the effort to clean up Maryland’s Chesapeake Bay, address climate change, and protect our air, land, and water resources for our children and future generations." U.S. Senator Chris Van Hollen has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Senator introduced the National Climate Bank Act (S.2057), which according to a subsequent press release, would "leverage $35 billion in public funds to fund as much as $700 billion in total investment into projects that support clean energy, reduce emissions." Senator Van Hollen also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2020 tweet supporting the Green New Deal, the Senator stated, "Anyone who thinks the Green New Deal is too 'radical' should pay attention to the devastating wildfires on the West Coast, which are directly linked to inaction on climate change. This isn’t about politics—we must act now to save lives and our planet." Senator Van Hollen makes climate change a top priority issue. He demonstrated this by becoming a co-sponsor of the Green New Deal. 100100100Senator Chris Van Hollen publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. On the Senator's 'Environment' website page, it states, "Senator Van Hollen also has proposed an innovative 'cap and dividend' approach to tackle climate change because it is a simple, fair, and effective way to address the dangers of climate change." Senator Van Hollen was not in Congress to vote on S.Amdt.928 to (S.Con.Res.11), which would have established a deficit-neutral reserve fund to protect the United States from an energy tax.100100https://www.vanhollen.senate.gov/about/issues/environment https://www.vanhollen.senate.gov/news/press-releases/van-hollen-and-markey-introduce-legislation-to-create-a-national-climate-bank https://twitter.com/ChrisVanHollen/status/1304837187108843522 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-resolution/59/cosponsors?q={%22search%22:[%22green+new+deal%22]}&searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=114&session=1&vote=00103 Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Warnock, Raphael 0GeorgiaDSenator Raphael Warnock understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, Senator Warnock states "Our state urgently needs leaders who will accept the science, invest in infrastructure, and combat the climate crisis that is already at our door."According to a 2021 Grist article, "...Warnock believes that “the Earth is the Lord’s,” according to his website, which lays out his support for a clean energy transition, environmental justice, and stewardship of the natural world. He is a proponent of rejoining the Paris Agreement, reversing Trump’s rollbacks, investing in climate resiliency projects to prepare the Georgia coastline for rising sea levels..." Senator Warlock's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 10010075Senator Raphael Warnock has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. According to the Protect Our Winters Action Fund, "Warnock does not include any language on carbon pricing as part of his campaign platform and POW AF researchers could not find instances in published media or in the public record of the candidate expressing views on this issue." 5081.25https://warnockforgeorgia.com/issues/climate/ https://grist.org/politics/what-the-georgia-senate-candidates-think-about-climate-change/ https://powactionfund.org/georgia/ https://www.warnock.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/senator-reverend-warnock-statement-on-the-supreme-courts-decision-to-overturn-roe-v-wade/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Wyden, Ron 5Oregon DSenator Ron Wyden understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. According to his website, Senator Wyden stated, "the effects of climate change are already being felt in every region of the United States... sea levels are rising, wildfires are getting worse and water supplies are diminishing – hitting right at the heart of the local economy in Oregon and elsewhere... these effects will continue to get worse if strong actions are not taken immediately to curb emissions of greenhouse gases and move toward a low-carbon economy."According to his website, Senator Wyden stated, "American businesses, farmers, ranchers and families are experiencing the effects of climate change in the United States today. Inaction on climate change is no longer an option, so those who would criticize EPA’s plan have a responsibility to put forward their own ideas on how to move to a low-carbon economy. Climate change is the most important environmental challenge of our time. Without immediate action, its effects will only get worse. EPA’s proposed rule offers an opportunity to put our country on the road to lower emissions and put each state in the driver's seat to determine its own best course." Senator Wyden also makes prominent public statements on the issue. According to 'The Oregonian,' when referring to his plan to address climate change, Senator Wyden "went on to say he would cut 40-odd concessions for fossil fuel companies written into the nation’s tax code... 'I propose we get rid of those 40-some and substitute three: one for clean energy, one for clean transportation fuel and one for efficiency... Let’s tell everybody in the United States that it’s time to get more green that actually costs us less green.'" Senator Wyden makes climate change a top priority issue. According to an article he wrote for 'Politico,' Senator Wyden stated, "Addressing climate change is a national security issue, but renewable energy is also a jobs issue, a health issue and a pocketbook issue for each American family. Constantly improving technology means that low-carbon renewable energy is cleaner, cheaper and safer than burning fossil fuels... Congress needs to kick the carbon habit. We need a “Green New Deal” that helps all Americans take advantage of this fundamental change... Urgency is everything. Failure to act spells dire consequences for our economy, the health and safety of our families and most vulnerable communities, and the future of our planet." Senator Ron Wyden has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. 100100100Senator Ron Wyden supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. Senator Wyden voted against S.Amdt.928 to (S.Con.Res.11), which would have established a deficit-neutral reserve fund to protect the United States from an energy tax. However, according to 'Politico,' Senator Wyden "will only support a domestic tax on carbon if it includes a well-designed border adjustment to ensure American workers are on a level playing field with overseas competitors.”7593.75https://www.wyden.senate.gov/news/press-releases/wyden-national-climate-assessment-confirms-need-to-act-on-climate-change https://www.wyden.senate.gov/news/press-releases/wyden-inaction-on-climate-change-is-no-longer-an-option https://www.oregonlive.com/education/2019/10/wyden-talks-impeachment-gun-control-climate-change-with-beaverton-teens.html https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/01/10/green-new-deal-congress-ron-wyden-223910 https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=114&session=1&vote=00103 https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/14/biden-trade-fight-global-warming-429495 https://www.wyden.senate.gov/news/press-releases/wyden-statement-on-the-overturning-of-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Young, Todd1IndianaRSenator Todd Young does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to 'Earth Forums,' "Indiana is represented by Todd Young, who made President Obama's list of representatives denying the science of climate change and blocking progress on efforts to solve the global warming problem. Todd Young states that he concludes as a non-scientist that 'the science has not settled.'" However, according to 'ABC News,' Senator Young stated, "I believe the climate is changing. I believe that all flora fauna and human beings have some impact on that. I also believe fervently that we can protect our environment without wrecking our economy.”Senator Todd Young demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. According to 'WLKY News,' when asked about climate change, Senator Young stated, "My mind remains open about various scientific questions and so forth. We're often told that there is a consensus among scientists and I've come to discover with the number of scientists that I've talked to and the number of things I read, that's not necessarily the case. I think we need to prepare for the worst, so I support energy efficiency measures. I think natural gas has been a big part of the solution if in fact we need to reduce man-generated carbon dioxide emissions. And, I think any public policy that doesn't account for the fact that most C02 emissions don't come from the United States, but they come from other countries is a flawed policy. Let's not unilaterally tax our power and our people to solve a global problem, which is what so many democrats have proposed." 2500Senator Todd Young makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. According to 'Congress.gov,' Senator Young cosponsored a concurrent resolution titled, Expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.89) which stated that a carbon fee "is not in the best interest of the United States." Senator Young was not in Congress to vote on S.Amdt.928 to (S.Con.Res.11), which would have established a deficit-neutral reserve fund to protect the United States from an energy tax. 06.25Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate

U.S. Senate Challengers

NameStatePartyPositionPosition ScoreCarbon FeeCarbon Fee ScoreClimate CalculationSourcesSupport/Oppose Roe
Barnes, Mandela WisconsinDCandidate Mandela Barnes understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue. On a video on his official campaign website, Candidate Barnes states, "Climate change is already taking a toll on our communities, from our cities to our family farms. We've got once in a generation storms coming every year now. We need bold, powerful action to address climate change that breathes new life into the manufacturing industry. China is making 80% of the world's solar panels right now. It's time for Wisconsin to get in on the action..." 100Candidate Mandela Barnes has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://mandelabarnes.com/priorities/ https://youtu.be/k6vlTLFNFg8 https://youtu.be/kLeeyhkUaxI Supports Roe
Beasley, Cheri North Carolina DCandidate Cheri Beasley understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue. On Candidate Beasley's official campaign website, she states, "Cheri believes that tackling the climate crisis is imperative to our health, economy, and security, and the consequences of inaction are already hurting the people of our state...Cheri supports investing in climate-resilient infrastructure, expanding our renewable energy industry and ensuring that workers across North Carolina receive the training they need for clean energy jobs. There is also more to be done modernizing our electrical grid and building codes to increase energy efficiency. Cheri will support efforts to reduce carbon emissions by 50 percent by 2030." 100Candidate Cheri Beasley has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://cheribeasley.com/issue/taking-on-the-climate-crisis-and-protecting-our-environment/ https://cheribeasley.com/issue/standing-up-for-womens-rights/Supports Roe
Bengs, Brian South DakotaDCandidate Brian Beng understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue. On Candidate Beng's' official campaign website, it states, "In the future, South Dakota will face more extreme heat, drought, and flooding. 2021 was a drought year for much of our state while 2019 brought us severe floods. Although both have happened before, the climate change risk is increased regularity and severity that imposes significant costs in human life, livelihood, and security...As senator, I will support actions such as tax incentives to improve the energy efficiency of buildings and for clean energy vehicles, investments to speed the transition of our economy from fossil fuels toward renewable sources, and more funding for renewable energy research." 100Candidate Brian Beng has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://bengsforsenate.com/my-policy-issues/climate/ https://mobile.twitter.com/BrianBengs/status/1543245382582505472Supports Roe
Bolduc, DonNew HampshireRDon Bolduc does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Don Bolduc has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/10/don-bolduc-calls-embryo-disposal-disgusting-practiceOpposes Roe
Booker, CharlesKentucky DCandidate Charles Booker understands the importance of climate action, but not as a top priority issue. In a 2022 tweet by Candidate Booker, "I believe climate change is happening, and it is threatening the air we breathe and the water we drink. Another reason I fully support a Green New Deal." 75Candidate Charles Booker has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5071.25https://twitter.com/booker4ky/status/1316559417719107584?lang=en https://charlesbooker.org/issues/reproductive-freedom/Supports Roe
Boyd, Will AlabamaDOn his official campaign website, Candidate Boyd states that one of his objectives is to "protect the environment in Alabama by cleaning up of areas where there is water contamination, modernizing our waterways and ports, installing more electric charging stations, and embracing clean and renewable energy sources as we still rely on an "all-inclusive approach" to energy." An 'all of the above' approach is not truly climate friendly and is counterproductive to reaching zero carbon emissions. Candidate Will Boyd agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.50Candidate Will Boyd has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5050https://drwillboyd.com/i-believe https://www.al.com/news/2017/06/florence_minister_will_boyd_a.html https://www.alreporter.com/2022/10/06/as-democrats-run-on-roe-boyd-has-history-of-mixed-feelings-about-abortion/Opposes Roe
Britt, Katie AlabamaROn her official campaign website, Senate candidate Britt states, "I support an all-of-the-above energy approach that prioritizes affordability, reliability and security. This means fully utilizing low-cost, American-made (and Alabama-made) generation such as coal, natural gas, nuclear, hydropower and biomass...I am ready to lead the fight against the so-called Green New Deal...I also proudly say this: Coal counts. I will back all of our state’s energy jobs, including our hardworking coal miners. We cannot allow Green New Deal pipe dreams to destroy jobs and communities here at home." Her support for 'all of the above' approach to generating energy is not truly climate friendly and remains counterproductive to meeting zero carbon emissions. Additionally, her 'proud' support for coal and other fossil fuels proves her indifference towards environmental sustainability. Candidate Katie Britt disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 0 Candidate Katie Britt has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee.507.5https://www.katiebrittforsenate.com/issuesOpposes Roe
Budd, Ted North Carolina DCandidate Ted Budd does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his official campaign website, Candidate Budd states, "I support an “all of the above” energy strategy that embraces all of our country’s natural resources. The federal government should not be picking and choosing which energy sources get advantages. Fundamentally, Americans deserve the most affordable fuel available." His support for an 'all of the above strategy' is not productive towards achieving zero carbon emissions and is only harmful to the environment in the long run. 25Candidate Ted Budd makes public statements, advocates or votes against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. U.S. Senate Candidate Ted Budd also currently holds office for the NC 13th congressional district. In 2021, he co-sponsored 'H.Con.Res.34,' a resolution 'expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy.' His opposition of the carbon tax does not take any potential environmental benefit into consideration. 021.25https://budd.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=14927 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/34/cosponsors?r=2&s=1 https://tedbudd.com/issues/pro-life/ Opposes Roe
Busch Valentine, Trudy MissouriDCandidate Trudy Busch Valentine understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue. On Candidate Busch Valentine's official campaign website, it states, "Trudy knows climate change is an undeniable scientific fact and that addressing this crisis must be a top priority in Washington DC. Here in Missouri, the effects of climate change will impact our way of life as temperatures rise, lakes and ponds dry up, and farmers have an increasingly difficult time growing crops...Trudy believes that we need to reduce our carbon emissions drastically, ensure clean air and water, and transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources–like the solar power her own ranch in Missouri uses." 100Candidate Trudy Busch Valentine has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee.5092.5https://www.trudybuschvalentine.com/issue/protecting-the-environment/ https://www.trudybuschvalentine.com/issue/protecting-safe-and-legal-abortion/ Supports Roe
Chaffee, Chris Maryland RCandidate Chris Chaffee does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels25Candidate Chris Chaffee has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://www.commonsenseeasternshore.org/where-do-the-candidates-stand-on-the-question-of-abortion-rightsOpposes Roe
Chesbro, Patricia AlaskaDOn her official campaign website, Candidate Chesbro states, "New products and processes can help diminish our dependence on fossil fuels for transportation, heating, and the manufacture of plastics and other disposable materials. Alaska can be a laboratory for small and localized renewable energy. I will fight for solutions that harness the great potential for renewable energy in Alaska and America." Candidate Patricia Chesbro understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue.100Candidate Patricia Chesbro has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://www.chesbroforalaska.com/issuesSupports Roe
Christiansen, KatrinaNorth DakotaD-NPLKatrina Christiansen understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, it states "Katrina supports policies and investments that will fuel the next 100 years of economic growth while fighting the real and dangerous impacts of climate change."100Katrina Christiansen has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.katrinaforussenate.com/issues-1 https://twitter.com/nddemnpl/status/1577780167203704832Supports Roe
Demings, ValFloridaDCandidate Val Demings understands the importance of climate action, but not as a top priority issue. On Candidate Demings' official campaign website, it states, "Chief Val Demings takes threats to our environment seriously, because they are threats to Floridians’ jobs and way of life. That’s why she opposes offshore drilling off Florida’s coasts, and why she has delivered funding to combat the toxic algae that impacts our shores and waterways. Chief Demings knows the threat of climate change is real, and that’s why she supported the bipartisan infrastructure bill which will fund billions of dollars of climate change-resistant infrastructure in Florida and create thousands of new jobs." 75Candidate Val Demings publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. In her previous tenure as Congresswoman, Candidate Demings voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). The Congresswoman co-sponsored the America Wins Act (H.R. 4142), which aims to put a tax on carbon pollution and reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 52% in ten years. 10078.75https://valdemings.com/issues/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4142/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://demings.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-demings-scotus-abortion-decisionSupports Roe
Fetterman, John PennsylvaniaDCandidate John Fetterman understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue. On his official campaign website, Candidate Fetterman states, "I believe that climate change is an existential threat, and we need to transition to clean energy as quickly as possible. But we must do it in a way that preserves the union way of life for the thousands of workers currently employed or supported by the natural gas industry in Pennsylvania and the communities where they live...In the Senate, I will support legislation that combats high gas prices, invests in upgrading infrastructure, and responsibly transitions us to cleaner energy sources. We must make proper investments in greener, cleaner technology in America — and make more of that technology right here at home." 100Candidate John Fetterman has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://johnfetterman.com/issue/promoting-american-energy-building-a-clean-energy-future/ https://johnfetterman.com/issue/protecting-womens-reproductive-freedom/ Supports Roe
Franken, Michael Iowa DCandidate Michael Franken understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue. On his official campaign website, Candidate Franken states, "Climate change is the most clear and direct threat to the survival of our planet and the future of our children and grandchildren. With a highly decorated background in science, Admiral Franken is serious about tackling climate change and will implement the necessary measures to reduce greenhouse gas emission and our overall carbon footprint. This is a global threat that we can no longer ignore. He will work across the aisle because the fate of our planet should not be a partisan issue. Iowa can be a leader in combating climate change." 100Candidate Micheal Franken has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://frankenforiowa.com/issues/Supports Roe
Holland, Mark KansasDCandidate Mark Holland understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue. On his official campaign website, Candidate Holland states, "Working for the environment is a win/win for the planet and the people. Emerging environmental industries offer new jobs and better long-term sustainability. We need to stop the culture war between liberals and conservatives and work together for a new, more sustainable economy that gives us the energy and resources we need. It is a false narrative that we must choose between a vibrant economy and a livable planet. America deserves both!" 100Candidate Mark Holland has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://www.hollandforkansas.com/issuesSupports Roe
Horn, KendraOklahomaDCandidate Kendra Horn does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made or from burning fossil fuels. However, her previous actions towards climate change legislation (as Congresswoman) show her indifferent attitude towards the environment. Candidate Horn's position on climate change, taken from various interviews, has been compiled into an article by 'The Washington Examiner.' The article states, "Horn says she has not abandoned her district’s oil and gas industry and considers herself a crucial, outlier voice among Democrats on how to handle fossil fuels as part of the party’s aggressive agenda to combat climate change. “I clearly stood up to leaders in my party against a federal ban on fracking,” Horn said...She does not support plans...to eliminate carbon emissions from the power sector within 15 or 20 years through a clean electricity standard or mandate...Horn considers the idea impractical and unnecessary, noting that natural gas has been the biggest contributor to emissions reductions in electricity over the last decade by replacing coal."25Candidate Kendra Horn has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/energy/freshman-democrat-runs-as-defender-of-oil-and-gas-industry-to-hold-oklahoma-district https://twitter.com/VoteKendraOK/status/1569768039129796613Supports Roe
Horn, Madison OklahomaDMadison Horn understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue. On Candidate Horn's official website, her goals for climate advocacy include "Pushing forward legislation protecting our environment and guaranteeing a livable planet for future generations," and to "Work with companies on actions to ensure that regulations are realistic and achievable while holding them accountable for their responsibilities in protecting our environment." Her objectives include investing in clean energy, using technology to reduce our carbon footprint, working with companies to protect the environment, etc. Candidate 100Candidate Madison Horn has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://www.madisonhorn.com/issues https://twitter.com/madisonhornok/status/1521849847166513153Supports Roe
James, Natalie ArkansasDCandidate Natalie James understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue. On her official campaign website, Candidate James states, "Between the floodings and extreme weather in the south to the week(s), long wildfires along the west coast, these are an impactful reminder of how climate change is taking a toll on our daily lives. Arkansas desperately needs a Senator who acknowledges the scientific truth that climate change exists and that the time to act on that science is NOW!" 100 Candidate Natalie James has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://www.jamesforarkansas.com/climate https://www.jamesforarkansas.com/healthcareSupports Roe
Laxalt, Adam NevadaRCandidate Adam Laxalt does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to the Nevada Independent, he has described a reliance on solar and wind power as “simply not enough. It’ll never get the job done.”25Candidate Adam Laxalt has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://www.adamlaxalt.com/issues https://thenevadaindependent.com/article/laxalts-stance-on-the-environment-solar-wind-power-simply-not-enoughOpposes Roe
Levy, Leora ConnecticutRCandidate Leora Levy does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Leora Levy has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://www.ctinsider.com/politics/article/CT-Republicans-weigh-in-15-week-abortion-ban-17447033.phpOpposes Roe
Malloy, Gerald VermontRCandidate Gerald Malloy does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Gerald Malloy has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://www.deploymalloy.com/landing/positions/Opposes Roe
Masters, Blake ArizonaRIn an interview for 'Rising' from The Hill, Candidate Masters was asked, "What's been the role of climate change in the politics of Arizona recently, particularly...given the excruciating heat and the changing weather patterns that we've been seeing?" He responded, saying, "Yeah, I think some people are concerned about it...we've got to figure out if the earth is warming up and why and how much is caused by humans. I think people are open- the problem is they feel like they've been lied to so much by the expert class, not just on climate change, on everything: on COVID, on Jeffery Epstein...literally on almost every narrative..." Candidate Blake Masters disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 0Candidate Blake Masters has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 507.5https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaNbmyz0rz0 https://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/laurieroberts/2022/09/14/blake-masters-policy-epiphany-linsdey-graham-abortion-ban/10382899002/Opposes Roe
Matthews, Krystle South Carolina DCandidate Krystle Matthews understands the importance of climate action, but not as a top priority issue. On Candidate Matthews' official campaign website, one of her primary objectives remain to "Fund resources to foster clean air and address contaminated water issues." 75Candidate Krystle Matthews has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5071.25https://www.matthewsforsenate.com/about Supports Roe
McDermott, Bob HawaiiRCandidate Bob McDermott disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a Q&A for 'Honolulu Civil Beat,' Candidate McDermott was asked, "Is the U.S. on the right path when it comes to mitigating climate change and growing renewable energy production? What specific things should Congress be considering?" He responded, saying, "First, I have 48 solar panels on my roof as it makes financial sense. I want clean air, water and land. However, man cannot control the climate, if so, we should pass a law against hurricanes! Foolishness. North America was once covered with glaciers, yet they melted and the Earth warmed with no SUVs around, how is that possible? Akua is in charge." 0Candidate Bob McDermott has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 507.5https://www.civilbeat.org/2022/09/candidate-qa-u-s-senate-bob-mcdermott/ https://www.ontheissues.org/Social/Bob_McDermott_Abortion.htm Opposes Roe
McDermott, Thomas Jr.IndianaDThomas McDermott Jr. understands the importance of climate action, but not as a top priority issue. On his official campaign website, Candidate McDermott stated, "I’ll make protecting our air and water a priority, as well as focusing on ensuring Indiana is set for the clean energy manufacturing jobs in that rapidly growing sector of America’s economy. Our work in the coming years to find solutions to the climate crisis is also an opportunity for our workforce and economy, and a chance for our citizens to lead safer and healthier lives." Candidate 75 Candidate Thomas McDermott Jr has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5071.25https://www.gomcdermott.com/issuesSupports Roe
Meuser, Mark CaliforniaROn his official campaign website, Candidate Meuser states, "Our planet and its resources are precious gifts. We need to act as good stewards, both utilizing and preserving them for future generations. We need to acknowledge the role of the private sector, leading to critical innovations that will preserve our environment, and ensure that the government supports these efforts rather than mandating them...Mark will strongly support programs, especially public-private partnerships, that will wisely use our forest resources and ensure that federal lands are preserved for future generations while mitigating the risk of severe fires." Candidate Mark Meuser agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.50Candidate Mark Meuser has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5050https://markmeuser.com/plan/ https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/political-courage-test/139080/mark-meuserUnclear on Roe
Mullin, MarkwayneOklahoma RCandidate Markwayne Mullin disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2022 tweet, Candidate Mullin states, "While Biden & the Democrats are setting lofty climate goals, they are simultaneously crippling our domestic producers' ability to meet them. I wrote to @POTUS calling out the ways his regulation is hurting our energy independence & how my Stop NEPA Expansion Act would solve this." In another tweet responding to President Biden voicing the urgency of climate change legislature, he replies, "Because that'll definitely help the price at the pump." 0Candidate Markwayne Mullin makes public statements, advocates or votes against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. Candidate Mullin is a cosponsor of H.Con.Res.119, a bill "Expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy." 00https://twitter.com/repmullin/status/1532733062903119872 https://twitter.com/RepMullin/status/1549829040894365697 https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/119/cosponsors https://mullin.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=5328Opposes Roe
O'Dea, Joe ColoradoRCandidate Joe O'Dea disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to Colorado Newsline, "Denver construction CEO and first-time candidate Joe O’Dea has rejected the scientific consensus on manmade climate change, falsely claiming in a Denver7 interview that 'there’s a debate there still to be had' on the extent to which human activity contributes to global warming."In an analysis article for The Washington Post, it states that Candidate O'Dea "said he believes the climate is changing but favors “prudent” rather than “urgent” action. Asked about his stance on environmental regulations, particularly with regard to fossil fuels, he said, 'I would default to those people that know — oil and gas people.'" Candidate Joe O'Dea agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Joe O'Dea has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://coloradonewsline.com/2022/07/27/where-colorado-candidates-stand-on-climate-change/ https://www.denver7.com/news/politics/primary-2022-meet-the-two-republican-u-s-senate-candidates https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/08/20/colorado-senate-race-sundaytake/Opposes Roe
Oz, Mehmet PennsylvaniaRCandidate Mehmet Oz disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a Republican forum discussing increasing gas prices, Candidate Oz stated "As a scientist, I’ll tell you the Green New Deal is a lie...It’s not just unfair because we’re sacrificing our energy independence. Actually, we want more than energy independence, we want energy dominance...The “ideology that carbon is bad” is “a lie-" Carbon dioxide, my friends, is 0.04% of our air. That’s not the problem." Dr. Oz is a surgeon, not a scientist, and his remarks are not based in science at all. 0Candidate Mehmet Oz has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 507.5https://www.huffpost.com/entry/mehmet-oz-pennsylvania-senate-fracking_n_62446ecfe4b0e44de9bc3b9f https://doctoroz.com/issue/protect-innocent-life/ Opposes Roe
Perkins, Jo RaeOregonRCandidate Jo Rae Perkins disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a political positions survey for votesmart.org, Candidate Perkins was asked "Do you support the federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions?" She replied, writing, "CO2 is 80% of the so called greenhouse gases. GHG proponents want zero carbon emissions. This poses a problem they are not talking about. Trees sequester CO2, Methane, and other gases. In turn, trees give us oxygen. if CO2 emissions are reduced to zero or near zero, the trees will die. If the trees die off, the amount of oxygen in the atmosphere will disappear and then we die." She also does not support government funding for renewable energy. 0Candidate Jo Rae Perkins has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 507.5https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/political-courage-test/146001/jo-rae-perkins https://perkinsforussenate.vote/2020/08/30/pro-life/Opposes Roe
Pinion, Joe New YorkRCandidate Joe Pinon understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue. In an opinion piece regarding the involvement of the GOP party in climate change politics for 'The Hill,' Candidate Pinon stated, "What’s clear now is that Republican climate solutions can no longer be driven by a fragile band of political insurgents hungry for change. If we are going to cultivate a broader conservative coalition, climate change needs to become not just a truth we acknowledge but a principle we support with our time, our dollars, and our votes. Because the climate is changing, the Arctic ice is melting, and if the GOP continues to deny what the majority of Americans know to be true, the future of the party may be one of political extinction or perhaps more horrifying, societal irrelevance."100Candidate Joe Pinon has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee.5092.5https://thehill.com/opinion/energy-environment/422930-climate-change-denial-is-killing-the-gops-future/ https://www.newsweek.com/stop-weaponizing-climate-partisan-political-gain-opinion-1700124 https://www.syracuse.com/politics/2022/05/joe-pinion-looks-for-support-in-syracuse-as-he-campaigns-to-unseat-sen-chuck-schumer.htmlOpposes Roe
Roth, David IdahoDCandidate David Roth does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25 Candidate David Roth has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://rothforidaho.org/statement-on-roe-v-wade/ Supports Roe
Ryan, Tim Ohio DCandidate Tim Ryan understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue. On Candidate Tim's official website, it states, "With climate change already bringing more intense heat, flooding, and changes to growing seasons for our farmers—along with greater risk of heat death and more unsafe air quality days that disproportionately harm low-income communities and people of color—Tim recognizes that we can’t afford not to act. He’s pushed to pass a robust infrastructure plan that will put thousands of Ohioans to work modernizing our grid, going big on clean energy, and preparing for the challenges of the 21st century, all while using American-made materials." 100Candidate Tim Ryan has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://timforoh.com/issues/dominating-the-clean-energy-economy-and-protecting-our-natural-resources/ https://timforoh.com/issues/protecting-reproductive-freedom/ Supports Roe
Salvi, Kathy IllinoisRCandidate Kathy Salvi does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Candidate Kathy Salvi has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://www.ksdk.com/article/news/politics/kathy-salvi-tammy-duckworth-abortion-women-rights-post-roe-wade/63-11443e47-dcfc-4bef-942d-7884cd1c2127Opposes Roe
Schmitt, Eric MissouriRCandidate Eric Schmitt disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2022 tweet, Candidate Schmitt wrote, "Climate Alarmism is and always has been a scam. It’s meant to allow the Left to claim the “moral high ground,” create fear, then implement their command and control economic system." 0Candidate Eric Schmitt has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 507.5https://twitter.com/Eric_Schmitt/status/1548823516123889665 https://ago.mo.gov/docs/default-source/press-releases/22-2022.pdf?sfvrsn=39ffd2d_2 Opposes Roe
Smiley, Tiffany WashingtonRCandidate Tiffany Smiley agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels, but her support for an 'all of the above' strategy is harmful to the environment in the long run and is counterproductive to reaching net zero emissions. On Candidate Smiley's official campaign website, it states that one her of main objectives is "Reforming our energy policy means adopting an all-of-the-above approach to our nation’s energy needs of today while preparing for the future in an environmentally responsible way...Expanding clean energy capacity, including reducing regulations for nuclear, wind and solar power to diversify our energy supply in the long term" will also be done along with expanding oil and gas.50 Candidate Tiffany Smiley makes public statements, advocates or votes against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a statement on her official campaign website, Candidate Smiley speaks about the rising gas prices in America, calling for American energy independence using fossil fuels and some renewables. She blames her opponent, incumbent Patty Murray, stating, "Patty even voted to allow the federal government to impose a carbon tax – which would hit low-income Washingtonians the hardest – while voting to allow the rich to take tax credits for purchasing electric vehicles." Her take completely disregards the benefit of carbon taxing to the environment.042.5https://www.smileyforwashington.com/agenda https://www.smileyforwashington.com/post/patty-s-price-hikes-part-ii-pain-at-the-pump-losing-our-energy-independence https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/04/politics/tiffany-smiley-senate-washington-abortion-law-cnntv/index.htmlSupports Roe
Vance, J. D. OhioRCandidate J. D. Vance does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. When interviewed by Spectrum News1, Vance stated "I mean, certainly the climate is changing. I think the big question is, how much is man causing it?And second, if you believe that man is causing it, do you actually have a real solution to solve the issue?".25Candidate J. D. Vance has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://spectrumnews1.com/oh/columbus/politics/2022/01/21/in-depth--ohio-senate-j-d--vance-platform-issues https://jdvance.com/issues/ Opposes Roe
Walker, HerschelGeorgiaRCandidate Herschel Walker disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an article by The Washington Post, Candidate Walker provides his criticism for the 'Inflation Reduction Act,' legislation that includes a significant amount of funding and plans to combat climate change, by saying that the legislation is 'wasteful spending.' He asked, "Don't we have enough trees?" 0Candidate Herschel Walker has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 507.5https://www.teamherschel.com/issues/stand-for-conservative-family-values/ https://www.georgiademocrat.org/new-washington-post-walker-criticizing-climate-law-asks-dont-we-have-enough-trees-around-here/ https://apnews.com/article/abortion-2022-midterm-elections-entertainment-government-and-politics-herschel-walker-192e79f2a53798c3e441049ea3134a52 Opposes Roe
Welch, Peter Vermont DCandidate Peter Welch understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue. On Candidate Welch's official campaign website, it states, "Peter is fighting to make sure future generations have equal opportunities to explore and take advantage of the great outdoors. That’s why he’s a cosponsor of the Green New Deal: because he knows we can confront climate change and create millions of good-paying jobs through energy efficiency and clean energy projects. And he understands we don’t have the luxury of time — we must act now."100Candidate Peter Welch publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. In his former tenure as a Vermont Congressman, Candidate Welch voted against the 2018 House resolution (H.Con.Res.119) that stated that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the U.S. economy. 100100https://welchforvermont.com/issues/ https://www.ethanallen.org/welch-votes-against-anti-carbon-tax-resolution/ https://welchforvermont.com/issues/ Supports Roe

U.S. House Incumbents

NameStateDistrictPartyPositionPosition ScoreVote ScoreLeadershipLeadership ScoreCarbon FeeCarbon Fee ScoreClimate CalculationSourcesSupport/Oppose RoeVotes [Attacking International Climate Collaboration (House Roll Call 27)]Vote [Advancing Climate Action in the COMPETES Act (House Roll Call 18)]Vote [Repealing Assault on Methane Pollution Safeguards (House Roll Call 185)]Vote [Pro-Environment Funding Package (House Roll Call 247)]Vote [Transformative Climate, Jobs, and Justice Investments (House Roll Call 385)]Vote [Investing in Climate-Smart and Pro-Wildlife Infrastructure (House Roll Call 201)]Vote [Inflation Reduction Act (HR 5376)]
Adams, AlmaNorth Carolina12DCongresswoman Alma Adams understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "There is no denying that Climate Change and the rise in global temperatures results in extreme ecological changes. As a member of the Congressional Safe Climate Caucus, Congresswoman Adams is pushing for strong and proactive environmental policies that combat climate change, curb pollution, invest in renewable energy, and promote sustainable development solutions. She believes it’s time to start investing in more renewable energy sources and develop new green technologies. Investing in energy and the environment is effectively investing in the economy."100100Congresswoman Adams has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2020 post on 'Twitter,' The Congresswoman stated, "CLIMATE CHANGE ISN’T NEW. We’ve known the damaging impacts of it for years and we can’t afford to not take action. That’s why I’m proud to support the Energy Innovation & Carbon Dividend Act in order to put a #PriceOnPollution and reduce our carbon emissions by 90% by 2050." The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a press release on a 2017 Executive Order that curtailed America's ability to tackle climate change, the Congresswoman stated, "This Executive Order lets companies off of the hook and shifts environmental cleanup costs onto American taxpayers who are expected to be charged as much as $58 Billion by 2030. The President’s actions roll back critical protections to our air and water supplies and significantly reduce our ability to effectively fight climate change. As long as this administration continues to put big business first, its American families who will pay the greatest price.” Rep. Adams makes climate change a priority issue as well. She demonstrated this by becoming a co-sponsor of the Green New Deal. 100Congresswoman Adams publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 763). This bill would put a $15 per metric ton price on carbon emissions. She voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 100100https://adams.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://adams.house.gov/media-center/in-the-news/what-withdrawing-paris-climate-agreement-means https://twitter.com/repadams/status/1220786542182006785 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://adams.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/adams-decries-fundamentally-wrong-supreme-court-decision-abortionSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Aderholt, RobertAlabama 4RCongressman Robert Aderholt disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2010 op-ed in The Daily Mountain Eagle, the Congressman flouted the science that underpins climate change blaming current warming on natural cycles, writing, "I fall into the second group of people who believe, as do many very credible scientists, that the earth is currently in a natural warming cycle rather than a man-made climate change. Many scientists believe that natural cycles of warming and cooling have existed since the beginning of Earth. If we take the current models of climate prediction and apply those same models to what actually happened in the last thirty years, the models are shown to be very flawed. In addition, what knowledge we do have of a warming period in the Middle Ages cannot be explained by current models which are focused on greenhouse gas reductions." 00In a 2013 press release on the economic climate the Congressman Aderholt stated, “While Obama's Organizing for Action is showing concern about the climate change debate, hardworking Alabamians and I are concerned with our nation’s dismal jobs climate... The biggest denial is that the Obama Administration’s burdensome EPA regulations that have increased the cost of manufacturing and doing business, that Obamacare driving up the cost of healthcare and crippling hiring, and catering to special interest groups like those that are stalling the Keystone Pipeline are not the root cause our nation’s dismal jobs climate.” Congressman Aderholt demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Aderholt co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).00https://aderholt.house.gov/media-center/in-the-news/controversy-about-climate-change https://aderholt.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/aderholt-only-climate-we-should-be-talking-about-today-countrys-stalled https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/34/cosponsors?r=1&s=1&q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22Alabama%22%7D https://aderholt.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/congressman-aderholt-statement-leaked-supreme-court-decision-roe-v-wadeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Aguilar, PeteCalifornia33DCongressman Peter Aguilar understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'On the Environment' page it says, "I am firmly committed to strengthening our clean air and water standards, promoting investments in clean energy technology and taking assertive actions to reduce carbon emissions and combat global climate change." On his, 'Protecting the Environment and Fighting Climate Change,' page, it states, "Representative Aguilar believes that Congress needs to do more to combat the effects of climate change in the Inland Empire and around the globe. In his commitment to sustainability, Representative Aguilar has supported initiatives to reduce pollution and has continuously opposed efforts to dismantle environmental protections."100100Congressman Aguilar has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congressman passed two amendments to lower inland automobile emissions as part of the Moving Forward Act (H.R. 2), stating, "I was proud to help pass this bill because it will bring real investment to our region and create good-paying jobs in our community. This forward-thinking legislation will help us work our way out of the recession caused by the coronavirus pandemic and will allow us to modernize our crumbling infrastructure, reduce pollution and fight climate change.” Congressman Aguilar also makes prominent public statements on the issue. Rep. Aguilar's campaign website, states, "I take the effects of climate change and pollution very seriously and have worked in Congress to reduce our carbon footprint and prioritize the health and safety of our communities." Congressman Aguilar makes climate change a top priority issue. In a January 2022 tweet, the Congressman stated "I had a chance to talk about how the bipartisan Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act will help prevent wildfires. We know we must do more to combat climate change and we will — thanks to the @VP’s leadership."100Congressman Aguilar publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. He voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).100100https://peteaguilar.com/on-the-issues/environment/ https://aguilar.house.gov/sites/aguilar.house.gov/files/documents/Protecting%20the%20Environment%20and%20Fighting%20Climate%20Change.pdf https://aguilar.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/aguilar-amendments-lower-pollution-and-reduce-traffic-inland-empire-pass https://twitter.com/RepPeteAguilar/status/1484668636488941584 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://aguilar.house.gov/2022/05/03/rep-aguilar-statement-on-draft-decision-overturning-roe-v-wade/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Allen, RickGeorgia12RCongressman Allen disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2014 election debate, when asked if he believed in man made climate change the Congressman said, "No." 00According to Politically Georgia, "Allen vehemently rejected the idea that warming is an established fact. “The science if definitely NOT settled,” he said in an email. “Limiting debate to one side is not the same as being conclusive… I am not convinced and I am certainly not ready to destroy jobs and whole industry sectors in order to tax industries liberals don’t like and send the money to sectors that they do like.” Rep. Allen opposed the Clean Power Plan, stating in a 2017 post of Rick's Weekly Report, stating "I believe the Clean Power Plan, one of the most drastic environmental regulations in history, did very little to help the environment, but instead, burdened families through reduced income, stifled economic growth and increased electricity costs." Congressman Allen demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Allen makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman co-sponsored a 2019 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res 41). 00https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D56lBsT9WHk https://politics.myajc.com/news/state--regional-govt--politics/politicians-cool-global-warming/r6EaMO72xM6UqCofVLvp3H/ https://allen.house.gov/news/email/show.aspx?ID=QL2FAABJSRT6G https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/41/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://twitter.com/reprickallen/status/1217839299292475392Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Allred, ColinTexas32DCongressman Colin Allred understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "It is a misconception that we must choose between a healthy environment and a prosperous economy. We can protect our environment, combat climate change, lower energy costs, and incentivize economic growth simultaneously. Texas is an energy state, and we have a unique competitive advantage being the only state in the country with its own electrical grid. Texas can and should lead the way in renewable and clean energy, creating good paying jobs for hardworking Texans and protecting the planet for future generations." Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change position.75100Congressman Allred has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. According to a 2019 Dallas Morning News article, the Congressman stated, "My position has always been clear: I am willing to work together with Republicans and Democrats on commonsense solutions to address climate change while creating good-paying, clean energy jobs." Rep. Allred also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release advocating for the Paris Agreement, the Congressman stated, "It's imperative the United States join the rest of the world in addressing the climate crisis. Meeting the conditions of the Paris Agreement will help bolster our clean energy sector by working toward a healthier planet for future generations. It’s time we rise to the occasion and act.” In a 2017 interview with Rebel HQ, when asked where he stood on combatting climate change, he responded, "Absolutely, I mean climate change is an existential threat there are very few things out there that scare me more than what's going on with our climate right now." Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.100Congressman Allred has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman did not vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5081.25https://www.colinallred.com/energyandenvironment https://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/2019/02/21/republicans-signal-early-interest-in-unseating-new-dallas-rep-colin-allred-in-2020/ https://allred.house.gov/media/press-releases/allred-votes-climate-action-now-act https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMK6pykYnXQ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.congress.gov/member/colin-allred/A000376?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22abortion%22%5D%2C%22within%22%3A%5B%22abortion%22%5D%7DSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Amodei, MarkNevada2RCongressman Mark Amodei does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On the Congressman's, 'Environment,' page, it states, "I believe Congress should promote policies that protect and preserve our environment for future generations. Responsible stewardship of our environment requires a commitment to sound science and continuous research."250On Congressman Amodei's, 'Energy,' page, it states, "In Nevada, new sources of energy, such as geothermal and solar are showing promise. Geothermal, in particular, brings jobs and growth to Nevada with 20+ plants in operation providing clean, reliable electrical capacity to the grid and significant additional capacity under development." Congressman Amodei does not oppose climate action. 25Congressman Amodei opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted for a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 2518.75https://amodei.house.gov/environment/ https://amodei.house.gov/energy1/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Armstrong, KellyNorth Dakota1RCongressman Kelly Armstrong agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2019 E&E News article Congressman Armstrong, "doesn't deny the scientific consensus on climate change but added that the U.S. shouldn't move forward unless 'you get the entire world to deal with it.'" 500At an energy round table in 2019, Congressman Armstrong pushed for policy reform saying, "The policies that are being promoted simply export the pollution," and, "We export this pollution to countries that don't have the regulatory framework we have here." However, he has also derided the Green New Deal saying, "It's absolutely detrimental to North Dakota in (agriculture), energy, coal and oil issues." Yet, in 2019 he said "any solutions to carbon and clean air and clean water need to be considered." According to a 2019 article in Roll Call the Congressman, "received at least $400,000 from those wells and as much as $1.1 million in the previous year, as well as $75,000 in salary from Armstrong Corp., his family’s oil and gas business." Representative Armstrong does not oppose climate action. 25Representative Armstrong has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5031.25https://armstrong.house.gov/media/in-the-news/ee-news-coaching-baseball-helped-prepare-freshman-congress https://www.grandforksherald.com/news/government-and-politics/4574737-armstrong-finds-north-dakota-connections-hot-topic-federal https://www.thedickinsonpress.com/news/4604447-lets-stay-offense-rep-armstrong-hosts-energy-roundtable-bsc https://www.kfyrtv.com/content/news/Armstrong-talks-energy-climate-committee-in-Bismarck-509085221.html https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://armstrong.house.gov/media/press-releases/armstrong-statement-reported-supreme-court-draft-decisionOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Arrington, JodeyTexas19RCongressman Jodey Arrington disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a House Floor speech condemning the Paris Agreement, the Congressman stated, "The climate activist agenda, Mr. Chairman, and extreme ideological views... embraces the view that the only means to successfully reducing carbon emissions is to eliminate conventional fuels, which by the way power our nation's economy...This framework is flawed in its assumptions, fraught with political bias, hostile toward our main source of energy, and amounts to a jobs program for ideological bureaucrats." Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change position.00On Congressman Arrington's energy page, it states, "West Texas currently accounts for 81% of the onshore production for the entire state of Texas. The oil and gas producers here in District 19 provide a safe and affordable supply of energy to our nation, and thousands of jobs to our people. We need to reduce regulations, cut taxes, and allow these industries to grow and thrive. Like Texas, our country needs more pro-growth, pro-energy policies." Congressman Arrington demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.0Congressman Arrington opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 256.25https://www.facebook.com/JodeyArrington/videos/493714594707977/?v=493714594707977 https://arrington.house.gov/issues/energy/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://arrington.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=761Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
Auchincloss, JakeMassachusetts4DCongressman Jake Auchincloss understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. According to a July 2021 article from 'The Hill,' "At the event co-sponsored by Walmart and Environmental Defense Fund, Rep. Jake Auchincloss (D-Mass.), said he’s 'not really waiting another decade for Republicans to decide ‘yeah, maybe we should group together climate change with infrastructure.’” “You can get on board or you can not. But we’re going to do it, because it is pertinent and it is necessary,' said the first-term lawmaker..."100100Congressman Jake Auchincloss has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In an October 2020 interview with 'WCVB Channel 5 Boston,' when asked "What steps do you believe are the most necessary to deal with global climate change?" Congressman Auchincloss answered "We've got to invest in green R&D, green infrastructure, and green jobs. That means putting a price on carbon. That means asserting muscular federal oversight over protecting our clean water and our clean air provisions..." The congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a February 2020 interview with 'WCVB Channel 5 Boston,' Congressman Auchincloss stated "Climate change will steal this planet from the next generation. That’s not just a political and environmentally reality... We are talking any federal investment in infrastructure. Not transportation, we are missing an opportunity. Transportation is 40% of what drives climate change in Massachusetts. We put together a progressive plan to reinvent transportation in Massachusetts." The congressman makes climate change a top priority issue. On his campaign website, Congressman Auchincloss lists "Meet the climate crisis head-on" as a priority, where he states "Jake has a track record of delivering progressive solutions to address climate change. On the city council, he voted with Green Newton priorities 100% of the time."100Congressman Jake Auchincloss publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. On his campaign website, to "Meet the climate crisis head-on," he includes "Tax[ing] carbon to curb the pollution that causes climate change." According to a 2021 New Boston Post article, "...in a Zoom event put together by the Foxborough Democratic Town Committee... Auchincloss said that he sees a carbon tax as essential to fighting climate change." In addition, Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. 100100https://thehill.com/policy/equilibrium-sustainability/561253-democrats-say-theres-no-time-to-wait-on-including-climate https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3R22o6H0f4Q https://www.wcvb.com/article/on-the-record-congressional-candidate-jake-auchincloss-discusses-personal-climate-change-issue/31067118 https://www.jakeforma.com/priorities https://newbostonpost.com/2021/07/13/asked-about-the-ideal-tax-code-jake-auchincloss-advocates-for-carbon-tax-higher-death-tax/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22Massachusetts%22%7D https://auchincloss.house.gov/media/press-releases/video-auchincloss-we-need-senate-step-and-make-roe-law-land Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Axne, CindyIowa3DCongresswoman Cindy Axne understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's Environment page, it states, "Cindy has seen firsthand the devastation that worsening floods, storms, and other effects of climate change are already having on Iowa. While working to curb greenhouse gas emissions and halt the growing threat of a warming planet, Cindy knows that we must also build up community and agricultural resiliency to withstand the new realities of our environment."100100According to the Des Moines Register, when asked if she supported the Green New Deal, Congresswoman Axne stated, "We need to protect our communities and our economy from the dire threats of climate change. The Green New Deal provides a broad framework, but it doesn’t provide the practical, bipartisan solutions we need to achieve these goals. Any plan to address climate change must incorporate the needs of Iowa families who are supported by our agriculture and manufacturing industries.." According to the Iowa Capital Dispatch in 2021, "Iowa will be at the center of efforts to use plantings to sweep carbon from the air and to build on renewable energy as the next farm bill approaches in 2023, U.S. Rep. Cindy Axne said Wednesday. Major pandemic-relief funds from the federal government also make this a good time to act on climate change issues, Axne said...'This is a great opportunity for us to look at things holistically and to really make sure that we made our mark when it comes to agriculture and impacting climate,” Axne, D-3rd District, said.'" Congresswoman Axne's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Rep. Axne has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5081.25https://axne.house.gov/issues/environment https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/2019/03/05/green-new-deal-where-iowas-congressional-representatives-stand-cortez-climate-change-ernst-grassley/3053319002/ https://iowacapitaldispatch.com/2021/09/01/axne-iowas-work-on-carbon-renewable-energy-points-to-next-farm-bill/ https://axne.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-axne-introduces-amendment-support-renewable-fuel-and-energy-industries https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://axne.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-axne-statement-supreme-court-decision-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Babin, BrianTexas36RCongressman Brian Babin disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2019 Pacific Standard article, Congressman Babin, "...tried to suggest that, because scientists are still researching what caused the Little Ice Age, which extended from the 14th to the mid-19th century, perhaps they are unsure about the causes of climate change now. He also suggested some global warming can be beneficial at times. For people living during the Little Ice Age, he said, 'I would say it would have been more advantageous for the climate to be a little bit warmer.'" Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change position.00In a 2017 press release applauding the withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, Congressman Babin stated, "Furthermore, it would uniquely hurt the people of the 36th District of Texas by threatening the many good-paying jobs provided by our area’s petrochemical and refining facilities. While this decision will not sit well with out-of-touch liberal politicians and pro-U.N. globalists, President Trump was elected to put American workers first and turn back such bad deals that undermine U.S. competitiveness and jobs.” Congressman Babin demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.0Congressman Babin makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman was a co-sponsor and voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 00https://psmag.com/news/the-house-science-committee-just-held-its-first-helpful-hearing-on-climate-science-in-years https://babin.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1314 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://babin.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=583Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Bacon, DonNebraska 2RCongressman Don Bacon does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2020 interview for The Reader, Congressman Bacon stated, "Well, I do believe in climate change. But there’s a lot of questions like how much do you put … If we did everything in America that we’re supposed to, does it make a difference or not? So there’s a good debate..."2529On Congressman Bacon's 'Energy and Environment,' page it states, "I am proud to be part of the Climate Solutions Caucus to further expand my knowledge on the potential impacts of climate change and find bi-partisan solutions. This was a promise I made to constituents of my district and I keep my promises." From a 2020 press release, "Congressman Don Bacon (NE-R-02) joined Congresswoman Abigail Spanberger (VA-D-07) to announce plans to introduce the Growing Climate Solutions Act in the House. Introduced in the Senate by Senators Mike Braun (R-IN) and Debbie Stabenow (D-MI), the bill seeks to help farmers, ranchers and foresters participate in the voluntary carbon market by establishing a Greenhouse Gas Technical Assistance Provider and Third-Party Verifier Certification Program through the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)." Congressman Bacon supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. 50Congressman Bacon makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a 2020 interview with The Reader, the Congressman stated, "I don’t like carbon taxes. I don’t think we should be jacking up gas tax or airfares or the utilities when you want to heat your house." When the interviewer questioned the Congressman on his opinion on carbon tax for corporation, he still insisted that carbon taxing hurts the economy, starting, “I am not a fan of carbon tax. I will never be a fan of carbon tax. I think in the end, I’m more into incentivizing behavior versus punishing behavior." Congressman Bacon voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 026https://thereader.com/news/the-reader-interview-with-don-bacon https://bacon.house.gov/issues/energy-environment https://bacon.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=517 https://thereader.com/news/the-reader-interview-with-don-bacon https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://bacon.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1031Opposes RoePro ClimatePro ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Baird, JimIndiana4RCongressman Jim Baird does not take a position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2019 article by Science Magazine, when asked about climate change, the Congressman stated, "I’ll have to look at their data once I start on the committee. I’m a data man, and we’ll just have to take a look at that.”250According to a 2019 article by Inside Climate News, as a way of downplaying the impact of climate, "Baird also speculated that species might adapt swiftly enough to climate change to avoid mass extinctions, despite vast scientific evidence to the contrary." Congressman Baird demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. In a 2021 Pharos Tribune article, the Congressman states "There is real risk that climate change policy could create many challenges for the agriculture industry. Challenges that create incredible regulatory burden, that decrease efficiency or productivity, that impact that the stability of America’s food supply chain, and that ultimately could cost farmers their business and family legacy."0Rep. Baird makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman co-sponsored a 2019 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 41). He was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 06.25https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2019/01/one-indiana-s-new-congressmen-vietnam-veteran-farmer-and-scientist# https://insideclimatenews.org/news/13022019/congress-house-science-committee-climate-change-republicans-green-new-deal-niskanen https://www.pharostribune.com/opinion/article_7cf849b8-c968-11eb-ad19-f32f4c455aa6.html https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/41/cosponsors?pageSort=alphaByState&searchResultViewType=expanded&KWICView=false https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/09/07/these-republicans-cheered-abortion-policy-going-states-they-are-also-sponsoring-federal-ban/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Balderson, TroyOhio12RCongressman Troy Balderson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250The Congressman supported the president's rollbacks of the Clean Power Plan, stating that President Trump's replacement, the Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) rule, “allows everyone to win." Rep. Balderson demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.0Representative Balderson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5018.75https://www.dispatch.com/news/20190620/trump-moves-to-gut-obama-climate-policy-and-bolster-coal-industry https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://twitter.com/RepBalderson/status/1540347973506371586Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Banks, JimIndiana3RCongressman Jim Banks disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2017 article in The Journal Gazette the Congressman was quoted stating, "I believe there is some evidence and some scientific research that might support that, and other research that doesn’t." He was also quoted saying by the Gazette that climate change, "is largely leftist propaganda to change the way Americans live and create more government obstruction and intrusion in our lives."00Congressman Banks supported Trump's decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement, stating in a tweet that, "I am glad @POTUS is following through on his campaign promise and pulling the United States out of the flawed Paris agreement." In a 2019 tweet on climate change the Congressman wrote, "If the Left cared about ‘Climate Change’, they would: have a plan to curb China’s CO2 emissions, support nuclear energy & natural gas, unleash power of markets to invest in R&D. Instead they make you late for work, ban plastic straws, want you to eat bugs and not have kids." Congressman Banks demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Banks makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman co-sponsored a 2019 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res 41). 00http://www.journalgazette.net/news/local/indiana/Banks-unsure-of-climate-change-18039245 https://www.indystar.com/story/news/2017/06/02/indiana-politicians-react-climate-agreement-withdrawal/364345001/ https://twitter.com/repjimbanks/status/1176156582037610496 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/41/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://banks.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=27Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
Barr, AndyKentucky6RCongressman Andy Barr disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2019 article from Spectrum News 1, the Congressman was quoted on climate change, stating, "Some say the science is settled, that's not true. There are scientists who dispute the level of warming, the extent to which humans are contributing to that." In an interview with WTVQ, the Congressman expressed his opposition to President Obama's climate change plan, stating, "Coal does contribute to climate change. 'But he says it’s better for the world if we use coal in America.' The administration is trying to destroy the coal industry and the result is more exports to countries like China that have a very poor environmental record." 00In a 2019 press release on the Green New Deal, the Congressman denied scientific consensus on climate change, stating, "While the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change has found a lack of scientific consensus on the causes and consequences of climate change, I am not a climate change denier." The Congressman Barr demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Barr makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a 2013 press release opposing a fee on carbon the Congressman cited the "human cost," of the war on coal. He also voted in favor and was a co-sponsor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 00https://spectrumnews1.com/ky/louisville/news/2019/04/16/rep--andy-barr-speaks-on-green-energy-and-the-green-new-deal https://www.wtvq.com/2013/07/02/rep-andy-barr-says-hes-offended-by-presidents-climate-change-plan/ https://barr.house.gov/columns?ID=6D9B3AC5-D9DE-40FF-8381-3DC72FB774C2 https://barr.house.gov/2013/3/barr-fights-carbon-tax https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://barr.house.gov/2022/6/barr-historic-victory-for-life-as-scotus-overturns-roe-v-wadeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateN/AN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Barragán, Nanette California44DCongresswoman Nanette Barragán understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. During a 2020 hearing on Energy and Commerce Joint Subcommittee Hearing on Climate Change and Wildfires, the Congresswoman stated, "I happen to be a big believer that the combination of the increasing heat longer droughts and intensifying winds along with record-breaking wildfires are becoming the new norm for California which is not a good new norm for us in Southern California. Los Angeles County Fire Chief Daryl Osby has been outspoken on this stating that climate change is undeniably a part of why these wildfires are more devastating and destructive than ever before. I think it's such an important issue that he's going to be my guest at the State of the Union to talk about the impact that wildfires are having."100100Congresswoman Barragán has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. The Congresswoman is a co-chair of the United for Climate And Environmental Justice Congressional Task Force, which aims to reduce the impacts of climate change on minority and low-income communities. In a press release announcing the formation of the Task Force, the Congresswoman stated, “Issues like climate change and pollution disproportionately impact low-income communities and communities of color, a fact that must be considered in our work as lawmakers." The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release opposing the U.S.-Mexico Trade Agreement, the Congresswoman stated, "Although there were labor and enforcement improvements made with the USMCA, climate change is a crisis that must be urgently addressed and accounted for in our trade agreements." Rep. Barragán makes climate change a top priority issue. She is a co-sponsor of the Green New Deal, a set of laws meant to "wean the United States from fossil fuels and curb planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions across the economy" while also "(guaranteeing) new high-paying jobs in clean energy industries." 100Congresswoman Barragán supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. She voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 7593.75https://barragan.house.gov/congresswoman-barragan-testifies-on-the-role-of-climate-change-in-wildfires/ https://mceachin.house.gov/media/press-releases/mceachin-barrag-n-jayapal-announced-united-climate-and-environmental-justice https://barragan.house.gov/congresswoman-barragan-releases-statement-on-house-resolution-5430-the-united-states-mexico-trade-agreement/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/21/climate/green-new-deal-questions-answers.html https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://barragan.house.gov/2022/07/15/rep-barragan-votes-to-protect-womens-access-to-abortion-protections-for-reproductive-health-freedom/ Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Beatty, JoyceOhio3DCongresswoman Joyce Beatty understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "The consensus view of scientists about the impact that climate change poses to our planet is alarming. Rising temperatures are projected to devastate many of our planet’s precious ecosystems, increase coastal flooding to dangerous levels, disrupt our food systems, and increase extreme weather occurrences. These science-backed facts are why I support taking bold steps to invest in federal programs to address climate change, prevent spending cuts to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), fully enforce the Clean Air Act, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, minimize our reliance on fossil fuels, and promote energy efficiency and conservation. I also support the Paris Climate Agreement and believe the United States should remain a full partner in the international effort to address climate change."100100In a 2017 tweet opposing President Trump's withdrawal from the agreement, she stated, "1. Syria. 2. Nicaragua 3. USA. The ONLY three countries to reject #ParisAccord. Talk about a list you don't want to be on! #ActOnClimate." Rep. Beatty in a press release opposed the Keystone Pipeline for climate reasons, stating, "We should focus on developing domestically produced energy as we transition away from energy sources that cause irreparable climate change and fail to create meaningful American jobs.” Congresswoman Betty's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue.75Congresswoman Beatty supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. She voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 7587.5https://beatty.house.gov/issues/climate-and-environment https://twitter.com/RepBeatty/status/870363347904069634 https://beatty.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/beatty-opposes-seriously-flawed-keystone-xl-legislation https://beatty.house.gov/issues/climate-and-environment https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://beatty.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/beatty-slams-roe-reversalSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Bentz, Cliff Oregon2RCongressman Cliff Bentz agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to an editorial from the Bulletin posted on the congressman's website, "Bentz’s concept is more circumspect, realistic and decentralized. He believes climate change is real. He wants innovation, sequestration and adaptation." 500Under 'Environment' on the 'issues' page of his campaign website, Congressman Bentz states "I applaud President Trump’s plan to update the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)." According to a 2021 'S&P Global' article, "Bentz has advocated other climate solutions, including carbon capture and sequestration and the development of solar energy, according to an August 2019 story by The Dalles Chronicle." From a June 2021 article from the 'Pacific Northwest AG Network,' "House Republicans launched the Conservative Climate Caucus. The caucus includes more than 50 representatives, including Oregon’s Cliff Bentz and Washington’s Dan Newhouse." The article says "The goal of the Conservative Climate Caucus is to bring members of the Republican party together to educate each other on climate policies that will make progress on reducing emissions through American innovation and resources." According to a Tweet on his page, "Rep.-elect Cliff Bentz, who led statehouse walkout, backs climate solutions people 'want to do.'" Congressman Cliff Bentz’s supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for effective policies. 50Congressman Cliff Bentz makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. According to a 2021 'Oregon state senate Republicans who walked out during the state's 2019 legislative session to effectively block Gov. Kate Brown and the Democrat-majority legislature from passing a carbon tax bill."025https://cliffbentz.com/2020/10/editorial-cliff-bentz-for-congress/ https://cliffbentz.com/2020/03/environment/ https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-news-headlines/new-members-of-us-congress-include-climate-defenders-carbon-tax-opponents-61690160 https://www.pnwag.net/2021/06/30/republicans-launch-conservative-climate-caucus/ https://cliffbentz.com/2020/03/life/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Bera, AmiCalifornia6DCongressman Ami Bera understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On Congressman Bera's, 'Environment and Agriculture,' page, it states, "We must address the grave threat that climate change poses to our state of California and to future generations. The vast majority of qualified scientists agree that the data on climate change is clear. The evidence shows climate change is making our drought worse and could lead to future droughts. Climate change is expected to result in rising sea levels, which could damage the Sacramento delta and major coastal cities throughout the Bay Area. It could also mean more out-of-control forest fires and more dangerous storms, affecting our country’s agriculture and infrastructure."100100Congressman Ami Bera has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In 2019 Congressman Bera co-wrote an op-ed with Congresswoman Kim Schrier (D-WA), stating, "Climate change is one of the biggest public health threats facing our country and planet. From increased air pollution, to worsening extreme weather disasters, to greater risks for diseases, climate change impacts every aspect of our health and safety." The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 Facebook post, he wrote, "Climate change is a grave (and real) threat. We have an obligation to future generations to do whatever we can to address this crisis." Rep. Bera makes climate change a top priority issue. He is a co-sponsor of the '100% Clean Economy Act of 2019' (H.R.5221), legislation that "establishes requirements to... (achieve) a 100% clean economy (i.e., economy-wide, net-zero greenhouse gas emissions) by no later than 2050." 100Rep. Ami Bera supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. Congressman Bera voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH) 7593.75https://bera.house.gov/environment#climatechange https://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/energy-environment/447011-to-protect-our-health-we-must-act-on-climate https://www.facebook.com/RepAmiBera/posts/2512714255408323 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5221?r=3&s=3 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://bera.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-bera-statement-supreme-court-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Bergman, JackMichigan1RCongressman Jack Bergman does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Congressman Bergman does not oppose climate action. When joining the Bipartisan Climate Caucus in 2017 Congressman Bergman was quoted by Climate Citizens Lobby stating, "Michigan’s First District is home to some of our nation’s most cherished natural resources and I’m proud to join my colleagues to examine ways to promote and protect these resources. Michiganders understand that our Great Lakes and natural resources are worth protecting—for our environment, for our economy, for our kids and grandkids, and for the future of the Great Lakes region.” 25Congressman Bergman has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman did not vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5025https://citizensclimatelobby.org/rep-jack-bergman-congressman-climate-conscious-youth/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://twitter.com/RepJackBergman/status/1540347859626856450 Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Beyer, DonVirginia8DCongressman Don Beyer understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's climate change and the environment page, he states, "Stopping the harmful consequences of global climate change is the existential crisis of our generation. We cannot continue pumping pollutants into our air at no economic cost. Fourteen of the fifteen hottest years on record have been in this century. Global temperature changes are causing prolonged droughts, extreme weather events, and rising sea levels." Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change position.100100Congressman Beyer has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 op-ed in The Hill, the Congressman stated, "The president’s recent decision to pull out of the Paris agreement, the international climate agreement by which each nation voluntarily committs to addressing climate change in their own country, is an intentional choice to bury his head in the sand. We can’t ignore reality, and we don’t have the luxury of just sitting this one out." Rep. Beyer also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2020 press release on infrastructure, the Congressman stated, “I’m proud to support this framework because I believe it is the roadmap we need to put people to work strengthening and modernizing our communities in a way that respects the environment and addresses the climate crisis. Congressman Beyer makes climate change a top priority issue. The Congressman is the Democrat Coalition Climate Change Task Force Co-Chair. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman's climate change leadership.100Congressman Beyer supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. The Congressman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). The Congressman supports the Healthy Climate and Family Security Act, which would, "cap the emissions of greenhouse gases through a requirement to purchase carbon permits, to distribute the proceeds of such purchases to eligible individuals, and for other purposes. 7593.75https://beyer.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=15199 https://beyer.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=4651 https://beyer.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=4722 https://beyer.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1210 https://www.vanhollen.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Healthy%20Climate%20and%20Family%20Security%20Act.pdf https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://beyer.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=5628Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Bice, Stephanie Oklahoma5RCongresswoman Stephanie Bice does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On her website, the congresswoman states "...I believe that Congress should enact a national strategy that ensures abundant, affordable energy for consumers, and creates more American jobs, all while reducing emissions. According to a 2020 'Washington Examiner' article, Bice stated, "Certainly, we should be mindful of the impact of oil and gas on our climate."250According to a 2020 'Washington Examiner' article, "...[Congresswoman Bice] says climate change is a problem that should be addressed by encouraging the private sector to produce innovative clean energy technologies." "'We need to be looking at all forms of energy,' she added, noting Oklahoma’s leading status in generating power from wind and, to a lesser extent, solar." However, in a May 2021 tweet, Congresswoman Bice writes "I am proud to join @RepArrington and 50+ of my colleagues in an effort to stand up for our oil and gas industry. It's important that we keep our energy workers employed and stand up for the families, farmers, and small businesses who rely on affordable energy." Congresswoman Stephanie Bice does not oppose climate action.25Congresswoman Stephanie Bice has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5025https://bice.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/energy/candidates-race-to-win-oil-industry-support-in-key-oklahoma-house-race https://twitter.com/repbice/status/1392977991337226243 https://bice.house.gov/media/press-releases/bice-applauds-reversal-roe-vs-wadeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Biggs, AndyArizona5RCongressman Andy Biggs disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2017 candidate survey by the Arizona Republic, the Congressman stated, “I do not believe climate change is occurring... I do not think that humans have a significant impact on climate. The federal government should stop regulating and stomping on our economy and freedoms in the name of a discredited theory.” 00According to the Arizona Republic, when asked about climate change by a constituent Congressman Biggs stated, "There are credible scientists who say climate change exists; we aren’t sure why... There are credible scientists who say it doesn’t.” During a 2017 Congressional hearing on the social cost of carbon, the Congressman also stated, "The previous administration disregarded scientific integrity by overestimating climate change resulting from greenhouse gas emissions. In order to push an expensive regulatory agenda, the administration inflated the SCC to justify costly regulations in response to the allegedly terrible damage CO2 emissions will cause in the future." Congressman Biggs demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Briggs makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. According to a 2017 article by The Guardian, when addressing a price on carbon pollution Congressman Biggs stated, "It is simply not right for Americans to be bearing the brunt of costs when the majority of benefits will be conferred away from home." Congressman Biggs voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 00https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/house-science-panel-adds-climate-denying-members/ https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/arizona/2017/04/12/andy-biggs-town-hall-arizona/100124436/ https://biggs.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-biggs-opening-statement-hearing-examining-social-cost-carbon https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2017/mar/01/republican-hearing-calls-for-a-lower-carbon-pollution-price-it-should-be-much-higher https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://iqconnect.house.gov/iqextranet/view_newsletter.aspx?id=103896&c=AZ05ABOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Bilirakis, Gus M.Florida12RCongressman Bilirakis agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to the Congressman's 'Environment, Energy Production, and Infrastructure' page on his website, "Congressman Bilirakis believes that climate change is real and has been active in Congressional hearings focused on reducing carbon emissions, boosting renewable energy options, and modernizing the nation’s power generation. The Congressman wants clean air, clean water, and environmental protection..."500Congressman Bilirakis lacks leadership by advocating against the Paris Agreement. According to Politifact, the Congressman stated in an email that, "A study by the National Economics Research Association showed that the (Paris climate) deal could cost 2.7 million lost jobs in the U.S. by 2025 should our country adhere to the commitments made by the Obama Administration." Politifact deemed the study referred to as unreliable, stating, "The study is unreliable, using an extreme model that does not consider the possible benefits of carbon regulation and rules out investment, flexibility or technology that would lead to more jobs." According to the Congressman's 'Environment, Energy Production, and Infrastructure' page on his website, " Congressman Bilirakis firmly supports an “all of the above” energy strategy that includes increasing domestic production, providing incentives for the development of renewable resources, and promoting conservation. " Congressman Bilirakis demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Bilirakis makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).012.5https://bilirakis.house.gov/issues/energy-production http://www.politifact.com/florida/statements/2017/jun/21/gus-bilirakis/gus-bilirakis-cites-flawed-study-defend-us-wit/ https://bilirakis.house.gov/issues/energy-production https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/119/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/34/cosponsors?r=1&s=1 https://bilirakis.house.gov/media/press-releases/bilirakis-applauds-historic-scotus-decision-uphold-sanctity-lifeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Bishop Jr., Sanford D.Georgia2DCongressman Bishop understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a 2009 press release on the House's passage of the American Clean Energy and Security Act (H.R. 2454) he stated, “All credible science confirms that the earth’s climate is warming. In fact, the global temperature is quickly approaching a level wholly unknown to human beings throughout the course of recorded history. Protecting the health and the survival of the planet is not only a moral concern, but a religious issue as well. My faith tells me that we must act as responsible stewards of God’s creation. We must do everything we can to ensure that the Earth and all of God’s creatures are preserved for generations to come.”75100Congressman Bishop supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. According to a 2017 WMGT 41 article the Congressman was quoted on his disappointment over President Trump pulling out of the Paris Agreement, stating, “I think it’s very unfortunate. I’m very disappointed that the President does not see the need for people to work together across the globe to protect the earth on which we live.” On the Congressman's, 'Energy,' page it states, "I have long supported the development and exploration of domestic energy sources which will revitalize our economy, create millions of new jobs, lower energy bills, and strengthen our national security. I am a strong supporter of the Keystone XL pipeline, increased exploration of energy sources on federal lands and offshore, renewable energy research, and promoting rural electric cooperatives and nuclear energy."50Congressman Bishop has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 763). This bill would put a $15 per metric ton price on carbon emissions. But despite this, the Congressman voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5068.75https://bishop.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/bishop-on-house-passage-of-climate-change-legislation https://www.41nbc.com/2017/06/01/congressman-bishop-disappointed-president-trumps-withdraw-paris-climate-agreement/ https://bishop.house.gov/legislative-work/fiscal-responsibility/energy https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://bishop.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/congressman-bishop-statement-on-reported-draft-supreme-court-decision-toSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Bishop, DanNorth Carolina9RCongressman Dan Bishop does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250Congressman Bishop does not oppose climate action.25Congressman Bishop has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5025NOTE: THIS CANDIDATES DID NOT VOTE ON ANY OF THE VOTES ABOVE, SO THE VOTE SCORE DOES NOT FACTOR INTO HER CLIMATE CALCULATION. https://danbishop.house.gov/issues https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://danbishop.house.gov/media/press-releases/bishop-applauds-end-roe-v-wadeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Blumenauer, EarlOregon3DCongressman Earl Blumenauer understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's campaign website, it states, "We must act immediately to embrace a just transition to green transportation and infrastructure and create clean energy jobs, protect natural resources, and practice regenerative agriculture to decarbonize our economy and save our planet."100100Congressman Blumenauer has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. The Congressman introduced a 2019 resolution, Expressing the sense of Congress that there is a climate emergency which demands a massive-scale mobilization to halt, reverse, and address its consequences and causes (H. Con Res 52), stating in a press release, "To address the climate crisis, we must tell the truth about the nature of this threat.” The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2017 press release condemning the president's decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement, the Congressman stated, "If Donald Trump thinks that he can put his head in the sand, ignore climate change, and instead subject the world to rising sea levels, stronger storms, and harsh droughts then he is wrong. As the second largest emitter of carbon pollution, the United States has an obligation and a commitment to protect our planet from climate change." According to the Congressman's website, "As a climate champion and a vocal defender of important environmental laws and policies, Earl supports efforts to strengthen the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Endangered Species Act, and more. He has also helped pass new laws that promote clean energy, fight climate change, reduce our dependence on fossil fuels and encourage more efficient use of valuable natural resources." Rep. Blumenauer makes climate change a priority issue as well. He demonstrated this by becoming a co-sponsor of the Green New Deal.100Representative Blumenauer publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. On the Congressman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "He has proposed a fee on carbon polluters that would drive down emissions and generate revenue that would be returned to American workers and fund programs to transition to a decarbonized economy." Congressman Blumenauer voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 100100https://www.earlblumenauer.com/priorities/environment-climate/ https://blumenauer.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/blumenauer-ocasio-cortez-and-sanders-introduce-resolution-declare https://blumenauer.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/blumenauer-statement-reports-donald-trump-pull-out-paris-climate https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22Oregon%22%7D https://blumenauer.house.gov/issues/environment https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://blumenauer.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/blumenauer-statement-on-supreme-court-s-decision-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Boebert, Lauren Colorado3RCongresswoman Lauren Boebert disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a tweet posted in August 2021 that seems to apply to her position on climate change, Congresswoman Boebert posts a picture of snow-covered hills and writes "Make America Warm Again."00In a 2020 tweet replying to Joe Biden, Congresswoman Lauren Boebert says "What’s your climate change solution that doesn’t include taxation and socialism? Oh wait..." In 2021, Congresswoman Boebert introduced a bill that "would prevent the U.S. from spending any money to rejoin the Paris Climate agreement unless the Senate ratifies the agreement," saying that "The Paris Agreement puts these jobs at risk and will increase energy costs." In a a 2021 editorial on her website, in opposition to the 30 x 30 initiative, the congresswoman stated "While I’m doubtful that the Earth’s temperature going up less than 2 degrees in the next century is an existential threat, I know that the 30 x 30 initiative is an existential threat to private property rights in this country.” Congresswoman Lauren Boebert demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congresswoman Lauren Boebert makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. She said in reference to her opponent, in an article in 'The Daily Sentinel,' "Aspen Adam has told multiple media outlets that he supports eventually ending fossil fuels and transitioning to 100% renewable energy. He voted in support of a federal carbon tax to help kill off responsible oil and gas production." 00https://twitter.com/laurenboebert/status/1361513231911632900?lang=en https://twitter.com/laurenboebert/status/1264681491814141953?lang=en https://www.cpr.org/2021/01/22/rep-lauren-boebert-targets-bidens-paris-agreement-who-orders-with-first-bills/ https://boebert.house.gov/media/editorial/washington-examiner-enviromentalists-latest-land-grab-scheme-30-x-30-initiative https://www.gjsentinel.com/news/western_colorado/boebert-answers-three-questions-ahead-of-re-election-bid/article_c34cddb8-4b1a-11ed-8dee-0b6058d3f3f2.html https://www.newsweek.com/glory-god-lauren-boebert-celebrates-overturn-roe-v-wade-1718976Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Bonamici, SuzanneOregon1DCongresswoman Suzanne Bonamici understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy and Environment,' it states, "In Northwest Oregon, we are facing the challenges of our inaction on climate change, whether it be more acidic oceans, rising sea levels, raging wildfires, changing agricultural conditions, and extreme weather events. Climate change and pollution also disproportionately affect our most vulnerable, and we must do more to protect the public of health of our communities. It is past time for Congress and the country to take action and address the growing threat of climate change and protect our environment. The United States has the ability and the obligation to lead the world’s efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and our dependence on fossil fuels, and transition to 100% clean energy. I will continue to work with my colleagues to implement adaptation and mitigation strategies as we fight to take meaningful action on climate change."100100Congresswoman Bonamici has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. During a 2019 Congressional hearing, the Congresswoman questioned Energy Secretary Rick Perry about the Department’s inaction on climate change and efforts to withhold federal funding for clean energy research and development, stating, "Climate change is an existential threat, and it requires the full attention of the federal government.” The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. As a member of the Select Committee on the Climate Crisis, the Congresswoman helped release the committee's climate action plan, stating in a press release, "Our committee was charged with crafting a bold, science-based, comprehensive climate action plan to address the climate crisis and reach net-zero emissions no later than mid-century and net-negative thereafter." We included a focus on the needs of frontline communities, opportunities to accelerate our transition to a 100 percent clean energy economy, and ways to create good-paying jobs." Rep. Bonamici makes climate change a priority issue as well. She is also a cosponsor of the Green New Deal.100Congresswoman Bonamici supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. She voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 7593.75https://bonamici.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://bonamici.house.gov/media/press-releases/bonamici-challenges-energy-secretary-perry-climate-change-clean-energy https://bonamici.house.gov/ClimateActionPlan https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://bonamici.house.gov/media/press-releases/bonamici-condemns-scotus-abortion-decision https://bonamici.house.gov/press-release/congresswoman-bonamici-statement-42nd-anniversary-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Bost, MikeIllinois12RCongressman Mike Bost disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview with St. Louis Public Radio, when the Congressman was asked if he believed in man made climate change, he stated, "I don’t. I don’t know that I do; no... Some scientists do; some scientists don’t."00On the Congressman's, 'Energy,' page, it advocates for the continued development of fossil fuel resources stating, "In addition to new sources of oil and natural gas, the United States also possesses significant quantities of coal, enough to last us for over a hundred years. Southern Illinois contains significant coal deposits. In recent years, new technologies have been developed that make it possible to more efficiently produce energy from this coal with far fewer emissions of pollutants." Congressman Bost demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Bost opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). Congressman Bost also co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).00http://news.stlpublicradio.org/post/illinois-12th-district-contenders-highlight-differences#stream/0 https://bost.house.gov/issues/energy https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/34/cosponsors?r=1&s=1 https://bost.house.gov/2022/5/bost-statement-on-leaked-supreme-court-opinion-on-abortionOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Bowman, Jamaal New York16DCongressman Jamaal Bowman understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a July 2021 press release, Congressman Bowman states "As we deal with a devastating climate crisis caused by decades of unchecked corporate greed, we need to center our children and their future." In a tweet posted in September 2021, the congressman writes "Fossil fuel companies are responsible for the climate crisis that's making it harder for our kids to breathe, causing extreme heat waves, and flooding our neighborhoods. They need to pay up."100100Congressman Jamaal Bowman has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In July 2021, Congressman Bowman "... unveiled the Green New Deal for Public Schools Act..." It "...would make a transformative and unprecedented investment in public school infrastructure by upgrading every public school building in the country, addressing historical harms and inequities by focusing support on high-need schools, and hiring and training hundreds of thousands of additional educators and support staff. If enacted, the legislation would fund 1.3 million jobs per year and eliminate 78 million metric tons of CO2 annually, the equivalent of taking 17 million cars off the road." The congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. On his campaign website, Congressman Bowman writes "The climate crisis is already damaging communities like our own in NY-16 and will require a mass mobilization to combat it. The scale, scope and urgency of this issue surpasses anything we have faced in generations." Congressman Jamaal Bowman makes climate change a top priority issue. In response to a New York Times tweet posted in July 2021, reporting severe flooding in Western Europe, the Congressman Bowman replied saying "We are living through a climate catastrophe. We have to redesign our economy to respond to the current crisis and to ensure it doesn’t get much, much worse. My colleagues in Congress have to understand. We don’t have 30 years. It’s now or never."100Congressman Jamaal Bowman publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. "Representative Jamaal Bowman of New York...have pushed for the [Polluters Pay Climate Act]..." According to a September 2021 'Bloomberg News' article, "The proposed language would require the fossil fuel producers to make payments based on the percentage of their contribution to global greenhouse gas emissions. It would apply to U.S.- based extractors and refiners of fossil fuels, including subsidiaries of foreign-owned companies." Rep. Bowman was not in Congress to vote on a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH))100100https://bowman.house.gov/press-releases?ID=B6D5D80C-356C-4DA9-802D-D8348B2F40AB https://twitter.com/RepBowman/status/1433886594507935759 https://www.bowmanforcongress.com/gnd https://twitter.com/JamaalBowmanNY/status/1416390965904904194 https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-09-03/progressives-push-for-fossil-fuel-firms-to-pay-into-climate-fund https://bowman.house.gov/2022/6/news-rep-jamaal-bowman-s-statement-on-scotus-ruling-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Boyle, BrendanPennsylvania2DCongressman Brendan Boyle understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2019 press release condemning the President's decision to withdraw the U.S. from the Paris Agreement, the Congressman stated, "With record-shattering temperatures and billions of dollars going toward natural disaster relief, the consequences of climate change are clearer than ever. But this is not a problem the United States can solve alone. Our atmosphere is everyone’s atmosphere, and only through international cooperation and compliance with the Paris Climate Agreement can we begin to tackle this monumental threat." Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman's climate change position.100100Congressman Boyle has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. The Congressman included an amendment in the Fiscal Year 2020 Energy and Water Appropriations Act, which would prohibit the Trump administration from rejecting any grant application for using the term “global warming” or the term “climate change” in the application. In a press release on the amendment, the Congressman stated, “At a time when climate change and global warming pose an unparalleled threat to our national security and the safety of the planet, we must fight back against the Trump Administration’s codification of climate change denial." The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. The Congressman discussed the reality of climate change at a 2019 town hall stating, "Climate change is not a hoax. It is a reality. This is a problem that is happening right now.” Rep. Boyle makes climate change a priority issue as well. He demonstrated this by becoming a co-sponsor of the Green New Deal. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.100Congressman Boyle has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). In a 2017 town hall hosted by the Congressman, he stated, "given the political climate in Washington right now, I don't see propositions like carbon fee and dividend legislation, which is supported by advocacy groups like the Citizen’s Climate Lobby, or a carbon tax as realistic accomplishments in the near term." 5087.5https://boyle.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/boyle-amendment-included-landmark-climate-change-legislation-passed https://boyle.house.gov/media-center/in-the-news/boyle-addresses-climate-change-lower-moreland-town-hall https://boyle.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/house-passes-boyle-amendment-counteract-trump-administration-climate https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://boyle.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/boyle-statement-supreme-court-decision-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Brown, ShontelOhio11DShontel Brown understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In an August 2022 tweet, she asserted, "there is no doubt that climate change is real. Acting as if it isn’t, is dangerous and will only harm us. Taking care of our environment is essential for our future because it affects everything we do." Additionally, she's committed to pushing the country toward a future with "net-zero emissions by 2050 and a carbon-free power sector by 2035."100100Congresswoman Shontel Brown has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. She makes climate change a top priority issue and has climate action on her 'Priorities' page on her website, where she wrote, "I support the principles laid out in the Green New Deal and I am committed to aggressive action on climate change." The congresswoman makes prominent public statements on the issue. She's posted many tweets calling for climate action and provided amicus briefs defending the EPA's authority earlier this year.100Shontel Brown has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5087.5https://twitter.com/RepShontelBrown/status/1554482793547272196 https://shontelbrown.com/priorities/ https://www.markey.senate.gov/news/press-releases/senator-markey-joins-190-congressional-democrats-in-amicus-brief-defending-epas-clean-air-act-authority https://shontelbrown.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-brown-statement-supreme-court-decision-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoeN/AN/AN/AN/APro ClimateN/APro Climate
Brownley, JuliaCalifornia26DCongresswoman Julia Brownley understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her official 'Environment' page, Congresswoman Brownley states, "We must take meaningful steps to fight climate change, which threatens Ventura County’s economic productivity, public health, and the environment. As a member of the Select Committee on the Climate Crisis, I support strategic investments in clean, renewable, and sustainable energy to counterbalance the effects of climate change on our economy and in our communities." 100100Congresswoman Brownley does not oppose climate action. She has been vocal in defense of the environment. In response to the 2022 SCOTUS ruling on 'West Virginia v. EPA,' she states, "Today’s ruling not only jeopardizes our nation’s goals and our international goals to combat the climate crisis, but it puts the health of every American at risk. It will also compound the devastating economic consequences of the greenhouse gas-induced climate crisis, which has already led to increasingly common wildfires, floods, coastal erosion, and other weather-related disasters. Something we’ve been impacted by, repeatedly, in my district." However, her strategy to tackling energy dependence is not very climate-friendly. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "I support an all-of-the-above approach to solving our energy needs. While our nation is overly dependent on fossil fuels, we need to look at new technologies that support the development and expansion of clean, renewable, alternative energy resources, like wind, biomass, and solar. Reducing our reliance on foreign oil will have multiple benefits for our national security, our environment, and will help to create and sustain good jobs in new high-tech sectors." An 'all of the above' strategy also encompasses expanding domestic production of fossil fuels/oil. This is not environmentally sustainable, nor is it productive to reaching zero carbon emissions.25Congresswoman Brownley supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. In a 2019 town hall, Brownley suggested that carbon fees were on the table but did not take a strong position one way or the other. She voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH))7575https://juliabrownley.house.gov/issues/environment/ https://juliabrownley.house.gov/brownley-statement-on-supreme-court-decision-on-west-virginia-v-environmental-protection-agency/ https://juliabrownley.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment/ https://www.vcstar.com/story/opinion/editorials/2019/11/18/carbon-tax-table/4207913002/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://juliabrownley.house.gov/brownley-statement-on-supreme-court-decision-to-overturn-roe-v-wade/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Buchanan, VernFlorida16RCongressman Vern Buchanan does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250He advocated on behalf of the Paris Agreement. In a 2019 tweet, supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), Congressman Buchanan stated, "Moments ago I voted for legislation to keep the United States part of the international Paris Climate Accord. Global warming is a serious threat - especially to a state like #Florida with two coastlines vulnerable to rising waters. #Sayfie." Congressman Buchanan does not oppose climate action. 25Congressman Buchanan opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 2518.75https://buchanan.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/buchanan-urges-trump-reconsider-climate-accord https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://twitter.com/VernBuchanan/status/1540364317161308160?ref_src=twsrc%5EtfwOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Buck, KenColorado4RCongressman Ken Buck disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2016 floor speech, the Congressman offered an amendment Department of Defense Appropriations Act, prohibiting funds from being used to implement the President's Directive 4715.21, which requires the military to incorporate climate change into everything they do. In his speech the Congressman stated, "Climate change adaptation and resilience would force our military to incorporate climate change and everything they do. From combat operations to preparedness to training. Climate change would become one of our nation's greatest enemies. When our nation is under attack generals in the war room and officers in the field need to be focused on winning the battle, not limiting their carbon footprint. Our national security has already been impacted by the thinking behind this directive."00In a 2019 tweet, Congressman Buck stated, "I’m glad to see @EPA move forward w/critical, commonsense reforms to reduce burdensome regulations on the oil and gas industry. This is a huge win for CO and I look forward to seeing the industry continue their work to reduce methane emissions. #oilandgas." Congressman Buck demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Buck makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). In a press release in support of a 2016 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise of the same name, the Congressman stated, “It’s not OK to implement a radical green energy agenda on the backs of the American people.”00https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JE6wP6Rv6wA https://twitter.com/repkenbuck/status/1167190277712470021 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://buck.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/ken-buck-supports-american-families-who-rely-affordable-energy https://buck.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/buck-celebrates-historic-reversal-roe-v-wadeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Bucshon, LarryIndiana8RThe Congressman disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a House Science, Space, and Technology Committee hearing on President Obama's Climate Action Plan, the Congressman stated, “Over the last few years, we’ve gone from global warming to climate change since the temperature hasn’t changed in many, many years. The temperature or the earth has been changing for centuries. I fully believe that the temperature is changing. But of course now supporters of this new regulation are saying ‘Well, it’s changing now at an unusual pace compared to the past, because now the American public is getting it that the temperature of the earth has been changing for centuries.” According to a press release on President Obama's war on coal, it states that, "Only 20 percent of CO2 emissions are produced in the United States. Bucshon stressed that while he does believe the Earth’s climate is changing, he believes it is minimally affected by human CO2 production and is a normal temperature variation consistent with past periods of climate changes. In fact, studies have shown a recent stagnation in warming temperatures." 00In a 2017 press release supporting President Trump's withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, he stated, "While we can all agree that we should continually work to minimize our impact on the environment through innovation and technology, this flawed deal is unfair to American workers and puts our country at an economic disadvantage to the benefit of countries like China, Iran, and India. Estimates show the agreement could cost 6.5 million American jobs and devastate areas like Southern Indiana where families rely on the coal industry. Not to mention, we were committed to this agreement – what should be considered a treaty – unilaterally by President Obama, without the advice and consent of the Senate.” The Congressman also opposed the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), stating in a 2019 press release, "Climate change is an issue that needs to be addressed. However, Democrats are using climate change as a political tool to strengthen Washington’s control of the economy and consumer choice, without any guarantees of actually reducing emissions, which is why I cannot support this legislation." Congressman Bucshon demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Bucshon opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 256.25https://thinkprogress.org/congressman-dont-trust-climate-scientists-they-re-in-it-for-the-money-4280ba3bf981/ https://bucshon.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=481 https://bucshon.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=225 https://bucshon.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=3439 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://bucshon.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=4278Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Burchett, TimTennessee2RThe Congressman disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2018 Tweet, the Congressman, referencing a snow storm, wrote, "Al Gore needs to scrape my dadgum windshield." Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change position.00Congressman Burchett demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Burchett has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5012.5https://twitter.com/timburchett/status/949267790049042432?lang=en https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://burchett.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-burchett-discusses-roe-v-wade-overturn-susan-b-anthony-pro-life-americaOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Burgess, MichaelTexas26RCongressman Michael Burgess agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to the Congressman's website, Burgess states, “The United States proves every day that we can walk and chew gum at the same time. In other words, we can do a whole host of things well every day. That should be our approach to climate change. There is no reason that we cannot confront climate change while boosting our economy and promoting energy security at the same time.”500On Congressman Burgess's, 'Energy,' page, it states, "The United States has vast supplies of domestic energy that should be explored. Today, the US imports nearly 60% of its oil, and most comes from the Middle East and politically unstable nations. I believe that energy exploration in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Reserve (ANWR) and the Outer Continental Shelf is an important component of comprehensive energy legislation." Congressman Burgess demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.0Congressman Burgess opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 2518.75https://burgess.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=636 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://burgess.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=403535Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Bush, CoriMissouri1DCongresswoman Cori Bush understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a tweet posted in 2020, Congresswoman Bush writes "Climate change does not belong on a list with Santa Claus, ghosts, and the tooth fairy. It's not just something you can 'choose' to believe exists." On her campaign website, the Congresswoman Bush states, "As your Congresswoman, I will: Support transformation of our energy systems to 100% renewable energy. Commit to the #NoFossilFuelMoney pledge. Rebuild & reform the Environmental Protection Agency."100100Congresswoman Cori Bush has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. According to an April 2021 press release "Congresswoman Cori Bush (MO-01) and Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY-14) announced the introduction of the Green New Deal for Cities Act of 2021, legislation that would federally fund city, state, local, tribal, and territorial governments to respond to the climate crisis, creating hundreds of thousands of jobs in the process." Congresswoman Bush also makes prominent public statements on the issue. During a webinar "hosted by the University of Missouri–St. Louis and Washington University in St. Louis," in April 2021, "She argued for the United States to transition to 100 percent renewable energy by the end of this decade." The congresswoman makes climate change a top priority issue. In a tweet posted in July 2021, Congresswoman Cori Bush writes, "We urgently need a climate, infrastructure, and jobs plan. But the bipartisan deal isn’t it and isn’t close. We need hundreds of billions for local climate projects, renewable energy, green transit, schools, and housing. This is our opportunity. We cannot afford to waste it."100Congresswoman Cori Bush has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5087.5https://twitter.com/coribush/status/1316795189521002498?lang=en https://coribush.org/environmental-justice-and-the-green-new-deal https://bush.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswomen-cori-bush-and-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-introduce-green-new-deal https://blogs.umsl.edu/news/2021/04/12/cori-bush-solve-climate-by-2030/ https://twitter.com/CoriBush/status/1420918571446714371 https://bush.house.gov/media/press-releases/statement-on-the-us-supreme-courts-decision-to-overturn-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Calvert, KenCalifornia41RThe Congressman does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels, but according to 'Vice,' he "[v]oted in support of the Energy Tax Prevention Act of 2011 (H.R. 910), which relied on climate change denial to prohibit the Environmental Protection Agency from regulating greenhouse gas emissions—additionally excluding carbon dioxide from the definition of "air pollutant"—as a means to prevent further global warming and harm to human health."00In a press release on the Green New Deal the Congressman stated, "Socialism disguised as radical environmentalism is still socialism. As Democrats admit, the Green New Deal seeks a ‘massive transformation’ of America... It would end air travel, force every homeowner to retrofit or tear down their home, and make small businesses plow any revenues into upgrading their stores. It even would kick us out of our cars, unless of course, you could afford an electric vehicle." Congressman Calvert demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Calvert makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). In a 2019 press release opposing the Green New Deal, the Congressman stated, "The only conceivable way to fund the Democrat’s Green New Deal government-state is through tax increases on all Americans, including the middle-class. Green New Deal supporters acknowledge it will likely require a carbon tax and that even if they took the revenues of every billionaire and business in the country, it would not be sufficient to fund the plan." 00https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/d7yekv/climate-deniers-congress-california https://calvert.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://calvert.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-calvert-statement-green-new-deal https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://calvert.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-calvert-statement-dobbs-v-jackson-women-s-health-organization-rulingOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Cammack, Kat Florida3RCongresswoman Kat Cammack does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250On her campaign website, Congresswoman Kat Cammack states "I strongly support an 'all of the above' energy policy. Everything from the development of oil, liquid natural gas, clean coal, and other fossil fuels as well as alternative energy sources such as wind, solar, hydro-power, nuclear, geothermal, and biomass must be on the table." However, Congresswoman Cammack expressed in a 2021 tweet that "Re-entering the Paris Climate Accords undermines our economic growth and competitiveness with strict requirements, giving the upper hand to the #CCP who get off with just a warning." Congresswoman Kat Cammack demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congresswoman Kat Cammack has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5018.75https://www.katforcongress.com/policy https://mobile.twitter.com/repkatcammack/status/1352073882405113859?lang=ar-x-fmOpposes RoeN/AN/AN/AN/AAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Carbajal, SaludCalifornia24DCongressman Salud Carbajal understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "Having raised my children on the Central Coast, I understand the importance that environmental preservation and energy efficiency has for our community. The Central Coast is already experiencing major climate change impacts like wildfires and drought. We can save lives, property, and money when we work to proactively mitigate these increasingly destructive events. I believe we cannot afford inaction on the most significant challenge of our time."100100Congressman Carbajal has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. In 2018 the Congressman introduced the, Climate Change is Real Act (H.R.5552) which would have required EPA to reinstate the information about climate change that was removed from, or redacted on, the EPA's website during the period beginning on January 20, 2017." The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release introducing the Coastal State Climate Preparedness Act (H.R. 3541), the Congressman stated, “Climate change is real and we cannot wait another minute to tackle the problem from every angle. My Coastal State Climate Preparedness Act will help communities across the nation, especially ones like our Central Coast, that are vulnerable to climate disasters and need more help on the front lines of this crisis." Rep Carbajal makes climate change a top priority issue. From a June 2020 press release, "On Tuesday, the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis unveiled a comprehensive congressional climate action framework, which includes two of Congressman Carbajal’s bills: H.R. 2470, the Clean Water Infrastructure Resilience and Sustainability Act and H.R. 2199, the Central Coast Heritage Protection Act.The Clean Water Infrastructure Resilience and Sustainability Act, establishes a competitive funding program at the Environmental Protection Agency for the development of innovative water-related infrastructure projects built with the threats of climate change in mind.In addition, the Central Coast Heritage Protection Act designates four new wilderness areas in the Carrizo Plain National Monument and expands nine existing wilderness areas in Los Padres National Forest. The wilderness designation is the highest form of protection the government can give to a public land and would prohibit any commercial development on the land, including oil and gas drilling."100Congressman Carbajal publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. Rep. Carbajal is also a co-sponsor of the 'MARKET CHOICE Act' (H.R.4520), legislation that intends to "(impose) a tax on the greenhouse gas emissions of fossil fuels, certain industrial processes, and certain product uses." He voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).100100https://carbajal.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=15122 https://carbajal.house.gov/district/climate-change-is-real-act.htm https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/5552?s=1&r=3 https://carbajal.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=683 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4520/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://carbajal.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1190Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Cárdenas, TonyCalifornia29DCongressman Tony Cárdenas understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's 'Environment and Climate Change page,' it states, "We've witnessed the devastating effects of climate change from the raging wildfires right here in California to the frequent hurricanes ravaging our coasts. We can and must do more to address the climate crisis now before the damage becomes irreversible. As a member of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Tony has dedicated much of his time in Congress to finding solutions to the climate crisis. From his early days in the California State Assembly and the Los Angeles City Council, Tony has never stopped advocating and pushing for cleaner air, safe drinking water, and renewable energy."100100Congressman Cárdenas has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. In a 2020 press release supporting the House Climate Crisis Action Plan (which highlighted two of the Congressman's bills that encourage clean energy investment), the Congressman stated, "Climate change is an existential threat to America’s economic prosperity and national security that cannot be ignored. We have witnessed the devastating effects of climate change. From the raging wildfires in my home state of California to the frequent hurricanes ravaging our coasts. We need a bold, holistic approach to tackle climate change." The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release on his opposition to NAFTA 2.0, the Congressman stated, "There was not a single mention of climate change in the text of the bill. As Democrats who are unified in our commitment to combat the growing climate crisis, it is unfortunate the final text of the bill omitted any mention of climate change." Rep. Cárdenas makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2019 press release condemning President Trump's decision to revoke California’s power to enforce emissions standards, the Congressman stated, "We are witnessing the devastating effects of climate change before our eyes; the Amazon is on fire, the hottest summer in recorded history, and frequent hurricanes ravage the coasts. The longer we wait, the more difficult it will be to reverse the effects of climate change. This is a very real threat to America’s security and economy."100Congressman Cárdenas publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. He was not in Congress to vote on a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)). 100100https://cardenas.house.gov/issues/environment-and-climate-change https://cardenas.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/house-climate-crisis-action-plan-highlights-c-rdenas-bills https://cardenas.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/c-rdenas-statement-opposing-nafta-20 https://cardenas.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/c-rdenas-statement-trump-decision-revoke-california-s-power-enforce https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://cardenas.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/cardenas-statement-on-supreme-court-decision-to-overturn-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Carey, MikeOhio15RMike Carey does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Mike Carey demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. He supports an all of the above solution, as evidenced on his campaign website where he states, "We must invest in new fossil fuel technologies as well as renewables because we need more electricity to run a 21st century economy, not less." Additionally, it says on his website, "Mike is fighting for American energy independence by co-sponsoring bills such as the Powering America Through Domestic Energy Act and the Keystone XL Pipeline Construction and Jobs Preservation Act."0Mike Carey has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5018.75https://www.careyforcongress.com/issues Opposes RoeN/AN/AN/AN/AAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
Carl, JerryAlabama1RCongressman Jerry Carl disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. During a debate in 2020 as a congressional candidate, Carl claimed climate change to be a "huge hoax."00In a tweet posted in September 2021, Congressman Jerry Carl wrote "...Democrats are pushing Green New Deal climate policies which will drive gas prices even higher. I’m in a @NatResources meeting today fighting back against this nonsense." Congressman Carl demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Jerry Carl has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5012.5https://carl.house.gov/issues https://www.al.com/politics/2020/01/republican-congressional-candidates-differ-on-i-10-financing-during-debate.html https://twitter.com/RepJerryCarl/status/1433458524391100420?s=20 https://carl.house.gov/media/press-releases/ccarl-issues-statement-leaked-supreme-court-decision-roe-v-wadeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/A
Carson, AndréIndiana7DThe Congressman understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In an interview with Fox 59, condemning President Trump's decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement, the Congressman stated, "I am deeply disappointed... It's disappointing because we have seen rising tides, globally... And next to China, America has the highest emission rates. So for us not to be an active player along with our global partners in addressing this issue is deeply disappointing." Climate change is not listed under the 'Issues' section of his website. Even on his 'Energy' page, there is no mention of the issue.75100Congressman Carson in a 2019 Facebook post supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9) the Congressman stated, "America has a moral obligation to lead on the global effort to stop #ClimateChange, which is harming our environment, our economy and public health in Indiana, across America and around the world -- particularly in low-income communities bearing the brunt of its negative effects. That's why it's imperative we pass H.R. 9, which helps create a clean energy economy that provides good-paying jobs, cleaner air for our children and a safer climate for future generations. I'll proudly vote for it when it comes to the House floor this week. #ClimateActionNow." Despite this, the Congressman does not mention climate change on his energy page. Congressman Carson website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congressman Carson publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. He voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). The Congressman co-sponsored the 2017 version of the America Wins Act (H.R. 4209), which would impose an excise tax on the carbon dioxide content of coal, petroleum, and petroleum products, but did not co-sponsor the 2019 version of the bill. 10087.5http://fox59.com/2017/06/04/in-focus-carson-on-climate-change-comey-hearing-next-week/ https://www.facebook.com/CongressmanAndreCarson/posts/america-has-a-moral-obligation-to-lead-on-the-global-effort-to-stop-climatechang/2395588163793613/ https://carson.house.gov/issues/energy https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/4209 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22party%22%3A%22all%22%7D https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/4209/cosponsors?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22John+Larson%22%5D%7D https://carson.house.gov/issues/womens-issuesSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Carter, BuddyGeorgia1RCongressman Buddy Carter understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a 2019 interview with Savannah Now on the Congressman's appointment to the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis, the Congressman said that he recognized humans contributed to climate change stating, "Yes I do... I do recognize that industrial activity is contributing to climate change... Regardless if it is mostly [caused by humans] or not, it has to be addressed." The Congressman also responded in the affirmative when asked if he thought it was a climate crisis, stating, "I believed there is [a climate crisis]." 750In a 2019 press release announcing his appointment to the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis, the Congressman stated, "Climate change is real and the need to protect our environment is real. We must find solutions to address this problem. I wanted to join this special committee because as the representative of the entire coast of Georgia, I know firsthand the need to protect our environment and do all that we can to prepare for severe weather. Unfortunately, many proposals coming out of Congress right now are big government solutions that are job-killing, too expensive, not actually effective and even completely unfeasible. I'm a member of this committee because I want to work with my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to create solutions to address climate change that are realistic, market-based and will actually have an impact on climate change. We should also be focusing on proposals that will create American jobs instead of killing them. I'm ready to get to work." In a 2019 CSPAN interview on climate change the Congressman stated, "I subscribe to an all of the above energy strategy... There is no question we will have to use fossil fuels until we can get to the point where we are totally reliable and we can rely on renewables, but we are not at that point... The fossil fuel sector has done a great job of cleaning it up. It is not nearly as bad as it used to be." Congressman Carter does not oppose climate action. 25Congressman Carter opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 2531.25https://www.savannahnow.com/news/20190304/georgia-congressman-buddy-carter-all-in-on-addressing-climate-change https://buddycarter.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=3844 https://www.c-span.org/video/?461834-4/washington-journal-rep-buddy-carter-r-ga-discusses-trump-administration-climate-amp-carbon https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://buddycarter.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=14891Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
Carter, JohnTexas31RCongressman John Carter disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an op-ed titled, "The Return of the Warmers," he states, "They were thoroughly discredited just last year in the international "Climategate" scandal. The United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and their pals from the East Anglia Climatic Research Unit in Great Britain were caught red-handed, through their own email communications, to have intentionally falsified the scientific data on which they claim that human activity is a leading cause of global warming. Further, they were found to have hidden their own research results that showed world temperature not rising, but actually falling over the past several years. The truth they tried to conceal from the world is that global temperature fluctuations are a normal earth cycle. We may or may not even be in a warming cycle. Even if we are, scientific evidence does not conclude that activity by man plays any significant role. The reason for the lies is because the goal of these people is not to protect the environment, it is to implement a socialistic one-world government that has dictatorial control over every human activity, led by tyrannical liberal elites." Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change position.00On Congressman Carter's, 'Energy,' page, it states, "I believe in an 'all of the above' energy strategy...while maximizing our use of domestic fossil fuels (coal, oil, and natural gas) that will allow us to plan for our future needs while providing enough energy for today. While doing this we must also unlock new oil supplies. As US oil prices decrease, I will continue to fight against per-barrel or at-pump taxes that hit Texans in their wallets. These proposals negatively affect successful free markets and continue a trend that promotes the flawed notion that the federal government knows how to spend your money better than you." Congressman Carter demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.0Congressman Carter opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 256.25https://carter.house.gov/opeds/the-return-of-the-warmers/ https://carter.house.gov/energy/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://carter.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=14897Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Carter, TroyLouisiana2DTroy Carter supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. There is no mention of climate change anywhere on his campaign website. However, he "embraced Biden’s priorities on addressing climate change and pledged not to accept money from oil and gas interests."50100Congressman Carter supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. He has voted for many significant pieces of climate legislation, but does not display leadership by pushing for more climate action. Additionally, although he pledged to not take any money from oil and gas special interest groups, he "accepted $19,150 from oil and gas interests despite a campaign pledge to shun the industry's money, a national environmental nonprofit says."50Congressman Carter has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5062.5https://troycarter4congress.com/ https://www.nola.com/news/environment/article_47d6257a-8e6c-11eb-8bfe-bbef118f6a3b.html https://www.nola.com/news/environment/article_f6dea29e-a209-11eb-aacc-374672a77988.html https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9FoyhN56kwSupports RoeN/AN/APro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Cartwright, MatthewPennsylvania8DCongressman Matt Cartwright understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. The Congressman's website's 'Energy and Environment' page states, "He believes in utilizing domestic resources in an environmentally responsible manner, finding newer, better uses for older forms of energy production, and investing in sustainable clean energy technologies to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions." On his website, Congressman Cartwright also states, “Climate change is going to fundamentally alter our lives in the coming decades, and scientists agree that it is one of the biggest threats this country faces. It is a real risk, but also an opportunity to create jobs and plan for the future."100100In 2019, the Congressman introduced Climate Change Health Protection and Promotion Act (H.R. 1243), which would develop a plan to identify and support the nation’s most vulnerable communities, while enhancing long-term research into the effects of climate change on the health of everyday Americans. In 2017 the Congressman also helped introduce the Safeguarding America’s Future and Environment (SAFE) Act (H.R. 2478), which would establish an integrated national approach to ongoing and expected effects of extreme weather and climate change. Despite this the Congressman does not mention climate change on his, 'Energy and Environment,' page and calls for an, "all-of-the-above” approach to investing in American energy." Congressman Cartwright's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.75Congressman Cartwright publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 763). This bill would put a $15 per metric ton price on carbon emissions. He also voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 10093.75https://cartwright.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://cartwright.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=391678 https://cartwright.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-cartwright-and-sen-markey-introduce-bill-to-prepare-for-health-0 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/1243 https://cartwright.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/cartwright-whitehouse-introduce-bill-to-protect-natural-resources-from https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://cartwright.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=392133Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Case, EdHawaii1DCongressman Ed Case understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "Protecting our environment is one of my top priorities. As Hawai`i and the rest of the planet face the impacts of climate change, I believe we must take the full range of action to protect our natural heritage and ensure it will survive and prosper for generations to come."100100According to Court House News, during a Congressional hearing on the Green New Deal, Congressman Case discussed the transition from coal to renewables stating, "If the majority of Congress enacts policies that are purposefully designed to move us toward renewable energy at the expense of coal, and there is a tremendous consequence to those businesses and communities, the question is, how do we best transition them.” Congressman Case's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Rep Case has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5081.25https://case.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=14893 https://www.courthousenews.com/green-new-deal-drives-a-wedge-at-house-energy-hearing/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://case.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=909Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Casten, SeanIllinois6DCongressman Sean Casten understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Climate Change,' page, it states, "A former CEO of a clean energy company, Representative Casten has worked throughout his career to reduce greenhouse gas emissions profitably. In Congress, he is continuing this mission. The cost of inaction is enormous, but Representative Casten recognizes that addressing climate change is an opportunity to invest in the energy infrastructure of tomorrow, making our businesses more productive and our economy more competitive globally. "100100Congressman Casten has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a press release co-sponsoring the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), the Congressman stated, "Climate change is the greatest existential threat to our species. It is also an unequivocal economic opportunity." The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2020 article in the Northwest Herald, the Congressman stated, "The reason I’m in this job is because I am deeply concerned about climate change and the fact that that was a priority in my prior professional career, doesn’t mean it stops being a priority once I got into this line of work.” Congressman Casten makes climate change a top priority issue. Rep. Casten, along with Congressman Mike Doyle, announced the 'Industrial Efficiency Incentive Act,' legislation that will not only "reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the industrial sector and maximize the energy efficiency of industrial facilities in the United States, but it will also make these facilities more financially viable and lower their energy costs."100The Congressman has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. In a 2019 tweet, on market mechanisms for reducing carbon emissions, the Congressman stated, "True, but important to note that an INCENTIVE [cap and trade] to reduce carbon is not the same as a PENALTY [carbon fee] to emit it. The incentive is much more important than the penalty and they are decidedly not equivalent, no matter how many academic economists may tell you otherwise." Rep. Casten was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5087.5https://casten.house.gov/issues/climate-change https://casten.house.gov/media/in-the-news/rep-casten-discusses-his-work-combat-climate-change-state-issues https://casten.house.gov/media/press-releases/following-passage-hr-9-casten-delivers-floor-speech-demanding-continued-climate https://casten.house.gov/media/press-releases/representatives-casten-and-doyle-introduce-legislation-make-us-industry https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4230 https://twitter.com/SeanCasten/status/1090291212106559491 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://casten.house.gov/media/press-releases/casten-responds-draft-scotus-opinion-overturning-roe-v-wade-headlines-445pm-ctSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Castor, KathyFlorida14DCongresswoman Kathy Castor understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2021 article published by the Guardian, regarding climate change, Congresswoman Castor states, 'We just don’t have any more time to waste,” the Florida congresswoman said in an interview with the Guardian ahead of crucial UN climate talks in Scotland. “We have got to act now or else we’re condemning our children and future generations to a really horrendous time.'”100100Congresswoman Castor has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. The Congresswoman introduced the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), stating in a 2019 press release, "Speaking as a Floridian who boarded up and fled my home with my family as Hurricane Irma spun its destructive winds and storm surge towards my hometown a year and a half ago, I understand we must act with urgency on the climate crisis.” The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. As the Chairwoman of the Select Committee on the Climate Crisis, she released the "Solving the Climate Crisis” plan, stating in a 2020 WMNF article, "We are releasing a transformative roadmap for solving the climate crisis. We have a plan for building the 100% clean energy economy. And we are going to do it in an equitable and inclusive way. Our task is urgent. The last five years are the hottest on record. And it’s getting hotter." Rep. Castor makes climate change a top priority issue. During 2019 Hispanic Heritage Month, the Congresswoman rallied with the Sierra Club, Green Latinos, and Mom's Clean Task Force, stating, "Combating climate change means enacting solutions that work for all of us. Those who are most impacted by our rapidly changing climate are our frontline communities who can’t afford flood insurance, families who can’t pay higher electric bills or those who don’t have places to turn when disaster strikes." 100Congresswoman Castor supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. She voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119).7593.75https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/oct/21/kathy-castor-interview-climate-crisis-democrats https://castor.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=398936 https://www.wmnf.org/kathy-castor-announces-solving-the-climate-crisis-plan/ https://castor.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=403085 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://castor.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=403900Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Castro, JoaquinTexas20DCongressman Joaquin Castro understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2019 press release celebrating Earth Day, the Chair of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, said, "As we mark this Earth Day, I am hopeful of a better future for our children. While the Trump Administration has abdicated our global leadership on climate issues and rolled back critical environmental protections, local leaders and everyday Americans are doing their part to fight climate change and protect our land and water. Hispanic families and communities of color – who are disproportionately impacted by pollution and climate change – are working to combat environmental injustice and ensure their children can live healthy lives away from pollution...The time to act is now." In a 2021 'Twitter' post, the Congressman stated, "Climate change is the defining crisis of our time — and its disruptive impacts are displacing people worldwide.”100100Congressman Castro’s website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.75Congressman Castro supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. The Congressman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 7587.5https://castro.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/chc-chairman-castro-statement-on-earth-day https://twitter.com/joaquincastrotx/status/1385294050534694916?lang=bg https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://castro.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/statement-from-congressman-castro-on-the-supreme-courts-abortion-decision-in-dobbs-v-jackson-womens-health-organizationSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Chabot, SteveOhio1RCongressman Steve Chabot disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 204 article in The Enquirer, the Congressman was quoted making this statement on climate change. "Despite claims to the contrary, the evidence concerning man-made climate change is far from conclusive. However, what is conclusive is the damage some of the more extreme proposals intended to address climate change, like cap-and-trade, will have on our economy."00In a 2019 blog post condemning the green New Deal on the Congressman's campaign website, it states, "I’d like to focus this week’s blog on one of the Democrats’ worst ideas in a long time – the so-called Green New Deal. It’s the brainchild of the new proudly-socialist congresswoman from New York, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. She’s the youngest, least-experienced woman to ever be elected to Congress. But from the bated breath coverage she’s been getting from the mainstream press, she’s apparently smarter than all the rest of us... That’s pretty much what the Green New Deal is – even bigger government than we already have, a series of far-left proposals, and massive tax increases to pay for it all (well actually to pay for some of it, with the unpaid-for-parts just driving up our already staggering national debt.)" Congressman Chabot demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Chabot opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119).256.25https://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/politics/2014/10/11/climate-can-debate-forever/17137787/ https://stevechabot.com/blog/what-the-heck-is-a-green-new-deal/ https://chabot.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=106688 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://chabot.house.gov/uploadedfiles/steve_chabot_on_the_right_to_life.pdfOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Cheney, LizWyoming1RCongresswoman Cheney disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2016 interview with KOWB, the Congresswoman made the following statement on climate science. "I think that [the federal government's] assertions about climate change are based on junk science. But even if you agree with what they are saying, the administration itself admits that the steps it's taking to kill our coal industry will have little or no impact overall on global temperatures." Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congresswoman’s climate change position.00In a 2017 article by WyoFile, the Congresswoman was quoted stating that climate change was not a serious threat to our national security stating, "We have heard testimony in front of this committee consistently about the array of imminent threats we face … the Russians, Chinese, ISIS, al Qaeda, Iran, North Korea. … There is simply no way that you can argue that climate change is one of those threats. Not even close. There is no evidence that climate change causes war.” On her campaign website, Congresswoman Cheny states, "Liz’s family’s involvement in the Wyoming energy industry reaches back a hundred years. Her great-grandfather began working in the Salt Creek Oil Fields in the early 20th century. Her grandmother and her siblings were raised there in a hard-sided tent on the edge of the oil fields. She has seen the cycles of boom and bust that have long characterized Wyoming’s energy economy. But today we are living through something altogether different – we are seeing an assault from Washington on our nation’s vital fossil fuels industry. With no regard for our economy, our security, or our livelihoods, the Biden/Harris Administration is determined to kill the fossil fuel industry at any cost." Congresswoman Cheney demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congresswoman’s climate change leadership.0Congresswoman Cheney opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congresswoman’s climate change position on a fee on carbon.256.25http://kowb1290.com/cheney-climate-change-assertions-based-on-junk-science/ https://cheneyforwyoming.com/advancing-wyoming-energy-production/ https://www.wyofile.com/cheney-chooses-climate-politics-military-preparedness/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.politico.com/minutes/congress/06-24-2022/cheney-dichotomy/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Cherfilus-McCormick, SheilaFlorida20DCongresswoman Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. During her 2022 Democratic Primary, Congresswoman Cherfilus-McCormick demonstrated her support for climate action as she worked for "$100 million into the South Florida market to make sure that, not only are we moving towards environmental resiliency, which is building more infrastructure for our waterways and building more infrastructure when it comes to emissions."10083Congresswoman Cherfilus-McCormick has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. On August 1, 2022, Congresswoman Cherfilus-McCormick received Vice-President Kamala Harris in Miami along with other local Floridian representatives, and called for "prioritizing the well-being of people and communities most exposed to climate harm and least able to cope with it." She makes prominent public statements on the issue.In a 2020 Q&A with the South Florida Sun Sentinel, voiced her strong support for the Green New Deal, and described her home state of Florida as "America's ground zero for climate change" due to its unique risk to rising sea levels. The Congresswoman makes climate change a top priority issue. In voting for government funding legislation (H.R. 2471), the congresswoman emphasized the importance of combating the "existential threat of climate change through a renewed focus on environmental enforcement, pioneering funding for environmental justice, and historic investments in clean energy and climate science". 100 Congresswoman Cherfilus-McCormick has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5083.25https://wsvn.com/news/politics/democratic-primary-for-floridas-district-20-again-pits-cherfilus-mccormick-against-holness/ https://www.miamitimesonline.com/news/local/veep-harris-visits-miami/article_88b960e4-130d-11ed-b7b0-5bd51bed8cc1.html https://cherfilus-mccormick.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-sheila-cherfilus-mccormick-votes-pass-omnibus-appropriations https://www.sun-sentinel.com/opinion/commentary/fl-op-com-questionnaire-sheila-mccormick-20200622-f23fbeyofvcjhkdx4t2rceaauu-story.html Since member was not in Congress for votes in 2022, the vote score was imputed using the average of position, leadership and fee on carbon score.Supports RoeN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Chu, Judy California28DCongresswoman Judy Chu understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her energy and environment page, she states, "Our economy is inextricably intertwined with our long-term energy and conservation strategies. By investing in renewable energy and protecting our natural wonders, we can address climate change while modernizing our economy. I am committed to taking aggressive action to reverse the effects of climate change. That is why I am committed to reducing our reliance on fossil fuels, promoting policies that keep our air and water clean, supporting a marketplace where green energy technologies and jobs can thrive, protecting our environment through conservation, and connecting communities to the outdoors."100100Congresswoman Chu has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. She is a co-sponsor of the 'Climate Action Now Act' (H.R. 9), legislation that "requires the President to develop and update annually a plan for the United States to meet its nationally determined contribution under the Paris Agreement on climate change." The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on climate change. In a 2019 press release introducing the Climate Resiliency Service Corps Act of 2019 (H.R. 5176) to establish a new AmeriCorps program to promote community adaptation, mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery from the effects of climate change, the Congresswoman stated, "Climate change is a national threat, affecting every region of the country. And it is one that demands immediate action." Rep. Chu makes climate change a top priority issue as well. According to a press release, "Today, Representatives Judy Chu (CA-27) and Jimmy Panetta (CA-20) introduced the National Climate Service Corps and Careers Network Act of 2021 to create a National Climate Service Corps within AmeriCorps. The corps would allow Americans to serve their communities through public service projects focused on community adaptation, mitigation, and resiliency."100Congresswoman Chu publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman/woman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. She voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).100100https://chu.house.gov/taxonomy/issues/energy https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/9/cosponsors https://chu.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-chu-bill-would-establish-americorps-program-address-climate-change https://chu.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-judy-chu-introduces-legislation-create-national-climate-service https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://chu.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-chu-s-statement-her-arrest-following-protests-decision-overturn-roeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Cicilline, DavidRhode Island1DCongressman David Cicilline understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "David is fighting to address climate change, and the undeniable science that tells us carbon pollution is threatening the health of our environment and the public. David knows that to protect Rhode Island’s air, water, and other natural resources today and years into the future, we need to end our reliance on the fossil fuels that pollute and degrade our ecosystem."100100Congressman Cicilline has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 press release endorsing the Green New Deal, the Congressman stated, "This is a 10-year plan that we can achieve if we come together to rise to this challenge and finally address the threat of climate change.” Rep. Cicilline also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release, supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), the Congressman stated, "We can’t afford to ignore it – especially in Rhode Island. If climate change continues, it will devastate our fishing and tourism industries, which support nearly 90,000 Rhode Island jobs and more than $7 billion in economic activity for our state each year.” Congressman Cicilline makes climate change a top priority issue. According to The Brown Daily Herald, in 2018 the Congressman joined Senator Sheldon Whitehouse in visiting the Climate Development Lab at the Urban Environmental Lab, in an attempt to elevate the work the lab was conducting. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.100Congressman Cicilline publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. In a 2018 press release reintroducing The American Opportunity Carbon Fee Act (H.R. 4926), Rep. Cicilline stated, "It is time for polluters to pay their fair share. We cannot simply continue to ignore the overwhelming science that climate change is happening and presents a serious threat to our national security, our economy and the health and well-being of millions of Americans. The federal government should not be in the business of subsidizing carbon pollution, and I applaud Senator Whitehouse and Senator Schatz for their leadership on this important legislation.” The Congressman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 100100https://www.cicilline.com/energy-and-environment https://cicilline.house.gov/press-release/cicilline-statement-introduction-green-new-deal https://cicilline.house.gov/press-release/cicilline-statement-passage-climate-action-now-act https://www.browndailyherald.com/2018/12/04/whitehouse-cicilline-meet-climate-lab/ https://cicilline.house.gov/press-release/whitehouse-schatz-blumenauer-cicilline-introduce-updated-american-opportunity-carbon https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2hI9_flveMgSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Clark, KatherineMassachussetts5DCongresswoman Katherine Clark understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Protecting the Environment,' page, it states, " Climate change will have devastating effects on the safety and health of billions of people worldwide and will cripple our global economy. Unprecedented climactic events from typhoons and extreme heat, to drought and famine, to rising sea levels and the destruction of delicate marine ecosystems, are warning bells that should call all of us to act before it is too late."100100Congresswoman Clark has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congresswoman is a member of the Safe Climate Caucus. Rep. Clark also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a Facebook post, the Congresswoman states, "#Climatechange is a challenge fit for America: seemingly impossible but solvable with ingenuity and determination. We can transform our country and economy with a Green New Deal. Let's get to work! #ChangeTheDebate." The Congresswoman makes climate change a top priority issue. Congresswoman Clark along with Senator Ed Markey hosted a town hall on climate change and the Green New Deal.100Congresswoman Clark supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. The Congresswoman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 7593.75https://katherineclark.house.gov/protecting-our-environment https://safeclimatecaucus-lowenthal.house.gov/members https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=2582504311764920 https://framinghamsource.com/index.php/2019/08/09/congresswoman-clark-sen-markey-hosting-town-hall-on-climate-change-and-green-new-deal-in-framingham/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://clarke.house.gov/congresswoman-clarke-issues-statement-on-supreme-court-decision-overturning-roe-v-wade/#:~:text=%E2%80%9CToday%20stands%20among%20the%20darkest,will%20not%20stand%20for%20it. Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Clarke, Yvette D.New York9DCongresswoman Yvette Clarke understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. As Vice Chair of the Energy and Commerce committee, she has introduced various bills to help "tackle the progression of the climate crisis," as stated on her website. During a press conference announcing her efforts to reintroduce climate legislation at the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Rep. Clarke said, "climate change is a crisis, [O]ur duty in Congress is to take bold action to tackle climate-warming emissions and protect the American public from future climate impacts." 100100Congresswoman Clarke has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. She is the sponsor of the Climate Justice Act of 2021, legislation that "requires the President to establish a Climate Justice Working Group that must advise federal entities on a just and equitable transition towards a clean, climate-resilient, and zero-emission economy." Rep. Clarke also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2020 press release supporting the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis action plan, which highlighted several of the Congresswoman's bills, she stated, "I am proud to see my colleagues in the House come together to take meaningful action on the critical issue of climate change and environmental protection. My bills that have been highlighted in the Climate Crisis Action have the potential to be invaluable tools in ensuring our environment is preserved for future generations.” Congresswoman Clarke makes climate change a top priority issue. She is the sponsor of the FEMA Climate Change Preparedness Act of 2019, a bill that would require "the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to revise its 2018-2022 Strategic Plan to ensure that the plan explicitly mentions climate change and addresses the implications of climate change."100Congresswoman Clarke publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 763). This bill would put a $15 per metric ton price on carbon emissions. She also voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 100100https://clarke.house.gov/climatecrisisreport/ https://clarke.house.gov/clarke-introduces-legislation-to-combat-the-impacts-of-climate-change/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2394?s=1&r=4 https://clarke.house.gov/climatecrisisreport/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4823?s=1&r=1 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/cosponsors https://clarke.house.gov/congresswoman-clarke-issues-statement-on-supreme-court-decision-overturning-roe-v-wade/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Cleaver, EmanuelMissouri5DCongressman Emanual Cleaver understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On Congressman Cleaver's energy page it states, "As early as 1859, British scientist John Tyndall discovered that carbon dioxide (CO2) can trap heat. Since Charles Keeling began measuring atmospheric CO2 in the late 1950s, scientists have accumulated a wealth of evidence documenting the increase of greenhouse gasses in the atmosphere, the rise of global average temperature and the influence of human activities on the Earth’s climate."100100Congressman Cleaver has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2021 article from the Martin City Telegraph, detailing an "an online meeting of the South Kansas City Alliance on Sept. 13," it stated, "The energy-themed meeting began with a pre-recorded talk by U.S. Rep. Emanuel Cleaver II, who announced he would be working in the next 90 days with the Kansas City Area Transportation Authority to launch an ambitious program to provide free rides on electric buses in three 21st century corridors. The corridors (which are yet to be determined) would provide charging stations for electric vehicles. “It will be no emissions and no admissions,” he quipped. 'This will be a major part of what I’m doing in the next session of Congress as a response to climate change.'" The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 tweet regarding the climate impact on black communities, he stated, "It’s no secret that #ClimateChange affects communities of color the hardest. That’s why @TheBlackCaucus is working hard to ensure these communities are protected from the consequences that will come with a warming climate." Rep. Cleaver makes climate change a top priority issue. As chairman of the Financial Services Subcommittee on National Security, International Development, and Monetary Policy, the Congressman held a hearing on how Climate Change is already impacting America’s economy and national security, as well as the extraordinary costs that are expected to arise as the planet’s climate continues to warm.100Congressman Cleaver publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments.The Congressman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 100100https://cleaver.house.gov/legislation/issues/energy https://martincitytelegraph.com/2021/09/27/rep-cleaver-addresses-climate-change-at-the-local-level/ https://twitter.com/repcleaver/status/1181264877190631424 https://cleaver.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-cleaver-holds-subcommittee-hearing-to-shed-light-on-economic-costs https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22party%22%3A%22all%22%7D https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://cleaver.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-cleavers-statement-supreme-court-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Cline, BenVirginia6RCongressman Ben Cline disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2020 News Leader article, "Cline also referenced the world stage when discussing climate change, a topic that constituents brought up several times. He agreed that humans contribute to climate change but disputed with the crowd how much was due to manmade reasons." Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change position.00In a 2019 Weekly Newsletter posted on Congressman Cline's website, he wrote about energy independence, stating, "In my remarks against this legislation on the House Floor, I spoke about my visit earlier this spring to the Gulf of Mexico off the coast of Louisiana, where I was able to see firsthand the great strides that have been made in energy exploration, technology, and innovation. The amazing developments in ensuring that energy resources can be explored and extracted safely, with minimal impact to our environment, demonstrated to me that similar efforts can be achieved back home in the waters off the coast of Virginia. These new developments would ensure that our environmentally sensitive areas can be protected for future generations while we lower energy costs for residents and businesses across the Commonwealth." Congressman Cline demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.0Congressman Cline makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. According to a 2019 Roll Call article, "Riggleman and Cline both said they support free-market innovations to combat climate change and incentives to spur those innovations, but opposes taxes on carbon." Congressman Cline was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 00https://www.newsleader.com/story/news/2020/01/07/rep-ben-cline-discusses-questions-and-concerns-during-staunton-town-hall/2833759001/ https://iqconnect.lmhostediq.com/iqextranet/view_newsletter.aspx?id=193654&c=VA06BC https://www.rollcall.com/2019/10/09/virginia-gop-representatives-town-hall-heavy-on-policy-light-on-impeachment/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://twitter.com/repbencline/status/1540374854582652929Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Cloud, MichaelTexas27RCongressman Michael Cloud does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change position.250Congressman Cloud demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.0Congressman Cloud has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5018.75https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://cloud.house.gov/posts/congressman-cloud-statement-on-scotus-repeal-of-roe-v-wadeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
Clyburn, James E.South Carolina6DCongressman James Clyburn understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2019 Tweet, supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), the Congressman wrote, "Climate change is real and its evidence is all around us. The Paris Agreement was an important first step toward holding countries accountable and we cannot allow this president to remove us from it. #ClimateActionNow #HR9." Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change position.100100Congressman Clyburn supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.50Congressman Clyburn supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. The Congressman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 7581.25https://twitter.com/WhipClyburn/status/1124007260013965314 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.majoritywhip.gov/media-center/press-releases/majority-whip-clyburn-statement-supreme-court-overturning-abortionSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Clyde, AndrewGeorgia9RCongressman Andrew Clyde disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. A 2020 article from the 'Associated Press' detailing a debate, the congressman stated "I will hold court with those scientists who don’t believe in man-made climate change. You know, we have four seasons of the year, the climate changes every year, four times.”00When asked about climate action in Congress in a questionnaire from the Atlanta Journal-Consitutution in 2020, Congressman Andrew Clyde stated that "It is not the federal government’s responsibility to regulate greenhouse gas emissions, or any aspect of our environment for that matter. The (Environmental Protection Agency) is an unconstitutional agency and should be dissolved. Climate change is fake news." Congressman Clyde demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Andrew Clyde has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5012.5https://apnews.com/article/business-georgia-climate-change-elections-athens-bfe5820602da1f78a17f4d5d18d9d02f https://www.ajc.com/issues-house-9-republican-runoff/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qPK8v1v9FOEOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Cohen, SteveTennessee9DCongressman Steve Cohen understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'environment,' page, it states, "In February 2007, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the leading international network of scientists, for the first time concluded that global warming is "unequivocal" and that human activity is the main driver of it, causing most of the rise in temperatures since 1950... Recently, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration released a report that expounds upon the IPCC findings and claims that climate change is undeniable and is the reason why the past decade is the warmest in the history of record-keeping." Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change position.100100Congressman Cohen has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In an op-ed written in December of 2019, the Congressman wrote, "I am alarmed by the increasing threat that climate change and other industrially created damage pose to the environment and recognize that bold actions must be taken to reverse the causes, as well as address the consequences." Rep. Cohen also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a press release supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), the Congressman stated, "President Trump’s ill-advised attempt to withdraw from the Accord is irresponsible and this bill makes it clear that a majority in this Congress intends to prioritize the needs of the future by addressing climate change." Congressman Cohen makes climate change a top priority issue. During the 16th Annual Environmental Justice Conference, the Congressman expressed his support for the Green New Deal, stating, "The Green New Deal is something that should be passed into law to ensure the safety of the future generations that inhabit the earth, but there are members of the Republican Party that fail to see that." Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman's climate change leadership.100Congressman Cohen publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. Rep. Cohen co-sponsored the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act of 2019 (H.R. 763). The Congressman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 100100https://cohen.house.gov/issues/environment https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/22/opinion/letters/climate-plastics.html https://cohen.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/congressman-cohen-votes-climate-action-now http://www.dailyhelmsman.com/news/congressman-cohen-sponsors-new-green-deal-at-environmental-justice-conference/article_433f761e-eaea-11e9-931d-a3cae32e478d.html https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://cohen.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/congressman-cohen-condemns-supreme-court-ruling-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Cole, TomOklahoma4RCongressman Tom Cole agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, the Congressman states, "While I believe climate change is real and needs to be addressed, it should be done in such a way that is collaborative with Congress and results in internationally equitable terms."500Congressman Cole supported President Trump's withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, stating, "Paris, on the other hand, was negotiated by President Obama in a way that was clearly in the best interest of China, India, and Europe. His agreement forced the United States to make sharper reductions in our greenhouse emissions than our European allies, it committed the United States to picking up far more than our fair share of the expenses associated with compliance, and it allowed China and India to actually increase their emissions until 2030." In addition, Rep. Cole opposed funding for the study of climate change by the Central Intelligence Agency, stating in a press release that, "I believe that common sense solutions that promote clean air and water are very important. But I do not believe that our nation's intelligence dollars should be redirected from gathering information that has kept our country safe from another attack to studying climate change." Congressman Cole demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Cole makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. He was a co-sponsor and voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). In a 2009 article, Rep. Cole stated his opposition to a carbon price: "In these uncertain times, policies like cap and trade are exactly the wrong way to proceed. Raising taxes and energy costs and putting Americans out of work are not the answer to our economic challenges."012.5https://cole.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/cole-statement-on-US-reentering-paris-climate-agreement https://cole.house.gov/media-center/weekly-columns/after-paris-climate-accord-america-will-continue-lead https://cole.house.gov/press-release/cole-opposes-cuts-critical-intelligence-funding https://cole.house.gov/cap-and-trade-costly-experiment https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://okcfox.com/news/local/roe-wade-supreme-court-overturned-dobbs-mississippi-oklahoma-reaction-abortion-reproductive-rights-pro-life-choice-samuel-alito-mullin-mccall-tom-cole-great-treat?fbclid=IwAR374VdYU-ix2bkL0ttDcg38b0nnHEm417SSzjZRKztPjdznWziNo6v0vWQOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Comer, James Kentucky1RThe Congressman disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2015 WFPL article, Congressman Comer stated on climate change, “I do not believe in global warming. I’m the one person whose business and livelihood depends on Mother Nature, so I understand weather patterns... We’ve had a very severe winter this year with 12-inch snows, so there is no global warming.”00In a 2017 article by WKMS, the Congressman was quoted supporting the President's withdrawal from the Paris Agreement stating, “I support President Trump’s decision to pull out of the Paris Accord. It’s something that was holding America back. The deal was not a good one for the United States, and with this move, President Trump continues to look out for working Kentuckians in coal country.” In a 2020 interview found on Facebook, when asked if climate change is the greatest threat to mankind, the Congressman responded, "Absolutely not. I don't know any serious credible scientific organization that makes such claims. It is not even our most severe environmental problem... I don't think there is any evidence that climate change is our most serious environmental problem." Congressman Comer demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Comer opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 256.25https://wfpl.org/a-look-at-kentucky-gubernatorial-candidate-comers-climate-change-remarks-and-agriculture/ http://wkms.org/post/congressman-comer-speaks-paris-climate-accord-decision https://www.facebook.com/CongressmanComer/videos/571690400194562/?v=571690400194562 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://sbaprolife.org/representative/james-comerOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Connolly, Gerald E. Virginia11DCongressman Gerry Connolly understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. According to Congressman Connolly's campaign website, "Climate change is one of the most pressing issues our society faces, endangering not just every individual here in Virginia and across our nation, but the future of humanity and our entire planet. As a founder and co-Chairman of the House Green Dogs, the largest environmental caucus in Congress, Congressman Connolly has consistently advocated for a 21st century, clean energy future. He helped successfully pass the largest government investments in clean energy, and was a proud supporter of the Paris Climate Agreement and Clean Power Plan. Congressman Connolly has continuously opposed Republican efforts to weaken the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, and Endangered Species Act. For his efforts, Gerry has consistently been endorsed by the Sierra Club and the League of Conservation Voters, two of the largest pro-environment advocacy organizations in the country."100100Congressman Gerry Connolly makes climate change a top priority issue. According to the Congressman's website, Connolly states, “With a new Administration, we can finally turn the page on President Trump’s climate denialism, and restore our standing in the global community as a leader in reducing climate change. President-elect Biden has pledged to rejoin and strengthen the Paris Climate agreement on the first day of his presidency. As co-chair of the House Green Dogs, I am committed to ensuring Congress is a partner with the Biden administration in providing visionary leadership and historic investment in addressing climate change and its public health impacts.” Congressman Gerry Connolly has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action.100Congressman Connolly supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. The Congressman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119).7593.75https://gerryconnolly.com/issues/environment/ https://connolly.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=4161 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://connolly.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=4560Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Correa, LouCalifornia46DCongressman Correa understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. While his website has an "Environment" section, it does not mention climate change. In a 2018 tweet the Congressman stated, "For decades, scientists have warned us about climate change. Today’s report shows how right they were. We cannot continue to ignore the signs all around us. Our homes, communities, and economy are at jeopardy."75100Congressman Correa has demonstrated leadership on climate change by voting in favor of legislation that promotes climate action. Despite this, the Congressman does not make prominent public statements on climate action, nor does he make the issue a priority. He does not mention climate change on his Congressional site. Congressman Correa supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. 50Congressman Correa publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. He voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).10081.25https://correa.house.gov/about/issues https://twitter.com/reploucorrea/status/1066068846514180096?lang=en https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://correa.house.gov/news/press-releases/rep-correa-statement-on-supreme-courts-draft-decision-to-overturn-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Costa, JimCalifornia21DCongressman Jim Costa understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2020 Weekly Newsletter, the Congressman stated, "The wildfires raging in Australia remind us all too well of the threat we face in California as we deal with drought and horrific fires among the many growing impacts of climate change. We can do more to improve air quality, transportation and water, all affected by climate change."100100On the Congressman's, 'Sustainable Energy,' page it supports the use of fossil fuels, stating, "Our Valley is an energy-rich region, supplying the state with power from oil, gas, and renewable sources like hydropower, biomass, wind, and solar. This vital sector of our economy is a job creator in our communities and a key player in reducing our nation’s dependence on foreign sources of energy." According to a press release on his website in 2021, "Congressman Jim Costa (AC-16) and the Problem Solvers Caucus endorsed the Growing Climate Solutions Act, which aims to remove barriers for farmers, ranchers, and forest landowners to participate in the voluntary carbon credit marketplace. As producers look to reduce their environmental footprint, they often look to the carbon credit marketplace to offset their emissions." Congressman Costa website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congressman Costa supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. He voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)). 7587.5https://costa.house.gov/news/weekly-newsletters/weekly-newsletters/weekly-newsletter-01062020 https://costa.house.gov/issues/energy-independence https://costa.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/costa-problem-solvers-caucus-endorse-growing-climate-solutions-act https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://costa.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/costa-statement-supreme-court-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Courtney, JoeConnecticut 2DCongressman Joe Courtney understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2017 press release condemning the President's decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement, the Congressman stated, "The United States is the second largest carbon emitter in the world, and the Paris Climate Accord proved that our nation, and the global community as a whole, has recognized that a zero-emissions, clean energy economy is the only path forward for a sustainable, sound future. In Connecticut, we’ve taken this to heart: over half of all electric power generation jobs are in the solar sector—more than natural gas or any other fuel. These jobs are not only going to dominate our economy in the future – they are already a major part of our economy today. Turning our back on the Paris Climate Accord leaves our nation without a seat at the table as the world determines climate and clean energy policies, raises troubling questions about whether our nation stands by its commitments, and undermines states like Connecticut that have longstanding commitments to reducing our greenhouse gas emissions.”100100In a 2017 tweet, Congressman Joe Courtney referred to a video melting arctic ice since 1979, writing, "Check out how much Arctic ice has melted since 1979. Climate change is NOT an #AlternativeFact. #DefendScience." The Congressman is also a co-sponsor of the Green New Deal. Congressman Joe Courtney's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue.75Congressman Courtney supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it.. He voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 7587.5https://courtney.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/courtney-backing-out-paris-climate-accord-puts-country-wrong-side https://twitter.com/RepJoeCourtney/status/824648100337774593 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22Connecticut%22%7D https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2021385 https://courtney.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/courtney-statement-supreme-court-decision-overturn-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Craig, AngieMinnesota 2DCongresswoman Craig understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Environment,' page, the opening statement says, "There’s no denying it – climate change is happening and we have to address it now. In Minnesota, we’ve already seen milder winters, heat waves, droughts, and floods. Climate change is a threat to our environment and the health and safety of all Americans."100100Congresswoman Craig has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. She introduced the Resilience Revolving Loan Fund Act of 2019 (H.R. 3779), which according to the Congresswoman would make loans available for projects that minimize the risk of wildfire, earthquake, flood, storm surge. The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a press release on the bill she stated, "As the impact of climate change gets closer and closer to home, we need to make sure our communities have the resources they need to be resilient in the face of increasing natural disasters.” She makes climate change a top priority issue. Regarding the 'Inflation Reduction Act,' she said, ""This bill is going to really motivate young voters across the nation,' said Democratic U.S. Rep. Angie Craig, who's in a tough re-election battle in the swing Second Congressional District. 'We've delivered on the single biggest bill to address climate change in the history of our country.'" It is the first issue mentioned on her 'Environment' page on her website.100In a 2021 tweet, Congresswoman Craig wrote, "As extreme weather events continue to intensify in the U.S. & abroad, we must take action to address climate change. That’s why I support legislation backed by @citizensclimate to put a price on carbon & return 100% of the revenue to American families." The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. The Congresswoman was not in Congress for a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 100100https://www.angiecraig.com/issues/ https://craig.house.gov/media/press-releases/reps-angie-craig-rodney-davis-introduce-bipartisan-disaster-prevention-bill https://twitter.com/RepAngieCraig/status/1421628570137464834 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22party%22%3A%22all%22%7D https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://craig.house.gov/media/press-releases/representative-angie-craig-helps-pass-house-bills-protect-and-strengthen https://www.startribune.com/divide-over-historic-climate-bill-animates-closely-watched-minnesota-congressional-campaigns/600199911/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Crawford, RickArkansas1RCongressman Rick Crawford disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2013 article in Talk Business & Politics the Congressman stated, "There's not sound science to support some of the initiatives that the President, I think, is committed to. We know that some of the research was faulty and it drove a lot of the agenda for a long time, and then it turned out there were some questions about the validity of that research. I don't see a lot of the green initiatives that are being talked about being supported by scientific data, but more supported by political agendas."00Congressman Crawford spoke out against President Obama's efforts to reduce coal emissions, writing in a 2013 weekly column that, "Today, roughly 50% of Arkansas homes are powered by coal energy. This is a power source that provides affordable heating and power for Arkansans, especially those in rural parts of the state. By propagating new regulations like the one President Obama announced on Friday, he misunderstands who will truly bear the heavy burden of his actions." In a 2017 interview with KUAF Morning Edition the Congressman when asked about the Paris Agreement stated, "President Obama did not have the authority to commit the United States to the Paris Accord... If this is a non-binding agreement what's the point of being apart of it...Other nations want us to do everything to fix the environment and don't want to participate at the same level that we do." In January 2021, the Congressman states in a tweet that "I’ve always supported an “all-the-above” energy approach because we have to ensure availability of energy and it’s affordability. This first action of cancelling #KeystoneXL will start to reduce available sources of energy, and with it, affordable energy..." Congressman Crawford demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Crawford makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 00https://talkbusiness.net/2013/01/cong-crawford-wants-permanent-spending-controls/ https://crawford.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=350654 http://kuaf.com/post/crawford-talks-comey-hearings-cuba-climate-change#stream/0 http://congress.freedomworks.org/legislators/rick-a-crawford https://twitter.com/reprickcrawford/status/1355180400235130884 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://crawford.house.gov/posts/rep-crawford-responds-to-scotus-overturning-of-roe-v-wadeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Crenshaw, DanTexas2RCongressman Crenshaw does not oppose climate action. According to 'CAP,' the congressman stated, in regards to climate change, that, “There is an interesting political tactic often employed by the Left, and it follows a predictable pattern. First, identify a problem most of us can agree on. Second, elevate the problem to a crisis. Third, propose an extreme solution to said crisis that inevitably results in a massive transfer of power to government authorities. Fourth, watch as conservatives take the bait and vociferously reject the extreme solutions proposed. Fifth and finally, accuse those same conservatives of being too heartless or too stupid to solve the original problem on which we all thought we agreed. This is the pattern we have seen play out with respect to climate change.”250In a 2019 video posted to You Tube, Congressman Crenshaw went on the offensive against the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), stating, "Today we voted on the climate action now act which prevents the president from withdrawing from the Paris agreement...The targets it sets are unrealistic and unworkable as the agreement calls for the u.s. to cut emissions by 28 percent from our 2005 levels. Well what would a 28 percent decrease in emissions by 2025 actually look like. The short answer, it would drastically alter the energy sources we depend on every single day, it would cut jobs, closed factories, dramatically increase utility costs, decrease economic production, and ruin our ability to create new green energy solutions like carbon capture technology." Congressman Crenshaw demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.0Congressman Crenshaw makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. When discussing a carbon tax and dividend in a 2018 Q&A on his campaign website, Rep. Crenshaw stated, "I am always going to be reluctant to put undue economic burdens on our people." The Congressman was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 06.25https://www.americanprogress.org/article/look-rhetorical-evolutions-congress-former-climate-deniers/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9jQ4ZF1SQ4 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://video.foxbusiness.com/v/6308464613112#sp=show-clipsOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Crow, JasonColorado6DCongressman Jason Crow understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's campaign website, it states, "Climate change is a severe threat to the planet, people, and our nation. Congress must act to reduce carbon pollution and other emissions to protect against further impacts of climate change, but it must also work to help communities adapt to an already changing climate. It is essential that Congress act to address climate change because, as we have seen, presidential action alone may be undone quickly under a future administration." 100100Congressman Crow has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In 2019 the Congressman hosted a forum on the impact of climate change on public health, stating in a press release, "Community conversations like this are vital to finding solutions to the threats that climate change poses. It’s time for Congress to lead on climate change and pass legislation that will protect our communities and children.” Congressman Crow also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release announcing a provision to the National Defense Authorization Act, which would require large military installations to include assessments of climate change and mitigation efforts in their master plans, the Congressman stated, "Our military has seen firsthand the impact of climate change on national security and the first step of countering any threat is to create a baseline understanding of what we’re up against. My provision will ensure we understand the threat so we can improve our military's resiliency to global warming and the dangerous impacts of extreme weather.” Rep. Crow makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2020 Facebook post, supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9) the Congressman wrote, "Climate change is affecting extreme weather events, public health, and our national security. It’s time for America to be a global leader and work to address climate change and reduce our carbon footprint. We need #ClimateActionNow."100Congressman Crow publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments.100100https://jasoncrowforcongress.com/environment-and-energy-policy-for-americas-future/ https://crow.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-crow-hosts-forum-impact-climate-change-public-health https://crow.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-jason-crow-secures-provision-ndaa-address-national-security-threats-posed https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.facebook.com/RepJasonCrow/photos/a.2006826719432464/2704174986364297/?type=3&theater https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://crow.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-crow-votes-codify-access-reproductive-healthcare-0Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Cuellar, HenryTexas28DCongressman Henry Cuellar agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a press release supporting the Natural Gas (LEADING) Act of 2019 (H.R. 3828), the Congressman stated, "We need an economically sensible solution to reducing greenhouse emissions and fighting climate change in the United States. Carbon capture has been shown to be the best way to properly mitigate the effects of climate change, create more reliable, affordable energy, and increase economic growth." Vote Climate U.S. PAC supports several forms of Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR), not including carbon capture and sequestration, because we believe that method perpetuates the fossil fuel economy. It is not clear what form of CDR the Congressman is referring to here. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change position.50100Congressman Cuellar's website's 'Energy and Environment' page does not mention climate change. Instead it says, "The 28th Congressional District of Texas, is both the 6th largest oil producing and 4th largest natural gas producing district in the state. It includes a large portion of the Eagle Ford Shale reserves; one of the most productive natural gas fields in the country. In order to support this production, last year, Congressmen Cuellar helped secure $13 million in federal funding towards the Corpus Christi Ship Channel Improvement Project (CIP). CIP is a USACE project to expand the Port’s ship channels, allowing vessels to navigate the channel safely, meeting surging global demand for U.S. produced oil and natural gas. The Port of Corpus Christi is the largest export port of U.S. produced crude oil and is a major export hub for U.S. energy products." Congressman Cuellar demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements supporting the fossil fuel industry. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.0Congressman Cuellar voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119).2543.75https://cuellar.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=404563 https://cuellar.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=3998 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.npr.org/2022/07/10/1110723295/texas-rep-henry-cuellar-is-one-democrat-who-opposes-abortion-rightsOpposes RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Curtis, JohnUtah3RCongressman John Curtis agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Congressman Curtis' website underneath the Conservative Climate Caucus page states, "The climate is changing, and decades of a global industrial era that has brought prosperity to the world has also contributed to that change."5028Congressman Curtis demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.0Congressman Curtis in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 2525.75https://curtis.house.gov/conservative-climate-caucus/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://curtis.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1455Opposes RoePro ClimatePro ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Davids, ShariceKansas3DCongresswoman Sharice Davids understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "I agree with the overwhelming majority of scientists who recognize that climate change is real, and that we must take action now to protect our planet for future generations. According to the Weather Channel, the Kansas City-area is the fifth most vulnerable U.S. city to the dangers of climate change. We need innovative solutions to combat this crisis, grow our economy, and leave behind a healthier world for our children."100100Congressman Davids co-sponsored the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9) stating, "Protecting our environment and natural resources is necessary for both our planet and our economy." in a 2021 tweet, the Congresswoman wrote "We aren't coastal or desert, but climate change & extreme weather is our reality in #KS03. It does not have to be the reality for future generations. Joining my colleagues to urge investment in clean energy, so we can leave a planet AND an economy that works for our grandkids." Congresswoman Sharice David's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congresswoman Davids has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5081.25https://davids.house.gov/issues/energy https://davids.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-davids-statement-passage-hr-9-climate-action-now-act https://twitter.com/RepDavids/status/1442923638211055616 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://davids.house.gov/media/in-the-news/here-s-what-kansas-city-area-elected-officials-say-about-potential-overturn-roe-vSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Davidson, WarrenOhio8RCongressman Warren Davidson disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. During a 2017 town hall reported on by the Journal-News, the Congressman was quoted on climate change, stating, "And while I’m not indifferent to climate change, I’m not saying it’s a total falsity and I’m not saying it’s a certainty." Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change position.00In a 2019 tweet mocking the severity of climate change, the Congressman wrote, "Manmade climate change is real. Humans are destroying America’s political climate. Mob rule is no way to defend the republic. #DefendFreedom." Congressman Davidson demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Davidson makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman co-sponsored a 2019 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res 41). 00https://www.journal-news.com/news/davidson-isis-more-threat-than-climate-change/gSD89FAxoXGtDUu20ThJAK/ https://twitter.com/WarrenDavidson/status/1176666085963313153 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/41/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://davidson.house.gov/pro-life-and-family-issuesOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Davis, Danny K.Illinois7DCongressman Danny Davis understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2019 press release condemning President Trump's proposed rules that would exacerbate climate change, the Congressman stated, "Climate change resulting from the burning carbon-based fuels for energy poses an urgent and critical threat to public health and welfare. Emissions of carbon dioxide from fossil fuel powered electric utility generators account for nearly 40 percent of the United States’ carbon pollution." In a press release in support of the Build Back Better Act, Congressman Davis said, "The Build Back Better Act represents a transformative investment in children, families, workers, businesses, and the planet that will improve health and well-being, advance economic and environmental justice, meaningfully address climate change, and grow our economy while asking the wealthiest and most secure to pay their fair share...Further, it ensures the largest effort to combat climate change in American history."100100Congressman Davis has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. In 2020 the Congressman joined a brief in support of youth for protection from human-caused climate change. The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2017 press release opposing the President's withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, the Congressman stated, "The science is clear and definitive. Ignoring or defying the science is a crime on the scale of starting a nuclear war. 195 nations came together after more that ten years of negotiations to change course and avoid a human made global disaster." Rep. Davis makes climate change a priority issue as well. In a 2020 Chicago Tribune interview, the Congressman stated "Climate change is real, the science is unequivocal despite the protestations of some who ignore the overwhelming scientific consensus and the on-the-ground reality we are experiencing world wide."100Congressman Davis has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He did not vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5087.5https://davis.house.gov/statements/davis-statement-on-trump-administration-proposed-rules-which-would-harm-the-environment-and-public-health/ https://davis.house.gov/statements/davis-joins-brief-in-support-of-youth-for-protection-from-human-caused-climate-change/ https://davis.house.gov/statements/statement-on-president-trumps-intent-to-withdraw-the-united-states-from-the-paris-climate-agreement/ https://www.chicagotribune.com/opinion/editorials/ct-who-is-danny-davis-7th-congressional-district-candidate-20200328-gvipgdobb5h2teafqq2tblbpcy-story.html https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/ https://news.wttw.com/2022/05/03/congress-members-weigh-possible-roe-v-wade-reversalSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Dean, MadeleinePennsylvania4DCongresswoman Madeleine Dean understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On her website's environment page, it states, "[She] supports legislation to boost America’s investments in renewable energy, fund green infrastructure, and reengage in global agreements to combat climate change." In a 2020 post on 'Twitter,' the Congresswoman stated, "Action on climate change is long overdue. The longer we wait, the more irreversible damage is done to our planet."75100The Congresswoman supports the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9) stating in a press release, “When everyone from the Pope to the Pentagon warns us that we are in peril, it is time to act. The climate crisis is the existential threat of our time, and it is essential that we deliver thoughtful and innovative action to protect public health, advance our economy and global preeminence in green technology, and defend our national security.” Congresswoman Dean's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue.75Congresswoman Dean publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 763). This bill would put a $15 per metric ton price on carbon emissions. The Congresswoman was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 10087.5https://dean.house.gov/issues/environment https://twitter.com/repdean/status/1301322556272717824?lang=en https://dean.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-madeleine-dean-votes-pass-climate-action-now-act https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://dean.house.gov/2022/6/congresswoman-dean-s-statement-on-the-supreme-court-s-dobbs-v-jackson-women-s-health-organization-decision-to-overturn-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
DeGette, DianaColorado1DCongresswoman Diana DeGette understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Combatting the Climate Crisis,' page, it states, "Rep. DeGette believes the ongoing climate crisis is the single greatest threat facing our planet. In Congress, DeGette is leading the charge to cut our nation’s carbon emissions, curb methane waste and pollution, and create the nation’s first-ever federal clean energy standard."100100Congresswoman DeGette has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 press release outlining a plan to get America to net-zero emissions by 2050, the Congresswoman stated, "If we are going to avoid the worst effects of our climate crisis, the U.S. has to take drastic steps now to cut our carbon emissions. By creating a national clean-energy standard that all U.S. power companies will have to adhere to, we will be able to spur the innovation and deployment of the new technologies we’ll need to solve this crisis.” The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a press release introducing the Clean Energy Innovation and Deployment Act (H.R. 7516), the Congresswoman stated, "To truly solve this climate crisis, we need to start driving the innovation and deployment of new clean-energy technologies today,” DeGette said. “This legislation will not only do that, but it will also help bring down the cost of these technologies so other countries can quickly follow suit.” Rep. DeGette makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2020 press release on the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis highlighting the Congresswoman's proposed legislation as necessary to combatting climate change, she stated, "If we are going to be serious about solving this crisis, we must take steps now to lower our emissions, increase our use of renewable energies and protect more of our public lands." 100Congresswoman DeGette publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. 100100https://degette.house.gov/issues/climate-crisis https://degette.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/degette-us-should-be-leader-in-combatting-climate-crisis https://degette.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/degette-introduces-legislation-to-cut-carbon-emissions-from-us https://degette.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/new-house-committee-report-cites-several-degette-bills-as-important-to https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://energycommerce.house.gov/newsroom/press-releases/ec-announces-hearing-on-impact-of-overturning-roe-v-wade-on-july-19Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
DeLauro, Rosa L.Connecticut3DCongresswoman DeLauro understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2019 press release supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9) the Congresswoman stated, "The facts are clear, and there should be no debate: climate change is real. It is an urgent problem. And our country must address it. The Paris Agreement set out an ambitious plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and the United States should not withdraw from it. Left unchecked, climate change will continue to have disastrous effects on our environment, our public health, our food safety, our economy, and our national security. We cannot allow climate-deniers to set the legislative agenda any longer. The time to act is now.”100100On Congresswoman DeLauro's, 'Energy' page, it calls for the development of natural gas, stating, "America has some of the most plentiful natural gas reserves in the world, and it is important for our economy that we develop them, while also protecting the environment and water quality." Congresswoman DeLauro's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue, since she wants to keep America dependent on the fossil fuel economy. 75Congresswoman DeLauro has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5081.25https://delauro.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/delauro-votes-block-trump-withdrawing-us-paris-climate-agreement https://delauro.house.gov/issues/energy https://delauro.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/delauro-votes-defend-reproductive-freedomSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
DelBene, SuzanWashington1DCongresswomen Suzan DelBene understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Environment,' page, it states, "Climate change is a serious threat to our way of life, our economy, our children, and the future of our planet and we need to address it now. Congress must do more to combat this growing and urgent existential threat. We need to continue making new investments in a green America." Congresswoman DelBene continues on, stating, "Protecting our natural resources is not only good for our environment but good for our economy as well. Here in the Northwest, sea levels are rising, our oceans are becoming more acidic and we are seeing an increase in insect outbreaks and tree diseases. This endangers our local economy – potentially costing us thousands of jobs – and threatens a way of life that is uniquely Northwest. In order to protect our environment, we must address the challenge that climate change poses without delay. Without a doubt, climate change is a serious threat to our way of life, our economy, and our children – not to mention the future of our planet – and we need to address it now. Congress can and must do more to combat this growing and urgent threat."100100Congresswoman DelBene expresses her belief in the importance of climate action, stating on her campaign website, "I believe that climate change is one of the most serious threats we face, and that we need to take the necessary steps to build a new economy based on clean and renewable energy sources and reduce our dependence on fossil fuels and foreign oil." In a 2017 press release the Congresswoman supported staying in the Paris Agreement, stating, "If President Trump withdraws from the Paris Climate Accord, it would endanger our children’s health, their futures and the planet. This reckless decision would also harm the reputation of our country, jeopardizing our role as a global leader on combating climate change." The Congresswoman also sent a tweet in 2019 on climate change, stating, "Climate change is real and without action its consequences will greatly alter our way of life." Congresswoman DelBene's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congresswoman DelBene supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. Congresswoman DelBene voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 7587.5https://delbene.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=14888 https://delbene.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1205 https://www.delbeneforcongress.com/issues/environment/ https://delbene.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1107 https://twitter.com/RepDelBene/status/1173705968443674624 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://delbene.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=3160Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
DeSaulnier, MarkCalifornia10DCongressman Mark DeSaulnier understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his 'Energy and the Environment' page, he writes, "Congressman DeSaulnier recognizes climate change for the existential threat that it is and, beginning with his time as a member of the California Air Resources Board (CARB) and the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD), he has been a proud champion of policies that promote sustainability, protect the environment, and mitigate the harmful effects of climate change. He is a firm believer that the challenges of climate change also present enormous opportunity and strong, forward-looking energy and environmental policy will be a key driver of growth, innovation, and competitiveness. While fueling economic growth, rigorous environmental protections will protect the health of all Californians."100100Congressman DeSaulnier has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. In a 2021 press release, the Congressman introduced the 'Jobs for a Carbon Free Transportation System Act' (H.R. 5896), "landmark legislation to help transition our economy off fossil fuels to cleaner, renewable energy while simultaneously supporting workers, communities, and state and local governments." Congressman DeSaulnier also makes prominent public statements on the issue. According to a 2019 Lamorinda Weekly article, the Congressman hosted a climate change town hall, where he stated, "The costs of not responding to climate change must be approached from an economic standpoint. We must not weaken our goals to slow down climate change, but aspire to save the planet for future generations." Rep. DeSaulnier makes climate change a top priority issue. He is a co-sponsor of the Green New Deal. The Green New Deal is a set of laws meant to "wean the United States from fossil fuels and curb planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions across the economy" while also "(guaranteeing) new high-paying jobs in clean energy industries." 100Congressman DeSaulnier publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. In a 2018 version of the DeSaulnier's Digest, regarding the anti-carbon tax resolution in the U.S. House, the Congressman stated, “A carbon tax has the potential to be an important tool for fighting climate change, and the Republican resolution is counterproductive." The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. He voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)). 100100https://desaulnier.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://desaulnier.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/congressman-desaulnier-introduces-landmark-legislation-support-workers https://www.lamorindaweekly.com/archive/issue1314/DeSaulnier-discusses-climate-change-and-environment-at-Town-Hall.html https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/21/climate/green-new-deal-questions-answers.html https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22California%22%7D https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://desaulnier.house.gov/media-center/desaulnier-digest/update-mark-s-trip-us-mexico-border https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://desaulnier.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/congressman-desaulnier-host-virtual-town-hall-fight-protectSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
DesJarlais, ScottTennessee4RCongressman Scott DesJarlais does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Congressman DesJarlais demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. On the Congressman's website's 'Energy and Infrastructure section, DesJarlais states, "In Congress, I have voted to permit new pipeline construction, authorize international gas exports, and protect dependable energy, such as coal and nuclear, so important to Tennessee. Supplying our allies with American-made energy helps cement alliances."0Congressman DesJarlais opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 2512.5https://desjarlais.house.gov/issues/energy-infrastructure https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363Unclear Position on RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Diaz-Balart, MarioFlorida26RCongressman Mario Diaz-Balart disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2017 E&E article, when asked about climate change, the Congressman stated, "It's more of a religion... on both sides of the issue. I don't play that game. My issue is, 'All right, what is the problem that you're trying to solve?' and 'Does it solve it?'"00Congressman Diaz-Balart was an advocate of the Keystone XL pipeline, stating, "The House has once again acted on a bipartisan basis to pass legislation to approve the Keystone XL Pipeline, which will create thousands of jobs, move the United States closer to energy independence and strengthen our national security. This project will contribute billions of dollars to communities across the nation and bolster our economy." Congressman Diaz-Balart demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Diaz-Balart opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 256.25https://www.eenews.net/stories/1060054524 https://mariodiazbalart.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/diaz-balart-votes-to-approve-keystone-pipeline https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://mariodiazbalart.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/diaz-balart-statement-scotus-decision-overturn-roe-v-wadeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
Dingell, DebbieMichigan6DCongresswoman Dingell understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a press release commemorating 2018 Earth Day the Congresswoman stated, "No one can deny that today, sea levels are rising, weather is becoming more severe, droughts are decimating crops and floods are devastating communities. This extreme weather impacts our environment and our economy, and it’s critical that our next generation of leaders have the knowledge and skills to help address this pressing problem."100100Congresswoman Dingell has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 press release supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), the Congresswoman stated, "The time is now – not tomorrow, not next year – to address climate change. The Paris Agreement takes real steps to slow down our changing climate and ensures the United States stays a leader in addressing one of our most critical global threats,” Rep. Dingell also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 speech on the House floor, the Congresswoman stated, "Weather events are getting more severe. Hurricanes and wildfires cause more damage each year, and extreme cold and heat waves more common. Climate change is changing the world around us causing mass displacement and global health crises caused by continuing sea-level rise and increasing annual temperatures." Rep. Dingell makes climate change a top priority issue. In December 2019, the Congresswoman introduced The National Climate Bank Act of 2019, which would publicly finance and stimulate private investment in clean, renewable energy and emissions reduction projects. 100Congresswoman Dingell supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. The Congresswoman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 7593.75https://debbiedingell.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=795 https://debbiedingell.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1708 https://debbiedingell.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1985 https://debbiedingell.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2024 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/michigan/2022/05/14/congresswomen-dingell-stabenow-speak-abortion-rally-university-michigan/9751811002/ Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Doggett, LloydTexas37DCongressman Lloyd Doggett understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's protecting our planet page, he states, "We cannot continue ignoring the critical challenges facing Texas, our country, and our planet caused by climate change, that's why I am a sponsor of the Green New Deal and H.R.9, the Climate Change Now Act. Encouraging the expansion of renewable energy is vital for protecting our world, strengthening our national security, and boosting our economy." Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change position.100100Congressman Doggett has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 press release supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9) the Congressman stated, '“Let's embrace the simple truth that preserving the earth is worth it. America should lead on creating new green jobs, but Trump clogs the corridors of power with fossil fuel industry cheerleaders. Now is the time for alternative energy, not alternative facts.” Rep. Doggett also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 op-ed in Newsweek, the Congressman wrote about climate change messaging, stating, "While American families absolutely have the capacity to be magnanimous and mindful about humanitarian crises around the world (many of which are increasingly caused by climate change) and climate chaos that will impact future generations, compelling and alarming reports can only do so much to equip them to take on this challenge. Climate messaging should not just alarm the reader; it should also equip them to combat climate change personally, and to demand change from major polluters and lawmakers. Congressman Doggett makes climate change a top priority issue. In 2019 the Congressman introduced the Green Transportation Act (H.R. 3822), which would aim to reduce pollution and mitigate climate change. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.100Congressman Doggett supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. The Congressman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 7593.75https://doggett.house.gov/issues/protecting-the-planet https://doggett.house.gov/media-center/in-the-news/newsweek-way-were-talking-about-climate-change-all-wrong-heres-how-we-win https://doggett.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/unbearable-cost-inaction-rep-doggett-urges-passage-climate-action-now https://doggett.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/paving-way-green-local-leadership-doggett-introduces-green https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/3822/all-info https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://doggett.house.gov/media/press-releases/statement-cruel-decision-demanding-accountability-every-elected-officialSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Donalds, ByronFlorida19RCongressman Byron Donalds disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. An article covering a 2020 debate states "Donalds said he believes the science on climate change is 'not settled,' particularly as it relates to humanity's role in causing it." 00In a 2020 interview with Cheddar News, Congressman Donalds says "... let's re-embrace nuclear power. It is cheap. Uh, when it comes to fossil fuels, it is clean. He later states that nuclear power is "renewable power that everybody can rely on..." On his campaign website, Congressman Donalds states "I support environmental research and studies that not only preserves our waters, but also leads to sensible solutions, that do not burden taxpayers." Congressman Byron Donalds does not oppose climate action. 25Congressman Byron Donalds has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5018.75https://www.news-press.com/story/news/2020/09/29/byron-donalds-and-cindy-banyai-debate-covid-19-climate-change-education-and-taxes/3559961001/ https://cheddar.com/media/rep-elect-byron-donalds-r-fl-on-his-plans-for-congress https://www.byrondonalds.com/water_quality https://donalds.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=703Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Doyle, MikePennsylvania18DCongressman Mike Doyle understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Climate Change, Energy, and Environment,' page, it states, "It is clear that climate change is real, it is affecting our communities today, and it will get worse if we do not take aggressive action to cut our greenhouse gas emissions. We are seeing hotter temperatures lead to worse wildfires and draughts, rising sea levels and warmer water cause major flooding and devastation to fishing economies, and more extreme weather events are becoming more common." 100100Congressman Doyle has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congressman hosted a climate change town hall in 2019, stating in a press release on the event, "Climate Change is one of the most important issues currently facing Congress – rising global temperatures and an increase in the frequency of extreme weather events." The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2017 press release, the Congressman condemned the President's withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, stating, "President Trump’s decision to withdraw the United States from the Paris climate agreement shows that he doesn’t understand the research on climate change and the impact it will have. It also demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of our country’s economy in the 21st Century – not to mention the dramatic improvement in environmental quality and the economic transformation underway in Pittsburgh." The Congressman makes climate change a top priority issue. The Congressman helped introduce the CLEAN Future Act, which would enact policies recommended by the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the world’s leading climate scientists for transitioning our country to a 100 percent clean energy economy in time to prevent a devastating rise in global temperatures. In a press release on the legislation, the Congressman stated, "We can tackle climate change by building smarter, greener, and safer. It will also create good new jobs. I believe the CLEAN Future Act and Moving Forward framework would put us on a glidepath to a sustainable economy.”100Congressman Doyle supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. The Congressman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). The Congressman also co-sponsored the Congressional version of the America Wins Act (H.R. 4209) in 2017 which would place a tax on carbon pollution to raise money for infrastructure projects but did not co-sponsor the legislation when in 2019 when it was reintroduced. 7593.75https://doyle.house.gov/taxonomy/issues/energy-environment https://doyle.house.gov/press-release/doyle-announces-town-hall-meeting-climate-change https://doyle.house.gov/press-release/doyle-attacks-trump%E2%80%99s-climate-decision https://doyle.house.gov/media/press-releases/doyle-announces-release-clean-future-act https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/4209https://www.google.com/search?q=mike+doyle+%22abortion%22&rlz=1C5CHFA_enUS949US949&ei=_plNY_61J4ubptQPmbe6mA4&ved=0ahUKEwj-rJfY7ef6AhWLjYkEHZmbDuMQ4dUDCA8&uact=5&oq=mike+doyle+%22abortion%22&gs_lcp=Cgdnd3Mtd2l6EAM6CggAEEcQ1gQQsAM6CwgAEIAEELEDEIMBOgQILhBDOgUIABCABDoFCC4QgAQ6CwguEIAEEMcBEK8BOgQIABBDOggIABCABBDJAzoGCAAQFhAeSgQITRgBSgQIQRgASgQIRhgAUPECWJgQYIQSaAFwAXgAgAGvAYgBnguSAQQwLjExmAEAoAEByAEIwAEB&sclient=gws-wizSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Duncan, JeffSouth Carolina3RCongressman Duncan disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2018 Index-Journal article, the Congressman was quoted stating, “The climate alarmists continue to move the goalposts when their politically motivated projections do not come true. What was predicted decades ago has yet to take place. We all know that global temperatures have changed throughout the generations, but we must not look to activist climate organizations to push a false agenda in an effort to upend parts of our economy.” Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change position.00 In a 2019 press release opposing the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), Congressman Duncan stated, "President Trump’s 2017 announcement of intent to withdraw the United States from the Paris Climate Accord was the right move for our country and part of the America first agenda. Today’s misguided attempt by House Democrats to bind us to this flawed accord would have devastating consequences on our economy and put us at a disadvantage to our main competitors around the globe, while accomplishing no meaningful environmental reforms." In a 2021 post on 'Twitter,' the Congressman stated, "A true 'Climate Czar' would be in Texas right now looking at the shortcomings of intermittent wind and solar power generation during a climatic event. Severe weather reiterates the need for an all-of-the-above energy strategy." Congressman Duncan demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Duncan was a co-sponsor and voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 00https://www.indexjournal.com/news/major-climate-change-report-met-with-silence-by-sc-gop/article_39e22255-80e0-5338-9191-af1a8abef10a.html https://jeffduncan.house.gov/press-release/duncan-statement-flawed-paris-climate-accord-legislation https://twitter.com/repjeffduncan/status/1361652287010197509 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://jeffduncan.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-duncan-celebrates-reversal-roe-v-wadeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Dunn, NealFlorida2RCongressman Neal Dunn disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2016 Panama City News Herald article Congressman Neal was quoted stating, "I am sure human activity plays some role, but I don’t think the science is clear on how much is man-made and how much is natural. What I do know is that the United States should not follow the path of the global warming alarmists like the Obama administration who wants us to unilaterally handicap... industry with over-burdensome EPA regulations. That will only further empower China, who is actually the largest polluter in the world.”014In a 2017 press release supporting the American withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, the Congressman stated, "The Paris agreement breaks faith with the Americans we were elected to represent. The pact demanded that America meet stricter emissions standards than it did for China, Russia or India. It also compelled American taxpayers to fork over billions of dollars to other countries in a wealth redistribution scheme. With rising energy prices, American workers would be forced to compete against foreign countries with one hand tied behind their backs, and it would cost our economy $2.5 trillion and 400,000 jobs by 2035. President Trump is right to walk away from a bad deal and put America first.” Congressman Dunn demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Dunn opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 259.75http://www.newsherald.com/news/20160416/local-political-figures-cautious-about-sea-level-rise https://dunn.house.gov/issues https://dunn.house.gov/2017/6/dr-dunn-s-statement-paris-climate-accord https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.nealdunn.com/issuesOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimatePro ClimateAnti Climate
Ellzey, JakeTexas6RCongressman Jake Ellzey does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Jake Ellzey demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. According to the League of Conservation Voters, Ellzey has continuously voted against bills that promote climate action.0Jake Ellzey has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5018.75https://scorecard.lcv.org/moc/jake-ellzey https://www.ellzeyfortexas.com/issues https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/key-votes/147592/jake-ellzey/2/abortionOpposes RoeN/AN/AN/AN/AAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
Emmer, TomMinnesota6RCongressman Emmer does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2020 SC Times article, at a town hall, "Another [voter] asked Emmer whether the GOP would acknowledge climate change and do something about it. 'Why don't we agree we should leave this place in as good a condition as we found it,'" Emmer said, and mentioned proposals to clean plastic from waterways and plant a trillion trees."250In a 2019 press release supporting President Trump's decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement, Congressman Emmer stated, "While other nations like China and India are increasing emissions, the United States has shouldered the burden of increased energy costs and the loss of American jobs by their participation in this agreement. America, and especially my home state of Minnesota has been leading the way to reduce emissions... I applaud President Trump and his Administration for officially withdrawing, and for responsibly advancing America's interests." According to a 2020 SC Times article, at a town hall, "When asked about supporting renewable energy, Emmer said 'all energy sources are important,'" and we should use any that make economic sense." Congressman Emmer demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Emmer opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). Congressman Emmer co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).2512.5https://www.sctimes.com/story/news/2020/02/21/military-trump-and-climate-change-put-rep-tom-emmer-foley-town-hall/4799098002/ https://emmer.house.gov/2019/11/au-revoir-paris-climate-accord https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/34/cosponsors?r=1&s=1 https://www.mprnews.org/story/2022/10/05/voter-guide-see-6th-district-candidates-stances-on-guns-abortion-more Opposes RoeN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Escobar, VeronicaTexas16DCongresswoman Veronica Escobar understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a January 2020 Tweet, the Congresswoman wrote, "Climate change is an urgent global crisis that demands a strong and swift response. As Congress continues to push for ambitious climate action, we must also ensure we harness foreign policy to combat this threat and protect our planet for future generations."100100Congresswoman Escobar has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. According to the Congresswoman's website, she states, "I was proud to sponsor the Department of Defense Climate Resiliency and Readiness Act to ensure that one of the largest producers of greenhouse gasses prioritizes necessary developments in renewable technologies, builds on the success of NetZero pilots, and makes judicious use of taxpayer dollars. I also introduced the Targeting Environmental and Climate Recklessness Act (TECRA), to modernize the use of sanctions - a key foreign policy tool - to meet one of our most pressing global challenges: climate change." Congresswoman Escobar also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 Tweet, the Congresswoman wrote, "This is the consequence of climate change—and our shameful unwillingness to make the sacrifices and changes necessary to slow it down. Too late to stop it, but never too late to act to try to slow it down some. Oh, what tragedy our children have inherited." Rep. Escobar makes climate change a top priority issue. According to a 2019 press release, "Congresswoman Escobar successfully added two amendments to the NDAA that will make our military more adept at mitigating climate change." 100Congresswoman Escobar publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. Rep. Escobar co-sponsored the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act of 2019 (H.R. 763). The Congresswoman was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 100100https://twitter.com/RepEscobar/status/1217942440264585216 https://escobar.house.gov/issues/energy/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/2759 https://twitter.com/vgescobar/status/939644562368118784 https://escobar.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-veronica-escobar-applauds-passage-ndaa-securing-wins-el-paso https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://escobar.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=952Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Eshoo, AnnaCalifornia16DCongresswoman Anna Eshoo understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Climate Change,' page, it states, "Climate change is one of the most serious issues facing our nation and our planet. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the leading international body for the assessment of climate change has stated with greater than 95 percent certainty that most of the observed increase in global temperatures since the mid-20th Century is due to increased concentrations of heat-trapping gases caused by human activities. Rep. Eshoo believes the United States must take immediate action to address climate change, and she strongly believes that established science should be the guide for making informed policy decisions."100100The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Green New Deal, a set of laws meant to "wean the United States from fossil fuels and curb planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions across the economy" while also "(guaranteeing) new high-paying jobs in clean energy industries." In a 2021 tweet, Congresswoman Anna Eshoo stated "My constituents know all too well the consequences of inaction on climate change. In #CA18 disastrous wildfires destroyed nearly a thousand homes last year and sea level rise poses a threat to numerous communities along the San Francisco Bay. Here, every day is #EarthDay." Congresswoman Eshoo’s website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congresswoman Eshoo publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. On her climate change page Rep. Eshoo, "supports capping or putting a price on carbon," as a method of curbing climate change. The Congressman/woman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. She voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).10093.75https://eshoo.house.gov/legislative-priorities/environment/climate-change/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22California%22%7D https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/21/climate/green-new-deal-questions-answers.html https://twitter.com/repannaeshoo/status/1385265677821480965 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://eshoo.house.gov/media/press-releases/eshoo-statement-supreme-court-decision-overturn-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Espaillat, AdrianoNew York13DCongressman Adriano Espaillat understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. At the United Nations Climate Change conference, he stated, "We can no longer ignore the climate crisis and I commend President Biden's leadership during this year's United Nations Climate Change Conference following the backtracking by the previous administration to remove the United States from the Paris Agreement...I look forward to working with climate justice champions to ensure international commitments to combat the impact of global warming, and I remain committed to ensuring the effects of the climate crisis on poor, developing populations and people of color across the world remain at the forefront of our policy discussions with international leaders in attendance during this year’s conference"100100Congressman Espaillat has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. He is a co-sponsor of H.R.3764 (Ocean-Based Climate Solutions Act of 2021), legislation that would establish "a variety of requirements to reduce carbon emissions and protect oceans, coastal habitats, marine mammals, and fish populations from climate change and other threats." The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release introducing the Green Climate Fund Authorization Act of 2019, the Congressman stated, "It remains critical that we continue our efforts to promote a bold and swift transition to a clean energy economy and work beyond our borders to mitigate and adapt to climate change as we bring forth solutions to combat it." Rep. Espaillat makes climate change a top priority issue as well. In July of 2020, the Congressman "secured no less than $500 million for international climate financing through the Green Climate Fund," money which will be used for "the creation of programs to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, mitigate the impacts of climate change on some of the most vulnerable global communities, and adapt to a changing climate."100Congressman Espaillat supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. He voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119).7593.75https://espaillat.house.gov/media/press-releases/representative-adriano-espaillat-attends-united-nations-climate-change https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/3764?r=5&s=1 https://espaillat.house.gov/media/press-releases/representative-adriano-espaillat-introduces-green-climate-fund-authorization https://espaillat.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-adriano-espaillat-reestablishes-us-global-climate-leadership-house https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://espaillat.house.gov/media/press-releases/representative-adriano-espaillat-votes-defend-reproductive-health-rightsSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Estes, RonKansas4RThe Congressman does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250In a 2019 press release on the Paris Agreement and the Green New Deal, the Congressman stated, "Both the Paris Agreement and Green New Deal would cost our country trillions of dollars and impact millions of American jobs... The Green New Deal is projected to cost $93 trillion." Congressman Estes demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Estes opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 2512.5https://estes.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1867 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://estes.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=3534Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Evans, DwightPennsylvania3DCongressman Dwight Evans understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Environment,' page, it states, "Scientific research proves climate change is real and its consequences are serious and evident. Sea level rise, droughts and rising temperatures across the nation show the serious impact of climate change. Climate change is directly related to our national security, economic prosperity and food supply. It is time to take our energy policy down a new path that reduces carbon pollution and promotes a sustainable, greener tomorrow for future generations."100100Congressman Dwight Evans has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congressman opposed President Trump's withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, stating in a 2017 press release, "I will continue to act on climate because our future generations depend on it and we have a lot to lose if not. In fact, 59% of Americans believe in climate change and know protecting our earth is crucial. Nevertheless, President Trump’s action to withdraw the US from the Paris Climate Agreement, does not mean that my colleagues and I will advocate less for what is in the best interest of the Philadelphians, Pennsylvanians and the American people." On his website's 'Environment' page, Congressman Evans states, "Scientific research proves climate change is real and its consequences are serious and evident. Sea level rise, droughts and rising temperatures across the nation show the serious impact of climate change. Climate change is directly related to our national security, economic prosperity and food supply. It is time to take our energy policy down a new path that reduces carbon pollution and promotes a sustainable, greener tomorrow for future generations." The Congressman also supported the Better Future Act (OFF Act) (H.R. 3671) in 2018, which would eliminate tax giveaways to the fossil fuel industry. Congressman Evans makes climate change a top priority issue.100Congressman Evans publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 763). This bill would put a $15 per metric ton price on carbon emissions. He voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 100100https://evans.house.gov/issues/environment https://evans.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/i-do-not-support-us-withdrawal-paris-climate-agreement https://evans.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/congressman-evans-announces-support-fossil-fuels-better-future-act https://evans.house.gov/issues/environment https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://evans.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/evans-senate-must-pass-women-s-health-protection-actSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Fallon, PatTexas4RCongressman Pat Fallon does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250In an April 2021 tweet posted in 2021, Congressman Fallon wrote "@AOC claims fossil fuel infrastructure and "climate-denying politicians" in Texas caused the 2021 power crisis. But according to @DallasFed, electricity generation started to fail when AOC's beloved wind turbines froze. Stop lying about Texas @AOC." In another April 2021 tweet, the congressman wrote "Democrats across the country say their definition of "infrastructure" includes: -Universal Pre-K -Climate Action -Climate Justice -Eradicating Right to Work Environments -Caregiving -Affordable Housing -Police Accountability -Paid Leave THIS AIN’T INFRASTRUCTURE!" Congressman Pat Fallon demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Pat Fallon has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5018.75https://twitter.com/RepPatFallon/status/1385345746954825732 https://twitter.com/reppatfallon/status/1385029338496741381 https://fallon.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-fallon-issues-statement-supreme-court-decisionOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Feenstra, Randy Iowa4RCongressman Randy Feenstra does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250According to a 2021 'Iowa Torch' article, Congressman Feenstra stated that "As a member of [the Energy, Climate, and Conservation] task force, I will continue fighting for Iowa biofuel producers.." The congressman "also coordinated members of the Iowa delegation in sending a letter to the president, urging him to uphold his previous promise to “promote and advance” ethanol and biofuels." Congressman Randy Feenstra demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Randy Feenstra has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5018.75https://www.feenstraforcongress.com https://iowatorch.com/2021/07/01/feenstra-to-serve-on-energy-climate-and-conservation-task-force/ https://feenstra.house.gov/media/press-releases/feenstra-issues-statement-roe-v-wade-0Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Ferguson, DrewGeorgia3RCongressman Drew Ferguson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250Congressman Ferguson showed a lack of leadership by helping deregulate the coal industry, stating in a press release that, "One of the key promises I made when I came to Congress was to get rid of job-killing federal regulations. The Stream Protection Rule is a perfect example. This rule puts almost one third of coal mining jobs in jeopardy and ignores the Department of Interior’s own reports that virtually all coal mines already operate safely and have no off-site impacts and that lands are being restored successfully under pre-existing regulations." Congressman Ferguson demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Ferguson opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 2512.5https://ferguson.house.gov/media/press-releases/ferguson-votes-end-stream-protection-rule https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://ferguson.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=3958Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Finstad, BradMinnesota1RCongressman Brad Finstad does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. When asked about climate change in an interview with a local newspaper, he addressed agricultural problems without mentioning climate change a single time.2533Congressman Finstad does not oppose climate action. Congressman Finstad supports an all of the above climate strategy plan. In an opinion piece, he wrote, "We need an “all of the above” strategy for energy solutions. I’m proud to say as a family farmer from New Ulm the agricultural community has been on the forefront of this effort through ethanol and biofuels production."25Congressman Finstad has no known position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5033.25https://www.dglobe.com/news/local/district-1-congressional-candidates-weigh-in-on-everything-from-roe-v-wade-to-immigration-and-climate-change https://www.postbulletin.com/opinion/letters/brad-finstad-we-need-to-address-the-energy-crisis Since member was not in Congress for votes in 2022, the vote score was imputed using the average of position, leadership and fee on carbon score.Opposes RoeN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Fischbach, Michelle Minnesota7RCongresswoman Michelle Fischbach does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250According to a February 2021 press release, "Fischbach, a member of the House Agriculture Committee, plans to voice support for ethanol and soy diesel during discussions about climate change, she said. “Those are sources we’re already using; we have to make sure that we don’t neglect those in favor of solar and wind,” Fischbach said." In an April 2021 press release, "Fischbach said she hopes to hear more from farmers and work on issues directly important to them, as opposed to broader issues like climate change." Later in the press release, Congresswoman Michelle Fischbach stated 'If we are going to do these things with climate change and make these changes, I don’t want to see us doing things like the California emissions standards,'” Fischbach said. Other measures like biofuels need to be supported as part of the solution, she said." Congresswoman Fischbach demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congresswoman Michelle Fischbach has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5018.75https://fischbach.house.gov/in-the-news?ContentRecord_id=059891B1-66CD-4C7B-88A2-4BD412AF71F8 https://fischbach.house.gov/in-the-news?ContentRecord_id=AD38A3C7-D61C-4614-9B4D-1AAFD6717141 https://fischbach.house.gov/2022/6/rep-fischbach-reacts-to-supreme-court-decision-on-dobbs-v-jackson Opposes RoeN/AN/AN/AN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Fitzgerald, Scott Wisconsin5RCongressman Scott Fitzgerald does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to the 'Milwaukee Journal Sentinel' in 2019, "Asked if climate change was a significant global threat, Fitzgerald said the issue 'deserves a lot more scrutiny.' 'I know that certainly the scientific community has said there are indicators, definitely something going on. But at this point, I don't know if we can draw any hard conclusions on the issue,' he said."250In 2021, Congressman Fitzgerald voted in favor of the Keystone XL Pipeline Construction and Jobs Preservation Act, "a bill to authorize the Keystone XL Pipeline. Congressman Scott Fitzgerald demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Scott Fitzgerald has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5018.75https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/politics/elections/2019/09/17/longtime-state-senate-leader-scott-fitzgerald-announces-bid-congress/2346564001/ https://www.billtrack50.com/billdetail/1299297 https://mobile.twitter.com/RepFitzgerald/status/1131739311941009408Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Fitzpatrick, BrianPennsylvania1RCongressman Brian Fitzpatrick understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. According to the Congressman's website, he states, "Climate change and the irresponsible management of our resources put a strain on the health of our communities—and our children...That is why I have been fighting hard for these priorities during my time in Congress." It continues, "Congress can and must do more to combat climate change and rebuild our crumbling infrastructure. We don’t need to choose between clean energy and economic growth, or between combating climate change and creating jobs. We can and should do both." 7543Congressman Fitzpatrick has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. In a Philadelphia Inquirer op-ed written in 2020 on bipartisan action on climate change, the Congressman wrote, "Climate change is already costing our economy through increased flooding, more severe storms, and devastating droughts. Delaware and Pennsylvania’s 1st Congressional district are about 40 miles apart, but they both border the Delaware River and are home to communities, including Levittown and Wilmington, that are at significant risk of damaging floods in the near future." The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2017 speech on the House floor on climate change, the Congressman stated, "It is critical in order to preserve public health the reality is climate change is real and humans are a contributing factor Congress must take serious and reasonable steps to combat it." Rep. Fitzpatrick makes climate change a top priority issue as well. The Congressman condemned the President's decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement, stating, "Every nation will be affected by climate change, which is why nearly every country agreed to work to reduce carbon emissions in the Paris Climate Accords. The people in my district remain committed to pursuing bipartisan solutions to address climate change and protect our environment which is why I voted yes on HR 9."100Congressman Fitzpatrick publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted against 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). The Congressman introduced the Modernizing America with Rebuilding to Kickstart the Economy of the Twenty-first Century with a Historic Infrastructure-Centered Expansion (MARKET) Act (H.R. 4520), which imposes a tax on the greenhouse gas emissions of fossil fuels, certain industrial processes, and certain product uses.10079.5https://fitzpatrick.house.gov/2021/5/reps-fitzpatrick-carbajal-re-introduce-market-choice-act https://fitzpatrick.house.gov/media-center/in-the-news/op-ed-it-s-time-bipartisan-support-combating-climate-change-and-rebuilding https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vaBKEfRURRU https://fitzpatrick.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/fitzpatrick-statement-paris-climate-agreement https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4520 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.buckscountycouriertimes.com/story/news/local/2022/06/24/roe-v-wade-abortion-pennsylvania-bucks-county-congressman-brian-fitzpatrick-ashley-ehasz/65363272007/Opposes RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Fleischmann, ChuckTennessee3RCongressman Chuck Fleischmann does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250On Congressman Fleischmann's, 'Energy,' page, it states, "The United States possesses immense oil and natural gas reserves that are completely unused. Increasing our energy independence can and should be done in a responsible manner that will not unnecessarily drive up energy costs or jeopardize economic growth." Congressman Fleischmann demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.0Congressman Fleischmann opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 2512.5https://fleischmann.house.gov/issues/energy https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://fleischmann.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-fleischmann-statement-on-us-supreme-court-s-decision-in-dobbs-v-jackson-women-s-health-organizationOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Flood, MikeNebraska1RRepresentative Mike Flood does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Representative Mike Flood demonstrates a lack of leadership with the lack of public statements, advocacy and vetoing of pro climate bills. On his website, he touts his achievements in paving "the way for state approval of the Keystone XL pipeline, helping secure America's energy future and defeating the left-wing, environmentalist radicals who fought to stop it in the Legislature."0Representative Mike Flood has no known position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He has not spoken publicly about this topic and has supported carbon capture as a State Senator.5018.75https://mikefloodfornebraska.com/about/Opposes RoeN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AAnti Climate
Flores, MayraTexas34RMyra Flores disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an article in 'Spectrum News 1,' Mayra Flores Flores "argues that Democrats are forcing Texans to choose between their energy sector jobs and curbing climate change." On her website she calls herself, "Pro-oil and gas."012.5Mayra Flores demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. On her campaign website, she touted herself as a champion of oil and gas, promising that she would "always work to help the oil and gas industry and stand firm against radical policies that would undermine it." She also attacked the Green New Deal on Facebook, where she posted, "Green new deal = wasting trillions of hardworking taxpayer money, give it to their donors, other countries and destroying America."0Mayra Flores has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5016.6667https://spectrumlocalnews.com/tx/south-texas-el-paso/news/2021/10/03/why-democrats--climate-goals-may-test-their-latino-appeal https://www.mayrafloresforcongress.com/issues/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QkU-BAsYBKQ Since member was not in Congress for votes in 2022, the vote score was imputed using the average of position, leadership and fee on carbon score.Opposes RoeN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Foster, BillIllinois11DCongressman Foster understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "We know that climate change is real and largely man-made. While some politicians claim it’s a hoax, most experts believe we will begin to see very significant economic, political, and social consequences from climate change if we do not act now. I support sound economic policies that reduce greenhouse gas emissions and protect our environment for the next generation."100100Congressman Foster has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. According to Naperville Community Television, in 2019 the Congressman hosted a climate change forum, where he was quoted stating, "The time for action is now. That we’ve spent decades debating this, we’ve been spending decades lowering the scientific uncertainty to the point where it’s absolutely clear that it’s passed time to take action.” The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. On his campaign website, the Congressman states, "We must aggressively combat climate change, reduce our dependence on foreign oil and promote cleaner and more economical sources of energy. In the near term we must do what we can, within the bounds of what is economically sensible and technically feasible, to begin making progress in these efforts. In the longer term, we must develop new energy technologies that have the best chance of succeeding in the market place." Rep. Foster makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2021 press release regarding the U.S. decision to re-join the Paris Climate Agreement, the Congressman stated, "I applaud President Biden acting on Day One to rejoin the historic Paris Climate Agreement. This sends a clear message to the world that American leadership is back. We will not abdicate our responsibility to help protect the planet for future generations, and we will employ our nation’s scientific infrastructure to tackle the challenge of climate change.”"100Congressman Foster supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. He voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 7593.75https://foster.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://foster.house.gov/media/in-the-news/representatives-host-climate-change-forum https://billfoster.com/issue/energy-that-is-safe-secure-and-affordable/ https://foster.house.gov/media/press-releases/foster-statement-on-rejoining-paris-climate-agreement https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://foster.house.gov/media/press-releases/foster-statement-on-supreme-court-decision-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Foxx, VirginiaNorth Carolina5RCongresswoman Virginia Foxx does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250In 2015, Congresswoman Foxx spoke out against the Clean Power Plan. In a press release the Congresswoman stated, "The EPA is out of touch with the energy needs of Americans, and its unelected bureaucrats too often make decisions without consideration for how those choices will affect people's daily lives. The ‘Clean Power Plan’ rule is yet another example of the EPA’s regulatory overreach.” Rep. Foxx was a supporter of the Keystone Pipeline, and spoke out against the Paris Climate Accord. In a 2019 interview, she said "The Paris climate accord doesn’t do anything to move us in the right direction globally." Congresswoman Foxx demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.0Congresswoman Foxx opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119).2512.5https://www.huffpost.com/entry/climate-change-facts-myths_n_846255 https://foxx.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=398625 https://www.mtairynews.com/news/73652/foxx-defends-climate-vote-at-outdoor-event https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://foxx.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=400077Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Frankel, LoisFlorida22DCongresswoman Lois Frankel understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's campaign website it states, "Climate change is the most immediate and pressing challenge globally, nationally, and locally right here in South Florida. We are already seeing the consequences with stronger hurricanes, higher temperatures, more frequent flooding, and beach erosion."100100As a member of the Energy & Water Appropriations subcommittee, the Congresswoman fought for $250 million in funding for Everglades Restoration, stating in a 2019 press release, "This bill will also increase the funding for renewable and energy efficiency programs critical to fighting climate change and reducing our carbon emissions as we strive to make our nation carbon neutral by 2050." In a 2019 tweet, the Congresswoman stated, "If we don’t do something about #climatechange, extreme weather will have an impact on every Floridian. On our public health, our agriculture, our unique environment & wildlife." Rep. Frankel makes climate change a top priority issue as well. Her website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congresswoman Frankel supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. She voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 7587.5https://frankel.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=574 https://frankel.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=3145 https://twitter.com/reploisfrankel/status/1100863141250883585?lang=bg https://loisfrankelforcongress.com/environment/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://frankel.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=3456Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Franklin, ScottFlorida18RCongressman Scott Franklin disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. A 2020 article from 'The Ledger' states that "Franklin said the climate seems to be changing, but he said he isn’t convinced human activity is the driving factor."00In the 2020 Candidate Questionnaire from the Florida Conference of Catholic Bishops, Congressman Scott Franklin wrote "I believe American innovation and entrepreneurship will help us solve the environmental and climate challenges we face. I am concerned about investing taxpayer dollars in specific businesses or research initiatives tied to renewable energy. The U.S. government should not be in the business of picking winners and losers. We must let the free market determine what solutions are effective, efficient and affordable." Congressman Scott Franklin does not oppose climate action.25Congressman Scott Franklin has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5018.75https://www.theledger.com/in-depth/news/politics/elections/2020/10/18/election-2020-franklin-cohn-battle-long-red-district-15/3670575001/ https://www.flaccb.org/documents/2020/10/franklin_scott.pdf https://franklin.house.gov/issues/agriculture https://franklin.house.gov/media/press-releases/franklin-defends-lives-unborn-votes-no-abortion-demand-until-birth-actOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Fulcher, RussIdaho1RCongressman Russ Fulcher disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to The Spokesman-Review, during a 2018 debate, when asked about climate change, the Congressman stated that he believes, "in the cycle that’s happened since the beginning of time.” 00During a 2019 speech on the House Floor about the Green New Deal, Congressman Fulcher stated, "Over the next ten years it would eliminate the use of fossil fuels and nuclear power. This mean our gasoline-powered vehicles and instruments would be useless and there would be no air travel... The architects fail to explain how they would rebuild the economy they would decimate." Congressman Fulcher demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Rep. Fulcher makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).5012.5https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2018/oct/29/medicaid-immigration-climate-top-idaho-1st-distric/ https://twitter.com/RepRussFulcher/status/1100463418614652930 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/34/cosponsors?r=1&s=1 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://fulcher.house.gov/2020/1/rep-fulcher-op-ed-after-47-years-it-s-time-congress-recognize-victims-of-abortionOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
Gaetz, MattFlorida1RCongressman Matt Gaetz understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. According to a 2017 In a Pensacola News Journal article the Congressman was reported to have stated after joining the bipartisan climate solutions caucus that, "I don't think there's a scientific debate left to be had on if it is happening. I also think history is going to judge very harshly climate change deniers, and I don't want to be one of them."7514In a 2019 press release promoting his climate change plan, titled the Green Real Deal, Congressman Gaetz stated, "While some in our government espouse that climate change isn’t happening, our military puts politics to the side. These leaders carry the trust of the American people on their shoulders. We call on them to lead this country’s most precious resource — our people — into battle. They do not have the luxury of an academic debate about climate change; they do not have time to argue with a thermometer. So, when these same people state that climate change is real and already impacting our military, we should all listen." In a 2019 interview on Fox Business, he described the Green New Deal as a "Green Nightmare." Congressman Gaetz supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. 50Congressman Gaetz makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119).034.75https://www.pnj.com/story/money/business/2017/11/24/after-pushing-bill-abolish-epa-rep-matt-gaetz-joins-climate-solutions-caucus/893141001/ https://gaetz.house.gov/media/in-the-news/matt-gaetz-addressing-climate-change-through-green-real-deal https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vcFMlpLZu0&feature=emb_logo https://gaetz.house.gov/media/in-the-news/meet-matt-gaetz-controversial-gop-congressman-leading-effort-release-fbi-memo https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.tallahassee.com/story/news/2022/07/23/florida-congressman-matt-gaetz-makes-controversial-abortion-comments/10136955002/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimatePro ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Gallagher, MikeWisconsin8RCongressman Mike Gallagher does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels and puts forth policies that have proven ineffective. According to the 'American Climate Contract (ACC),' Rep. Gallagher states, "Climate change is a serious issue that requires us to put forward responsible solutions. The ACC’s Climate Contract demonstrates that reducing carbon emissions, conserving natural resources, and promoting economic growth are not mutually exclusive goals, and provides a common-sense path to a more sustainable future. I applaud their hard work in putting together this proposal, and look forward to fighting for bipartisan ways to invest in energy innovation and protect our environment for the next generations of Wisconsinites.” The ACC puts forth vague, ill-defined policies like "energy innovation" and approaches that have proven ineffective or problematic like deregulation and carbon capture and sequestration. At the same time, supporters of ACC vote against effective, climate policies. 250Congressman Mike Gallagher opposed the Clean Power Plan, stating in a Q&A with Door County Plus, "I do not believe we should sacrifice economic growth and opportunity here in Wisconsin and around the world in the hopes of mitigating carbon emissions by an amount nobody will ever be able to measure. The Clean Power Plan was a particularly terrible idea that won’t meaningfully affect the climate but will cost Wisconsin thousands of jobs and will leave a huge portion of our nation’s economic activity subject to the command-and-control of the Environmental Protection Agency." Congressman Gallagher demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.0Congressman Gallagher makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. According to a 2019 article in The Lawretian, when responding to a question on lowering carbon emissions, "Gallagher responded to this by saying that he is skeptical of a carbon fee and dividend system to tax fossil fuels, because he doesn’t want higher prices passed on to consumers and he does not trust the government to make good on its word to return the money to the American people." Congressman Gallagher voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s position on a fee on carbon.06.25https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5e2b36f4583dee21c466f074/t/5ec84481da1108570067ed93/1590183045523/ACC+Pillar+1-+Energy+Innovation.pdf https://www.climatesolution.eco/house https://doorcountypulse.com/candidate-qa-8th-congressional-district/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.wbay.com/2022/05/05/gallagher-baldwin-react-supreme-court-draft-leak-signaling-end-abortion-rights/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/A
Gallego, RubenArizona3DCongressman Reuben Gallego understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2019 press release on the Select Committee on the Climate Crisis the Congressman stated, “In order to turn the tide of the climate crisis in our lifetime, we must prioritize bold policies that sustainably address emissions, public lands, clean air and water, and renewable energy development while boosting our economy, creating jobs, and empowering communities that have long borne the brunt of environmental neglect and exploitation. That’s why I will continue to work tirelessly in Congress to author and pass legislation like the bills highlighted in this report. Future generations are counting on us.”100100According to a 2014 Huffington Post article, Congressman Gallego tied climate mitigation to the health of the Hispanic community stating, "I think we need Hispanic congressmen and congresswomen to start stepping up and talking about climate change, start talking about a living wage or at least a higher minimum wage because that directly impacts Latinos here in this country." In a 2017 tweet responding to President Trump withdrawing from the Paris Agreement, the Congressman wrote, "Strong action on climate change produces real benefits for our environment & economy. Walking away from the Paris agreement is a mistake." Congressman Gallego's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue.75Congressman Gallegopublicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. 10093.75https://rubengallego.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-gallego-statement-trump-administration-s-repeal-clean-power-plan https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/02/27/ruben-gallego-ed-pastor_n_4869759.html https://twitter.com/RepRubenGallego/status/869648570768658434 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22Arizona%22%7D https://rubengallego.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/statement-gallego-supreme-court-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Garamendi, JohnCalifornia8DCongressman Garamendi understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2022 press release for Earth Day, he stated, “There is no Planet B. On this Earth Day, I am recommitting myself to doing everything in my power to protect our air, water, and ecosystems for this generation and those to come. 2020 was tied for the hottest year on record, and recent climate reports paint a grim picture for the future of our planet if we don’t act now,” Garamendi said. “Mother nature is crying out for help, and we must all heed her warning and answer the call before the climate crisis permanently upends our lives and our world. As a public servant, I have and will continue to spend my career fighting to address the existential threat of climate change" 100100Congressman John Garamendi has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. On the Congressman's, 'Environment,' page, it states, "America must take the climate crisis seriously. Congressman Garamendi is a passionate advocate for investments in clean energy, building weatherization, public transit, and biking amenities, because these are the key ways we can lower our carbon footprint." The congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a speech on the House floor, he stated, “Global warming is real. Take a look at California. We are in the midst of the fourth year of a very severe drought. You can debate whether this drought is or is not the result of climate change, but you cannot debate the fact that CO2 in our atmosphere is approaching 400 parts per million – highest it’s ever been in over 800,000 years. You cannot debate the fact that it’s a heck of a lot warmer in California in the last decade than it’s ever been in recorded time. You cannot debate the fact the snow level in California is rapidly rising up the Sierra Nevada and the Siskiyou Mountains leaving us with an ever smaller snow reservoir." Congressman Garamendi makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2022 press release announcing his support and vote for the 'Inflation Reduction Act,' he stated, "This historic legislation provides over $369 billion—the single largest investment ever—to tackle the climate crisis. With the clean energy programs funded in this bill, we will reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 40% by 2030. This critically important funding will make the air we breathe and the water we drink cleaner and spur a once-in-a-generation investment in research and technology to mitigate the risks posed by climate change" 100Congressman Garamendi publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. Rep. Garamendi voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).100100https://garamendi.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-garamendi-s-statement-earth-day https://garamendi.house.gov/legislative-work/issues/environment https://garamendi.house.gov/press-release/garamendi-calls-congress-address-climate-change https://garamendi.house.gov/media/press-releases/garamendi-applauds-inflation-reduction-act-s-introduction-us-senate-deliver https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://garamendi.house.gov/media/press-releases/garamendi-s-statement-supreme-court-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Garbarino, AndrewNew York2RCongressman Andrew Garbarino agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he wrote, "I believe we can address our changing climate while also protecting the economic prosperity of the United States."500Congressman Garbarino does not oppose climate action. He supports an all of the above solution, as indicated in a June 2022 tweet: "As Long Islanders continue to pay the price for Biden’s Energy Crisis, I recently traveled to Houston, TX to learn more about domestic oil and gas production and see firsthand the potential of America's energy sector. We can and must produce the energy we need here at home."25Congressman Garbarino has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5031.25https://garbarino.house.gov/issues/environment https://twitter.com/repgarbarino/status/1532067132032229377 https://dccc.org/vulnerable-rep-andrew-garbarino-is-complicit-in-continued-threat-to-abortion-rights/Opposes RoeN/AN/AN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Garcia, ChuyIllinois4DCongressman Chuy Garcia understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Environment,' page, it states, "This generation faces an unprecedented and urgent climate crisis that threatens our economy, our national security, and our planet. As a nation and member of the global community, we must aggressively confront human-caused climate change. To do so, policy makers must promote a transition to sustainable technologies in the 21st century.100100Congressman Garcia has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 press release calling for infrastructure policies to address climate change, Rep. Garcia stated, "The fact is, climate change is causing more extreme weather events and will put more strain on our crumbling infrastructure." The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 speech endorsing the Green New Deal, the Congressman stated, "The greatest challenge to our generation combating and reversing the effects of global climate change." Congressman Garcia makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2019 speech on the EPA, he stated, "It is important to acknowledge the growing crisis of climate change in our times. Yet President Trump wants to severely cut funding for the atmospheric reduction programs."100Congressman Garcia publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. He was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 100100https://chuygarcia.house.gov/issues/environment https://chuygarcia.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-jes-s-chuy-garc-calls-federal-infrastructure-policies-address https://chuygarcia.house.gov/media/videos/pledging-support-green-new-deal-chicago https://www.facebook.com/RepChuyGarcia/videos/410631513059484/?v=410631513059484 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22party%22%3A%22all%22%7D https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://twitter.com/RepChuyGarcia/status/1540346068969324544Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Garcia, MikeCalifornia27RCongressman Mike Garcia agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a September 2021 Simi Valley town hall, Representative Garcia stated that "I do believe the climate has changed in the last 120 years as a result of the industrial revolution."500Congressman Mike Garcia demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. In a December 2019, Representative Garcia tweeted that "it’s climate change” excuse is a typical politician fabrication to cover her [Christy Smith] poor leadership on policy". In response to a question on the spread of wildfires during his September 2021 Simi Valley town hall, Congressman Garcia remarked that “God forbid if anyone tells you that this is a product of climate change", and attributed the increasing spread of wildfires to poor forest management. In an August 8 tweet, Rep. Garcia said that the Inflation Reduction Act (H.R. 5376) and American Rescue Plan (H.R. 1319) do not "make any sense, and calling these bills anything other than what they are (dumb) is wrong".0Congressman Mike Garcia has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. Representative Garcia was not in Congress to vote on a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH))5025https://theproclaimerscv.com/2021/09/02/the-vaccines-work-ok-garcia-talks-afghanistan-biden-climate-change-and-more-at-simi-valley-town-hall/ https://twitter.com/ElectMikeGarcia/status/1205657952062824449 https://theproclaimerscv.com/2021/09/02/the-vaccines-work-ok-garcia-talks-afghanistan-biden-climate-change-and-more-at-simi-valley-town-hall/ https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2022-10-20/2022-california-midterm-election-garcia-smith-abortion-economy-environment https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2022-08-29/california-congressional-republicans-recalibrate-abortion-stanceOpposes RoeN/AN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Garcia, SylviaTexas29DCongresswoman Sylvia Garcia understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her website, Congresswoman Garcia states, “To mark the start of hurricane season, I introduced the Climate Change and Hurricane Correlation and Strategy Act. We know that climate change isn’t just warming the Earth, but also changing weather patterns around the globe. While we must prepare for worse hurricanes in the future, we also need to be planning on how to reduce greenhouse gases that drive climate change and ultimately greater storm intensity,”100100Congresswoman Sylvia Garcia has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. According to Congresswoman Garcia's website, "Congresswoman Sylvia Garcia (TX-29) issued the following statement to mark the first day of the Atlantic hurricane season and the introduction of the Climate Change and Hurricane Correlation and Strategy Act. This bill requires the Administration to produce a report to Congress every 5 years on how the United States plans to combat the increasing hurricane activity due to climate change. These reports will lay out a strategic plan on how the nation can address the causes of climate change and weather intensification. The legislation also prohibits the use of nuclear weapons for weather modification." Congresswoman Garcia makes climate change a top priority issue.100Congresswoman Garcia has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5087.5https://sylviagarcia.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-sylvia-garcia-issues-statement-start-hurricane-season-introduces https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://sylviagarcia.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-garcias-statement-roe-v-wade-decisionSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Gimenez, Carlos Florida28RCongressman Carlos Gimenez understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. Speaking about climate change in 2017 during his 'State of the County' address , the congressman said "It's not a theory. It's a fact. We live it every day." In a 2021 'Orlando Sentinel' article, Congressman Gimenez wrote "Now more than ever, it is incumbent upon all of us to invest instead in clean energy and resiliency solutions to deal with the impacts we have created and prevent the worse ones coming down the pipeline."750On his website, Congressman Gimenez states "I support an all-of-the-above approach to domestic energy production with a focus on research, and deployment of new, clean energy technologies that ensures all Americans have access to affordable and reliable energy sources." Gimenez also states, "I am a strong supporter of free market solutions that protect our environment and innovate our economy to make renewable and clean energy as affordable as, and ultimately cheaper than, traditional energy sources for American families." Congressman Carlos Gimenez does not oppose climate action.25Congressman Carlos Gimenez has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5037.5https://www.governing.com/archive/tns-miami-climate-change-gimenez.html https://www.orlandosentinel.com/opinion/guest-commentary/os-op-carlos-gimenez-hurricane-insurance-invading-sea-20210528-fi4mw4bfnrbldcwmnnqes3lbay-story.html https://gimenez.house.gov/issues/energy https://gimenez.house.gov/2022/6/gimenez-statement-on-the-supreme-court-s-dobbs-decisionOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Golden, JaredMaine2DCongressman Jared Golden understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "Climate change is the greatest environmental challenge of our time. Jared believes it presents a unique and pressing threat to homes, jobs, and entire industries across our state, as well as our national security."10071.42Congressman Golden co-sponsored the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9) stating in a press release, "We have to protect Maine’s environment – and the thousands of jobs that depend on it – from climate change. If our forests, water, or climate go bad, it would destroy our forest products, fishing, and farming industries. The United States must honor the commitments it made in the Paris Agreement." Congressman Golden's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congressman Golden has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5074.105https://golden.house.gov/issues/energy-environment https://golden.house.gov/media/press-releases/golden-votes-keep-us-paris-agreement-protect-maine-s-environment-0 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://golden.house.gov/media/press-releases/golden-statement-on-supreme-court-decision-overturning-roe-vs-wade-decisionSupports RoePro ClimateAnti ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimateAnti ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Gomez, JimmyCalifornia34DCongressman Jimmy Gomez understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2019 press release in support of the Green New Deal, the Congressman stated, "Climate change is one of the most urgent threats to our nation’s security and prosperity, and tackling it will require the federal government to adopt a comprehensive, bold, and equitable approach. As an original cosponsor of the Green New Deal resolution, I look forward to building upon California’s progress in combating climate change and elevating this ambitious plan of action to the forefront of our national dialogue.”100100Congressman Gomez has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. Congressman Gomez introduced the Climate Solutions Act of 2019 (H.R. 2958), which would require 100 percent of electricity sold in the United States be generated from renewable sources by 2035, stating in a press release, “The Climate Solutions Act of 2019 will shift our country away from the inaction and cowardice that have come to define this administration’s approach to environmental justice and towards an aggressive strategy that supports strong renewable energy standards, forcefully targets greenhouse gasses, and establishes a bold national energy efficiency standard." The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 Facebook post, the Congressman stated, "Climate change doesn’t stop at borders. Neither should our effort to fight it... Trump may have ceded America’s leadership on climate change — California will not." Rep. Gomez makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2019 tweet, the Congressman stated "97% of scientists agree that #ClimateChange is happening and we’re causing it. There’s NO “both sides” to this issue."100Congressman Gomez supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. He voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 7593.75https://gomez.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=493 https://gomez.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=438 https://www.facebook.com/RepJimmyGomez/photos/a.172532199956354/363344207541818/?type=1&theater https://twitter.com/RepJimmyGomez/status/1100144930020909057 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://twitter.com/JimmyGomezCA/status/1540417701960630272Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Gonzales, TonyTexas23RCongressman Tony Gonzales disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. During a December 2019 meet and greet in Pearsall, Texas, the congressman stated 'A lot of times the narrative is, minorities and young people are for this climate change stuff. Well, guss what, I’m young, I’m a minority, and I am completely against that.’”00On his website, Congressman Gonzales states "Texas is our country’s lead producer of oil and natural gas. It’s important that we are free from regulations in order to tap into our state’s full energy potential." Congressman Tony Gonzales demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Tony Gonzales has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5012.5https://dccc.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/200826-Tony-Gonzales-Research-Book-ONLINE-.pdf https://gonzales.house.gov/issues/energy https://dccc.org/tony-gonzales-supports-extreme-near-total-abortion-ban-bounties-on-doctors-family-members/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Gonzalez, VicenteTexas34DCongressman Vicente Gonzalez does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change position.25100On Congressman Gonzalez's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "Congressman Gonzalez supports an all-the-above approach to energy and understands the importance of American energy not only to power our cars and homes, but also as a national security issue and a job creator. The 15th District is home to the Eagle Ford Shale, one of the largest oil production areas in the state, creating more than 3.8 million jobs and generating $473 billion in gross domestic product. The Congressman has seen firsthand the effects of a thriving oil and gas industry." Congressman Gonzalez does not oppose climate action, instead supporting an 'all-of-the-above' energy plan, which does not go far enough to completely eliminate the use of fossil fuels. 25Congressman Gonzalez opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. Congressman Gonzalez voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res.119). 2543.75https://gonzalez.house.gov/issues/energy https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/political-courage-test/166483/vicente-gonzalezSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Good, BobVirginia5RCongressman Bob Good does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an August 2021 tweet, the congressman wrote "The President and NSC HAVE:...• combated “climate change”..."250According to a 2020 'Martinsville Bulletin' article, "During a campaign stop," the congressman stated 'I reject climate and environmental extremism that has a radical, negative impact on our economy, on jobs and on the American way of life.'” Later, the article also states that "Good decried...rejoining the Paris Climate Agreement..." Congressman Bob Good demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Bob Good has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5018.75https://twitter.com/repbobgood/status/1430967844951543809 https://martinsvillebulletin.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/gop-5th-district-candidate-bob-good-says-battle-against-democrats-akin-to-fighting-terrorism/article_452ecf76-1a30-11eb-99ee-ffcb16a0269f.html https://wset.com/news/local/republican-bob-good-congress-house-of-representatives-second-term-virginia-convention-dan-moy-ukraine-russia-inflation-abortion-supreme-court-roe-v-wadeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
Gooden, LanceTexas5RCongressman Gooden disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. When responding to a 2017 voter survey guide by The Dallas Morning News, the Congressman stated, "Climate science is imprecise and so are the consequences of any legislative action we take to address the issue. We can never be so arrogant to believe we can predict with certainty the impacts that will follow specific regulations about emissions, not only for the environment but also for our economy." In a 2021 post on 'Twitter,' the congressman stated, "Climate change is not the reason for the boarder crisis. Joe Biden is."00In a 2019 editorial on climate solutions, Congressman Gooden says, "I offer another solution – one that utilizes the creative power of the American economy. By sponsoring developments in carbon capture, natural gas extraction and nuclear power, Republicans have found a way to allow the genius of American innovation to solve the problems we face. We can’t regulate our way out of this mess as the Obama administration attempted. The future of clean energy and reducing emissions lies in new technologies like small-scale, advanced nuclear power plants and solid-state batteries. The only way to access those solutions is for the American economy to be unleashed." Congressman Gooden demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.0Congressman Gooden has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5012.5https://voterguide.dallasnews.com/2018-general/candidates/469/ https://twitter.com/lancegooden/status/1383929296767504385 https://gooden.house.gov/media/editorials/republican-solutions-climate-crisis https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://iqconnect.house.gov/iqextranet/view_newsletter.aspx?id=101216&c=TX05LGOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Gosar, Paul A.Arizona9RCongressman Paul Gosar disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2019 Axios article, when asked about climate change by a Green New Deal protestor, the Congressman answered, "Unfortunately you haven't been taught about photosynthesis. Photosynthesis is where plants take carbon dioxide to produce oxygen. That's a problem in today's world. We haven't taught kids exactly what's going on in America and in science."00In a 2017 press release advocating against the Paris Agreement, Congressman Gosar stated, "This unconstitutional treaty is nothing more than an extension of the Obama Administration’s ideological war on affordable energy." The Congressman also wrote a 2014 op-ed for the news publication, Town Hall, where he boycotted the Pope's address on climate change stating, "The earth's climate has been changing since God created it, with or without man. On that, we should all agree… If the Pope wants to devote his life to fighting climate change then he can do so in his personal time. But to promote questionable science as Catholic dogma is ridiculous." Congressman Gosar demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Gosar makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a 2019 press release on the Green New Deal, Congressman Gosar stated, "Democrat socialists made clear today that they want to use climate change as a means to abolish capitalism and implement massive taxation, expropriation and government control." In a 2014 op-ed for the Arizona Republic on President Obama's Clean Power Plan, he stated, "Knowing he can’t lawfully enact a carbon-dioxide tax plan, Obama is unlawfully directing his EPA to impose strict limits on carbon emissions from existing coal and gas-fired facilities." Congressman Gosar was a co-sponsor and voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 00https://www.axios.com/paul-gosar-climate-change-photosynthesis-green-new-deal-aa3af04e-2437-49ec-bf23-fbb2fb1fd393.html https://gosar.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1480 https://townhall.com/columnists/congressmanpaulgosar/2015/09/17/why-i-am-boycotting-pope-francis-address-to-congress-n2053596 https://gosar.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2529 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://gosar.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2241Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Gottheimer, JoshNew Jersey5DCongressman Gottheimer understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a statement regarding President Biden's executive order to rejoin the Paris Climate Agreement, he stated, "Withdrawing the United States from the historic Paris Agreement on climate change was a mistake, an abdication of American leadership on the world stage, and a setback for the united effort needed to keep our air and water clean. We must prioritize addressing the threat of climate change and work to mitigate the harm to our environment, our economy, and our communities. When it comes to clean air and water and a healthy environment, we cannot afford to look the other way"100100In a press release discussing his advocacy for new climate protections, Rep. Gottheimer stated, "We are in the middle of a major climate crisis. It’s not something we can just ignore and hope will get better. When you talk about fighting climate change, at first it seems like an insurmountable task. But then you dig into it, and you realize we can take immediate steps now that will have both an immediate and long term impact on our lives-on our health, on our economy, on our planet. The cost of inaction on climate change is incalculable." He is a co-sponsor of the Climate Action Now Act (H.R.9), legislation that "requires the President to develop and update annually a plan for the United States to meet its nationally determined contribution under the Paris Agreement on climate change." Congressman Gottheimer's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Rep. Gottheimer supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. The Congressman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 7587.5https://gottheimer.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2329 https://gottheimer.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2352 https://gottheimer.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2771 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/9?s=1&r=8 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Granger, KayTexas12RCongresswoman Granger does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change position.250Congresswoman Granger demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy,' page it states, "I was proud to support the Fiscal Year 2016 Omnibus Appropriations bill that became law and repealed the crude oil export ban. This outdated policy, which was signed into law in the 1970’s, blocked American energy producers from being able to sell any of our abundant domestic oil to our allies and partners around the world. This positive change in policy contributes to more American energy jobs, better security here at home and for our allies around the world, and lower prices at the pump for consumers." The Congresswoman also supports an 'all-of-the-above' energy plan, which allows for the continued use of fossil fuels. According to her website, the Congresswoman states, "From conventional resources like oil and natural gas to renewable resources like wind and solar, Texas’ energy sector is powering our homes, fueling our vehicles and driving our nation’s economy. I support an all-of-the-above approach that moves America towards energy independence."0Congresswoman Granger has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman did not vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5018.75https://kaygranger.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://kaygranger.house.gov/energy-and-environment https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://kaygranger.house.gov/2022/6/granger-applauds-historic-supreme-court-decision-affirming-lifeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Graves, GarretLouisiana 6RCongressman Garrett Graves has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. In a 2019 article by The Guardian, the Congressman was quoted stating, "Years ago I said that I thought the Republican position on climate change is unsustainable... Just sitting around totally denying the science is an unsustainable position.”5014In a 2020 Vox article discussing Republican climate strategies, the Congressman was quoted stating, "Fossil fuels aren’t the enemy. It’s emissions. So let’s devise strategies that are based on emissions strategies, not based on eliminating fossil fuels.” In a 2015 press release the Congressman stated, "If these rules are implemented as proposed, many power plants across the country will be forced to ramp down production or close, reducing supply and increasing the cost of electricity for our businesses and families." Congressman Graves demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Graves makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In an excerpt from a 2016 E&E News article it stated, "Graves said climate denial and overreliance on fossil fuels are an 'unsustainable policy position,' but he thinks a carbon tax or cap-and-trade policy could have negative economic impacts, putting the United States at a competitive disadvantage." Congressman Graves voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 016https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/apr/15/garret-graves-republican-climate-change-louisiana https://garretgraves.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/graves-epa-imposes-will-through-costly-regulatory-policies https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2020/2/5/21121935/climate-change-republicans-conservatives https://www.eenews.net/stories/1060044822 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/news/politics/article_d0bfd1c8-f4dd-11ec-a141-33e9ce152c88.htmlOpposes RoePro ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Graves, SamMissouri6RCongressman Sam Graves disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a September 2019 tweet, the Congressman wrote, "Cattle farmers have enough difficulties to deal with without politicians promising to tax away their profits. It’s time for the ‘cattle are a driving force behind climate change’ myth to die."00In an op-ed written in the Washington Times, regarding the Green New Deal, the Congressman wrote, "The Green New Deal isn’t about the environment at all. It’s about making America a socialist country.” Congressman Graves demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Graves opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman was a co-sponsor and voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 00https://twitter.com/repsamgraves/status/1177253308475617280 https://republicans-transportation.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=404401 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://graves.house.gov/media-center/e-newsletters/my-pro-life-priorityOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Green, AlTexas9DCongressman Al Green understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a 2022 Tweet regarding the Inflation Reduction Act he said, "I won’t allow the perfect to be the enemy of the good bill the Senate just passed, the IRA, which will cut inflation, fight climate change, cap healthcare expenses, & reduce the deficit. Although the perfect is beyond our reach, the good is in our grasp. I’ll vote for the good."75100Congressman Green supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.50Congressman Green supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. The Congressman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 7575https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://twitter.com/RepAlGreen/status/1556385433822674946 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTRDruHv7eESupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Green, MarkTennessee7RCongressman Mark Green disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2021 post on 'Twitter,' Congressman Green stated, "If climate change is an 'existential threat,' according to Joe Biden, what does he consider Americans trapped under Taliban rule in Afghanistan?"00In an interview on Fox News, while discussing a climate change plan put forward by then Presidential candidate Beto O'Rourke, Congressman Green stated, "I think he recognizes that there are a lot of democrats who recognize that the Green New Deal is absurd so he's trying to meet them halfway with an idea that gets us to carbon neutrality... But even his plan, it's crazy, I mean 5 trillion dollars." Congressman Green demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Green has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119).5012.5https://twitter.com/RepMarkGreen/status/1435662151931342852 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlBZEjZHsUQ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://markgreen.house.gov/2019/1/dr-mark-green-announces-support-for-pro-life-bills-ahead-of-46th-anniversary-of-roe-v-wadeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Greene, Marjorie Taylor Georgia14RCongresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. During a town hall in March 2021, the congresswoman claimed “Maybe perhaps we live on a ball that rotates around the sun, that flies through the universe, and maybe our climate just changes.” In an article in 'Gizmodo' she states, "The Earth is more green than it was years and years ago, and that’s because of the Earth warming, it’s because of carbon, because plants do need carbon. Their whole argument is not even scientific."00During a town hall in March 2021, the congresswoman inquired, "How much taxes and how much money did the people back in the Ice Age spend to warm up the earth?” Congresswoman Greene demonstrates a lack of leadership with dangerous public statements, advocacy and votes against climate action.0Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a tweet posted in May 2021, Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene claimed "The Earth’s climate has always changed, and there is NO amount of taxes or government that can change it." 00https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/mtg-aoc-climate-town-hall-b1823660.html https://gizmodo.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-says-climate-change-is-healthy-f-1849066151 https://twitter.com/mtgreenee/status/1396810561548083202?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1396810561548083202%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2F https://www.salon.com/2022/06/24/marjorie-taylor-greene-calls-overturning-of-roe-v-wade-a-blessing/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Griffith, MorganVirginia9RAccording to the Briston Herald Courrier, Congressman Griffith stated, "The climate is changing. Any plan of action must reflect the reality that most countries in the world will continue to use fossil fuels. Our goal as a worldwide leader and energy exporter should be to develop cleaner, more efficient ways to utilize the wealth of energy resources our country possesses." In an op-ed to the 'Roanoke Times,' posted on his website, the Congressman says, "The America of the Green New Deal is no leader. That plan expects us to dismantle our economy and fundamentally alter our lifestyle to cut carbon emissions." On his 'Energy and Environment' page he says, "We need to increase current coal production..." 00According to Congressman Morgan Griffith's website's 'Energy and Environment' page, Griffith states, "I support coal use and production. Coal is a vital component of the American economy, with a third of the nation’s electricity being generated from it. We need to increase current coal production and eliminate overly burdensome regulations that hurt the industry with little to no environmental gains. I also support research into technologies to burn coal more efficiently." The page is also headed with a large image displaying a piece of coal. Congressman Griffith demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Griffith opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman was a co-sponsor and voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 00https://www.heraldcourier.com/news/local/rep-morgan-griffith-named-to-committee-on-climate-change/article_53d4b3a6-3c1a-11e9-a117-c3c4bf8b360c.html https://morgangriffith.house.gov/spotlight/ https://morgangriffith.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=398741 https://morgangriffith.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=44643 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://morgangriffith.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=402684Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Grijalva, RaulArizona7DCongressman Grijalva understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On Congressman Grijalva's, 'Combatting Global Climate Change,' page it states, "According to the Environmental Protection Agency, global average temperatures have risen by 1.5 degrees Fahrenheit over the past 100 years. Without a proactive national strategy to reduce emissions from greenhouse gases and contain other man-made drivers of climate change, temperatures will continue to rise. Some members of Congress deny the challenges presented by climate change and prefer to ignore the overwhelming scientific data available on the issue. Rep. Grijalva continues to believe in the need for comprehensive energy legislation that meets the nation’s energy needs, creates green jobs and decreases greenhouse gas emissions. He understands the importance of investing in clean energy and preventing the potentially catastrophic effects global warming could have on our farms, coasts, and oceans."100100Congressman Grijalva has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 press release on the House Natural Resources Committee Climate Action Report, he stated, "This report illustrates the Committee’s focus on climate change and the solutions we have offered. I’m proud of the work we’ve done so far and know that so much more needs to be done to fight the climate crisis. I look forward to continuing our efforts in 2020, and beyond, to helping protect the entire planet and meet our ethical responsibilities to future generations.” The Congressman makes prominent public statements on the issue. On his, "Carbon Dioxide & Climate Policy," page, it states, "Climate disruptions will cause the spread of invasive species, threaten native species, endanger watersheds, cause habitat loss, and increase the intensity and length of the fire season on our public lands. It is difficult to imagine Glacier National Park without glaciers or Joshua Tree National Park without trees. Yet the evidence is clear that we may be facing just that kind of future." Rep. Grijalva makes climate change a top priority issue. He is a co-sponsor of the Green New Deal, saying in a press release, “What I heard yesterday is what I’ve been hearing for years: this economy needs to be cleaner and more sustainable if we want a livable future. The Green New Deal is the right framework for the work we need to do, in Congress and across the nation, to reduce our fossil fuel use, create green jobs, and protect our country and our planet for the long term.” 100Congressman Grijalva publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. In 2015 as the Progressive Caucus Co-Chair Rep. Grijalva helped create a competing budget proposal to that of the then-Republican majority called the "Peoples Budget." The proposal looked to implement a carbon fee of $25 per ton emitted. Congressman Grijalva voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). In 2013 he also spoke on the House floor advocating for a carbon tax stating, " it's time for serious action climate change is global the United Nations report indicates at 31 3.1 billion people because of climate change will be in extreme poverty by 2050 if we want to make a sizable dent in the human contributions to climate change we have to start making those responsible for pollution accountable and pay for it." 100100https://grijalva.house.gov/combating-global-climate-change/ https://grijalva.house.gov/press-releases/chair-grijalva-releases-natural-resources-climate-action-report-highlights-top-accomplishments-of-2019/ https://naturalresources.house.gov/media/press-releases/chair-grijalva-champions-bold-climate-action-supports-green-new-deal-resolution https://www.vox.com/2015/3/24/8284171/progressive-caucus-peoples-budget https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqo2aY2Nlrk https://grijalva.house.gov/rep-grijalva-statement-on-executive-order-to-help-safeguard-abortion-access-and-rights/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Grothman, GlennWisconsin6RCongressman Glenn Grothman disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2014 interview with Right Wing Watch, the Congressman stated, "This is this environmental stuff, this is the idea that is driven by this global warming thing. Global warming is not man-made and there is barely any global warming at all. There's been no global warming for the last twelve or thirteen years. I see a shortage of Republicans stepping up to the plate and saying, 'look, this global warming stuff is not going on.' It's ridiculous for the United States, of all the countries in the world, to be putting extra regulations on our business while the Chinese, the Indians, whatever are building new factories all the time. And our factories are stuck saying, 'you can't do this, you can't do this,' because you've got to reign in this global warming which doesn't exist anyway." Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman's climate change position.00In a 2017 op-ed supporting the withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, the Congressman wrote, "The Paris climate agreement was a bad deal for all Americans, but would have hit Wisconsin’s Sixth District particularly hard... At best, the climate agreement was a wealth redistribution program that imposed hefty costs on American families, and focused far more on handouts to other countries than actually protecting the environment." During a 2017 Town Hall the Congressman fielded a question on climate change, responding, "In general, I'm old enough to remember the 1970s when they talked about global cooling." Congressman Grothman demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman's climate change leadership.0Congressman Grothman opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s position on a fee on carbon.256.25https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oEDiN_CNTCs https://grothman.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=332 https://www.postcrescent.com/story/news/local/2017/04/30/grothman-town-hall-draws-angry-raucous-crowd/101066122/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://grothman.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=3034Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Guest, MichaelMississippi3RCongressman Michael Guest does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250In a March 2022 tweet, the Congressman wrote "America can run on AMERICAN energy," attaching a picture of an oil rig and the words 'Unleash American Energy Independence." Congressman Guest demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Guest has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5018.75https://twitter.com/RepMichaelGuest/status/1504558980319924225 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://guest.house.gov/media/press-releases/guest-speaks-pro-life-rally-following-opening-statements-supreme-court-hearingOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Guthrie, S. BrettKentucky 2RCongressman Brett Guthrie agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On the Congressman's, 'Energy,' page it states, "Climate change is a real and serious threat, but I do not believe that radical solutions proposed in the Democrats’ “Green New Deal” are the solution. The Green New Deal is projected to cost up to $93 trillion over ten years, at an estimated cost of over $60,000 per year per household. I believe that we need innovative and market-based solutions to combat climate change."500Congressman Guthrie demonstrates a lack of leadership by voicing his support for the Keystone Pipeline and advocating against President Obama's climate change plan. According to WFPL, the Congressman stated, “As President Obama prepares to roll out an agenda on climate change, I hope he will also address our nation’s energy needs... While claiming to support an all-of-the-above energy program, President Obama has yet to approve the Keystone XL pipeline and the EPA continues its attempt to regulate the coal industry out of business.” According to Impact2020, "A spokeswoman for Rep. Brett Guthrie, R-Bowling Green, said he shared concerns about climate change, but that he’s 'mindful of the costs associated with over-regulation that hurt our economy.'" Congressman Guthrie demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Guthrie makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)). 012.5https://guthrie.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=71998 https://guthrie.house.gov/latest-news/guthrie-new-epa-rules-could-cripple-kentuckys-economy/ https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/policy/environment/climate/article222424225.html https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/119/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://guthrie.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=387748Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Harder, JoshCalifornia9DCongressman Josh Harder understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Protect our Environment,' page, the Congressman states, "I strongly believe in the scientific consensus that climate change is real and man-made. I will fight back against the Trump Administration’s dangerous attempts to undo international agreements on climate change like the Paris Climate Accord. We also must go further, we must incentivize investments in clean energy sources and move away from polluting fossil fuels."100100In a 2019 press release advocating for the needs of farmers on the front line of climate change, the Congressman stated, "Farmers are on the front lines of the climate crisis, but they’re often treated like a part of the problem rather than a part of the solution.” The Congressman introduced the Future of Agricultural Resiliency and Modernization (FARM) Act which would help farmers across the country to more effectively fight climate change. In a 2022 tweet, Congressman Josh Harder stated "There's no more time to speculate — climate change is impacting our health, our farms, our jobs, our food, and our economy. We have to take real action now." Congressman Harder website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congressman Harder has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He was not in Congress to vote on a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)). 5081.25https://www.harderforcongress.com/environment https://harder.house.gov/media/press-releases/harder-urges-climate-change-committee-include-farmers-needs-environmental https://harder.house.gov/media/press-releases/harder-introduces-farm-act-support-agriculture-efforts-fight-climate-change https://twitter.com/JoshHarder/status/1480584689672929296 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://harder.house.gov/media/press-releases/harder-votes-to-pass-of-pair-of-bills-ensuring-women-s-access-to-health-careSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Harris, AndyMaryland1RCongressman Andy Harris disagrees with statured scientists that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2018 Baltimore Sun article, when asked if he was concerned about a U.N. climate report, the Congressman, responded stating, "there are many different projections for the pace of climate change” and "differing analysis for the degree of causality assigned to types of emissions.” 00In a 2017 press release on the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, Congressman Harris stated, "Under the Paris Accord, the United States would pay trillions of dollars in economic costs and lose millions of jobs, while China is permitted to increase its emissions through 2030. President Obama made a bad deal, and President Trump can do better. Any new international climate agreement should be ratified by the U.S. Senate, as outlined in the Constitution.” Congressman Harris demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Harris opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 256.25https://www.baltimoresun.com/opinion/columnists/dan-rodricks/bs-md-rodricks-column-1021-story.html https://harris.house.gov/media/press-releases/paris-accord-bad-deal-american-people https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.wmdt.com/2022/06/lawmakers-react-to-supreme-court-decision-to-overturn-roe-v-wade/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Harshbarger, Diana Tennessee1RCongresswoman Diana Harshbarger does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250In a 2020 interview with the 'Bristol Herald Courier,' "Harshbarger said she believes America is doing a lot to address climate change with efforts like emissions reduction. She said China and India are the countries that need to do more. “It’s other countries that need to step up and do their part in order to diminish the climate change from happening,” Harshbarger said." Congresswoman Diana Harshbarger demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congresswoman Diana Harshbarger has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5018.75https://heraldcourier.com/elections/candidates-discuss-their-stances-on-issues/article_09b55219-806f-550b-a5e7-51b823b581cf.html https://www.votediana.com/issuesOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Hayes, JahanaConnecticut5DCongresswoman Jahana Hayes understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2019 press release supporting the Paris Agreement, she stated, "The decision by the Trump Administration to withdraw from the landmark Paris Climate Accord is irresponsible, irrational, and dangerously close-minded. The science is clear: climate change is real and it is here. We need to be doing more to repair the damage done to our planet, not backing away from the necessary steps. A failure to act is a theft from our children’s future. I urge the Administration to reverse this decision in the strongest possible terms.” 100100Congresswoman Hayes has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 press release supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9) the Congresswoman stated, "Like the overwhelming majority of Americans, I understand that climate change is one of the most pressing issues of our time. If we do not adhere to the promises we made as a nation in the Paris Climate Agreement, our children and grandchildren will pay the price." The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2020 press release on the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis's recommending the Clean School Bus Act, a bill the Congresswoman introduced, she stated, "“Climate change has been threatening the lives of our children and the health of our environment for decades. COVID-19, which directly threatens our respiratory health, has made it crystal clear that we need to address air pollution caused by our school bus fleet immediately.” Rep. Hayes makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2020 tweet, the Congresswoman stated "The negative effects of climate change are happening in real time all over the country. We must take real action now." 100Congresswoman Hayes publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. 100100https://hayes.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-hayes-statement-trump-administration-withdrawing-paris-climate-accord https://hayes.house.gov/media/blog-posts/hayes-cosponsored-and-voted-hr-9-climate-action-now-act https://hayes.house.gov/media/press-releases/hayes-clean-school-bus-legislation-recommended-address-climate-change-select https://twitter.com/repjahanahayes/status/1306257430242885637?lang=en https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2021369 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2021385 https://hayes.house.gov/press-releases?ID=2E188817-CEF9-46FE-A423-1A580933045E Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Hern, KevinOklahoma1RCongressman Kevin Hern disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. A 'Business Insider' article says, "The New York Times characterized Hern in a January 2019 reports as 'the aerospace engineer elected in Oklahoma, [who] has questioned whether human activity is the primary cause of climate change.'" In a 2019 House Budget Committee hearing on the Costs of Climate Change, the Congressman stated, "Climate change must be addressed without sacrificing our country's economic and fiscal wellbeing through destructive policies like the Green New Deal." Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change position.00The Congressman stated in a 2019 interview with Newsmax that climate advocates, "don't truly understand the impact of fossil fuels." According to a 2019 Oklahoma Energy Today article, the Congressman opposed the Green New Deal, stating, "It’s simple, the Green New Deal is bad for Oklahoma and bad for America." Congressman Hern demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.0Representative Hern makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. According to a 2019 article by Americans for Tax Reform, the Congressman was applauded for offering, "an amendment to an upcoming spending package that would block any funds in the bill from being used towards implementing a carbon tax." The Congressman co-sponsored a 2019 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res 41). 00https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7lgfPBfWUI&feature=youtu.be https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/green-new-deal-kevin-hern-nancy-pelosi-house/2019/07/01/id/922890/ https://www.businessinsider.com/climate-change-and-republicans-congress-global-warming-2019-2#oklahoma-28 http://www.okenergytoday.com/2019/06/congressman-hern-tells-house-democrats-their-green-new-deal-would-be-devastating-to-oklahoma/ https://www.atr.org/atr-applauds-rep-kevin-hern-amendment-prohibiting-carbon-tax?page=1 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/41/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://hern.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=650Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Herrell, Yvette New Mexico2RCongresswoman Yvette Herrell does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250In a May 2020 interview with the 'Albuquerque Journal,' when asked about Congressional action regarding climate change, the congresswoman replied "We all have a responsibility to take care of the planet and protect the environment, but this is best done through conservation efforts and common sense rules, not excessively burdensome mandates." Congresswoman Yvette Herrell demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congresswoman Yvette Herrell makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The congresswoman co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).06.25https://www.abqjournal.com/1451187/qa-congressional-district-2-yvette-herrell.html https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/34/cosponsors?r=1&s=1&q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22New+Mexico%22%7DOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
Higgins, BrianNew York26DCongressman Brian Higgins understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a 2019 press release supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), the Congressman stated, "Last October, the UN released a report that indicated that without significant action, the effects of climate change could constitute a crisis as early as 2040. This includes worsening wildfires, food shortages, coral bleaching, and rising sea levels." 75100In a 2018 tweet promoting the 4th National Climate Assessment, the Congressman stated, "In the #NCA4 climate report, 13 federal agencies & 300 scientists conclude climate change presents 'growing challenges to human health and safety, quality of life, and the rate of economic growth.' @realDonaldTrump doesn’t believe it. We do. #ScienceMatters #ActOnClimate." Rep. Higgins is also a co-sponsor of the Green New Deal, a set of laws meant to "wean the United States from fossil fuels and curb planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions across the economy" while also "(guaranteeing) new high-paying jobs in clean energy industries." Congressman Higgins website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue.75Congressman Higgins supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. He voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 7581.25https://higgins.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/higgins-announces-house-passage-of-climate-action-now-act https://twitter.com/RepBrianHiggins/status/1068600793358577664 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/21/climate/green-new-deal-questions-answers.html https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://higgins.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/statement-by-congressman-brian-higgins-on-supreme-court-decisionSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Higgins, ClayLouisiana3RCongressman Higgins disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2017 interview with PBS News Hour, the Congressman Higgins stated, "I certainly do not disagree with the fact that climate change happens, but I do think it is reasonable to question very carefully the science that has used models, which has sometimes come under fire for having been sort of fraudulently manipulated in order to produce a result... Climate change has existed for well before human history. So the question is not whether or not our climate changes across the planet, nor is it really a question that the human race does have some sort of impact upon climate change..." 00The Congressman ignored the true causes of coastal erosion. On his campaign page, instead of correctly blaming sea level rise and oil spills, he claimed that coastal erosion was caused by decreased sediment, stating, "Throughout history, the Louisiana marshland was replenished by river sediments – land-building deposits derived from the Mississippi River overflowing its banks. But in the early 1900s, a decision was made to levee the river as we know it today. So for the last 80 or 90 years, south Louisiana has been lacking that natural re-building process." The Congressman also does not make prominent public statements on climate action, nor does he make the issue a priority. On his energy and environment page he touts the benefits of fossil fuels, stating, "Even with the fluctuations in oil prices, Louisiana’s fossil fuels industry remains a bright spot and major contributor to our state and national economy." Congressman Higgins demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0The Congressman makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In an interview on PBS News Hour the Congressman stated, "When we talk about spending the people's treasure, and the very concept that we can fix climate change with some sort of a tax, is something that I certainly take very seriously with regards to having an intelligent debate about." Congressman Higgins voted for a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). He did not sign the Americans for Prosperity “No Climate Tax” pledge.00https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/watch-louisiana-rep-clay-higgins-skepticism-human-caused-climate-change http://captainhiggins.com/issues/ https://clayhiggins.house.gov/issues/energy https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://clayhiggins.house.gov/media/press-releases/higgins-supreme-court-ruling-major-victory-lifeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
Hill, FrenchArkansas2RCongressman French Hill agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2019 press release opposing the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), the Congressman stated, “Climate change is real, but the proposals put forward by Democrats, like the Green New Deal, are fiction. The reality is, America is already a global leader in pursuing cleaner production of energy and reducing carbon emissions–to the tune of approximately 10% over the past decade. Addressing climate change should include investing in longer battery life technologies, lowering barriers for solar cell innovation, and pursuing cleaner more cost-effective methods to use nuclear energy. I believe that we need to continue pursuing an ‘all of the above’ energy strategy that leads to a cleaner, less carbon dependent future without forcing Arkansas families to bear the burden of the flawed Paris Climate Accord."500Congressman Hill advocated against the Paris Agreement. In a 2016 Q&A with THV11 the Congressman stated, "I believe, though, that the Paris Accord, while circumventing Congress and public debate on the issue of how to best address carbon emissions, would seriously impair the United States’ ability to support critical jobs in our energy sector and maintain our competitive advantage in energy production, as well as limit our energy independence and hurt our economy and family energy budgets." Congressman Hill demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Hill opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 2518.75https://hill.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=5690 http://www.thv11.com/article/news/local/rep-hill-says-2016-election-demonstrates-right-message-will-be-more-powerful-than-money/91-452491177 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://katv.com/news/local/arkansas-lawmakers-praise-supreme-court-decision-to-overturn-roe-v-wade-united-states-governor-asa-hutchinson-senator-tom-cotton-john-boozman-lieutenant-tim-griffin-attorney-general-leslie-rutledge-representative-french-hill-bruce-westerman-rick-crawfordOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Himes, JimConnecticut4DCongressman Jim Himes understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Energy and environment,' page it states, "President Trump’s misguided and harmful decision to exit the agreement will lead us down a path to rising sea levels and destructive weather that will wreak havoc on our planet. Drought, climate refugees, and competition over dwindling resources will destabilize global security. Leading scientists believe that the window opportunity for us to avert the most disastrous climate scenarios caused by climate change is quickly closing." 100100In a 2017 press release condemning the president's decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement, Congressman Hime stated, "Pulling out of the Paris Climate Agreement is a terrible decision that leads us down a path to rising sea levels and destructive weather that will wreak havoc on our planet. Drought, climate refugees and competition over dwindling resources will destabilize global security. Without a coordinated global effort to combat climate change, the future looks bleak." In a 2021 press release from Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont, regarding an "offshore wind proposal awarded $500,000," the Congressman stated 'Catastrophic and deadly weather events will only continue to worsen unless we face the climate crisis head on,” Congressman Jim Himes said. “Connecticut stands ready to do its part by shifting to wind and other renewable energy sources.'" Congressman Hime's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congressman Himes publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. 10093.75https://himes.house.gov/energy-and-environment-depth https://portal.ct.gov/Office-of-the-Governor/News/Press-Releases/2021/12-2021/Governor-Lamont-Announces-Connecticut-Offshore-Wind-Proposal-Awarded https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://himes.house.gov/press-releases?ID=2A07B459-DB29-4D09-9572-6FF1F3D2F85FSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Hinson, AshleyIowa2RAshley Hinson agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On her website, she wrote, "We need to find other solutions to address climate change without putting farmers and producers out of business. In Congress, I will work across the aisle and find ways to combat climate change that won’t destroy our economy."500Ashley Hinson demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. In a 2020 tweet, she spread misinformation about the Green New Deal Bill, where she gave the bill an unrealistic price tag and made other false claims including that the bill, if passed, would put all Iowan farmers out of business. 0 Congresswoman Hinson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She has supported other policies like carbon capture and sequestration but not taken a clear stance on carbon fee. 5025https://ashleyhinson.com/statement-from-ashley-hinson-regarding-the-zero-emissions-vehicles-act-of-2020/ https://www.thegazette.com/campaigns-elections/fact-checker-hinsons-green-new-deal-tweet-speaks-to-base-not-facts/ https://hinson.house.gov/media/press-releases/hinson-statement-roe-v-wadeOpposes RoeN/AN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Holmes Norton, EleanorDistrict of Columbia1DCongresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a press release on the increasing frequency on natural disasters, Congresswoman Norton stated, "Climate change has exposed to country to the increasingly numerous and severe natural disasters that are occurring in areas never previously recorded. We have a moral and civic obligation to be upfront with the American people about federal, state, and local unpreparedness for new and unanticipated disasters. Both the funding and thinking in Congress is locked somewhere in the 20th century, failing to take into account what climate science already shows is occurring on an annual basis.”100100Congresswoman has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2020 press release advocated for the INVEST in America Act, which was included in the Moving Forward Act (H.R. 2) and would reauthorize funding for DC public transit. In the press release, she stated, "The use of technology in transportation and the bill’s many climate change innovations make this a break from prior bills to become the nation’s first 21st century transportation and infrastructure bill. The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. According to a 2017 press release, the Congresswoman during an Economic Development, Public Buildings and Emergency Management Subcommittee hearing on disaster mitigation and recovery called climate change “the elephant in the room.” Rep. Holmes makes climate change a top priority issue. From a July 2021 press release, "Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC), Chair of the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit, released her House floor remarks on the INVEST in America Act, the surface transportation infrastructure bill, which Norton held write and which the House passed today." The Congresswoman stated "However, today's bill, for example, for the first time tackles climate change in recognition that transportation leads as a source of greenhouse gas emissions. The need to reduce burning fossil fuels is a priority in this bill to move us more quickly to zero emissions."100Congresswoman Norton Holmes publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. ”The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments.The Congresswoman also co-sponsored the America Wins Act (H.R. 4142), which aims to put a tax on carbon pollution and reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 52% in ten years.100100NOTE: THIS CANDIDATES DID NOT VOTE ON ANY OF THE VOTES ABOVE, SO THE VOTE SCORE DOES NOT FACTOR INTO HER CLIMATE CALCULATION. HER VOTE SCORE IS IMPUTED BASED ON THE AVERAGE OF HER POSITION, LEADERSHIP AND FEE ON CARBON SCORES. https://norton.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/norton-presses-importance-of-pre-disaster-funding-at-committee-hearing https://norton.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/norton-ensured-the-new-surface-transportation-reauthorization-bill-the https://norton.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/norton-applauds-house-passage-of-surface-transportation-infrastructure https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4142/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://larson.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/larson-introduces-bill-address-climate-crisis-head-and-invest-nation-s https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://norton.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/norton-condemns-supreme-court-decision-overturning-roe-says-dc-woman-areSupports RoeN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Horsford, StevenNevada4DCongressman Steve Horsford understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2021 press release discussing the House's Climate Crisis Action plan, he stated, "Climate change is an existential crisis that threatens our children’s futures, and the futures of our children’s children. As a member of the House Natural Resources Committee, I’m working to push Congress to take up the bold action that’s needed to address the ever-growing threat of climate change and ameliorate the effects of human emissions and pollution."100100Congressman Horsford has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. He is a co-sponsor of H.Res.755, a bill that expresses "support for the 2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Glasgow and reaffirm(s) the United States commitment to international cooperation (in) combating climate change." Congressman Horsford also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2021 press release discussing the need for climate action via Build Back Better and the Bipartisan Infrastructure Deal, he stated, "The historic drought at Lake Mead is a shocking example of the threat climate change poses to the West...I’m grateful to Vice President Harris for coming to Nevada to see our water crisis firsthand, and I look forward to working with the White House to pass the urgent climate investments in the Build Back Better Act and the Bipartisan Infrastructure Deal. Together, these bills will create jobs, invest in Nevada’s clean energy economy, and protect our environment for generations to come.” Congressman Horsford makes climate change a top priority issue. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the 100% Clean Economy Act of 2019 (H.R.5221), legislation that "sets a national goal of achieving a 100% clean economy (i.e., economy-wide, net-zero greenhouse gas emissions) by no later than 2050."100Congressman Horsford has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.The Congressman was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5087.5https://horsford.house.gov/media/press-releases/house-climate-crisis-action-plan-highlights-congressman-steven-horsford-s-geo https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-resolution/755?s=1&r=2 https://horsford.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-horsford-joins-vice-president-harris-push-climate-action-through https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5221?s=6&r=10 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Houlahan, ChrissyPennsylvania6DCongresswoman Chrissy Houlahan understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. According to her website's 'Energy and Environment' page, Congresswoman Chrissy states, "As an engineer and a scientist, I understand the grave threat that climate change poses to America and the world at large. Let’s be clear: climate change is real, and human behavior is making it worse. The adverse effects will impact not only the natural environment but also our national security and our economic vitality. I am committed to fighting for binding legislation with actionable measures to mitigate these negative impacts and stop climate change in its tracks."100100Congresswoman Houlahan has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a press release supporting The Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9) the Congresswoman stated, "Climate change is happening. And we are causing it. Inaction on this threat harms our economy, national security, and health. I refuse to stand by and do nothing. This is a fight for our country, for our children, and for humanity." Rep. Houlahan also makes prominent public statements on the issue. Congresswoman Houlahan penned a 2019 op-ed for the Daily Loca, where she wrote, "Let us be frank: Climate change is happening. The effects will be disastrous. And it’s caused by human activity. But this recognition cannot be reserved to one day a year. We need to be acting every day from here on out to combat climate change and reverse the negative impacts it has had on our world and will continue to have if we don’t take aggressive action quickly." Rep. Houlahan makes climate change a top priority issue. The Congresswoman proposed an amendment to The Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9) which, "encourages the United States to go above and beyond the requirements outlined in the Paris Agreement and aggressively employ diplomacy to work with our partners around the world to take swift and decisive action to combat climate change."100Congresswoman Houlahan publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman co-sponsored the Climate Action Rebate Act of 2019 (H.R. 4051), which imposes a carbon fee on the use, sale, or transfer of certain fossil fuels and fluorinated gases that emit greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. Rep. Houlahan was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 100100https://houlahan.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1335 https://houlahan.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1120 https://houlahan.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1152 https://houlahan.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1115 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4051/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://houlahan.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2792Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Hoyer, StenyMaryland5DCongressman Steny Hoyer understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a June 2019 press release responding to the EPA's rollback of the Clean Power Rule, the Congressman stated, “The science behind climate change could not be more clear. More frequent and extreme weather, longer and more intense wildfire seasons, rising sea levels, and melting permafrost affecting millions of Americans bear out these facts. We need to take dramatic action to reduce carbon pollution in order to avoid the most catastrophic impacts of climate change, not provide a giveaway to polluters at the expense of public health and a worsening of the climate crisis."100100In a press release advocating for the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), Congressman Hoyer stated, "Our bill would restore America’s standing in the global fight against climate change and address the threats to public health and our economy posed by rising sea levels, wildfires, and a greater frequency of deadly storms." In a September 2019 Tweet, the Congressman, responding to an IPCC Ocean's report, wrote, "The major climate report by the @IPCC_CH only further illustrates what is at stake if we do not #ActOnClimate. Our oceans, coastal communities, and marine ecosystems are suffering from the dangerous heat of climate change." Congressman Hoyer's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congressman Hoyer supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. The Congressman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 7587.5https://hoyer.house.gov/content/hoyer-statement-epas-decision-roll-back-clean-power-plan https://www.majorityleader.gov/content/hoyer-statement-house-democrats-introduction-hr-9-climate-action-now-act https://twitter.com/LeaderHoyer/status/1176931695347601409 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.majorityleader.gov/content/hoyer-statement-supreme-court-decision-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Hudson, RichardNorth Carolina8RRichard Hudson understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. A 2021 statement from his website states "The science is clear — humans are contributing to it, and time is running out to address it."750Richard Hudson does not oppose climate action. In 2021, he joined the Conservative Climate Caucus. However, he's advocated for production of "more of America's own energy resources, including wind, solar, clean coal, hydropower, biofuels, nuclear energy, as well as oil and natural gas."25Richard Hudson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5037.5https://hudson.house.gov/media/in-the-news/column-count-on-rep-hudson-to-deliver-climate-solutions https://www.fayobserver.com/story/opinion/2021/07/25/letter-hudson-showing-leadership-environment/8059383002/ https://hudson.house.gov/press-releases/hudson-releases-statement-on-dobbs-v-jacksonOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Huffman, JaredCalifornia2DCongressman Huffman understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Environment and Climate Change,' page, it states, "Addressing climate change is the greatest imperative of our time. The stakes are enormous for our environment, our economy, and our planet. Confronting climate change will require major investments in infrastructure, new technologies, high-quality jobs, and energy independence." In a video message on climate change from the Safe Climate Caucus, Congressman Huffman stated, "Climate change is clearly influencing the extreme drought that we're grappling with in California that in turn is threatening everything from our drinking water to our food supply to our wild salmon populations so we should be acting to fight against climate change we should be investing in climate research supporting renewable energy that helps pivot away from our nation's addiction to polluting fossil fuels and raising efficiency standards for vehicles buildings and power plants."100100Congressman Huffman has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2020 press release introducing Resources for Workforce Investments, not Drilling Act (ReWIND Act) he stated, "The Trump administration has proven time and again that it cannot be trusted to act in the country’s -- or the planet’s -- best interests. Any large allocation of money invites misuse, and Congress must take the necessary precautions to ensure that Trump doesn’t use taxpayer money to provide handouts to the fossil fuel industry.” The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), Rep. Huffman stated, "It’s time to draw a line against the Trump administration’s attempts to take us backward, worsen the climate crisis, and make the United States an international laughing stock." Congressman Huffman makes climate change a top priority issue. In an op-ed co-written with Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, the Congressman writes, "Denial is no longer an option; mockery of the Green New Deal is not a constructive answer. It is time for serious action." 100Congressman Huffman publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. In 2015 the Congressman introduced the Gas Replacement Act, which according to his site would, "Replace the chronically-underperforming federal gas tax with a life-cycle assessment-based carbon tax on gasoline and diesel fuels that will accurately reflect the carbon emissions of the fuel." The Congressperson co-sponsored the Climate Action (H.R. 4209) which would place a tax on carbon pollution to raise money for infrastructure projects. Congressman Huffman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119).100100https://huffman.house.gov/policy-issues/environment-and-climate-change https://huffman.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rewind-act-prohibits-bailout-of-fossil-fuel-industry-with-cares-act-funds-during-public-health-crisis https://huffman.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-huffman-votes-to-pass-hr-9-new-legislation-to-keep-the-us-in-the-paris-climate-agreement https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/green-new-deal-vote-shows-republicans-would-rather-mock-climate-ncna987486 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4051/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://patch.com/california/sanrafael/marin-congressman-jared-huffman-blasts-roe-rulingSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Huizenga, BillMichigan4RCongressman Bill Huizenga disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an article in 'Vice," he is referred to as a "climate denier," and quoted there saying, "I do not believe that further congressional action is needed to address climate change...Today's global warming doomsayers simply lack the scientific evidence to support their claims. A host of leaders in the scientific community have recognized that the argument for drastic anthropogenic global warming is no longer based on science, but is being driven by irrational fanaticism."00In a 2022 press release, the Congressman stated "The SEC is engaging in these rulemakings to advance the Biden Administration’s environmental agenda. The intellectual foundation for these rulemakings leaves little doubt that the purpose of these rulemakings is not truly an attempt to provide financially material information to investors for all companies; the real intent is to fight climate change. Congress, however, has not passed any securities-related law that would allow for that to be a legitimate aim of Commission rulemaking. If and until that happens, the Commission must act consistently within its historical bounds, or rulemakings like these should and likely will be thrown out in federal court." Congressman Huizenga demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Huizenga opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman was a co-sponsor and voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119).00https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/d7bxvj/michigans-climate-change-deniers https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/119/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://huizenga.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=401479 Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Issa, DarrellCalifornia48RCongressman Darrell Issa disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2020 interview with the 'San Diego Union-Tribune,' Congressman Issa stated, "It got a lot warmer before we were ever burning, uh, extracted, uh, net extracted carbon. And we don’t know what man’s impact is. We don’t know how to affect it." He later said “Climate change is occurring if humans all died today.”00In a 2020 interview with the 'San Diego Union-Tribune,' Congressman Darrell Issa said "We need to promote an all-of-the-above approach to clean energy, including clean natural gas..." An 'all-of-the-above' energy approach does not eliminate the use of fossil fuels, an essential step to combating climate change. Congressman Issa demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Darrell Issa opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. In a 2018 interview with the 'San Diego Union-Tribune,' when asked if he supported a carbon tax, the congressman stated "Uh, the answer is no. Uh, I think the carbon tax is too simplistic." He voted for a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).00https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/opinion/commentary/story/2020-09-25/2020-election-q-a-with-darrell-issa-candidate-in-the-50th-congressional-district https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/opinion/story/2020-01-12/meet-darrell-issa-candidate-for-the-50th-congressional-district https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://issa.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-issa-issues-statement-supreme-court-roe-v-wade-decisionOpposes RoeN/AN/AN/AN/AAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
Jackson Lee, SheilaTexas18DCongresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2018 press release on the National Climate Assessment, the Congresswoman stated, "Congress must act now because according to the National Climate Assessment, ‘without substantial and sustained global mitigation and regional adaptation efforts, climate change is expected to cause growing losses to American infrastructure and property and impede the rate of economic growth over this century.’" Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congresswoman's climate change position.100100In a 2019 Tweet supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9) Congresswoman Jackson Lee wrote, "Climate change is real and poses a significant threat to the future of the only planet we have. That’s why I was proud to stand in support of #HR9 so that we can take action on climate change." Congresswoman Jackson Lee’s website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congresswoman's climate change leadership.75Congresswoman Jackson Lee publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman co-sponsors the Climate Action Rebate Act of 2019 (H.R. 4051). Rep. Jackson Lee voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 10093.75https://jacksonlee.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/congresswoman-sheila-jackson-lee-calls-on-congress-to-take-protective https://twitter.com/JacksonLeeTX18/status/1110915912763392000 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4051/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://twitter.com/jacksonleetx18/status/1433153692367269896?lang=enSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Jackson, Ronny Texas13RCongressman Ronny Jackson disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an April 2020 tweet, Congressman Jackson wrote "Under the guise of the pseudo-threat called 'climate change,' Democrats want to destroy American industry, and put millions of Americans on unemployment."00On his campaign website, Congressman Jackson writes "While the radical left pushes bad energy policies...which would decimate our ability to produce vital resources—I will always support legislation that protects the energy industry, and its impact on our local economy. Maintaining America’s energy independence and Texas’s position as the nation’s leading oil and gas producer is an important priority to me, and I will be an active voice in standing up to the Biden Administration’s war on energy." Congressman Ronny Jackson demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Ronny Jackson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5012.5https://twitter.com/RonnyJacksonTX/status/1252354737074130953?s=20 https://jackson.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=10177 https://jackson.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=427Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
Jacobs, SaraCalifornia51DCongresswoman Sara Jacobs understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, Jacobs states, "Climate change is one of the biggest threats faced by humanity, and we need to do far more to stop it." Jacobs recognizes the "the value and urgency of the Paris Climate Agreement and will push to re-enter it."75100On her campaign website, Congresswoman Jacobs states that "Congress must also maintain, establish, and fully enforce environmental regulations that protect our ecosystems, natural resources, and public health." In a 2020 interview with the 'San Diego Union-Tribune,' the congresswoman stated that "As the climate crisis worsens, it is my sincere hope that more Republicans will rejoin the efforts to address climate change with the urgency it deserves, and I will gladly work with them to that end." In a tweet posted in 2020, Congresswoman Jacobs said "Climate change is one of the biggest threats we face, but Washington has failed to act & our young people will be forced to live with the consequences. We need to send a new generation of leaders to Congress who will address climate change with the urgency it requires." The Congresswoman's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congresswoman Sara Jacobs publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. She was not in Congress to vote on a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).10087.5https://sarajacobsforca.com/environment https://sarajacobs.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=184 https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/opinion/commentary/story/2020-09-24/sara-jacobs-53rd-congressional-district https://twitter.com/sarajacobsca/status/1252974148093194241 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://sarajacobs.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=565Supports RoeN/AN/AN/AN/APro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Jayapal, PramilaWashington7DCongresswoman Pramila Jayapal understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's campaign website, it states, "Pramila is standing up to climate change deniers in Congress and fighting for immediate action on climate change — pushing to reduce carbon emissions in the U.S. and around the world. She is a proud co-sponsor of the "100 by '50" Act, which lays out a road map to achieve 100 percent renewable energy by 2050, including a just transition for workers in the fossil fuel industry. Pramila understands the dire consequences any further delay will have on our environment, public health, and local fishing and tourism industries." Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congresswoman’s climate change position.100100Congresswoman Jayapal has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congresswoman brought a climate scientist as her guest to the 2019 State of the Union, stating in a press release, "Climate change is creating refugees, claiming lives and costing taxpayers billions of dollars. The Trump administration continues to push our planet down a path of destruction. Instead of tackling the problem head-on, President Trump is burying his head in the sand and handing out favors to his friends in the coal industry.” Congresswoman Jayapal also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2020 Twitter post, the Congresswoman stated, Boldly taking on climate change isn’t something we can compromise on — the fate of our communities and our planet is at stake." Rep. Jayapal makes climate change a top priority issue as well. She demonstrated this by becoming a co-sponsor of the Green New Deal.100Congresswoman Jayapal publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. In a 2019 E&E News article, the Congresswoman claimed the progressive movement had been, "a little bit all over the place," on carbon taxes and that, "No one wants to take it off the table... And at the same time, we want to recognize that there are some challenges inherent to each of these methods." The Congresswoman was also a supporter of Washington Initiative 1631, a 2018 ballot initiative in Washington state, which would have implemented a fee on carbon. Congresswoman Jayapal voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 100100https://www.pramilaforcongress.com/energy-and-the-environment https://twitter.com/RepJayapal/status/908796614654935040 https://twitter.com/pramilajayapal/status/1304965786273021953 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.eenews.net/stories/1060118143 https://www.thestranger.com/slog/2018/09/19/32586929/washington-states-carbon-fee-will-make-history-unless-big-oil-can-stop-it https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://jayapal.house.gov/2022/06/24/jayapal-chair-of-the-congressional-progressive-caucus-on-supreme-court-decision-overturning-roe-v-wade/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Jeffries, HakeemNew York8DCongressman Jeffries understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a statement of support for President Biden’s Build Back Better Framework, he stated, “We will confront the climate crisis with the fierce urgency of now by making the largest federal investment ever in combating climate change. “100100Congressman Jeffries is a co-sponsor of the Climate Action Now Act, legislation that would require the President “to develop and update annually a plan for the United States to meet its nationally determined contribution under the Paris Agreement on climate change.” The Congressman’s website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congressman Jeffries supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. The Congressman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 7587.5https://www.dems.gov/newsroom/press-releases/chairman-jeffries-statement-of-support-for-president-bidens-build-back-better-framework https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/9?r=10&s=1 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://jeffries.house.gov/2022/06/24/rep-jeffries-statement-on-the-extreme-supreme-court-decision-to-overturn-roe-v-wade/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Johnson Jr., Henry C.Georgia4DCongressman Johnson understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Environment,' page, it states, "We cannot achieve or maintain a high standard of living if our environment is severely degraded or damaged. The window of opportunity to secure our natural environment against existential threats produced by human activity is rapidly closing. Humans are in large part responsible for climate change, a potentially devastating threat to our security and health that must immediately be addressed."100100Congressman Johnson has demonstrated leadership on climate change through advocating for climate action. In a 2018 press release being recognized for his 100% environmental voting record by Environment Georgia, the Congressman stated, "Protection of our imperiled planet is the central challenge of our time. Climate change is real and threatens our health, the environment, national security and our economy, and I’m committed to working with anyone on Capitol Hill, the White House and the Fourth District to invest in clean-energy technologies and jobs.” The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2020 meeting with Climate Climate Lobby volunteers, the Congressman stated, "Every American and indeed every person on this planet is affected by this public health crisis, but yet, in these times of isolation, self-reflection, and fervent politicking, it is all the more important that we take a step back and acknowledge the effect we are having on our planet." Rep. Johnson makes climate change a top priority issue as well. In a 2022 press release, "Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Ga.) criticized Shell for a 2020 company statement, saying that its operating plans, outlooks, budgets and pricing assumptions “do not reflect” its emission reduction targets. 'How can we take Shell’s climate mitigation goals seriously when they do not even consider these goals in their current budgets, outlooks and prices?” he asked.'" 100Congressman Johnson publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. He also voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 100100https://hankjohnson.house.gov/issues/environment https://hankjohnson.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-johnson-recognized-100-environmental-voting-record https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=280636796428603 https://hankjohnson.house.gov/media-center/in-the-news/democrats-go-after-big-oil-climate-pledges-calling-them-insufficient https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/cosponsors?q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22Georgia%22%7D https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://hankjohnson.house.gov/media-center/e-newsletters/roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Johnson, BillOhio6RCongressman Bill Johnson disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2021 article in the 'Washington Examiner,' Johnson wrote, "A centerpiece to Biden’s plan is the Green New Deal, the far-left’s effort to end the production and use of fossil fuels, which are critical to our nation’s economy. We’ll be lectured that 'there’s no time to waste' and 'the climate crisis is making hurricanes stronger and more deadly.' That assertion, like much of what we hear from radical environmentalists filtered through the liberal media, is flat-out wrong." The Congressman went on to say, "Second, before making sweeping policy changes, people deserve to know the truth that natural disasters are not becoming any stronger, more deadly, or more frequent. With the clamor of the climate crisis movement at a fever pitch and with far-left politicians shamelessly predicting that the End of Days is around the corner, it can be difficult to separate fact from the fiction in all the heavily financed propaganda. According to a heavily researched 2018 study by the American Meteorological Society titled 'Continental U.S. Hurricane Landfall Frequency and Associated Damage: Observations and Future Risks,' hurricanes aren’t getting any stronger, and there aren’t more of them. They’re just causing more property damage because we’ve built more structures (homes, businesses, critical infrastructure, etc.) in vulnerable locations close to the ocean. It’s no surprise that this study didn’t get much attention because it didn’t fit the far-left’s narrative." Congressman Bill Johnson has repeatedly spread misinformation in order to undermine the severity of climate change and to discredit attempts to solve it.00In a 2017 press release supporting the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, the Congressman stated, “Under the Paris Climate Agreement, communities and industries in Eastern and Southeastern that depend on fossil fuels would have been disproportionately harmed. Meanwhile, under the same agreement, other countries like China and India are allowed to increase their coal consumption, while here at home we would have handcuffed ourselves for no economic benefit." According to a 2016 Clean Technica article the Congressman called the Clean Power Plan, "Un-American." Congressman Johnson demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.0Congressman Johnson opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 256.25https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/dont-buy-what-the-radical-left-is-selling-on-climate https://billjohnson.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=399196 https://cleantechnica.com/2016/07/16/clean-power-plan-called-un-american-rep-bill-johnson-r-oh/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://billjohnsonleads.com/issues/pro-life/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Johnson, DustySouth Dakota1RCongressman Dusty Johnson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview with Bill Zortman of KELO, the Congressman stated, "We are reducing our carbon footprint more quickly than the European Union. And the last few years, they've been increasing their carbon footprint. We're not doing that through a piece of paper that doesn't hold China and India accountable until 2030. So yes, let's make sure we take care of the environment. I don't think, the accords or the right vehicle." Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change position.250In a 2019 radio interview with SDPB, when asked about the Paris Agreement, Congressman Johnson stated, "It seems interesting that they’re putting pressure on us for compliance when they’re so far out of compliance. And, of course, the Paris Accord exempts China and India from any mandates until 2030. If this is really an existential threat to human kind, it seems like it should be all hands on deck, not letting China and India out of the bag. And it seems like the European Union—if they believed it was an existential threat—they’d be meeting their goals under the Paris Accord.” Congressman Johnson demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.0Congressman Johnson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5018.75https://kelo.com/news/articles/2019/may/01/dusty-johnson-updates-bill-zortman-on-the-border-and-carbon-emissions/ https://listen.sdpb.org/post/rep-johnson-disagrees-climate-action-now-act-ahead-vote https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://dustyjohnson.house.gov/media/press-releases/johnson-issues-statement-scotus-roe-v-wade-decisionOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Johnson, MikeLouisiana4RCongressman Mike Johnson disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2017 USA Today posted a video of the Congressman, stating, "I am not a big proponent of climate change data because I have seen data on the other side... The climate is changing. But the question is, is the climate changing because of natural cycles in the atmosphere... or is it changing because we drive SUVs."00Congressman Johnson demonstrates a lack of leadership by supporting President Trump's decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement. In a 2017 op-ed in the Shreveport Times, the Congressman wrote, "President Donald Trump did us all a service this month by removing our country from the lopsided Paris climate agreement... Fourth, and very importantly, the Paris agreement accomplished almost nothing in exchange for all those extraordinary costs. Even the most optimistic studies projected that if all its conditions were met, the agreement would reduce global temperatures by only 0.2 degree Celsius. That’s a far cry from 'saving the planet.'" Congressman Johnson is a supporter of oil and gas exploration, stating in a press release, that, "The Trump administration’s decision to allow enhanced exploration, leasing and development within the Outer Continental Shelf, previously closed to such activities, prioritizes home-grown energy production and puts the United States one step closer to achieving energy dominance." Congressman Johnson demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Johnson makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)). 00https://www.usatoday.com/videos/news/2017/05/31/u.s.-rep.-mike-johnson-and-climate-change/102355868/ https://www.shreveporttimes.com/story/opinion/2017/06/08/rep-johnson-paris-climate-deal-bad-u-s/381772001/ https://mikejohnson.house.gov/media/press-releases/johnson-statement-trump-administration-s-proposed-oil-and-gas-leasing-program https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/41/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://mikejohnson.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1155Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
Jordan, JimOhio4RCongressman Jim Jordan disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to an article by 'MIC,' "Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan, who has taken a cool $200,000 from fossil fuel firms, said 'God bless Chevron' for their plans to increase oil production rather than shrink their carbon emissions."00Congressman Jordan supported the president's withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, stating in a 2017 press release, "The Paris accord is a treaty that should have had a vote in the Senate. President Trump did the right thing by withdrawing us from an agreement that was not properly ratified. The Paris treaty would hurt American companies and American workers by depressing economic output, keep companies from creating jobs and drive millions more out of the country." He has also opposed the Green New Deal, stating, "The Green New Deal is not new, but it is devastating.” Congressman Jordan demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.0Congressman Jordan makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). In 2008, Rep. Jordan was the first to sign Americans for Prosperity No Climate Tax Pledge. He has also said that "[He] will oppose any legislation relating to climate change that includes a net increase in government revenue."00https://www.mic.com/impact/house-oversight-committee-shell-exxon-executives-hearing https://jordan.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=4563 https://jordan.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=398131 https://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/ny-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-jim-jordan-climate-deniers-climate-change-20190409-fca3h7mj65g7xmjz264fo45qvi-story.html https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/03/us/politics/republican-leaders-climate-change.html https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86-ThC1_iQ0Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Joyce, DavidOhio14RCongressman David Joyce does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 2528On the Congressman's, 'Energy,' page, it states, "The United States must take an 'all of the above' approach that utilizes all available energy sources, including coal, oil, natural gas, and wind. This will help keep energy costs low for consumers. During my time in Congress, I have supported efforts which promote and prioritize the domestic production of energy sources and feel strongly that we must reduce our dependence on foreign energy." Coal is one of the main contributors to man made climate change. Congressman Joyce demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Joyce opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 2519.5https://joyce.house.gov/energy/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://joyce.house.gov/posts/joyce-issues-statement-on-scotus-dobbs-decisionOpposes RoePro ClimateAnti ClimatePro ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Joyce, JohnPennsylvania13RCongressman Joyce does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2019 press release touting Natural Gas, the Congressman stated, "Congress must support an ‘all of the above’ strategy to ensure Americans’ access to affordable and efficient energy. A leader in our nation’s natural gas production, Pennsylvania’s natural gas reserves have tripled between 2011 and 2017 thanks to the development of the Marcellus Shale. Not only has the development of natural gas in Pennsylvania expanded economic opportunities, but it also is driving declining carbon dioxide emissions in the U.S. power sector. As a physician, I believe it is critical that we utilize clean-burning natural gas as a key component of our energy economy.” Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change position.250In a 2019 press release advocating against the Paris Agreement, Congressman Joyce stated, "“When President Obama signed the Paris Agreement, he clearly did not understand the harm it would do to the manufacturers of south central Pennsylvania. The workers of the 13th District overwhelmingly elected President Trump to remove them from bad deals that hurt their businesses and eliminate their jobs, and I do not support reentering this lopsided pact that is unfair to my constituents.” Congressman Joyce demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman's climate change leadership.0Congressman Joyce has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5018.75https://johnjoyce.house.gov/media/press-releases/joyce-clean-natural-gas-key-component-america-s-energy-economy https://johnjoyce.house.gov/media/press-releases/joyce-votes-shield-13th-district-workers-unfair-climate-deal https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.penncapital-star.com/government-politics/pa-s-toomey-eight-gop-u-s-house-lawmakers-urge-supreme-court-to-overturn-roe-v-wade/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Kaptur, MarcyOhio9DCongresswoman Marcy Kaptur understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2017 press release condemning the President's climate change Executive Orders, the Congresswoman stated, "Climate change is not an abstract issue for many Ohioans. Its impacts can be felt all along the shoreline of Lake Erie where warmer water can exacerbate problems such as harmful algal blooms. The effects of climate change are far and wide and impact our land, our water and our air – let the science be our guide, Mr. President.” Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congresswoman’s climate change position.100100Congresswoman Kaptur has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congresswoman supported the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), stating in a 2019 press release, "Families in Northern Ohio know the climate crisis is real and poses an existential threat to our future. Tackling climate change to protect public health, the air we breathe, and the water we drink must be among our highest priorities." The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. As the Chairwoman of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development, the Congresswoman hosted a 2019 hearing on climate change, stating, "Climate change is the global issue of our time and a challenge to our ability to sustain life on Earth. Our responsibility in Congress is to support efforts that meet that challenge head on." Congresswoman Kaptur makes climate change a top priority issue. In 2019, she hosted a roundtable on Dept. of Energy's role in fighting climate change. In her opening statement she stated, "We are here to discuss the topic of climate change – a global issue that challenges our ability to sustain life on earth. Our job in Congress is to frame the magnitude of this challenge and provide a practical pathway forward that is regionally sensitive."100Congresswoman Kaptur supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. She voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119).7593.75https://kaptur.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/kaptur-statement-trump-executive-orders-climate-change https://kaptur.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/kaptur-votes-keep-us-paris-climate-accord https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1060433344348518 https://kaptur.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/kaptur-hosts-hearing-department-energy-s-role-addressing-climate-change https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.wkyc.com/article/news/politics/ohio-leaders-react-supreme-court-draft-ruling-roe-v-wade-abortion-marcy-kaptur-sherrod-brown-tim-ryan/95-6b340037-7ed5-4ae1-a442-f7de77059788Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Keating, BillMassachussetts9DCongressman Bill Keating understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. During his opening statement of an April 2019 hearing on the threats of climate change to national security, the Congressman stated, "What does our warming globe actually look like? Intensifying food and water insecurity; population flows related to migration, displacement, and planned relocation; the inability of fragile states to anticipate and mitigate the impacts of climate change; increased need for disaster relief and humanitarian assistance; great power competition resulting from the diminishment of arctic sea ice; and heightened conflict with and among states. These are problems that would generally demand the full focus of American foreign policy. You’d think that getting at the root cause of such an alarming list of issues would be a major priority."100100Congressman Keating’s 'Environment' page states, "Bill has long been a champion for environmental conservation. In the face of a changing climate, he believes is critical to invest in both conservation and coastal restoration initiatives." He was also quoted in The Hill, stating, "Our generation has failed to adequately address the climate crisis.” Congressman Keating’s website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congressman Keating supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. The Congressman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 7587.5https://foreignaffairs.house.gov/2019/4/keating-opening-statement-at-climate-change-hearing https://keating.house.gov/policy-work/issues/environment https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/461977-climate-activist-greta-thunberg-implores-lawmakers-to-listen-to-the https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://sbaprolife.org/representative/bill-keating Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Kelly, MikePennsylvania16RCongressman Mike Kelly disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2013 press release responding to a speech President Obama gave on climate change, the Congressman stated, “In spite of serious, ongoing crises in trouble spots around the world, President Obama recently flew abroad to name climate change, of all things, the ‘global threat of our time.’ Despite the thousands of jobs that the Keystone XL pipeline is guaranteed to create and the vast public support it enjoys, the president refuses to approve it. Despite the hundreds of thousands of jobs derived from our nation’s coal industry – including more than 40,000 jobs in Pennsylvania – and the affordable energy it provides our communities, the White House’s climate advisor has shockingly declared that ‘a war on coal is exactly what’s needed.'" Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change position.00In a 2017 press release supporting the withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, the Congressman stated, "Today’s announcement is great news for the American people. It is a victory for our economy, our sovereignty, and our Constitution. The Paris Agreement – which should have been considered a treaty from the very beginning – was written with Americans and their elected representatives as an afterthought. It would result in unfair domestic harm for American workers, taxpayers, consumers, manufacturers, and energy producers. We would shoulder most of the cost and gain no measurable reward. There’s a reason President Obama never submitted this accord to the Senate for proper approval: it would have been rejected as a very bad deal for America, and rightly so." Congressman Kelly demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.0Congressman Kelly makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman co-sponsored a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 00https://kelly.house.gov/press-release/rep-kelly-responds-president-obama%E2%80%99s-climate-change-speech https://kelly.house.gov/press-release/rep-kelly-applauds-president-trump%E2%80%99s-announcement-paris-agreement https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/119/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.penncapital-star.com/government-politics/pa-s-toomey-eight-gop-u-s-house-lawmakers-urge-supreme-court-to-overturn-roe-v-wade/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Kelly, RobinIllinois2DCongresswoman Robin Kelly understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her 'Energy and Environment' page, it states, "We are experiencing a climate crisis. Changing weather and natural disasters have created challenges for Illinoisans throughout the state. Addressing climate change and moving toward clean, sustainable energy sources is one of the most pressing issues facing our country." Some of her key objectives are "achieving net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, prioritizing energy infrastructure that encourages sustainable, clean energy that supports the goal of net-zero emissions... (and) lowering energy costs for consumers through investments in biofuels, solar, and wind energy sources." 100100In a 2020 press release on air pollution and climate change, the Congresswoman stated, "In the ensuing decades, the focus has shifted to global warming, and fossil fuels have largely been reframed as a climate problem. And that makes sense, given the enormous implications of climate change for long-term human well-being. But there’s an irony involved: The air pollution case against fossil fuels is still the best case! In fact, even as attention has shifted to climate change, the air pollution case has grown stronger and stronger, as the science on air pollution has advanced by leaps and bounds. Researchers are now much more able to pinpoint air pollution’s direct and indirect effects, and the news has been uniformly bad." The Congresswoman does not mention climate change on her issues page. Congresswoman Kelly’s website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue.75Congresswoman Kelly publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. She also voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 10093.75https://robinkelly.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://robinkelly.house.gov/media-center/in-the-news/air-pollution-is-much-worse-than-we-thought https://robinkelly.house.gov/issues https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22party%22%3A%22all%22%7D https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://robinkelly.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-kelly-expresses-outrage-scotus-overturns-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Kelly, TrentMississippi1RCongressman Trent does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250On Congressman Trent's, 'Energy,' page, it states, "I support an all-of-the above energy strategy. Americans deserve access to reliable and affordable energy, and the federal government does not need to be in the business of picking winners and losers. Technological advances in extracting oil and natural gas from shale, specifically a technique known as fracking, has increased our GDP, reduced prices for consumers, expanded investment in the energy sector, created jobs, and is the leading contributing factor for improvements in the economy." Congressman Trent does not oppose climate action. 25Congressman Trent makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman co-sponsored a 2019 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 41).012.5https://trentkelly.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=14933 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/41/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://trentkelly.house.gov/newsroom/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=5512Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Khanna, RoCalifornia17DCongressman Ro Khanna understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Environment and Climate,' page, it states, "It is our responsibility to leave the planet healthy and safe for our children and future generations. This requires preserving open spaces, developing sustainable communities, achieving energy efficiency and water conservation, and investing in alternative energy sources. I will fight for protective measures against the harmful effects of climate change and hold local polluters accountable."100100Congressman Khanna has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 tweet, the Congressman stated, "Anyone who denies that climate change exists is ignoring the facts: The last five years have been the hottest ever recorded. If we don’t confront this crisis, the temperatures will keep rising with the sea level. Storms, droughts, and floods will get even more destructive." The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 op-ed on California's climate progress in the Sacramento Bee, the Congressman wrote, "We have been pushing for our state to lead in the fight against runaway climate change for years now, and together we’ve achieved a lot. We’re on our way to running on 100 percent clean energy by 2045 – one of the most ambitious targets in the nation. California is showing concrete results in achieving the vision of a Green New Deal while fostering economic growth. Gov. Gavin Newsom’s latest budget commits California to becoming “carbon-neutral” by 2045." Rep. Khanna makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2019 San Jose Spotlight article, The Congressman in a 2021 tweet stated, "The UN’s climate change report confirms we've already warmed the globe and must act immediately to prevent it from worsening. Global warming is causing heat waves, stronger storms, flooding, and droughts. The stakes are clear for the infrastructure bill. No climate no deal.” 100Congressman Khanna supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it.. According to Science Magazine Rep. Khanna has stated his support for a carbon fee stating, "I’m obviously in favor of a carbon tax.” Congressman Khanna voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 7593.75https://khanna.house.gov/issues/environment-climate https://twitter.com/RoKhanna/status/1094267681170059265 https://khanna.house.gov/media/editorials/climate-crisis-needs-courage-change-here-s-what-gov-newsom-needs-do https://twitter.com/RepRoKhanna/status/1424842631083925508 http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/12/special-series-new-congress-meet-ro-khanna-representing-heart-silicon-valley https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://khanna.house.gov/media/press-releases/statement-khanna-supreme-court-decision-overturn-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Kildee, DanielMichigan8DIn a 2019 press release on President Trump's withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, the Congressman stated, "The effects of climate change are evident all around us in Michigan, including record high lake levels in the Great Lakes, harmful algal blooms and the spread of invasive species like Asian carp. Not only do we have a moral responsibility for future generations to recognize that climate change is real and requires urgent action, it is also in our economic interest, as the Great Lakes support millions of good-paying jobs in the tourism, boating and fishing industries. The Great Lakes are not immune to the effects of climate change and, if we fail to act now, they could be forever altered."100100In a press release supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), Congressman Kildee stated, "We must combat climate change to protect Michigan’s economy, our Great Lakes and our future. The Great Lakes support millions of good-paying jobs in the tourism, boating and fishing industries, and the Great Lakes are a part of what define us as a state. If we don’t act now, the Great Lakes will be forever altered by climate change." The Congressman does not mention climate change on his websites, 'On the Issues,' page. Congressman Kildee’s website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congressman Kildee publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. The Congressman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119).10093.75https://dankildee.house.gov/media/press-releases/statement-congressman-dan-kildee-president-trump-withdrawing-paris-climate https://dankildee.house.gov/media/press-releases/house-passes-bill-protect-great-lakes-climate-change https://dankildee.com/on-the-issues/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22party%22%3A%22all%22%7D https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://dankildee.house.gov/media/press-releases/statement-congressman-kildee-supreme-court-roe-v-wade-decisionSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Kilmer, DerekWashington6DCongressman Kilmer Makes understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2019 interview with the Kitsap News Group, when asked about climate change, the Congressman stated, "I think the evidence is clear that climate change is real and that we need to do something about it. You can just look at the district I represent. I represent 11 Native American tribes, four are coastal tribes that as we sit here are in the process of trying to move to higher ground. We were out in Taholah a few weeks back meeting with the Quinault Indian Nation. Their lower reservation is below sea level. Their president Fawn Sharp said to me, ‘When I was a kid the ocean was a football field’s length away.’ She said, 'Now it’s our front porch.'" Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman's climate change position.100100Congressman Kilmer has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis recommended five bills introduced by the Congressman as part of its congressional climate action framework. In a 2020 press release, the Congressman stated, "There is no debate that climate crisis is real and it’s past time for bold action. Already, our communities are experiencing the devastating impacts of our changing climate, which is why this report and Congressional action is so urgently needed.” The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), the Congressman stated, "The American people are not just demanding action – but leadership – to counter the impacts of climate change. Today, Congress took an important step and passed the Climate Action Now Act, a bill that would enable America to join every other nation on the planet in committing to the Paris Climate Agreement. Additionally, it directs the Administration to develop a comprehensive plan to meet the emission reductions that we committed to back in 2015." Rep. Kilmer makes climate change a top priority issue as well. In a blog post published for The Citizen's Climate Lobby, which highlighted the climate crisis during the 2020 State of the Union, the Congressman wrote, "Climate change is real, and it requires bold action. That’s why I used the State of the Union to elevate the important work that Congress and CCL are doing to foster that bold action and called on the President to do the same." Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.100Congressman Kilmer publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 763). This bill would put a $15 per metric ton price on carbon emissions. He also voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119).100100https://kilmer.house.gov/news/in-the-news/congressman-kilmer-talks-climate-change-congress-government-spending https://kilmer.house.gov/news/press-releases/5-kilmer-bills-to-combat-climate-change-included-in-new-climate-crisis-recommendations https://kilmer.house.gov/news/press-releases/rep-kilmer-votes-to-support-the-climate-action-now-act https://citizensclimatelobby.org/ccler-mike-kelly-attended-state-of-the-union-climate-crisis/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://kilmer.house.gov/news/press-releases/kilmer-statement-on-supreme-court-decision-to-overturn-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Kim, AndyNew Jersey3DCongressman Andy Kim understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "Most people in New Jersey - Democrats, Republicans and Independents - know that climate change is real. I’ve called it a national security crisis. We need to respond as such. Our weather patterns are worsening. We have more “record-breaking” storms, more frequent flooding, more severe droughts, higher tides, more beach erosion and on and on. Climate change is an issue that can’t wait."100100Congressman Andy Kim is a co-sponsor of the Climate Action Now Act (H.R.9), legislation that "requires the President to develop and update annually a plan for the United States to meet its nationally determined contribution under the Paris Agreement on climate change." In a press release regarding an amendment on H.R.9 calling for infrastructure resilience, Rep. Kim stated, "Climate change isn’t just measured by rising tides and rising temperatures, it’s measured by the investment needed in infrastructure to keep our communities resilient in the face of this real threat." Congressman Andy Kim’s website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congressman Andy Kim has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5081.25https://kim.house.gov/issues/energy https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/9 https://kim.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-kim-leads-effort-strengthen-infrastructure-protect-environment https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Kim, Young California40RCongresswoman Young Kim agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to an interview with 'ABC7' in 2018, Kim stated, "I do believe that humans contribute to climate change. The use of the oil and gas production to renewable energy using wind and solar."5014Congresswoman Young Kim is a co-sponsor of the Trillion Trees Act (H.R 2639), which will "conserve, restore and grow 1 trillion trees worldwide globally to grow our forest resiliency and reduce emissions." Congresswoman Kim expressed in a tweet posted in February 2021 that "We can address climate change, grow our economy and ensure reliable, affordable energy for consumers. I’m looking forward to promoting free-market climate solutions on @housesciencegop." Congresswoman Kim supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. 50Congresswoman Young Kim has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She was not in Congress to vote on a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).5041https://abc7.com/young-kim-gil-cisneros-ed-royce-congressional-election-californias-39th-district-seat/4511909/ https://youngkim.house.gov/issues/wildfires https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2639/cosponsors?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22trillion+trees%22%5D%7D https://twitter.com/repyoungkim/status/1359224144496328714 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://youngkim.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-young-kim-fights-protect-lifeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimatePro ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Krishnamoorthi, Raja Illinois8DCongressman Raja Krishnamoorthi understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his 'Protecting Our Environment & Growing The Green Economy' page, he states, "We have a solemn obligation to protect our environment and to take a sustainable approach to managing our natural resources. As the former president of a solar technology company, I know firsthand that the preservation of our air, water, and wildlife for future generations is not only a moral imperative, but also an economic necessity. I’m dedicated to a comprehensive approach to protecting our environment and supporting our economy at every level." In a 2018 press release calling on FEMA to incorporate climate change into its flood maps, the Congressman stated, “We can no longer afford to ignore climate change’s role in magnifying the damage of storms and their staggering cost to taxpayers as we plan for future disasters. Experts have noted that the flood waters of Hurricane Florence could be half a foot higher due to rising sea levels caused by climate change while other research points to its capacity to amplify the power of the storms themselves...it’s imperative that FEMA accepts the scientific consensus on climate change and incorporates its impact into projecting the potential damage of future storms."100100Congressman Krishnamoorthi has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. From a 2021 press release, "Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi hailed Thursday’s passage of the Investing in a New Vision for the Environment and Surface Transportation (INVEST) in America Act, a five-year plan to invest $715 billion into infrastructure to create jobs and fortify U.S. transportation systems. "I’m proud that the House was able to pass the INVEST in America Act to keep the U.S. competitive on the global stage for infrastructure and to positively contribute to the environment,” Congressman Krishnamoorthi said. 'The climate change, environmental equity, and water policy aspects of the INVEST in America Act are crucial to safeguarding our natural resources and economic future. I’m proud that my amendments to support environmentally friendly materials and study sewage system sustainability were included in this landmark legislation which will rebuild and reimagine our country’s infrastructure for the next generation.'” The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2021 tweet, the Congressman stated, "Climate change isn't just a problem for one political party, or one country. It's a problem facing every country, every human, now and for generations to come. We need to take action NOW." Rep. Krishnamoorthi makes climate change a top priority issue. He is a co-sponsor of the 'Climate Action Now Act' (H.R.9), legislation that "requires the President to develop and update annually a plan for the United States to meet its nationally determined contribution under the Paris Agreement on climate change."100Congressman Krishnamoorthi supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. He voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 7593.75https://krishnamoorthi.house.gov/issues/environment https://krishnamoorthi.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-krishnamoorthi-we-can-no-longer-afford-ignore-climate-change-s-role https://krishnamoorthi.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-raja-krishnamoorthi-applauds-passage-invest-america-act-including https://twitter.com/RajaForCongress/status/1458732580023508996 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/9/cosponsors?r=3&s=1 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://krishnamoorthi.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-krishnamoorthi-denounces-supreme-court-decision-overturn-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Kuster, AnnNew Hampshire2DCongresswoman Ann Kuster understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2019 press release the Congresswoman stated, "'Climate change poses a serious threat to our economy and environment in New Hampshire,' said Kuster. 'We must act aggressively to reduce carbon pollution so we can curb the most dangerous effects of climate change. As a member of the Energy and Commerce Committee, I will work with my colleagues to advance policies that will put our country on the path towards a sustainable future that will ensure the wellbeing and prosperity of future generations.'"100100Congresswoman Kuster has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 press release announcing her co-sponsorship for the 100% Clean Economy Act of 2019 (H.R.5221), legislation that "sets a national goal of achieving a 100% clean economy by no later than 2050," the Congresswoman stated, "Building a clean energy economy is a critical part of combating climate change, which is one of the most daunting challenges of our time...This legislation will put our country on the path towards a sustainable future, improve public health, and strengthen our economy while creating green jobs. The time to act on climate change is now." Rep. Kuster also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2021 press release announcing the Congresswoman's support for climate action in Concord, she stated, "I’m proud to support the Build Back Better Act to make the most significant investment in climate change solutions in our country’s history. This legislation will reduce our carbon emissions, bolster community resilience, conserve our public lands, and save hardworking Americans money." Congresswoman Kuster makes climate change a top priority issue. She is a co-sponsor of the Climate Smart Ports Act (H.R.7024) legislation that "requires the Environmental Protection Agency to establish a grant program for purchasing or installing equipment and technology that (1) is used at a port and produces zero exhaust emissions of certain pollutants and greenhouse gases, or (2) captures 100% of the exhaust emissions produced by an ocean-going vessel at berth."100Congresswoman Kuster publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. The Congresswoman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 100100https://kuster.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1785 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5221 https://kuster.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2117 https://kuster.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=4131 https://kuster.house.gov/legislation/cosponsoredbills.htm https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Kustoff, DavidTennessee8RCongressman David Kustoff does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change position.250On Congressman Kuster's, 'Energy,' page, it states, "H.R. 2910, the Promoting Interagency Coordination for Review of Natural Gas Pipelines Act: This legislation increases transparency and accountability and promotes better coordination among agencies involved when reviewing interstate natural gas pipelines," as well as, "H.R. 2883, the Promoting Cross-Border Energy Infrastructure Act: This bill establishes a predictable and transparent process to permit the construction of cross-border pipelines and electric facilities." Congressman Kuster demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Kustoff opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 2512.5https://kustoff.house.gov/issues/energy https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://kustoff.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-kustoff-issues-statement-supreme-court-dobbs-decisionOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
LaHood, DarinIllinois16RCongressman LaHood does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. During a 2017 Town Hall the Congressman was asked his stance on climate change, in which he answered, "I agree, the climate is changing. I believe that humans play a role in that, there's no doubt about that. The question is, at what level do they play a role? Is it 51% is it 35% what is that?"250In a 2016 Facebook Post the Congressman wrote, "What happened in Paris won't stay in Paris. How did President Obama circumvent Congress during the climate change conference?" In a hearing in the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology Rep. Lahood made the following statement on the social cost of carbon. "Last year I was pleased to cosponsor H.R. 5668, Transparency and Honesty in Energy Regulation Act. Or THERA. This legislation is aimed at prohibiting the Department of Energy and the Environmental Protection Agency from considering the Social Cost of Carbon as part of any cost benefit analysis unless specifically authorized by law. If passed the DOE and EPA would no longer rely on manipulated and fabricated economic benefits to justify or support new job-killing environmental regulations. The Social Cost of Carbon is nothing but a political tool lacking scientific integrity and transparency conceived and utilized by an administration pushing a green agenda to the detriment of the American taxpayers. Perhaps a better measurement of the Social Cost of Carbon is not the net damages that result from a 1-metric ton increase in carbon dioxide emissions in a given year but the damage inflicted on domestic industries by the environmental regulations justified by this flawed calculation." Congressman Lahood demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Lahood opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 2512.5http://www.week.com/story/35194619/darin-lahood-in-town-for-first-town-hall https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1568524306804354 https://science.house.gov/sites/republicans.science.house.gov/files/documents/HHRG-115-SY18-WState-LaHood-20170228_0.pdf https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://lahood.house.gov/2022/6/lahood-statement-on-dobbs-v-jackson-decisionOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
LaMalfa, DougCalifornia1RCongressman LaMalfa disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a House floor discussion regarding the cause of wildfires in the west, he stated, "Every single year, wildfires are part of California's landscape and have been for centuries...the announcement of wildfires (being) solely a consequence of climate change is flat out false...We're seeing more and more of these giant wildfires due to decades of policy failures (which) have allowed our forests to become built up with overgrown brush and dried out decaying wood aka fire fuel. On top of that, environmental regulations make it near impossible to clear that overgrowth, sand trees, or create bulldozer lines for fire breaks near towns, or create large buffers around power lines and roads as needed." In 2012, 'Grist' reported Congressman LaMalfa's position against the science underpinning climate change. "It's 'bad science.' It's 'Al Gore.' It's a 'naturally occurring cycle.' You should 'look at the numbers.'" It was also reported by the Daily Kos in 2015, that the Congressman stated, “The climate of the globe has been fluctuating since God created it.”014According to a 2018 article by The Guardian, the Congressman was quoted stating that he, "didn't buy" human-made climate change. Congressman LaMalfa demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Lamalfa makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman referred to a carbon fee as a, “job-killing scheme,” in a 2016 brief sponsored by the Center for American Progress. He also voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 03.5https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGAyWwTqkO0 https://grist.org/politics/doug-lamalfa-is-the-archetypal-climate-denying-idio/ https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2015/9/15/1421547/-The-educational-inferno https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/jul/31/california-wildfire-climate-change-carr-fire https://cdn.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/28144132/CarbonPriceFiscal-brief.pdf https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://lamalfa.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/lamalfa-reacts-to-supreme-court-s-repeal-of-roeOpposes RoePro ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Lamborn, DougColorado5RCongressman Lamborn disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2015 press release promoting the views of Mr. John Christy, a Professor of Atmospheric Science and State Climatologist in Alabama, who denied the connection between carbon emissions and extreme weather, the Congressman stated, "We must always strive to be good stewards of our environment. However, we must not cripple our economy and potential for growth and development with hugely expensive costs based on assertions that are being disputed and questioned within the scientific community. I commend Professor Christy for his courage in speaking up on this very important issue."00In a 2019 press release repudiating the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9) Congressman Lamborn stated, "Climate change policies should not be far-reaching socialist schemes like the Green New Deal. America is already a leading reducer of greenhouse gasses without being in the Paris Climate Accords. I support pathways to renewable energy but do not support an action that will cause massive job loss and economic downfall. The Climate Action Now Act does not put America first, and this bill would do nothing but harm my constituents, which is why I voted no." Congressman Lamborn demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Lamborn opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 256.25https://lamborn.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-lamborn-votes-no-hr-9 https://lamborn.house.gov/media/press-releases/climatologist-denies-connection-between-emissions-and-extreme-weather https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://lamborn.house.gov/media/in-the-news/colorado-republican-reps-ask-court-overturn-roe-v-wadeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Larsen, RickWashington2DCongressman Rick Larsen understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "Scientific evidence leaves no doubt that the global climate is changing as a result of greenhouse gas emissions produced by human activity. The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the world’s leading organization in assessing climate change, has found that greenhouse gas emissions have risen to unprecedented levels. I am committed to protecting Washington state’s environment and mitigating the devastating effects of climate change." Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change position.100100Congressman Larsen has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congressman supported the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), stating in a 2019 press release, “Congress must take concrete steps to address the threats of climate change. Since the beginning of the 116th Congress, Democrats in the House of Representatives have made addressing climate change a priority." The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. The Congressman also introduced National Evaluation of Aviation and Aerospace Solutions to Climate Change Act (H.R. 5977), stating in a press release, "Climate change threatens life on Earth, and addressing this threat is one of my top priorities in Congress... This bill will help catalog those efforts, identify barriers to the adoption of mitigation efforts and serve as a roadmap for the steps the aviation and aerospace sector must take to achieve a 100 percent clean economy by 2050.” Rep. Larsen makes climate change a top priority issue. The Congressman voted to direct the United States Coast Guard to submit a report on the vulnerabilities of Coast Guard installations and requirements from climate change over the next 20 years, stating in a 2019 press release, "Congress must take concrete steps to protect U.S. Coast Guard installations at risk due to the effects of climate change, including rising sea levels, flooding, drought and wildfires.” Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.100Congressman Larsen supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. He also voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 7593.75https://larsen.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=14892 https://larsen.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1513 https://larsen.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2345 https://larsen.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1500 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://larsen.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2672Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Larson, John B.Connecticut1DCongressman John Larson understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On Congressman Larson's, 'Energy and Environment,' page it states, "Climate change is one of the planet’s most significant challenges from the standpoint of the environment, the economy, public health, and national security. The scientific evidence is clear in telling us that if we continue our current pace of burning coal, oil, and gas, it will result in a rising concentration of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere."100100Congressman Larson has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. During a 2019 House Ways and Means Committee hearing, the Congressman on The Economic and Health Consequences of Climate Change the Congressman stated, "The science is clear, we are in a midst of a climate crisis and must act now. Climate change is real, it is caused by human activity, and without action, the consequences for the planet will be dire." The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2022 tweet, the Congressman stated, "Climate change isn't going anywhere. We need to act NOW. That's why I support multiple bills to address this dire need...” Rep. Larsen also makes climate change a top priority issue as well. On his campaign website, the Congressman states "Climate change is here now. In Connecticut and around the world, we are already seeing its effects on our air quality, wildlife, the severity of natural disasters, and more. We can’t wait any longer to cut our emissions and create new green energy jobs while we’re doing it. John knows this. That’s why he hasn’t waited for gridlock to clear in Washington to take bold action and get results. As a senior member of the House Ways and Means Committee, John has spearheaded numerous clean energy tax credits, which have sparked a boom in solar, wind, and other zero emission technologies."100Congressman Larson publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman introduced the American Wins Act (H.R. 4142), which aims to put a tax on carbon pollution and reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 52% in ten years. 100100https://larson.house.gov/issues/energy-environment https://larson.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/larson-calls-action-climate-change https://twitter.com/johnlarsonct/status/1489406721042923522 https://larsonforcongress.org/issues/climate-change/ https://larson.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/congressman-larson-introduces-carbon-tax-legislation https://larson.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/larson-introduces-bill-address-climate-crisis-head-and-invest-nation-s https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4142/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://larson.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/larson-statement-supreme-court-ruling-end-reproductive-rightsSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Latta, Robert E.Ohio5RCongressman Robert Latta does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a statement made to the Subcommittee on Conservation, Credit, Energy and Research Hearing on Climate Change Legislation, he stated, "It is time for Congress to take a strong look at climate change legislation and the effects it will have on our economy, especially how hard it will affect the Midwestern states that rely heavily on agriculture, manufacturing, and small businesses." Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman's climate change position.250Congressman Robert Latta does not take a clear position on climate change. According to a a 2015 press release, Congressman Latta stated, "Despite the lofty rhetoric we heard at this afternoon’s press conference, these new rules are more about this President looking to build a legacy than build a better future. The rules, released under the guise of ‘Climate Change prevention’, will directly impact hardworking families all across Ohio with job losses, and increased energy costs – dramatic increases in some cases." Congressman Latta demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Latta makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a 2012 press release opposing a fee on carbon, the Congressman stated, "During a time when many families and local manufacturers are already facing financial hardships, we cannot impose a tax increase that will result in higher energy prices.” Congressman Latta was a co-sponsor and voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 06.25https://latta.house.gov/blog/?postid=157726 https://latta.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=398046 https://latta.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=315306 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://lattaforcongress.com/ (Listed on main page)Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
LaTurner, Jake Kansas2RCongressman Jake LaTurner does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Congressman Jake LaTurner demonstrates a lack of leadership with no public statements, advocacy or votes for climate action.0Congressman Jake LaTurner has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5018.75https://www.ksn.com/news/your-local-election-hq/candidates/jake-laturner-republican-for-u-s-house-kansas-district-2/ https://laturner.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-laturner-issues-statement-scotus-overturning-roe-v-wadeOpposes RoeN/AN/AN/AN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Lawson, AlFlorida2DCongressman Al Lawson understands the importance of climate action, but not as a top priority issue. In a statement to the League of Conservation Voters in 2016, Congressman Lawson asserted that he "will aggressively support policies to address climate change." But there is no mention of climate change on his 'Environment' page.75100On his congressional website issues tab, Representative Lawson writes that "all Americans have a role to play in protecting Earth", particularly when it comes to the impact of hurricanes on the Florida panhandle. Congressman Lawson also supported the Build Back Better Act (H.R. 5376), and he emphasized that the bill will help with "tackling climate change." Congressman Lawson supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. 50Congressman Lawson publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. Congressman Lawson did not vote in a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.119). However, the Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments.10081.25https://www.lcv.org/environmental-facebook/al-lawson/ https://lawson.house.gov/issues/environment https://lawson.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-lawson-votes-to-pass-build-back-better-act https://lawson.house.gov/media/press-releases/-us-rep-lawson-statement-on-the-supreme-court-overturning-roe-v-wade-Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Lee, Barbara California13DCongresswoman Barbara Lee understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's energy and environment page, it states, "In Congress, she is working to combat and prevent climate change and she has long opposed taxpayer-funded giveaways to Big Oil and other major polluters. Instead, she has advocated for increased investments in clean, renewable energy technologies. Congresswoman Lee is fighting to ensure that the good-paying jobs created by the growing green energy sector are open to all, especially people of color, women and veterans."100100Congresswoman Lee has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. In 2018 the Congresswoman introduced the Women and Climate Change Act of 2018 (H.R. 4932), stating in a press release, "Climate change is already impacting communities around the world, with a disproportionate effect on the world’s poorest residents. Women make up the majority of the world’s poor and are especially vulnerable to abrupt changes in the environment." Congresswoman Lee also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In 2019 Congresswoman Lee stood with school children on the steps of Capitol Hill advocating for climate change education. In a press release, the Congresswoman stated, "By failing to address climate change in a meaningful way, we are failing our children – and they know it... More than half of young adults in the U.S. are worried about climate change and are taking action by leading protests or walkouts to urge their elected leaders to act. To effectively act upon our changing climate, young people need education on its causes, consequences, and possible solutions.” Rep. Lee makes climate change a top priority issue. She is a co-sponsor of the Green New Deal. The Green New Deal is a set of laws meant to "wean the United States from fossil fuels and curb planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions across the economy" while also "(guaranteeing) new high-paying jobs in clean energy industries." 100Congresswoman Lee publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. On a panel for the Democratic Party Platform Drafting Committee Lee said, “Taxing carbon is the most effective way to reduce carbon emissions. It will offset the massive societal cost of unchecked carbon emissions.” The Congressperson co-sponsored the America Wins Act (H.R. 4209) which would place a tax on carbon pollution to raise money for infrastructure projects. She voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).100100https://lee.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://lee.house.gov/news/press-releases/congresswoman-barbara-lee-stands-with-students-to-support-teaching-climate-change-in-schools https://lee.house.gov/news/press-releases/rep-barbara-lee-announces-introduction-of-women-and-climate-change-act https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22California%22%7D https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/21/climate/green-new-deal-questions-answers.html https://www.carbontax.org/blog/2016/06/29/last-weeks-democratic-platform-vote-was-a-win-for-carbon-taxes/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://lee.house.gov/news/press-releases/-congresswoman-lee-releases-statement-on-supreme-court-overturning-roe-v-wade-Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Lee, SusieNevada3DCongresswoman Susie Lee understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2022 virtual town hall, Rep. Lee discussed the need for urgent climate action, saying, "As federal leaders, we owe it to our communities to act with urgency to deliver on climate action that meets this moment at the scale that science and justice demand. I am proud to work alongside the Nevada Conservation League and environmental advocates to help secure a better climate future."100100On Congresswoman Lee's, 'Environment,' page, it states, "I will be a leader in Congress when it comes to energy independence and combating climate change." The Congresswoman is a cosponsor of the Climate Action Now Act (H.R.9), legislation that "requires the President to develop and update annually a plan for the United States to meet its nationally determined contribution under the Paris Agreement on climate change." Congresswoman Lee’s website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congresswoman Lee has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5081.25https://nevadaconservationleague.org/icymi-congresswoman-susie-lee-joins-environmental-advocates-to-discuss-federal-climate-action/ https://susieleeforcongress.com/environment https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/9?s=1&r=4 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Leger Fernandez, Teresa New Mexico3DCongresswoman Teresa Leger Fernandez understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2020 interview with 'NM Political Report,' the Congresswoman Leger Fernandez states, "Some of the science and data that I’ve read places very dire consequences if we don’t address climate change. If you read the book by William duBuys, 'A Great Aridness,' he summarizes a lot of that research, where they discuss that New Mexico may face a future of being like the Sonoran desert. The desertification of New Mexico is very scary, which is why I believe that addressing climate change and doing this transition is an urgent need." In a tweet posted in October 2021, Congresswoman Teresa Leger Fernandez writes "We need bold climate action now."100100Congresswoman Teresa Leger Fernandez has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a tweet posted in September 2021, Congresswoman Leger Fernandez writes "The climate crisis is already here. It's past time to act. It's time to pass a clean energy standard. #BuildBackBetter." The congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In an endorsement interview with 'Yucca Action,' Congresswoman Congresswoman Teresa Leger Fernandez states "We must seriously and intentionally listen to climate scientists and address climate change. In Congress, I will advocate for bold action to meet or exceed carbon reductions of 50% of 2005 levels by 2030." Congresswoman Legar Fernandez makes climate change a top priority issue. On her campaign website, the congresswoman writes, "And we know that climate change is an existential crisis. We must reduce carbon pollution, rejoin the Paris Climate Agreement, and invest in renewable energy resources like wind and solar, as well as clean energy tax incentives."100Congresswoman Teresa Leger Fernandezhas no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5087.5https://nmpoliticalreport.com/2020/10/07/candidate-qa-teresa-leger-fernandez-on-environmental-issues/ https://twitter.com/RepTeresaLF/status/1450141247549710341?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet https://twitter.com/TeresaForNM/status/1441118934678192131 https://www.yuccaaction.org/teresa https://www.teresaforall.com/sustainabilitySupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Lesko, DebbieArizona8RCongresswoman Debbie Lesko disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2018 Arizona Republic article, when asked about climate change, the Congresswoman stated, "Is some of it, maybe, human-caused? Possibly. But certainly not the majority of it. I think it just goes through cycles and it has to do a lot with the sun. So no, I'm not a global warming proponent."00In a 2019 House floor speech against the passage of the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), Rep. Lesko stated, "This is not a legitimate solution. It is little more than a messaging bill that is intended to undermine the President and message to the Democrat base." Congresswoman Lesko demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congresswoman Lesko makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. She co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)). 00https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/arizona-environment/2018/01/30/west-valley-congressional-candidates-climate-change/1067821001/ https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4795777/user-clip-debbie-lesko-climate-change-agreement https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/34/cosponsors?r=1&s=1&q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22Arizona%22%7D https://lesko.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2727Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Letlow, JuliaLouisiana5RJulia Letlow does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250Julia Letlow demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. She has sent multiple tweets criticizing the Biden Administration's supposed attacks on the oil and gas industries, arguing that they are essential to American energy production, like this one: "Our people don't have to be paying outrageous gas prices at the pump. Louisiana has both the abundant natural resources and a skilled workforce ready to return to work. We just need this Administration to end their unreasonable war on domestic energy production."0Congresswoman Letlow has no known position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5018.75https://twitter.com/repjulialetlow/status/1501320460679757830 https://mobile.twitter.com/RepJuliaLetlow/status/1404931024690331653 https://twitter.com/repjulialetlow/status/1501320460679757830 https://www.era-leader.com/local-content-top-stories/congresswoman-letlow-issues-statement-supreme-court-abortion-decision-0#sthash.lCKr7J6t.dpbsOpposes RoeN/AN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Levin, MikeCalifornia49DCongressman Mike Levin understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. The Congressman's, 'Climate Change & Natural Resources,' page, it states, "Rep. Levin knows that the climate crisis is the defining issue of our time. With California experiencing worsening droughts, heat waves, and rising sea levels, Rep. Levin believes we must take aggressive action now to limit the worst effects on our planet and preserve our natural resources for future generations. Rep. Levin is proud to serve on the House Natural Resources Committee and the Select Committee on the Climate Crisis. He knows that we can grow our economy, create new jobs in America, and combat the climate crisis at the same time, and he has introduced a number of bills to achieve those goals."100100Congressman Mike Levin has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 op-ed published in The Hill on pressing the Interior Secretary on climate change, the Congressman wrote, "Climate change is a defining issue of our time, and if we don’t take bold action to address this crisis, our children and grandchildren will suffer the worst consequences." Congressman Levin also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a Q&A with the San Diego Union Tribune, the Congressman when asked about climate change, stated, "I think that the fossil fuel industry had an opportunity to invest in technology and innovation and to change their business model but instead they decided to invest in politicians. And that’s what they’ve done. And I’ve got colleagues, I don’t want to name them but smart, Republican colleagues who their own districts are facing climate change today." Rep. Levin makes climate change a top priority issue. According to a 2021 press release, "U.S. Representative Mike Levin (CA-49) led a letter signed by 133 House Members calling on President Biden to ensure infrastructure legislation includes robust investments to combat the climate crisis."100The Congressman publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. Rep. Levin is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. He was not in Congress to vote on a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)). 100100https://mikelevin.house.gov/issues/climate-change-natural-resources https://mikelevin.house.gov/media/in-the-news/hill-rep-mike-levin-op-ed-congress-must-press-interior-secretary-act-climate https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/opinion/story/2019-08-21/interview-with-rep-mike-levin https://mikelevin.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-mike-levin-leads-letter-with-133-house-members-calling-for-strong-climate-action-in-infrastructure-package https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://mikelevin.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-mike-levin-statement-on-draft-supreme-court-decision-on-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Lieu, TedCalifornia36DCongressman Lieu understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2019 press release recapping his testimony before the Select Committee on the Climate Crisis, the Congressman said, "I believe that climate change is the greatest existential threat to humankind. In recent years, the dangers of climate change—and the need to address it—have become increasingly clear. According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the last five years have been the five hottest on record with July 2019 being the hottest month in recorded history. These records have severe consequences. In 2018, the U.S. experienced several major weather disasters resulting in 247 lives lost and $91 billion in damages." 100100Congressman Lieu has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. Congressman Lieu introduced the Climate Solutions Act of 2019 (H.R. 2958), which would require 100 percent of electricity sold in the United States be generated from renewable sources by 2035, stating in a press release, "There is no threat greater to our nation’s security than climate change. Failing to protect our planet will endanger the lives of millions, hurt our economy and jeopardize our children’s future. The wildfires in my district were worsened by drought conditions and are a sliver of what is in store if we fail to act." Rep. Lieu also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 op-ed in the Brentwood Residents Association Newsletter, the Congressman wrote, "When it comes to our future, there is no greater threat than climate change. I believe that strong federal action is necessary to protect the air we breathe, the water we drink, and the world our children will inherit. Having a clean environment should not be a partisan issue." Congressman Lieu makes climate change a top priority issue as well. According to a March 2021 article from 'The Hill,' "Speaking at The Hill’s “The Loss of Nature: A Global Threat” event, Lieu said climate change has prompted an upheaval in biodiversity, with policies needed at the state, federal and international to address the problem. “Climate change is an existential threat, not just to California or America, but to the entire world. And the way that we solve this is we get the rest of America to do what California did and the rest of the world to do what America hopefully will do soon," Lieu told The Hill’s Steve Clemons.“The good news is a number of countries are taking climate change seriously. I think they can all do more, but we’ve shifted in just a decade or so from a bunch of people denying that climate change even is happening to now people who are acknowledging it and that’s a very good first step,” said Lieu, a member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee."100Congressman Lieu publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. In a press release condemning a resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise, which opposed a carbon fee, he stated, "A majority of the American people and even ExxonMobil support a carbon fee. I call on my House Republican colleagues to stop the shenanigans and work across the aisle to help solve our climate crisis.” He voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH))100100 https://lieu.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-lieu-testifies-climate-crisis-committee-bills-curb-climate-change https://lieu.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-lieu-introduces-bold-climate-change-bill https://lieu.house.gov/media-center/editorials/ted-lieu-takes-climate-change https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22California%22%7D https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/544881-ted-lieu-raises-alarm-biodiversity-climate-change https://lieu.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/congressman-lieu-statement-opposing-house-vote-condemning-carbon-tax https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://lieu.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-lieu-statement-supreme-court-decision-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Lofgren, ZoeCalifornia18DCongresswoman Lofgren understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy and Environment page,' it states, "Climate change is the most serious environmental issue facing our nation and our planet. Today we see the negative impacts of climate change as heat-trapping emissions increase global temperatures, melt once permanent ice caps and glaciers, and raise our sea levels leading to greater threats from erratic weather. The pace of climate change threatens habitats and food production as well as public health."100100Congresswoman Lofgren has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congresswoman introduced The Clean Energy Victory Bonds Act of 2019 (H.R. 4041), which according to her press release would, spur investment in clean energy projects, create jobs, and help communities fight the climate crisis. In her press release, the Congresswoman stated, "We all benefit as Americans when we invest in the future of our country. I am pleased to reintroduce the Clean Energy Victory Bonds Act for the fourth time, as momentum builds in California and across the country for aggressive action on climate change.” The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy,' page, it states, "Our oil dependency also undermines our national security and worsens the threat of climate change. That's why Zoe has supported efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and increase efficiency standards for cars, trucks, and buildings. By increasing efficiency, we can reduce overall consumption and slow emissions that lead to climate change." Rep. Lofgren makes climate change a top priority issue. She is a co-sponsor of the Green New Deal, a set of laws meant to "wean the United States from fossil fuels and curb planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions across the economy" while also "(guaranteeing) new high-paying jobs in clean energy industries." 100Congresswoman Lofgren supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. She voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).7593.75https://lofgren.house.gov/energy-environment-issues/environment.htm https://lofgren.house.gov/media/press-releases/clean-energy-victory-bonds https://lofgren.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment/energy https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22California%22%7D https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/21/climate/green-new-deal-questions-answers.html https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://twitter.com/RepZoeLofgren/status/1525176800447451136Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Loudermilk, BarryGeorgia11RCongressman Barry Loudermilk disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2017 press release advocating for sound science to be used in the Environmental Protection Agency, the Congressman stated, "For several years, the EPA and other government bureaucracies have been pushing out environmental regulations based on new scientific ‘discoveries’ relating to climate change. However, the data on which these ‘discoveries’ are based have not been made available to the general scientific community for review or fact-checking. This has brought into question the overall motives of the EPA and other agencies who are demanding more environmental regulations. All regulatory decisions should be based on factual scientific information that is open and available for public viewing. Americans deserve common sense reform, and this bill is a positive step to bring honesty and sound science to the EPA.”00Congressman Loudermilk shows a lack of leadership by tweeting in support of the President's withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, stating, "President Trump is making the right decision withdrawing from the #ParisAgreement on climate change, and I fully support his decision." Along with fellow House Republicans, Rep. Loudermilk submitted an amicus briefing to the Supreme Court opposing the Clean Power Plan. In a press release, he stated, "The EPA’s regulations on new and existing power plants would be devastating to our economy if they are implemented. In my home state of Georgia alone, electricity prices would be expected to increase by 12 percent; and, with the average American household already spending $15,000 a year on hidden regulatory taxes, the Clean Power Plan is simply unworkable." Congressman Loudermilk demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Loudermilk makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a 2016 press release advocating against a federal carbon fee, the Congressman stated, "The last thing that the federal government needs to do is to add more tax burdens on hardworking Americans. The President’s plan to tax carbon is yet another attempt to grow the government and cut private sector jobs. While environmental issues are important, the solution is not to make gas and electricity more expensive for consumers. Instead, we need to further encourage businesses to explore alternative energy options, so we can protect the environment and allow Americans to keep their hard-earned money in their pockets.” The Congressman also co-sponsored a 2019 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res 41). 00https://loudermilk.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1052 https://twitter.com/reploudermilk/status/870378067528744965 https://loudermilk.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=547 https://loudermilk.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=778 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/41/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://loudermilk.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=4028Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Lucas, FrankOklahoma3RCongressman Frank Lucas agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2021 article in the 'Tulsa World News,' Congressman Lucas states, "Fossil fuel use isn’t incompatible with emissions reductions," Lucas wrote. "We don’t have to repeat Europe’s mistake and choose between reliable, affordable energy and clean energy. My Republican colleagues and I acknowledge that climate change is real, but the way we succeed isn’t by weaponizing financial regulators and shunning the energy companies that are essential to meet our energy needs. If we do that, we are cutting off the industry that is making essential investments in the new technologies necessary to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and climate-related risks."500In a press release criticizing the Paris Accords, Congressman Lucas stated, "It will be fascinating to see how the EPA responds to this concept of sending U.S.employees out to enforce agreements that the Senate has not yet approved.” According to a 2019 E&E News article, the Congressman who is the ranking member of the House Science, Space and Technology Committee, wants to better understand the complex relationship between climate change and weather. According to a spokeswoman, "As a rancher who represents a large community of agricultural producers, Ranking Member Lucas wants to better understand the complex relationship between climate change and weather... He's interested in how we can help communities increase preparedness for weather events and help businesses benefit from better short-term weather prediction." Congressman Lucas demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Lucas makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a 2019 interview with Axios, when asked about climate change regulations the Congressman stated, "A lot of folks I work with advocate carbon taxes, rules and regulations — all sorts of ways to compel consumers to do things that are at least in the short- and medium-term not in their best economic interest. ... I just fundamentally believe that’s not the direction that will ultimately get to where we and the world wants to go.” Congressman Lucas voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119).012.5https://tulsaworld.com/news/state-and-regional/govt-and-politics/d-c-digest-lucas-challenges-limitations-placed-on-energy-companies-to-combat-climate-change/article_1f2580da-4325-11ec-844f-4b38ce9fd8e9.html https://lucas.house.gov/press-release/lucas-questions-epa%E2%80%99s-role-international-climate-agreement https://www.eenews.net/stories/1060120401 https://www.axios.com/republican-bill-double-science-funding-climate-change-b734c787-257a-49c3-87bb-0f9ff762d906.html https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.kjrh.com/news/local-news/oklahoma-lawmakers-react-to-roe-v-wade-overturnOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Luetkemeyer, BlaineMissouri3RCongressman Blaine Luetkemeyer disagrees with the scientific consensus that that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2019 press release reintroducing legislation that would ensure taxpayer dollars are never again used to fund the United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the Congressman stated, “A nice name doesn’t camouflage the fact that these entities are fraught with waste and fraud, and engaged in dubious science. My bill will stop this egregious abuse of taxpayer dollars and prevent American taxpayers from footing the bill for these programs.”00In a 2021 press release "regarding House passage of Democrats’ massive tax-and-spree," Congressman Luetkemeyer stated, "Harmful provisions include: $80 billion to shutdown American energy to advance their radical climate agenda and a Natural Gas Tax that would raise American families’ bills by up to 30 percent a year. Electric vehicle subsidies for households making $500,000 a year and big businesses to establish their own fleets of electric vehicles. Tax breaks for Ivy League Schools and Universities, including $7.8 billion in an “environmental justice tax credit” for schools that support climate change studies. Expands our nation’s already oversized bureaucracy by establishing than 150 new government programs, including $450 million to train people for “climate change” careers and $25 million to create and fund President Biden’s 'environmental justice initiative.'” On the Congressman's, 'Energy' page it states, "I support an all-of-the-above energy plan that develops our own domestic resources, including oil from Alaska and the Gulf, natural gas, coal, nuclear power, along with alternative sources such as wind, solar, geothermal, and hydropower." Congressman Luetkemeyer demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Luetkemeyer opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. On his website he says, "If cap-and-tax passes, it is expected to dramatically drive up the cost of energy from coal fired power plants like Thomas Hill. Farmers and small businesses have told Luetkemeyer these increases will cost jobs and possibly their livelihoods." The Congressman voted for a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 00https://luetkemeyer.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=399211 https://luetkemeyer.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=400617 https://luetkemeyer.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=56688 https://luetkemeyer.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=279457 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://luetkemeyer.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=400733 Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Luria, ElaineVirginia2DCongresswoman Elaine Luria understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In testimony submitted to the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis, the Congresswoman stated, "In Coastal Virginia, climate change is not a problem for tomorrow; it is one we face every day. In addition to threatening our environment and infrastructure, the effects of climate change undermine national security. As Committee members consider policy recommendations, I hope that they will prioritize national security, clean energy, and resilient communities.” Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congresswoman’s climate change position100100Congresswoman Luria has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a speech on U.S national security, the Congresswoman stated, “I saw the world during my 20 years in the Navy. No nation, state, or person is immune to the growing impacts of climate change." Climate change presents a clear threat to the national security of the United States and its allies.” Rep. Luria also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release supporting the Paris Agreement, the Congresswoman stated, "The President’s decision to begin formally withdrawing from the Paris Climate Agreement threatens our coastal community and puts our military readiness at risk. Congresswoman Luria makes climate change a top priority issue. The Congresswoman is the Co-Chair of the New Democrat Coalition Climate Change Task Force. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congresswoman's climate change leadership100Congresswoman Luria has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5087.5https://luria.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-elaine-luria-fights-coastal-virginia-priorities-testimony-house https://luria.house.gov/media/press-releases/emphasizing-national-security-congresswoman-elaine-luria-highlights-importance https://luria.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-elaine-luria-statement-president-trump-s-decision-begin https://newdemocratcoalition.house.gov/policy/task-forces/climate-change https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://luria.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-luria-releases-statement-on-the-supreme-court-s-decision-to-overturn-roe-v-wade-and-a-woman-s-right-to-chooseSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Lynch, Stephen F.Massachussetts8DCongressman Stephen Lynch understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "The seminal Fourth National Climate Assessment, recently released by the federal U.S. Global Change Research Program, only reinforced the current and potential impact of climate change on U.S. national security. According to the report, produced by thirteen federal agencies: “[c]limate change and extremes increase the risk to national security through direct impacts on U.S. military infrastructure and by affecting factors, including food and water availability, that can exacerbate conflict outside U.S. borders.” Moreover, climate change is already affecting our defense readiness by “damaging roads, runways, and waterfront infrastructure.” 100100Congressman Lynch has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congressman introduced the Climate Change National Security Strategy Act of 2019 (H.R. 1201), which, "calls on the Federal Government to step up and lead the fight against the greatest global threat facing the earth," according to a press release announcing an earlier version of the bill. The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2017 press release condemning President Trump's withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, stating, "President Trump risks irreparably damaging America’s future generations by abandoning the Paris Climate Agreement." Rep. Lynch makes climate change a top priority issue. In a December 2018 Tweet, the Congressman announced his support for a Green New Deal, writing, "I am happy to support the Resolution for a Standing Committee on a #GreenNewDeal."100Congressman Lynch publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. Rep. Lynch is a co-sponsor of the America Wins Act (H.R. 4142), which would implement a fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 100100https://lynch.house.gov/issue/energy-environment https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/1201/text?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22S.+1238%22%5D%7D https://lynch.house.gov/press-release/rep-lynch-introduces-climate-change-national-security-strategy-act https://lynch.house.gov/press-release/rep-lynch-statement-response-president-trump-abandoning-paris-climate-agreement https://twitter.com/RepStephenLynch/status/1075516895875489792?fbclid=IwAR0i6nDCNyuGZ31xgJ-c1FIPppbsXdWH9oSeBsBHX5NWqOhKeDK0IS8qzgk https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4142/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://twitter.com/repstephenlynch/status/1521574188968034309?lang=enSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Mace, NancySouth Carolina1RNancy Mace disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview, she declared "I'm kind of mixed on this. I'm not a scientist. To me, it's not clear cut." She later argued "You can't say one or the other when there's data on both sides of the issue."014Nancy Mace’s does not oppose climate action, but is not a strong advocate for effective policies. She helped establish the Conservative Climate Caucus, and has called for efforts to increase renewable energy production.25Nancy Mace has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5022.25https://twitter.com/joecunninghamsc/status/1301692362314387456?lang=en https://mace.house.gov/media/newsletters/06252021-our-environment-everything https://mace.house.gov/media/press-releases/reps-mace-khanna-introduce-bill-ban-russian-oil-imports https://mace.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-mace-releases-statement-re-supreme-court-roe-v-wade-leakOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimatePro ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Malinowski, TomNew Jersey7DCongressman Tom Malinowski understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Energy and the Environment,' page, it states, "For more than two decades, Congressman Pascrell has fought for the preservation of our air, land, and water in order to ensure a safe and healthy environment for future generations to come. He believes that we must protect our finite natural resources from polluting industries and use every tool available to combat climate change. Bill frequently reminds his skeptical colleagues across the aisle that the impacts of climate change are undeniable because they are already here. He has taken an active role in advancing legislation such as the Green New Deal."100100Congressman Malinowski has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. He is a co-sponsor of the 100% Clean Economy Act of 2019 (H.R.5221), legislation that "sets a national goal of achieving a 100% clean economy (i.e., economy-wide, net-zero greenhouse gas emissions) by no later than 2050." Rep. Malinowski also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a statement discussing the passage of a budget resolution on Build Back Better, he stated, "The Build Back Better bill must address the climate crisis head-on through market-based incentives that will reduce carbon emissions and transition America to a clean energy future. The storms, floods, and fires that Americans have experienced in just the last few months are a wakeup call, but also a reminder that America can prosper if our companies, innovators, and consumers win the race to develop the technologies that lead the world to clean energy. This legislation is our best opportunity in a generation to do so." Congressman Malinowski makes climate change a top priority issue. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of H.Res. 755, a bill that expresses support for the 2021 UN Climate Change Conference in Glasgow and reaffirms US commitment to international cooperation in combating climate change.100Rep. Malinowski publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. The Congressman was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 100100https://pascrell.house.gov/issues/energy-and-the-environment/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5221?s=1&r=11 https://malinowski.house.gov/media/press-releases/representative-malinowski-statement-passage-budget-resolution https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/117/hres755/cosponsors https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Malliotakis, NicoleNew York11RNicole Malliotakis does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Nicole Malliotakis does not oppose climate action. In a statement, she said "“In Congress, I will continue to fight for commonsense solutions that protect our environment while empowering America’s energy industries to reach their full potential in producing clean, inexpensive energy for our nation’s consumers."25Nicole Malliotakis has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5025https://nicolemalliotakis.com/congresswoman-nicole-malliotakis-endorsed-by-citizens-for-responsible-energy-solution/ https://www.silive.com/politics/2022/05/malliotakis-dodges-roe-v-wade-discussion-this-is-a-decision-for-the-courts-not-politicians.htmlOpposes RoeN/AN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Maloney, Sean New York17DCongressman Sean Maloney understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2021 press release, the congressman stated, “We only have one chance to protect our planet from climate change, and the time to act is now. These are common sense, science-backed steps we can take…I look forward to working with a new White House that understands how consequential this threat is to our environment, our economy, and our future.” 100100The Congressman is the sponsor of the Hudson River Climate Change Protection Act, a bill that “requires the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to study the threat of sea-level rise and low-frequency precipitation events.” However, on Congressman Maloney’s 'Energy and Environment' web page, it advocates for the continued use of fossil fuels, stating, "We can use a mix of traditional fossil fuel sources while expanding domestic resources and investing in innovative renewable technologies that will allow us to have more secure, affordable energy." Congressman Maloney does not oppose climate action.25Congressman Maloney publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is the sponsor of H.R.5457 (Carbon Reduction and Tax Credit Act), whose main goal is to “impose an excise tax based on the carbon content of fuel.” This resolution would tax carbon at $40 per ton. He also voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. 10081.25https://seanmaloney.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/maloney-statement-on-new-science-first-actions-to-combat-climate-and https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/7220 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5457 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://seanmaloney.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/maloney-statement-on-supreme-court-decision-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Mann, Tracey Kansas1RCongressman Tracey Mann disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2020 interview with the 'High Plains Public Radio,' Congressman "Mann said scientific data shows that the 'climate is changing' and 'scientific data that says it’s not.'" Mann does not believe that climate action needs to be taken. “I hear stories about smog and various things, the climate and how it was decades ago, and is getting much better,” Man stated.”00In a 2021 Kansas Reflector article detailing a policy hearing, Congressman Mann stated, “We need to highlight climate solutions that are produced by agriculture...” Congressman Tracey Mann does not oppose climate action. 25Congressman Tracey Mann makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. Congressman Mann co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).06.25https://www.hppr.org/hppr-news/2020-07-06/a-look-at-the-sizable-pool-of-candidates-hoping-to-represent-kansas-big-1st https://kansasreflector.com/2021/02/27/u-s-house-agriculture-panel-to-key-in-on-climate-change-and-farming/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/34/cosponsors?r=1&s=1&q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22Kansas%22%7D https://mann.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-mann-reacts-us-supreme-court-ruling-dobbs-v-jacksonOpposes RoeN/AN/AN/AN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Manning, Kathy North Carolina6DCongresswoman Kathy Manning understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a tweet posted in 2018, the congresswoman writes, "There are steps we can and should be taking to address climate change. We have seen rising temperatures and storms in North Carolina. It's long past time to take steps to alleviate the impacts of climate change."75100Under 'issues' on Congresswoman Manning's website, she writes "I will work to ensure North Carolina continues its leadership in renewable energy technology and will help incentivize companies to shift toward more sustainable and cleaner power supplies." According to the League of Conservation Voters, "Kathy Manning is committed to safeguarding our environment and combating climate change." Later, the 'LVC' writes "Manning is opposed to offshore drilling and is committed to investing in renewable energy in North Carolina. In Congress, she will advocate for communities of color who have historically been disproportionately impacted by environmental pollution and injustice." Congresswoman Kathy Manning’s website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congresswoman Kathy Manning has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5075https://twitter.com/kathymanningnc/status/1054884146420633601 https://manning.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://www.lcv.org/member/kathy-manning/ https://manning.house.gov/media/press-releases/manning-statement-scotus-decision-overturn-roe-vs-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Massie, ThomasKentucky4RCongressman Thomas Massie disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an article in the Washington Times, Congressman Massie, was quoted saying, “I would challenge him [President Obama] to show us the linkage — the undeniable linkage — between droughts and the change of weather, and some kind of human activity.”00Congressman Massie demonstrates a lack of leadership by supporting President Trump's decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement. In a press release, the Congressman stated, "There is no way to meet the level of CO2 emissions that President Obama signed up for in the Paris Climate Accord without drastically raising the price of energy on every consumer in the United States and hurting our economy. Pulling out of this agreement was the smart thing to do and I applaud President Trump on his decision." In an article in The Liberty Conservative, the Congressman was quoted making this statement on climate change. "I took a trip once to one of the inland glaciers in the Canadian Rockies, and there were stakes in the ground showing how much it had receded since the 1800s. And it was obvious to me that it had been melting since preindustrial times… Most of the public is still debating whether the earth is heating up. But I think the real question is by how much? I’m still looking for an answer I can hold onto… I think the jury is still out on the contribution of our activities to the change in the earth’s climate." Congressman Massie demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Massie makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman co-sponsored a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 00https://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/inside-politics/2013/jan/22/rep-massie-mit-grad-questions-obamas-global-warmin/ https://massie.house.gov/newsroom/press-releases/congressman-massies-statement-on-president-trumps-decision-to-pull-out-of https://www.thelibertyconservative.com/rep-thomas-massie-considered-science-advisor-president-trump/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/119/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://massie.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=112043Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Mast, BrianFlorida21RCongressman Brian Mast understands the importance of climate action but does not see it as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Protecting the Environment,' page, it states, "As research tools have become more robust, scientists have developed a more comprehensive understanding of our planet’s changing climate. Their research has made clear that we must do more to protect our Earth and air quality. That’s why I’m proud to be a member of the Bipartisan Climate Solutions Caucus. The Caucus is an important tool to educate members on economically-viable options to reduce climate risk and protect our nation’s economy, security, infrastructure and environment. Together, we can find a path forward to protect our planet for future generations." Despite this, in a 2017 Climate Home News article, the Congressman was quoted, stating that he did not believe, “the science is completely concrete in either direction.” 7514In a 2017 article in The Atlantic, Congressman Mast was quoted stating, "It’s important that we take climate change very, very seriously because the threats that are posed by that are very serious. I’m just not a person that believes we should be turning a blind eye to it." According to a 2017 Florida Politics article, the Congressman advocated for climate change innovation, stating, "Treasure Coast residents know all too well about the crippling impact on both the quality-of-life and economy when environmental disaster strikes. We must act now to find economically-viable solutions to address the risk of climate change.” Congressman Mast's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congressman Mast opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted for a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 2547.25https://mast.house.gov/environment?page=14 http://www.climatechangenews.com/2017/04/05/gop-climate-rebels-emerge-shadows/ https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/03/house-republicans-climate-change-global-warming-trump/518430/ http://floridapolitics.com/archives/234006-brian-mast-carlos-curbelo-call-american-innovation-climate-change https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://mast.house.gov/2022/6/victory-for-lifeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimatePro ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Matsui, DorisCalifornia7DCongresswoman Doris Matsui understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's environment page, it states, "Enacting policies that assist in our ongoing efforts to reverse the effects of a changing climate, while protecting our air, water, lands, oceans, and wildlife remains a priority of the Congresswoman’s."100100Congressman Matsui has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a press release advocating for the Moving Forward Act (H.R. 2) which addresses provisions related to federal-aid highway and transit, the Congresswoman stated, "The Moving Forward Act provides a roadmap that will prioritize resiliency, combat climate change, and create economic opportunities across the Sacramento region.” The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 tweet the Congresswoman wrote, "As climate change worsens, today’s @UN #ClimateAction Summit marks a turning point in our efforts to reverse climate change and build a healthier planet for years to come. We must support the Paris Agreement and create actionable solutions to combat this global climate crisis." Rep. Matsui makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2021 tweet, the congresswoman stated "Proud to support the #BuildBackBetter Act, which combats #ClimateChange by: ·funding a Clean Electricity Performance Program that will help meet climate goals ·supporting equitable EV infrastructure & clean transportation ·investing 40% of the funds in underserved communities"100Rep. Matusi supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. Congresswoman Matsui voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)). 7593.75https://matsui.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=14897 https://twitter.com/DorisMatsui/status/1176243885359751171 https://matsui.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1971 https://twitter.com/dorismatsui/status/1437929160031281159 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://matsui.house.gov/media/press-releases/matsui-statement-supreme-court-decision-overturn-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
McBath, LucyGeorgia7DCongresswoman Lucy McBath understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "Congresswoman McBath believes we must address climate change while securing a sustainable energy future. The Congresswoman supports increased investment in sustainable energy and increasing subsidies for homeowners who utilize solar or other forms of renewable energy."100100In a 2019 Facebook post supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), the Congresswoman wrote, "Climate change poses a real threat not only to our planet, but to our nation’s economy. We must remain in the Paris Climate Agreement, and we need a concrete plan to meet our environmental goals. Today, I was proud to vote YES for H.R. 9 to take #ClimateActionNow." Congresswoman McBath's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congresswoman McBath publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. She was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 10093.75https://mcbath.house.gov/energy-environment https://www.facebook.com/replucymcbath/videos/climate-change-poses-a-real-threat-not-only-to-our-planet-but-to-our-nations-eco/430887874374864/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://mcbath.house.gov/press-releases?ID=3CAF7930-0A63-4390-AF41-3CAAD9173885Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
McCarthy, KevinCalifornia20RCongressman Kevin McCarthy does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2020 E&E News article on the Republican plan to reduce carbon emissions, the Congressman was quoted stating, "The one thing that unites us all as Americans is that we do want a cleaner, safer and healthier environment. The good news is in America, the ingenuity that we've had, when we unshackle that we're able to make that all happen."250Congressman McCarthy supported President Trump's decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement, stating in a press release that, "The previous Administration refused to recognize that private innovation and clean American natural gas have achieved more than government mandates and misguided international agreements—and that naiveté led President Obama to sign a climate deal that will impose great costs with little gain. President Trump made the right call in leaving a deal that would have put an unnecessary burden on the United States." Congressman McCarthy demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman McCarthy makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In the 'MIT Technology Review' it says, "But these business-friendly proposals, coordinated by House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy of California, would specifically avoid more aggressive measures like emissions reduction mandates or taxes on carbon pollution. And they’d fall far short of the sweeping economic and regulatory overhaul envisioned by Democrats championing the Green New Deal." He voted for a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH))06.25https://www.eenews.net/stories/1062336799 https://www.majorityleader.gov/2017/06/01/paris-climate-deal/ https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/01/21/276151/what-the-gops-proposed-climate-policies-would-and-wouldnt-do/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/news/2022/06/24/republican-mccarthy-congress-abortion-roe-v-wadeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
McCaul, Michael T.Texas10R Congressman Michael McCaul agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to an article in 'Politico,' "Climate change, McCaul said, 'is real.' The question 'is how to deal with it.'"500On the Congressman's, 'Energy,' page, it states that he is in support of offshore oil drilling, opening up new oil refineries, and clean coal. Congressman McCaul demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.0Congressman McCaul opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 2518.75https://www.politico.com/news/2021/02/21/mccaul-texas-power-grid-winter-weather-470576 https://mccaul.house.gov/issues/energy https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363Unclear Position on RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
McClain, LisaMichigan9RLisa McClain does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Lisa McClain demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. In August 2022, she tweeted "Less than 1% of people named climate change as the most important issue facing America. Why then is it the 100% focus of the Democrats agenda?" She has not advocated for any form of climate action.0Congresswoman McClain has no known position on a U.S. fee on carbon as she has not spoken about the topic publicly or on her website.5018.75https://twitter.com/RepLisaMcClain/status/1555603791642238977 https://mcclain.house.gov/2022/1/congresswoman-lisa-mcclain-speaks-house-floor-49th-anniversary-roe-v-wadeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
McClintock, TomCalifornia5RCongressman Tom McClintock disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an op-ed published in the Tahoe Daily Tribune, titled, 'Tom McClintock column: On climate change — the sky is not falling (opinion),' the Congressman wrote, "And despite what we are told, there is a vigorous debate within the scientific community over how much human activity influences climate compared with vastly more powerful natural forces that have driven climate change for 4.5 billion years. As Chicken Little belatedly discovered, there is a big difference between an acorn and the sky."00According to The Sacramento Bee, In a 2018 Congressional debate, Congressman McClintock, when asked about climate change, stated, "The planet’s been warming on and off since the last Ice Age... The climate has been changing for 4.5 billion years. The extent to which human activity has a role to play is being hotly debated right now.” He added that “there’s a lot we still don’t know about the feedback mechanisms within or climates.” Congressman McClintock demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman McClintock makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The congressman co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).00https://www.tahoedailytribune.com/news/opinion/tom-mcclintock-column-the-sky-is-not-falling-opinion/ https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article218767065.html https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/34/cosponsors?r=1&s=1 https://sbaprolife.org/representative/tom-mcclintockOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
McCollum, BettyMinnesota4DCongresswoman Betty McCollum understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy & Environment,' page, it states, "Today, our planet is in peril because of climate change, which is already affecting Minnesotans and Americans. As the Chair of the Interior-Environment Appropriations Subcommittee, I am a strong supporter of action on climate change and strongly oppose efforts to undermine our international commitments and turn the United States into an environmental rogue nation."100100Congresswoman McCollum has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. While attending the United Nations Foundation Climate Change (UNFCC) Conference of Parties (COP) 25 in Madrid, the Congresswoman stated, "So, we’re here to say that we're still in it. We're still working in Congress to reduce emissions, to build green infrastructure. And as you know, our Twin Cities are doing everything they can do to combat climate change, as well as many other cities.” The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. During a 2019 House floor debate on congressional spending, Rep. McCollum stated, "I believe we have a moral obligation to future generations to leave this planet better than we found it. Limiting pollution from power plants is part of an overall strategy to protect us from the worst impacts of climate change. We owe it to the next generation.” Congresswoman McCollum makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2021 Star Tribune article, the Congresswoman was quoted, saying 'Confronting the consequences of climate change on the environment, biodiversity, and human health is the most significant scientific and policy challenge of this generation.'"100Congresswoman McCollum supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. The Congresswoman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 7593.75https://mccollum.house.gov/issues/environment-energy https://www.mprnews.org/story/2019/12/02/minnesota-rep-mccollum-at-madrid-climate-meeting-were-still-in-it https://www.rollcall.com/news/congress/democrats-weave-climate-messages-into-spending-bills https://www.startribune.com/new-u-climate-center-is-a-win-for-region/600104278/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://mccollum.house.gov/media/press-releases/mccollum-statement-reported-draft-supreme-court-decision-overturn-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
McEachin, DonaldVirginia4DCongressman Donald McEachin understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his website, McEachin states, "Research continues to confirm what residents of communities in Virginia and across the United States already know –– climate change is a public health threat multiplier and communities on the frontlines of our climate crisis suffer disproportionately from the health impacts of our warming planet. It is imperative that we develop a long-term strategy to address the threats posed by climate changes to public health. Our discussion draft moves our country one step closer to meeting these challenges by advancing federal research, building capacity and increasing planning in order to protect public health and our public health systems.”10086Congressman McEachin has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 press release supporting the Climate Action Now act, the Congressman stated, “An overwhelming majority of Americans believe that we should take strong action to protect our environment, and I am very proud to support legislation that does just that. I cannot stress enough how important it is that the Senate pass this legislation for the well-being of our children and all future generations.” Rep. McEachin also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release responding to the IPCC Oceans Report, the Congressman stated, "If we fail to deviate from our current path, the consequences for our planet will be calamitous and irreversible. That is why I am committed to leading our transition to a clean energy economy and will be introducing the 100% Clean Economy Act of 2019." Congressman McEachin makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2019 op-ed written in The Virginian Pilot, the Congressman wrote, "THE TIME TO act on climate is now. Over the last year, we have suffered devastation from record-breaking hurricanes, wildfires and other extreme natural disasters — all while scientists continue to warn us that we must take bold, decisive action to address the urgent threat of climate change." Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.100Congressman McEachin introduced The Pollution Transparency Act (H.R. 3981) in 2017 that would have worked, "to ensure that federal agencies calculate a per-unit, dollar-value cost of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide emissions, and make those figures a part of cost-benefit analyses of proposed policy actions." Congressman McEachin voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 10096.5https://mceachin.house.gov/media/press-releases/mceachin-bennet-announce-discussion-draft-bolster-efforts-address-long-term https://mceachin.house.gov/media/press-releases/mceachin-applauds-house-passage-climate-action-now-act https://mceachin.house.gov/media/press-releases/mceachin-statement-ipcc-oceans-report https://www.pilotonline.com/opinion/columns/article_8ea8bbca-25af-11e9-9fe5-cfe2df2baed7.html https://mceachin.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-mceachin-introduces-bicameral-pollution-transparency-act https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://mceachin.house.gov/media/press-releases/mceachin-statement-supreme-court-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoeAnti ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
McGovern, JamesMassachussetts2DCongressman James McGovern understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Energy and Environment page,' it states, "Our climate is changing. Our children's future depends on investing in clean, sustainable energy sources -- and taking bold steps to address the damage we have already done to our fragile planet."100100Congressman McGovern has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In September 2019, the Congressman gave a speech at a climate strike in front of the Capitol Building. Rep. McGovern also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a March 2019 interview with the Daily Hampshire Gazette, the Congressman was quoted stating, "The amount of young people that are engaged on this issue is amazing to me. Middle, high school kids, and college students — they are so articulate, and they are so motivated. I think climate change is this generation’s Vietnam.” The Congressman makes climate change a top priority issue. According to the Boston Globe, while discussing his support for the Green New Deal, Congressman McGovern stated, "We need to listen to the scientists more than the corporate executives who run fossil fuel companies, and more than these people who peddle conspiracy theories. The bottom line is that what is at stake is the future of our planet.”100Congressman McGovern publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. The Congressman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 89). 100100https://mcgovern.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=120518 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2gObn_ZJyo https://www.gazettenet.com/McGovern-discusses-Trump-budget-leadership-of-rules-committee-24220831 https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2019/11/03/markey-and-mcgovern-talk-climate-change-raucous-worcester-forum/dcePDc55MupgqkjSYaZ1rO/story.html https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22party%22%3A%22all%22%7D https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a40410841/supreme-court-roe-v-wade-jim-mcgovern/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
McHenry, Patrick T.North Carolina10RCongressman Patrick McHenry agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to an article in the 'Citizen Times,' Congressman McHenry states, "Climate change is real and we have to break free from the established partisan politics of Capitol Hill...In order to do that you can’t have the same partisan food fight...We have to work together to make sure these innovative solutions happen in the private sector...”250The Congressman supports the continued development and utilization of fossil fuel resources, stating on his, 'Energy,' page, "One day, America will be powered by alternative energy – and Congressman McHenry is working to make that happen – but until then, we must drill for American oil and natural gas to power the American economy and bring down energy costs for American families. The inter-mountain west of the United States is home to the world’s largest deposits of oil shale. Oil shale is sedimentary rock that over the course of millions of years would geologically mature into common crude oil." Congressman McHenry demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman McHenry makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. According to the Citizen Times, the Congressman said he considers a carbon tax, "a very complex proposal," and a, "massive undertaking" to put in place." Congressman McHenry voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 06.25https://www.citizen-times.com/story/opinion/2019/10/19/important-moment-bipartisanship-climate-change-opinion-asheville/4022875002/ https://mchenry.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=397711 https://mchenry.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=1616 https://www.citizen-times.com/story/news/local/2016/08/09/residents-challenge-mchenry-trump-guns-climate/88487362/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://mchenry.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=1621Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
McMorris Rodgers, CathyWashington5RCongresswoman McMorris Rodgers disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2016 article in The Guardian, the Congresswoman was quoted stating that former Vice President Al Gored deserved a, "'F' in science and an 'A' in creative writing," for his stance on climate change. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congresswoman’s climate change position.00According to the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, Congresswoman McMorris Rogers stated, "We all want to protect our environment and ensure we leave a better community for the next generation. The problem with the Paris Agreement is how it was done -- without the approval of the American people or their elected representatives through a ratified treaty." The Congresswoman has also undermined and spread misinformation around attempts to lessen the effects of climate change, stating on her website, “Unbelievably, President Biden is even considering closing another major energy infrastructure project, Michigan’s Line 5 pipeline, right before winter. Closing Line 5 could kill thousands of jobs and increase the price of heating fuels, like propane, which are already in short supply across the nation. This is threatening people’s livelihoods." The Congresswoman demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congresswoman McMorris Rodgers opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 256.25https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/dec/09/cathy-mcmorris-rodgers-department-interior-trump https://www.seattlepi.com/local/politics/article/Connelly-McMorris-Rodgers-praises-Trump-s-Paris-11191632.php https://mcmorris.house.gov/posts/mcmorris-rodgers-energy-security-is-national-and-financial-security https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://mcmorris.house.gov/posts/mcmorris-rodgers-a-momentous-day-for-the-dignity-and-sanctity-of-every-human-lifeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Meeks, Gregory W.New York5DCongressman Gregory Meeks understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's Health Issues webpage, "Climate change and other environmental issues pose an enormous threat to global public health. Extreme weather, crop destruction, changes to ecosystems, and the mere presence of air and water pollutants are all serious threats to people’s well-being across the globe. We must fight climate change and protect the environment like our lives depend on it, because they very much do."100100Congressman Meeks has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. He is a co-sponsor of 'Recognizing the duty of the Federal Government to create a Green New Deal' (H.Res.332) bill, legislation that "calls for the creation of a Green New Deal." The Green New Deal aims to invest in fighting climate change and reducing GHG emissions while also creating new jobs in the American economy. Rep. Meeks also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In an Op-ed for The Hill, he states, "While the people who have historically inhabited the Western Hemisphere...are among the most vulnerable to the climate crisis, they are also the key to its survival. It is the responsibility of those in power — including myself as chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee — to make systemic change that empowers those at the forefront of climate change to be at the core of its solution." Congressman Meeks makes climate change a top priority issue. He is a co-sponsor of 100% Clean Economy Act of 2019 (H.R.5221), legislation that "sets a national goal of achieving a 100% clean economy (economy-wide, net-zero greenhouse gas emissions) by no later than 2050."100Congressman Meeks publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 763). This bill would put a $15 per metric ton price on carbon emissions. He voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 100100https://meeks.house.gov/issues/health https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22New+York%22%7D https://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/energy-environment/583934-those-on-the-front-lines-of-climate-change-should-be/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5221/cosponsors?r=8&s=1 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/cosponsors https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://meeks.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-meeks-statement-scotus-decision-strip-away-right-abortionSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Meng, GraceNew York6DCongresswoman Meng understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "Recent disasters such as Hurricane Sandy have highlighted how vulnerable our coastline is to climate change. The only response to this crisis is to proactively reduce carbon emissions and invest in programs that promote energy efficiency. I support an energy plan that has a balanced approach, helps consumers now, boosts production of energy from alternative sources, draws from a diverse energy supply, stresses conservation, and protects the environment. Addressing America’s reliance on fossil fuels by investing in renewable-energy sources is essential for protecting our environment and ensuring our nation’s energy security."100100Congresswoman Meng has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. As part of the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), the Congresswoman included an amendment that stresses the critical link between climate change and food security. The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 article by Queens County Politics, the Congresswoman was quoted the importance of climate change education, stating, "The magnitude of climate change will continue to grow and challenge how we live. That is why it is imperative that we bring the issue into our schools.” Meng makes climate change a top priority issue. She is a co-sponsor of the Green New Deal, a set of laws meant to "wean the United States from fossil fuels and curb planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions across the economy" while also "(guaranteeing) new high-paying jobs in clean energy industries." 100Congresswoman Meng publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 763). This bill would put a $15 per metric ton price on carbon emissions. She voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 100100https://meng.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://meng.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/meng-measure-stressing-link-between-climate-change-and-food-security https://www.queenscountypolitics.com/2019/09/20/climate-change-education-necessary-congresswoman-grace-meng/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22New+York%22%7D https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/21/climate/green-new-deal-questions-answers.html https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://mobile.twitter.com/RepGraceMeng/status/1498484051077959688Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Meuser, Dan Pennsylvania9RCongressman Dan Meuser does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250In a 2019 speech on the House floor condemning the Paris Agreement, Congressman Meuser stated, "We need to harness American talent not squander them with bogus plans like the Green New Deal or ineffective climate plans. We need access to affordable, reliable, clean energy sources including natural gas, nuclear, oil, and clean coal." Congressman Meuser demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman's climate change leadership.0Congressman Meuser makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman co-sponsored a 2019 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 41).06.25https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4795923/user-clip-congressman-dan-meuser-speaking-forcing-us-2015-paris-agreement-climate-change https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/41/cosponsors?pageSort=alphaByState&searchResultViewType=expanded&KWICView=false https://www.wfmz.com/news/area/pennsylvania/read-pa-s-elected-leaders-react-to-scotus-abortion-ruling/article_efffa90c-f3cd-11ec-83a0-ab0b70132776.html (Unclear on Roe but considers himself Pro-Life)Unclear Position on RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Mfume, Kweisi Maryland7DCongressman Kweisi Mfume understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2020 interview with 'The Baltimore Sun,' Congressman Mfume stated "On a forward-looking basis, America must take bold steps to avert the catastrophic effects of climate change. These steps include incentivizing personal choices, motivating corporations to make better choices (either by the carrot, the stick or both), helping to lead the way towards an increasingly green economy, and reestablishing our role as a global leader on climate issues. Establishing benchmarks and regularly measuring our progress in the fight against greenhouse gas emissions and ozone depletion, for example, should be a way of life across the globe." 100100According to a 2020 'Fox News' article, "During his short term, Mfume said he voted to combat the impacts of climate change..." In a 2020 interview with 'The Baltimore Sun,' the congressman said, "As an initial matter, the federal government must reaffirm its commitment to enforcing existing environmental laws. This work includes ensuring existing laws are not weakened by regulations or administrative interpretations." On his campaign website, Congressman Mfume lists "Work to protect the environment and combat climate change" as a 'priority' on his website. Congressman Kweisi Mfume's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congressman Kweisi Mfume has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5081.25https://www.baltimoresun.com/politics/elections/voter-guide/bs-voter-guide-d07-kweisi-mfume-20200106-maqinkka4jhwravcdr5frzyfmi-story.html https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kweisi-mfume-maryland-congressman-kim-klacik-baltimore https://mfumeforcongress.com https://mfume.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-kweisi-mfume-statement-on-the-supreme-court-decision-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Miller, CarolWest Virginia1RCongresswoman Carol Miller does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congresswoman’s climate change position.250On the Congresswoman's campaign website she describes herself as, "Pro Coal," and one her priorities as, "Protecting Coal and Gas." The Congresswoman was also quoted in a 2019 E&E News article calling coal, "clean." Congresswoman Miller demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congresswoman's climate change leadership.0Congresswoman Miller makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a press release in March 2019 about her selection to the House Select Committee on Climate Crisis, she said, "I hope that my colleagues will join me in prioritizing innovation, not taxation or over-regulation, in our energy industry to maximize efficiency, cut costs, protect and create jobs in West Virginia, and care for our earth for generations to come.” The Congresswoman was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congresswoman’s position on a fee on carbon.06.25https://www.electcarolmiller.com/ https://www.eenews.net/stories/1060122761 https://miller.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-miller-s-statement-selection-house-select-committee-climate https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://miller.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-miller-statement-supreme-court-decision-overturn-roe-v-wadeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Miller, MaryIllinois15RCongresswoman Mary Miller does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250Congresswoman Mary Miller demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. In a 2021 interview with the 'Chicago Tribune,' the congresswoman states she "will fight to protect rural residents by opposing radical ideas like the Green New Deal and other extreme environmental legislation." 0Congresswoman Mary Miller has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5018.75https://www.marymillerforcongress.com/issues https://www.chicagotribune.com/opinion/editorials/ct-who-is-mary-miller-15th-congressional-district-candidate-20200228-qdc257smdbevdfxvpt5sfepcg4-story.html https://www.npr.org/2022/06/26/1107710215/roe-overturned-mary-miller-historic-victory-for-white-lifeOpposes RoeN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AAnti ClimateN/A
Miller-Meeks, MariannetteIowa1RCongresswoman Mariannette Miller-Meeks agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an article on her congressional website, Congresswoman Miller-Meeks states that "scientists almost universally warn that climate change is poised to cause disastrous effects across the globe, largely caused by the burning of fossil fuels like gasoline and coal."/500Congresswoman Miller-Meeks supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. . In an October 2020 interview with the Iowa Capital Dispatch, the congresswoman agreed with Trump's withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accords while simultaneously arguing that "incentives for farmers could be a key tool in fighting climate change". Congresswoman Miller-Meeks advocates for a market-focused approach to climate action, saying that "we know that the market works, we know that economic freedom and innovation go hand in hand and that when we’re talking about emissions, and talking about a cleaner, healthier planet".According to her congressional website, Congresswoman Miller-Meeks supported Biden's move to allow the sale of E15 during the summer in 2022, saying that it "makes sense for agriculture-heavy states like Iowa".50Congresswoman Miller-Meeks has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5037.5https://millermeeks.house.gov/media/in-the-news/rep-mariannette-miller-meeks-highlights-conservation-efforts-young-americans https://iowacapitaldispatch.com/2020/10/27/2nd-district-candidates-debate-climate-change-environmental-regulations/ https://c3newsmag.com/mariannette-miller-meeks-iowa-climate-solutions/ https://iowacapitaldispatch.com/2022/09/26/miller-meeks-bohannan-trade-barbs-over-abortion-in-1st-district-debate/Opposes RoeN/AN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Moolenaar, JohnMichigan2RCongressman John Moolenaar disagrees with the scientific consensus that that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to the Daily News, during a 2017 town hall, when asked about climate change, the Congressman stated, "When we breathe, we emit our own carbon dioxide.” 00During a 2017 town hall when receiving questions on regulatory rollbacks of the Environmental Protection Agency, Congressman Moolenaar stated, "I believe in sound science, in good science. I believe the federal government has an important role in funding good science. I also have seen how, sometimes, agencies like the EPA get off track in their mission and pursue... I believe science, science moves forward... when people challenge a theory." Congressman Moolenaar demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Moolenaar opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 256.25https://thedailynews.cc/articles/congressman-moolenaar-hosts-raucous-listening-session-at-cmu/ https://www.yaleclimateconnections.org/2017/05/climate-concerns-raised-at-many-town-halls/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.themorningsun.com/2022/06/24/moolenaar-praises-end-of-roe-others-blast-decision/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Mooney, AlexWest Virginia2RCongressman Alex Mooney disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2017 Vice News article, "Mooney said the debate about man-made climate change belongs in the 'climate change community' but that debate is not resolved." Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change position.00According to Congressman Mooney's campaign website's 'Energy and Environment,' page, "Congressman Mooney is also working to ensure that federal tax dollars do not go towards funding international projects to reduce greenhouse gas emissions." According to the Charleston Gazette-Mail the Congressman supported the withdrawal from the Paris Agreement. Congressman Mooney demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.0Congressman Mooney makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).00https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/wn3jax/west-virginias-climate-change-deniers https://mooney.house.gov/issues/energy-and-mining https://www.wvgazettemail.com/news/wv-leaders-praise-withdrawal-from-climate-deal/article_0eab3dc9-cc75-54b5-9b9c-7fb843fb6ede.html https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/34/cosponsors?r=1&s=1 https://mooney.house.gov/issues/family-values/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Moore, BarryAlabama2RCongressman Barry Moore does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250In August 2020, Congressman Barry Moore claimed the Green New Deal to be ''job killing" in response to Biden's speech delivered on the final day of the Democratic National Convention. Congressman Moore demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Barry Moore has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5018.75https://barrymooreforcongress.com/index.php/2020/08/21/barry-moore-the-democrats-have-had-their-turn-next-week-its-ours-i-cant-wait/Opposes Roe
Moore, Blake Utah1RCongressman Blake Moore understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. According to a 2021 'Park Record' article, "First Congressional District Republican Rep. Blake Moore, who represents Summit County in Congress, says the Republican Party cannot sit on the sidelines of the climate change debate and stressed the need for the GOP to 'change that narrative' as the United States explores ways to lower carbon emissions."7514According to a 2021 article from 'C3 News Magazine,' "Moore has indeed offered unique and principled conservative perspectives, including... engaging in issues of climate and the environment by joining the Conservative Climate Caucus this summer." According to a 2021 'Park Record' article, "Moore said in his first few months in Congress he has joined the Natural Resources Committee as well as the bipartisan wildfire caucus and others dedicated to addressing climate change from several angles." In the article, the congressman also stated, "If we want to make progress on climate issues we have to focus on our shared goals and start our discussions from a point of mutual understanding.” “Beginning with where we disagree dooms conversations.” Congressman Blake Moore supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. 50Congressman Blake Moore has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5047.25https://www.parkrecord.com/news/rep-blake-moore-calls-for-gop-to-change-the-narrative-around-climate-change/ https://c3newsmag.com/utahs-blake-moore-joins-c3-solutions-on-right-voices-series/ https://blakemoore.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-blake-moores-statement-supreme-courts-decision-overturn-roe-v-wadeOpposes RoePro ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Moore, GwenWisconsin4DCongresswoman Moore understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2019 House floor speech on climate change, the Congresswoman stated, "If we give up the fight against climate change, we are giving up the fight for our future, and the future of our children. But I'm a fighter, so I took to the House floor to demand action from the Administration on climate change." Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congresswoman’s climate change position.100100Congresswoman Moore has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congresswoman cited climate change as her reason for supporting the Coastal and Great Lakes Communities Enhancement Act (H.R. 729), stating in a 2019 press release, "I am proud to support the Coastal and Great Lakes Communities Enhancement Act, which ensure coastal communities have the resources to properly respond to the effects of climate change." The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2020 speech published to her campaign website, Moore states, “Climate change is an issue we must address now through meaningful policies. This important report details sweeping actions and legislation our country needs, including legislation that I have introduced. Rather than running away from the challenges posed by combatting climate change, as this Administration has done, this report reaffirms that the federal government must lead both domestically and internationally to achieve meaningful change." Rep. Moore makes climate change a top priority issue. 100Congresswoman Moore supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. The Congresswoman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congresswoman’s position on a fee on carbon.7593.75https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=386515005606738 https://gwenmoore.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=4412 https://gwenmoore.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=4600 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://gwenmoore.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=5042Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Morelle, JosephNew York25DCongressman Joseph Morelle understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Protecting our Envrionment,' page, it states, "There is no debate here: climate change is real and it’s wreaking havoc all over the globe. Each day our country fails to act on climate change, we threaten the future of our children and grandchildren and the long-term vitality of our planet. I have always stood up to protect our environment by supporting measures that reduce our carbon emissions, protect our critical natural resources, and ensure our planet’s well-being for future generations."100100Congressman Morelle has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congressman is a supporter of the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), stating in a 2019 press release, “Climate change is, without a doubt, the most pressing threat not only to the future of our nation, but our entire planet.” The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release announcing his sponsorship of the Climate Emergency Resolution (H. Res. 52), which calls for a comprehensive, large-scale approach to address climate change, the Congressman stated, "The science is clear: climate change is real, it is already occurring, and it is a global emergency. We must take action now to protect our planet for future generations. That’s why I’m declaring a climate emergency and strongly supporting the Climate Emergency Resolution to demand immediate and comprehensive action." Rep. Morelle makes climate change a top priority issue. The Congressman introduced the 100% Clean Economy Act, which sets a national goal of achieving a 100% clean economy by 2050. In a press release on the bill the Congressman stated, "The effects of climate change pose an existential threat to our environment as we know it – we need bold, unprecedented action to combat this crisis and protect our planet for future generations.”100Representative Morelle publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 763). This bill would put a $15 per metric ton price on carbon emissions. He was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 100100https://morelle.house.gov/issues/protecting-our-environment-0 https://morelle.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-joe-morelle-takes-action-address-climate-change-crisis-protect https://morelle.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-morelle-takes-action-fight-back-against-climate-change-and-protect https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5221/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://morelle.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-morelle-takes-bold-action-address-climate-crisis-and-achieve-clean https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://morelle.house.gov/media/press-releases/statement-congressman-joe-morelle-response-supreme-court-decision-overturn-roeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Moulton, SethMassachussetts6DCongressman Seth Moulton understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "When leading scientists throughout the world agree on a single issue, it should be a clear sign that we lawmakers need to pay attention. Climate change is real, and it jeopardizes our homes, our cities, our futures, and the only planet we have."100100Congressman Moulton has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a November 2019 Tweet, the Congressman stated, "Climate change is a threat to our national security. The U.S. shouldn't just re-join the Paris accord—we need to be leading on this issue, at every level of government and in the private sector and academia." Congressman Moulton also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 interview with the Milken Institute, the Congressman stated, "We need to start providing some leadership [on climate change] here at home in America that means reducing our carbon footprint but also actually leading in green technology." Rep. Moulton makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2018 press release, the Congressman announced his support for the Green New Deal, stating, "No issue is more important today for our children and our grandchildren than addressing climate change. And if we do so successfully, our nation will be stronger, our economy will be stronger, our communities will be more resilient, and the futures of our children and grandchildren will be much brighter.”100Congressman Moulton publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon.The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. The Congressman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 100100https://moulton.house.gov/issues/energy/ https://twitter.com/sethmoulton/status/1191785965116968960 https://twitter.com/sethmoulton/status/1125521075121610754?lang=en https://moulton.house.gov/news-stories/press-releases/moulton-announces-support-of-green-new-deal/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22party%22%3A%22all%22%7D https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://moulton.house.gov/press-releases/moulton-statement-on-leaked-supreme-court-opinion-on-overturning-roe-vs-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Mrvan, FrankIndiana1DCongressman Frank Mrvan agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his 2022 campaign website, Congressman Mrvan emphasized that "it is past time that the federal government recognizes the value of science and the challenges of pollution and climate change".50100Congressman Mrvan supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. In August 2021, Congressman Mrvan went on a birding trip with Audobon Great Lakes and learned about "climate solutions to protect Indiana's birds and people". In addition, the congressman's campaign website calls for innovation and alternative energies that are necessary to meet" the challenge of climate change".50Congressman Mrvan has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5062.5https://mrvanforcongress.com/issues/#protecting-our-environment https://gl.audubon.org/news/congressman-frank-j-mrvan-goes-birding-audubon-great-lakes https://mrvan.house.gov/media/press-releases/mrvan-statement-supreme-court-decision-overturn-roe-v-wadeSupports RoeN/AN/APro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Murphy, GregNorth Carolina3RGreg Murphy disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a Fox News interview, he stated “I was thrilled to buy gas for $4.32 last night. Biden and his administration, the progressive left are chasing this dream that if we all go to renewables, world climate change will stop happening. Let's just be real about this. Climate change has happened on this Earth for billions of years.”00Greg Murphy demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. According to the League of Conservation Voters, Murphy has consistently voted against bills that promote climate action.0Greg Murphy has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5012.5https://cnsnews.com/article/washington/melanie-arter/rep-greg-murphy-climate-change-has-happened-earth-billions-years https://scorecard.lcv.org/moc/greg-murphy https://murphy4congress.com/issues/pro-life/ Opposes RoeN/AN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Nadler, JerroldNew York12DRepresentative Nadler understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2019 op-ed for The Villager, he states, "Climate change is real and threatens all of us, regardless of nationality, political party, or economic status. Extreme climate change has already arrived in the United States and impacts every congressional district across our country." The Congressman acknowledges and applauds the advocacy of young activists such as Greta Thunberg and additionally says, that while "their advocacy is critical and admirable...our children and grandchildren should not need to skip school and stage mass protests to stop climate change," thus calling for governments to be more strongly involved. 100100Congressman Nadler has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. He is a co-sponsor of the Fracking Ban Act (H.R.5857), legislation that would prohibit "federal agencies from issuing permits for the expansion of fracking or fracked oil and natural gas infrastructure, including infrastructure intended to extract, transport, or burn natural gas or oil." Rep. Nadler also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 Capitol Hill climate change speech the Congressman stated, "We talk about a climate crisis and indeed it is a climate crisis. The people have no idea how great a crisis it is or how pressing it is... I have a 13-month-old granddaughter and I look at her, I get terrified because I don't know if human life will survive 50 years." Congressman Nadler makes climate change a top priority issue. He is a co-sponsor of the Climate Justice Act of 2021 (H.R.2394), legislation that would require "the President to establish a Climate Justice Working Group that must advise federal entities on a just and equitable transition towards a clean, climate-resilient, and zero-emission economy."100Congressman Nadler supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. He voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 7593.75https://www.jerrynadler.com/news-clips/op-ed-listen-kids-climate-change-must-be-addressed https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5857?r=10&s=1 https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4817970/user-clip-nadler-climate-speech https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2394?s=1&r=4 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://jerrynadler.com/issues/protecting-reproductive-rights/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Napolitano, GraceCalifornia31DCongresswoman Grace Napolitano understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2018 press release regarding President Trump's termination of the Clean Power Plan, the Congresswoman stated, "It is infuriating that President Trump is again siding with coal-burning states and coal lobbyists over the health and safety of all Americans. It does not take a scientist to understand that pollution does not follow state boundaries. The expected rule and its increased emissions of carbon dioxide will affect human health all across the country and globe. Today’s announcement further shows this administration’s absence when it comes to mitigating the catastrophic impacts of climate change."100100Congresswoman Napolitano has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2020 press release introducing an infrastructure modernization bill, the Congresswoman stated, "Our robust plan modernizes our nation’s roads, bridges, buses, railways, airports, sea ports, and critical drinking water and wastewater infrastructure. It makes smart investments to create good-paying jobs, while tackling climate change head on and improving the daily commute." Congresswoman Napolitano also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2020 press release announcing monies appropriated to California for climate initiatives, she stated, "By tackling climate change head on and improving the daily commute, we are investing in the future of Americans and American infrastructure. I am very pleased that many of the priorities I submitted on behalf of my constituents, businesses, and transit agencies are included in this bill." Rep. Napolitano makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2020 tweet, the Congresswoman stated "This week, we will pass the #MovingForward Act, a 21st Century infrastructure plan to modernize our nation’s roads, bridges, buses, railways, airports, sea ports & vital drinking water/wastewater infrastructure, creating good-paying jobs & tackling climate change in the process."100Congresswoman Grace Napolitano publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman/woman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. She voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).100100https://napolitano.house.gov/media/press-releases/napolitano-s-statement-trump-administration-s-proposed-carbon-emissions-rule https://napolitano.house.gov/media/press-releases/napolitano-unveils-house-democrats-new-infrastructure-framework https://napolitano.house.gov/media/press-releases/napolitano-secures-over-37-billion-california-key-local-priorities-new https://mobile.twitter.com/gracenapolitano/status/1278050540283404295 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://napolitano.house.gov/media/press-releases/napolitano-s-statement-supreme-court-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Neal, RichardMassachusetts1DCongressman Richard Neal understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Environment and Climate Change,' page, it states, "One of his top priorities as Chairman of the Ways & Means Committee is making the environment we share cleaner and safer, while also promoting renewable energy that creates thousands of jobs in the process. That’s why he held the first Ways & Means hearing on climate change in over a decade. It's why he cosponsored the Climate Action Now Act, which would enter the US back into Paris Climate accords, and set hard limits on carbon emissions."100100Congressman Richard Neal has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In May 2019 as the Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, Congressman Neal hosted the first hearing on climate change in 12 years for that committee. The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2017 press release condemning the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, Congressman Neal stated, "The administration that consistently denies the existence of climate change has now abandoned an international effort to preserve and protect our environment." Congressman Neal makes climate change a top priority issue. "As Chairman, Richie is also a champion of the GREEN Act, which would be Congress’s largest tax investment ever in combating climate change and promoting clean energy. The act extends current renewable energy tax incentives, and creates new models to increase the use of green energy while reducing greenhouse gas emissions." But according to IBerkshire.com, during a town hall, he was pressed on climate change by constituents and gave an unsatisfactory answer which advocated for natural gas as a bridge fuel. Congressman Neal's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue, since he remains committed to fossil fuels. On their website it says, "'Neal said he continues to support the wind production tax credit to increase renewables there but 'you have to have an integrated approach.' He said by simply ending the use of natural gas, prices would increase dramatically.'" While Vote Climate U.S. PAC believes that we must transition to 100% renewable energy by 2030, there may need to be a short transition period. 100Congressman Neal publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. In a speech on the House floor in opposition to a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise Expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con Res 119), the Congressman stated, "Listen. If you want to debate a carbon tax, let’s hold some hearings. Let’s find out what it would mean for the economy, for Big Oil, for families in Springfield. Let’s find out what impact it would have on fossil fuel emissions and on economic growth. Let’s think strategically about how it would affect our geopolitics. If you want to have this debate, let’s have this debate." Congressman Neal voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119).100100https://www.nealforcongress.com/environment-climate-change https://neal.house.gov/press-releases/neal-opening-statement-hearing-economic-and-health-consequences-climate-change https://neal.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/statement-congressman-richard-e-neal-president-trumps-decision-withdraw http://www.iberkshires.com/story/55590/Neal-Talks-Politics-With-Residents-at-Town-Hall-Meeting.html https://neal.house.gov/press-releases/rep-richard-neal-opening-floor-statement-h-con-res-119 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://waysandmeans.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/chairman-neal-statement-supreme-court-s-rollback-roe-v-wade Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Neguse, JoeColorado2DCongressman Joe Neguse understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "Climate change is an existential threat that we need to begin tackling head on. In Colorado, we already see the first-hand effects of a changing climate and its impact on our ecosystems including flooding, droughts, and more intense storms. Our state’s recreation-based industries have a lot to lose as well: threatening skiing, hiking and backpacking, rafting, fishing, and wildlife dependent activities. Backcountry enthusiasts flock to Colorado to enjoy our natural wonders; global climate change could damage this important sector of Colorado’s economy. Simply put, Colorado has a vested stake in the health of our world’s climate."100100Congressman Neguse has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congressman introduced the Climate Readiness Act of 2020 (H.R. 6119), which would require the Department of Defense to submit to Congress a report outlining the threats both domestic and abroad of climate change to United States national security. The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release introducing the Thirty by Thirty Resolution to Save Nature (H.RES. 835), the Congressman stated, "Climate change is the existential threat of our time, one that cannot be ignored or idled on, but one that must be met with bold and pragmatic solutions that protect our future and our planet.” Rep. Neguse makes climate change a top priority issue. According to a 2021 Colorado Politics article, "U.S. Rep. Joe Neguse of Lafayette is taking credit for landing more than $50 billion in stimulus money for the proposed 21st Century Climate Conservation Corps. The first $10 billion would go to hire thousands of young people and veterans starting out at $15 an hour, followed by $40 billion for local resilience and wildfire preparedness projects and other work to cut emissions, administered by the Department of Interior and the U.S. Forest Service."100Congressman Neguse publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. In a 2018 interview with the League of Women Voters, when asked about climate change, the Congressman stated, "I believe we should have stronger federal emissions standards, a federal carbon tax, and an end to the massive subsidies currently provided in our tax code to oil and gas companies who contribute so greatly to climate change." 100100https://neguse.house.gov/issues/energy-environment https://neguse.house.gov/media/press-releases/neguse-spanberger-introduce-legislation-to-address-the-national-security-threat-of-climate-change https://neguse.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-neguse-sets-national-goal-of-conserving-30-of-us-lands-and-ocean-by-2030 https://www.coloradopolitics.com/news/neguse-secures-50-billion-for-proposed-climate-conservation-corps/article_08403cee-11ba-11ec-adc1-6b5e265d1994.html https://www.ontheissues.org/Archive/2018_Endorsements_Joe_Neguse.htm https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://neguse.house.gov/media/press-releases/statement-rep-neguse-responds-to-supreme-court-decision-overruling-roe-v-wade_Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Nehls, Troy Texas22RCongressman Troy Nehls does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250According to a February 2021 Click 2 Houston article, “These policies are dangerous and they’re reckless,” said U.S. Rep. Troy Nehls (R-District 22). The Republican leaders are referring to Biden’s executive order aimed at tackling climate change. The order temporarily suspends new oil and gas permits on federal lands and waters. The order also cancels the Keystone XL Pipeline permit." On his campaign website, Congressman Nehls states "Some in Congress are pushing for a complete ban on fossil fuels. This would be a travesty not only to Texas' economy but the entire country." Congressman Troy Nehls demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Troy Nehls has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5018.75https://www.click2houston.com/news/politics/2021/02/03/texas-republicans-call-bidens-energy-policy-reckless-but-energy-experts-outlook-isnt-as-bleak/ https://www.nehlsforcongress.com https://sbaprolife.org/representative/troy-nehlsOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Newhouse, DanWashington4RCongressman Dan Newhouse disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to the Alliance to Save Energy the Congressman made the following statement on climate change: "Congress should have an honest and respectful debate about this issue. Those of us who are wary of the negative economic impact to America caused by schemes like Cap and Trade have been branded ‘climate deniers,’ which only hardens people's positions on both sides. Of the global warming proposals I've seen, the proposed benefits have been vague and hard to quantify, while the negative economic impact in the form of higher energy costs has been severe, especially when countries like China aren't bound to the same agreements and limits.” Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change position.00The Congressman supports the continued development of fossil fuels, stating on the energy page of his website, "We must continue to increase the development of domestic energy sources to ensure greater economic security for Washington State and the U.S. In order to maintain access to affordable energy for Central Washington’s residents, it is essential that the U.S. continue to develop a safe, domestic, all-of-the-above energy strategy." Congressman Newhouse demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.0Congressman Newhouse makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. He was the original sponsor of H.Res.1001 — 115th Congress (2017-2018), "Providing for consideration of the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 119) expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy." He voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 00http://www.ase.org/sites/ase.org/files/resources/Media%20browser/new_members_in_house_114th_final.pdf https://newhouse.house.gov/sponsored-legislation https://newhouse.house.gov/issues/energy https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://newhouse.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/newhouse-defends-life-pivotal-supreme-court-caseOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Norcross, DonaldNew Jersey1DCongressman Norcross understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's 'Environment' page, it states, "We have a responsibility to future generations to leave behind an earth and environment that is clean and sustainable. This responsibility also presents opportunities to create jobs and grow our economy by inventing, manufacturing and installing clean energy technology and other sustainable solutions here in America. Environmentally sustainable policies and investments in renewable energy will reduce America’s dependence on fossil fuels and foreign oil, and help address climate change."100100Congressman Norcross has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In January of 2021, he announced over $233,000 in funding to Rutgers University to research the effects of climate change on ecological diversity. In the News Release, he stated, "Climate change is a serious threat to our communities, with devastating consequences both globally and here in South Jersey...The work being done at Rutgers–Camden is critical to deepening our understanding of how changing temperatures are affecting ecological systems around the world. This funding will advance the vital research being conducted right here to ensure a safe and healthy environment for generations to come.” Rep. Norcross also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In February 2021, in a 2021 News Release regarding that day's vote on Build Back Better, he stated, "Climate change isn’t coming, it’s already here...Last week, tornadoes and flooding caused by Ida devastated portions of New Jersey, underscoring why we must respond to the climate crisis. Today’s vote sends a clear message: to build back better, America needs historic levels of investment in climate monitoring; we need to fund institutions and universities that are on the cutting-edge of climate research; and we need a climate-ready workforce. Climate change and job creation go hand in hand, and by investing in our climate response we are laying the foundation for economic growth and generating good-paying jobs. I am proud to vote for these vital investments in America’s future to ensure our nation is prepared as climate change brings increasingly extreme weather events to our shores." Congressman Norcross makes climate change a top priority issue. He is a co-sponsor of the Climate Action Now Act (H.R.9), legislation that "requires the President to develop and update annually a plan for the United States to meet its nationally determined contribution under the Paris Agreement on climate change."100Congressman Norcross supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. The Congressman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 7593.75https://norcross.house.gov/issues/environment https://norcross.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/norcross-announces-more-233k-rutgers-university-camden-climate-change https://norcross.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/norcross-votes-advance-science-space-and-technology-committee-s https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/9/cosponsors?r=6&s=3 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimateN/APro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Norman, RalphSouth Carolina5RCongressman Norman does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels, but 'Inside Climate News' reports, "The House of Representatives on Wednesday voted to cut funding from key climate protection rules and rejected an attempt to save regional offices of the Environmental Protection Agency from being closed...Offered by Rep. Ralph Norman, a Republican from South Carolina, the amendment's cuts would have come close to the 31 percent reduction sought by President Donald Trump." Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change position.00In a 2018 Tweet, Congressman Norman announced, "Today, I introduced a bill that would eliminate the Global Climate Change Initiative (GCCI) within the US Agency for International Development (USAID)." Congressman Norman demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.0Congressman Norman makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman co-sponsored a 2019 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 41).00https://insideclimatenews.org/news/13092017/house-budget-vote-climate-change-enforcement-epa-methane-trump-social-cost-carbon https://twitter.com/RepRalphNorman/status/996794987005272064 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/41/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://norman.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1373Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
O'Halleran, Tom Arizona2DCongressman Tom O'Halleran understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. According to a 2020 press release on his website, the Congressman stated, 'From raging forest fires to decades-long droughts, every corner of our state has felt the effects of climate change,” said O’Halleran. “As a member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, I am working with my colleagues to take decisive, bipartisan action and address this very real threat to the livelihood of Arizonans and the American people.'"100100Congressman O'Halleran has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2021 press release, "Congressman Tom O’Halleran (AZ-01) voted to pass H.R.5376, the Build Back Better Act." He also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a November 2018 press release he stated, “If we want to secure a prosperous future for future generations of Americans, we need to act. This will impact everything from crop yields to the safety of Americans living in high-risk areas near the ocean, or those living right in Arizona who face the threat of wildfires every year. This is not a partisan issue; it is something that Congress and the Administration should come together to address before it is too late." Congressman O'Halleran makes climate change a top priority issue. He is a member of the Safe Climate Caucus.100Congressman O'Halleran has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5087.5https://ohalleran.house.gov/newsroom/press-releases/o-halleran-legislation-included-house-climate-crisis-plan https://ohalleran.house.gov/newsroom/press-releases/o-halleran-votes-pass-build-back-better-act https://ohalleran.house.gov/newsroom/press-releases/ohalleran-calls-greater-focus-impact-climate-change https://ohalleran.house.gov/newsroom/press-releases/o-halleran-joins-safe-climate-caucus https://twitter.com/repohalleran/status/1020037706192220165Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Obernolte, JayCalifornia23RCongressman Jay Obernolte does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Speaking in regards to natural resources as an issue, Congressman Jay Obernolte states that "We need common-sense policies that will support our communities, protect our environment, and help our economy to grow." Congressman Obernolte does not oppose climate action.25Congressman Jay Obernolte has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He was not in Congress to vote on a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)). 5025https://obernolte.house.gov/issues/natural-resources https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.vvdailypress.com/story/news/2022/06/24/abortion-roe-v-wade-overturn-high-desert-victorville-california/7726230001/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Ocasio-Cortez, AlexandriaNew York14DCongresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's official website, she states, "We must treat Climate Change like a serious, existential threat to our planet." When speaking about the large-scale changes that would have to be implemented by the Green New Deal, legislation that would implement economic reforms to cut carbon emissions while boosting the economy, she said that ""Even the solutions that we have considered big and bold are nowhere near the scale of the actual problem that climate change presents to us."100100Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. According to the Congresswoman's, 'Green New Deal,' page, she introduced and sponsored the Green New Deal Resolution (H.R. 109), "to recognize the scale of the climate crisis and provide a roadmap to evaluate policies that can protect our planet and uplift our communities. Rep. Ocasio-Cortez also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a speech introducing the Climate Emergency Resolution (H. Con. Res 52) the Congresswoman stated, "Climate change represents not only our greatest threat but one of our greatest opportunities. Working to solve the climate crisis will create tens of millions of union jobs, empower communities, and improve the quality of life for people across the globe.” The Congresswoman makes climate change a top priority issue. According to a 2019 AP article, when discussing the Green New Deal, the Congresswoman said there is, "no middle ground” when it comes to climate change. 100Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. According to an article in Politico, "Even some progressives who support a carbon tax, such as Rep.-elect Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), are promoting it as just one possible element of a sweeping "Green New Deal" that includes pouring huge amounts of money into renewable energy." An article in 'The World,' said, "The Post's Editorial Board recently laid out its own argument for a Green New Deal that, unlike the AOC-Markey plan, includes carbon pricing and stops short of broader progressive goals. Stephen Stromberg of the Post, who authored the editorial, expressed some surprise that the Green New Deal did not include carbon pricing, noting that in 2009, Sen. Markey co-sponsored a carbon-pricing bill that, at the time, was considered 'the premier global warming/climate change legislation of the Obama era.'” Rep. Ocasio-Cortez was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 100100https://ocasio-cortez.house.gov/legislation/climate https://www.npr.org/2019/02/07/691997301/rep-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-releases-green-new-deal-outline https://ocasio-cortez.house.gov/gnd/resolution https://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/sanders-blumenauer-and-ocasio-cortez-announce-introduction-of-climate-emergency-resolution https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/52 https://apnews.com/4359d6588f9740aca1ab24a9745f2c9d https://www.politico.com/story/2018/12/09/carbon-tax-climate-change-environmentalists-1052210 https://www.pri.org/stories/2019-04-11/green-new-deal-doesnt-include-carbon-pricing-some-say-thats-big-mistake https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://ocasio-cortez.house.gov/legislation/reproductive-rightsSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Omar, IlhanMinnesota5DCongresswoman Ilhan Omar understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Ensure Environmental Justice & Energy Independence,' page, it states, "It is unacceptable for fossil fuel and energy companies to dictate how we treat our planet. We need bold action, and a transformation of our political and economic systems to combat climate change."100100Congresswoman Omar has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a House floor speech supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), the Congresswoman stated, "The United States is responsible for nearly a third of excess carbon dioxide in the atmosphere today and thus bears more responsibility for the climate crisis than any other country." Rep. Omar also makes prominent public statements on the issue. According to a 2021 Yahoo News article, Congresswoman Omar attended a hearing by the House Oversight and Reform Committee, where "Omar ended her remarks by saying, 'We’re at a tipping point developing fossil fuels now; given the escalation of the climate crisis and its harm to black and brown communities, it is unconscionable. Given each of your roles in these attacks on humanity, you all should resign. Thank you, and I yield back.'” Congresswoman Omar makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2019 press release announcing the introduction of the Zero Waste Act (H.R. 4050), the Congresswoman stated, "Today, we need elected leaders to champion solutions that match the scope of the challenges we face. Addressing the waste crisis is critical to preventing further damage to our climate—it’s integral to racial justice and a clean, equitable future.”100Congresswoman Omar has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5087.5https://www.ilhanomar.com/environmental-justice https://twitter.com/ilhan/status/1123979802250182659?lang=en https://www.yahoo.com/video/congresswoman-omar-blasts-oil-execs-151623183.html https://omar.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-ilhan-omar-introduced-zero-waste-act https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://omar.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-ilhan-omar-statement-supreme-court-decision-overturn-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Owens, Burgess Utah4RCongressman Burgess Owens does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250According to a 2021 'Deseret News' article, "...Rep. John Curtis, R-Utah, led more than 50 of his Republican colleagues, including...Burgess Owens...in the newly formed Conservative Climate Caucus. The Conservative Climate Caucus is another step toward meaningful Republican action on climate change." During a 2020 general election debate, when asked about policies to address climate change, Congressman Owens stated, "I would suggest a warp time speed commission." The congressman later states "We can pull together free market and let them take the lead..." Congressman Burgess Owens does not oppose climate action.25Congressman Burgess Owens has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5025https://www.deseret.com/opinion/2021/6/25/22547236/guest-opinion-a-step-toward-meaningful-republican-action-on-climate-change https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9FKsAjtKsb8 https://burgess4utah.com/issues/life/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Pallone Jr., FrankNew Jersey6DCongressman Frank Pallone understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2021 new conference addressing the 'CLEAN Future Act,' legislation that aims for 100% clean electricity by 2035 he stated, "I really believe that the time for slow, marginal change has gone...You can’t just watch from the sidelines as the climate crisis wreaks havoc on Americans’ health and home. The cost of inaction is staggering — it already is."100100Congressman Pallone has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. He is the sponsor of the CLEAN Future Act (H.R.1512), legislation that "establishes an interim goal to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to at least 50% below 2005 levels by 2030 as well as a national goal to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050," and specifies that "Each federal agency must develop a plan to achieve the goals." Rep. Pallone also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a press release discussing the CLEAN future act and it's role in combating climate change, he stated, "Record wildfires, flooding, heat waves and drought have spelled out a dire reality: the climate crisis is here. New Jersey is on the frontline of this crisis, and we can no longer afford to address climate change along the margins. The CLEAN Future Act provides the kind of serious federal leadership this moment requires...This plan represents our commitment to achieving net-zero greenhouse gas pollution. For the sake of the American people, the long-term sustainability of our economy, and public health, we must act boldly, and that is exactly what we intend to do.” Congressman Pallone makes climate change a top priority issue. He is a co-sponsor of the 100% Clean Economy Act of 2019 (H.R.5221), legislation that "sets a national goal of achieving a 100% clean economy (i.e., economy-wide, net-zero greenhouse gas emissions) by no later than 2050." 100Congressman Pallone has an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). However, when discussing the CLEAN Future Act (of which he is a sponsor), the Congressman made it clear that his bill did not call for a carbon tax as it was futile. He stated, "We don’t have a carbon tax…I think it’s time to try something new. The votes are just not there for a price on carbon.” 5087.5https://www.politico.com/news/2021/03/03/house-energy-commerce-climate-legislation-473351 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/1512 https://pallone.house.gov/media/press-releases/pallone-details-plan-combat-climate-change https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5221?s=1&r=8 https://www.politico.com/news/2021/03/03/house-energy-commerce-climate-legislation-473351 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Palmer, GaryAlabama6RCongressman Gary Palmer agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2021 press release announcing his second term to the Select Committee on the Climate Crisis, Congressman Palmer stated, "It is imperative that the United States continue to utilize our technological advantages and engineering expertise to lead the world in reducing CO2 and other greenhouse gas emissions while not completely abandoning our vast natural energy resources. "500During a 2019 Congressional hearing on carbon emissions, Congressman Palmer stated, "Apparently some folks take as the gospel truth whatever these esteemed scientists project and for instance, in his book Farewell to Ice Peter Wadhams, a professor of ocean physics at Cambridge University predicted that the polar ice in the Arctic would be gone by mid decade. Not only is the ice still there but at points between 2012-2016 it actually increased by about 50 percent. I went from 2.2 million square miles to 3.3 million square miles, so my point is, I guess my question is, do each of you believe that the science on climate is settled?" Congressman Palmer demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Gary Palmer makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In an April 2021 blog post on Republican Leaders, Representative Palmer states "...the truth behind the carbon tax – it is bad policy that increases costs, mainly on the poorest among us, and will not achieve the global goals its proponents claim it will."012.5https://palmer.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/palmer-appointed-second-term-select-committee-climate-crisis https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91fOn6j36d8 https://www.republicanleader.gov/rep-gary-palmer-the-cost-of-a-carbon-tax/ https://www.rocketcitynow.com/article/news/local/alabama-legislators-respond-leaked-scotus-draft-opinion-roe-v-wade/525-add771b1-3b09-445c-9190-73bb9c21a700Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Panetta, JimmyCalifornia19DCongressman Panetta understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Environment,' page, it states, "We must remain committed to protecting our environment for future generations by confronting and attempting to reverse the effects of climate change to support the health of our community, country, and planet. As your Member of Congress, I am working to deliver thoughtful and innovative action on climate change to protect public health, and clean air and clean water; advance our economy and global preeminence in green technology; defend our national security; and to pass on a healthy and sustainable future for our children."100100Congressman Panetta has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 press release supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9) the Congressman stated, "United States leadership was crucial in the widespread adoption of the Paris Climate Agreement. Withdrawing our nation from the agreement undermines U.S. global leadership on combating climate change and threatens the future of our planet." Congressman Panetta makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release introducing The Climate Action Rebate Act (H.R. 4051), the Congressman stated, "Climate change is a severe and serious threat to our coastal communities, agricultural economies, public health, and national security. It’s beyond time for our government to do its part to respond to this crisis by reducing carbon emissions and promoting a financially feasible transition to a clean energy economy.” Rep. Panetta makes climate change a top priority issue. From a June 2020 press release, "the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis unveiled a comprehensive congressional climate action framework, which includes Congressman Jimmy Panetta’s (CA-20) legislation, the Green Bus Tax Credit Act... By tackling climate change through the tax code and incentivizing the adoption of clean energy technologies, these bills will help meet the report’s ambitious but attainable climate goals."100Congressman Panetta publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. Congressman Panetta, along with Senators Coons and Feinstein, introduced 'The Climate Action Rebate Act' (H.R. 4051) which would put a price on carbon and use the revenue to fund infrastructure and other government programs. He voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).100100https://panetta.house.gov/issues/environment https://panetta.house.gov/media/press-releases/house-passes-amendment-congressman-panetta-climate-action-now-act https://panetta.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-panetta-sens-coons-and-feinstein-introduce-bill-price-carbon-pollution https://panetta.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-panetta-secures-bold-legislation-first-ever-house-climate-crisis https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4051 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://twitter.com/RepJimmyPanetta/status/1540362490458112001?ref_src=twsrc%5EtfwSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Pannill Fletcher, LizzieTexas7DCongresswoman Lizzie Fletcher agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On her campaign website, the Congresswoman states, "We know that domestic production of oil and natural gas is critical to our national security, our economy, and our energy future. And we know that renewable energy is an increasingly important part of the energy mix. We also know that climate change represents a real and growing threat. We know we are already experiencing its effects."50100In a 2019 Congresswoman Fletcher co-wrote an op-ed with Congressman Adam Graves (R-LA), they came out in support of offshore drilling, stating, "Opponents of offshore drilling cite the need to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in their calls for a ban on exploration of the OCS. As members of Congress representing districts along the Gulf of Mexico that have been ravaged by storms made worse by a changing climate, we understand all too well the need to address climate change and reduce GHG emissions. In 2016, the Obama administration Bureau of Ocean Energy Management found when analyzing lifecycle GHG emissions that 'in the absence of new OCS leasing,' emissions could actually increase from reliance on foreign sources of oil and gas. In 2018, oil and natural gas supplied 67 percent of the energy Americans used. In other words, our concern is that these bills will result in greater GHG emissions and further threaten the environment due to the risks associated with the transportation of fuels." Congresswoman Fletcher supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congresswoman’s climate change leadership.50Congresswoman Fletcher has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5062.5https://fletcher.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2068 https://fletcher.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2187 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://fletcher.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=3951Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Pappas, ChrisNew Hampshire1DCongressman Chris Pappas understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "I believe it is critical that Congress develop and pass thoughtful, innovative solutions to the climate crisis before it’s too late to mitigate the worst effects of the catastrophic changes that are already upon us. We must act now to put our state and our nation on a pathway to a more sustainable future."100100In a 2019 press release announcing his support for the Climate Action Now Act, he stated, "Climate change is an existential threat not only to our environment but also our economy, our national security, and our way of life...With rising sea levels and worsening storms, New Hampshire communities are already facing the very serious impacts of climate change and it is imperative we take action. The U.S. plays an outsized role in global emissions and it is critical that we reaffirm our international commitment to combat climate change. I will continue to fight for policies that support a robust clean energy economy and a more sustainable future.” However, his previous support for climate action does not mirror his current actions and view. According to a 2022 NH Journal article, "After years of calling climate change is “an existential threat” and voting to raise taxes on oil and gas companies, Pappas now says he supports increased fossil fuel production and an “all of the above” — oil, gas, and nuclear — energy policy." Congressman Chris Pappas does not oppose climate action.25Congressman Pappas has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. During a 2019 interview with New Hampshire Public Radio, when asked about his support of a carbon tax, the Congressman stated, "We had a forum last night on CNN. But I think we do need a more robust debate around climate issues, including a proposal like a carbon tax. It's not an idea that I've signed on to at this point in time." Rep. Pappas was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5068.75https://pappas.house.gov/issues/energy https://pappas.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-pappas-co-sponsors-climate-action-now-act-stepping-us-commitment https://nhjournal.com/pappas-signed-no-fossil-fuel-money-pledge-took-money-from-nord-stream-lobbyist/ https://www.nhpr.org/post/conversation-1st-district-congressman-chris-pappas#stream/0 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Pascrell Jr., BillNew Jersey9DCongressman Bill Pascrell Jr. understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "He believes that we must protect our finite natural resources from polluting industries and use every tool available to combat climate change. Bill frequently reminds his skeptical colleagues across the aisle that the impacts of climate change are undeniable because they are already here."100100Congressman Pascrell Jr. has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a press release re-introducing the Renewable Chemicals Act, a bill whose main goal is to phase out the use of fossil fuels he stated, "For our children and grandchildren, America must lead the world in the fight against climate change,...Our bipartisan legislation today will help boost our production of renewable chemicals and clean energy and decrease our dependence on the fossil fuel industry." Rep. Pascrell Jr. also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a press release discussing the 2021 IPCC report, the Congressman stated, "this report has shaken me to my core. It makes clear that we cannot afford to wait any longer. Our planet is burning. We need bold action to combat climate change now. I joined over 180 House Democrats urging clean energy provisions in our infrastructure investment because every agenda item must prioritize our environment. For too long Congress has legislated without a keen eye on the climate crisis. I say: No more. An investment in America’s infrastructure will hold no weight unless we preserve the planet for our children and grandchildren. I’ll continue to push for bold climate provisions in every single piece of legislation I work on because future generations are counting on us. No more delays.” Congressman Pascrell Jr. makes climate change a top priority issue. He is a co-sponsor of the 100% Clean Economy Act of 2019 (H.R.5221), legislation that "sets a national goal of achieving a 100% clean economy (i.e., economy-wide, net-zero greenhouse gas emissions) by no later than 2050."100Congressman Pascrell Jr. supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. The Congressman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 7593.75https://pascrell.house.gov/issues/energy-and-the-environment/ https://www.insidernj.com/press-release/pascrell-fitzpatrick-reintroduce-green-bill-help-phase-fossil-fuels/ https://pascrell.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=4843 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5221?s=1&r=7 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Payne Jr., DonaldNew Jersey10DCongressman Donald Payne Jr. understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a press release discussing the Congressman's support for the 'Climate Action Now Act,' legislation that requires the President to maintain an annual plan that assures the US meets it's national contributions to the Paris Agreement on climate change, he states, "There is no future if the planet is not taken care of...Climate change is real. Climate change is happening. And climate change cannot be ignored."100100Congressman Payne Jr. has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. He is a co-sponsor of H.R.9 Climate Action Now Act, a bill that "requires the President to develop and update annually a plan for the United States to meet its nationally determined contribution under the Paris Agreement on climate change." Rep. Payne Jr. also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In response to receiving an endorsement by the Sierra Club, the Congressman stated, "Climate change and air pollution have a disproportionate impact on the most vulnerable members of our community, and therefore the fight for environmental justice is integral to the fight for racial and economic justice." Congressman Payne Jr. makes climate change a top priority issue. He is a co-sponsor of the 100% Clean Economy Act of 2019 (H.R.5221), legislation that "sets a national goal of achieving a 100% clean economy (economy-wide, net-zero greenhouse gas emissions) by no later than 2050."100Congressman Payne Jr. publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. He is a co-sponsor of the America Wins Act (H.R. 4142), legislation that "imposes an excise tax on the carbon dioxide content of coal, petroleum and petroleum products, and natural gas sold by the manufacturer, producer, or importer and requires the revenues to be used for infrastructure, an energy refund program to provide payments to certain low-income households, and other purposes." The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. Rep. Payne Jr. voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 100100https://www.insidernj.com/press-release/rep-payne-jr-votes-pass-climate-action-now-act/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/9?s=1&r=22 https://newjerseyglobe.com/congress/payne-gets-endorsement-from-sierra-club/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5221?s=1&r=15 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4142 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Pelosi, NancyCalifornia11DCongresswoman and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On Speaker Pelosi's energy and environment page, it states, "The verdict of science is clear: climate change is real, and its consequences are undeniable. Rising seas, severe droughts, and increasingly extreme and unpredictable weather patterns will impact every nation on every continent—and communities across the San Francisco Bay Area are already feeling the effects. There is no time left to deny the reality of climate change, or to turn a blind eye on the impact it is having on our country. Climate change threatens our economic security, our national security, and our food security, and we must act quickly to reduce carbon pollution and secure a sustainable future for our children and our children’s children."100100Speaker Pelosi has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 CNN article, it was reported that Congresswoman Pelosi led the congressional delegation to the UN COP25 environmental summit in the wake of President Trump affirming his decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement. According to CNN the Speaker stated, "On behalf of the United States Congress, I extend my gratitude to the Spanish government for hosting this critical meeting, and for elevating the priority of the climate crisis to the forefront of the international conversation." The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. At the 2021 UN Climate Change Conference, Global warming “is a threat multiplier, amplifying and accelerating existing inequities in our economies and societies,” Pelosi said during a Tuesday meeting focused on gender and climate change." Congresswoman Pelosi makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2020 speech unveiling the, "Solving the Climate Crisis," action plan, the Congresswoman stated, "Democrats know that the climate crisis is the essential crisis of our time, threatening public health, jobs and the economy, national security and values. Our plan honors our obligation to address the climate crisis and embraces our opportunity to solve that crisis as we build a new, clean energy economy that creates millions of good-paying jobs with strong labor protections. And it champions, and so many here you’ll hear from, environmental justice, tackling systemic racism by reducing pollution and empowering leaders from communities who are disproportionately affected, both from COVID-19 and the climate crisis, which are related."100Congresswoman Pelosi supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. She voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)). 7593.75https://pelosi.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/30/politics/nancy-pelosi-un-climate-change/index.html https://www.pbs.org/newshour/live-update/climate-summit-updates-biden-joins-world-leaders-in-glasgow/pelosi-america-is-back-to-curb-climate-change https://www.speaker.gov/newsroom/63020-0 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.speaker.gov/newsroom/62422-1Supports RoePro ClimateN/AN/AN/APro ClimateN/APro Climate
Peltola, MaryAlaska1DMary Peltola understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In an interview with a local Alaskan newspaper, she asserted, "climate change is one of the most pressing crises facing our planet — and communities across Alaska are already experiencing its devastating impacts."10058Mary Peltola does not oppose climate action. She supports an all of the above solution, as evidenced in an interview where she stated, "I am pro-resource development. At the same time, I recognize that we've got to make sure that our ecosystems are healthy and balanced." Furthermore, POLITICO reported that Pelolta "has also taken stances on investing in renewable energy while continuing dependence on oil and gas."25Mary Pelolta has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5058.25https://www.ktoo.org/2022/08/12/just-answers-where-the-u-s-house-special-election-candidates-stand-on-climate-change-in-alaska/ https://www.hcn.org/articles/north-politics-a-q-a-with-mary-peltola-alaskas-new-house-rep https://www.politico.com/minutes/congress/09-14-2022/new-face-on-natural-resources/ https://twitter.com/marypeltola/status/1540485004706230272?lang=en Since member was not in Congress for votes in 2022, the vote score was imputed using the average of position, leadership and fee on carbon score.Supports RoeN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Pence, GregIndiana6RCongressman Greg Pence does not take a position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250In a 2019 tweet condemning the Green New Deal, the Congressman states, "Green New Deal? Sounds like a Big Raw Deal." According to a 2021 press release, "U.S. Congressman Greg Pence (IN-06) introduced H.R. 1788, The Clean Energy Hydrogen Innovation Act, to expand the definition of hydrogen projects and advance innovation in clean and reliable hydrogen energy in Indiana and across the country. 'It is vital that Hoosiers have access to affordable and reliable energy. This bill will spur innovation and expand hydrogen research projects for companies and energy producers across Indiana,” said Congressman Pence. Our modern approach to energy should be ‘all of the above’ not an ‘everything but’ solution.'" Congressman Pence demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Pence makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. Congressman Greg Pence co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)). The Congressman was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 06.25https://twitter.com/repgregpence/status/1100463423358406665 https://pence.house.gov/media/press-releases/greg-pence-introduces-bipartisan-legislation-advance-innovation-clean-reliable https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/34/cosponsors?r=1&s=1 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.korncountry.com/2022/06/24/rep-pence-issues-statement-on-overturning-of-roe-v-wade/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Perry, ScottPennsylvania10RCongressman Scott Perry disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2018 Penn-Live Patriot News article, the Congressman when asked about climate change, stated, "The climate's changing, without a doubt. I think we contribute to it. I don't know exactly how, and that becomes the rub." The article also stated that the Congressman believed reports that "suggest global surface temperature data often used to corroborate climate change over time has been 'adjusted' to make the planet appear cooler in the past." The Congressman was quoted again, stating, "It opens up an opportunity for skepticism... and I think it's right because what we're talking about is the things we do impact peoples' lives. And we want to proceed based on the facts; not based on suppositions or the facts we hope that we have." Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change position.00In 2016, Congressman Perry introduced the Energy Sovereignty Act (H.R. 4544), which looked to block the Clean Power Plan. The Congressman stated that, "’[Hydropower] only one part of the solution – but it’s much better than this attempt to delegate nearly unlimited power over the energy sector to the unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats at the EPA. Such expansive authority of the EPA would be economically devastating and could threaten the reliability and viability of our Nation’s energy sector." The Congressman sought to cut climate change reporting from the 2018 defense budget according to the York Daily Record, stating that, "My goal with this amendment is to prioritize our limited defense resources on efforts that pose an immediate and direct threat to our national security. A litany of other federal agencies deal with environmental issues." Congressman Perry demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.0Congressman Perry opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He co-sponsored a 2019 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res 41) and voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 00https://www.pennlive.com/politics/2018/10/where_they_stand_a_look_at_the.html https://perry.house.gov/issues/energy.htm https://perry.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=398234 https://www.ydr.com/story/news/2017/07/12/funding-behind-perrys-amendment-cut-climate-change-reporting-defense-budget/472158001/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.pennlive.com/opinion/2022/10/where-do-our-local-representatives-really-stand-on-the-abortion-pennlive-letters.htmlOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Peters, ScottCalifornia50DCongressman Peter understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, "Energy and Environment," page, it states, "I am dedicated to combating climate change and fostering renewable energy. Unfortunately, San Diego is facing some of the consequences of climate change--from droughts, to wildfires, and floods from rising sea levels. Therefore, we must not only work to curb climate change but prepare for the effects it has on our region and nation as well. San Diego is home to many innovative green energy and cleantech companies that are important to our environment and economy. I will work in Congress to make sure these companies, as well as the premier research institutions in our region, get the support they need. We owe it to the next generation to ensure they, too, get a chance to enjoy our great outdoors."100100Congressman Peter's has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congressman published a "Climate Playbook" on his website, stating, "The threat posed by climate change and the cost of inaction are undeniable. Climate change and its effects include: less habitable coastal regions due to rising sea levels, entire cities underwater from floods, homes and centers of commerce destroyed, devastating weather events that worsen every year, and water and food scarcity. Policymakers in the United States must confront this existential crisis head on, and time is of the essence." Congressman Peters also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release announcing the Super Polluters Act (H.R. 4113), which would aim to slow climate change by regulating black carbon, hydrofluorocarbons, the Congressman stated, "As oceans warm, sea levels rise, and droughts sear our world, we must find immediate ways to slow and reverse climate change or face these dire consequences of inaction." Rep. Peters makes climate change a top priority issue. In a press release highlighting his contributions to the House Climate Crisis Action Plan, stated, "The climate crisis requires urgent, comprehensive action. We cannot wait to get to where we need to be without major policy change,” said Rep. Peters. “The Select Committee report published today provides Congress with a pragmatic and substantive agenda that we must act on swiftly, including the bipartisan bills I introduced last year, to protect our environment and public health.” 100Congressman Peters publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. He voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)). 100100https://scottpeters.house.gov/issues/energyandenvironment https://scottpeters.house.gov/climateplaybook https://scottpeters.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/reps-peters-gaetz-introduce-bill-to-slow-climate-change-reduce-super https://scottpeters.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-peters-bills-highlighted-in-new-house-climate-crisis-action-plan https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://scottpeters.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-peters-releases-statement-following-scotus-decision-to-overturn-roeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Pfluger, August Texas11RCongressman August Pfluger does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, regarding energy independence, the congressman writes "I’m proud to support the hard-working oil and gas producers that keep our Texas economy strong. In Washington, I’ll fight back against the oil-hating liberals and work to secure total energy independence for our country."250According to a February 2021 press release on his website, "Congressman August Pfluger (TX-11) is proud to announce the introduction of his second piece of original legislation, H. Res. 125, which protects the oil and gas industry from executive overreach by recognizing that any policy-making action taken to address climate change should be undertaken by the legislative branch, not through unilateral executive action—which the Biden administration continues to abuse." From a January 2021 press release on his website, "Congressman Pfluger issued a statement: “The Paris Climate Agreement does nothing to save or clean up the planet. With no mechanism to hold China and India—the two largest global polluters—accountable, this agreement merely shackles the United States with job-killing regulations that cost trillions of dollars and imperil our national security." Congressman August Pfluger demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman August Pfluger makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The congressman co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).06.25https://www.augustpfluger.com/#issues https://pfluger.house.gov/media/press-releases/pfluger-schumer-its-jobs-emergency https://pfluger.house.gov/media/press-releases/pfluger-moves-block-biden-rejoining-paris-climate-agreement https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/34/cosponsors?r=1&s=1&q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22Texas%22%7D https://pfluger.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=524Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
Phillips, DeanMinnesota3DCongressman Dean Phillips understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaigns, 'Priorities,' page, it states, "We didn’t leave the Stone Age because we ran out of rocks; rather, we discovered better ways of doing things. It’s the 21st century, and it’s time to accelerate our transition to a clean-energy economy, reduce our carbon footprint, and preserve and protect our planet for future generations.”100100Congressman Phillips has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 press release supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9) the Congressman stated, "In Minnesota we have rising temperatures, more extreme storms, and more intense flooding due to climate change. The President’s decision to pull out of the Paris Agreement was shortsighted and wrong." Rep. Phillips also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In testimony before the Select Committee on Climate Crisis, the Congressman stated, "Humankind's ability to survive, let alone thrive, on a dramatically changing planet is very much in question. The fourth National Climate Change Assessment and the 2018 IPCC report, have illustrated an urgent and inconvenient truth, and that is that we are running out of time. Congressman Phillips makes climate change a top priority issue. On October 26, 2019, the Congressman hosted a Climate Forum in Eden Prairie, Minnesota.100Congressman Phillips publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. In a press release supporting the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act of 2019 (H.R. 763), which would implement a fee on carbon, the Congressman stated, “Extreme weather events are causing the loss of American lives and property today, and our window to avoid the very worst effects of climate change is quickly closing. We fully support the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act because it will drive down America’s carbon pollution while unleashing American technology innovation and ingenuity." The Congressman was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments.100100https://www.phillipsforcongress.org/priorities/climate-change/ https://phillips.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-phillips-votes-pass-climate-action-now-act https://twitter.com/RepDeanPhillips/status/1195446295571378176 https://phillips.house.gov/media/press-releases/phillips-co-sponsors-bipartisan-energy-innovation-and-carbon-dividend-act https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22party%22%3A%22all%22%7D https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://phillips.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=695 Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Pingree, ChellieMaine1DCongresswoman Chellie Pingree understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2019 press release affirming the importance of the Paris Agreement, the Congresswoman stated, "In Maine is already seeing its harmful effects every day—rapidly warming oceans are threatening our economy by causing fish and lobster to migrate while rising sea levels are jeopardizing coastal communities. We cannot ignore America’s role and expect our state will remain unscathed by the effects of climate change.”100100Congresswoman Pingree has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. The Congresswoman has a 'Fighting Climate Change,' page, which states, "Climate change is real, caused by human activity, and an urgent threat to our way of life. For too long, scientific warnings were ignored and now we’re at a crisis point. To avoid a major, irreversible catastrophe, we must take bold action to become carbon neutral by 2050." The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2020 press release supporting the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis, the Congresswoman stated, "I’m proud that after years of inaction, Congress has turned the page on climate denial. As we face our post-coronavirus economic reality, Congress’ work to put our climate at the forefront is more important than ever." Rep. Pingree makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2020 tweet, the Congresswoman wrote "Climate change isn’t like Santa Claus. It is real whether you believe in it or not." 100Congresswoman Pingreepublicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments.100100https://pingree.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/pingree-statement-affirming-importance-us-commitment-paris-agreement https://pingree.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=14914 https://pingree.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=3428 https://twitter.com/chelliepingree/status/1316527704817180674 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22party%22%3A%22all%22%7D https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://pingree.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=4215Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Pocan, MarkWisconsin2DCongressman Pocan understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. According to Pocan's campaign website, the Congressman states, "At a time when we face high energy and gas prices and see the effects of global climate change in our daily lives, I believe that making the country more energy efficient will not only reduce our carbon footprint, but also will position the U.S. to thrive in a twenty-first century economy. As a member of the Safe Climate Caucus, I am committed to preserving our environment through investments in clean energy capabilities. I subscribe to the notion that if we make investments in the short term, we can ultimately make our energy use more efficient in the long term."100100Congressman Pocan has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a video from the Safe Climate Caucus, the Congressman stated, "There's no question that increasing levels of CO2 are bad for the planet bad for our country that rising sea levels could have devastating impacts across the globe and that we need to do something about climate change." The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 tweet, the Congressman stated, "Climate change is a reality. Period. Pulling the U.S. out of the #ParisAgreement is not only a blatant refusal to participate in a necessary global fight against climate change, but it threatens ALL life across the world. @realDonaldTrump, you're a failure." Rep. Pocan makes climate change a priority issue as well. He demonstrated this by becoming a co-sponsor of the Green New Deal. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.100Congressman Pocan supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. The Congressman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s position on a fee on carbon.7593.75https://pocan.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJ6-qMNpoI0 https://twitter.com/repmarkpocan/status/1191466230600912900 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://pocan.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/pocan-on-scotus-decision-overturning-roeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Porter, KatieCalifornia47DCongresswoman Katie Porter understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, she stated, "In Washington, Congresswoman Porter has kept her promise to take concrete action to fight climate change. She joined House colleagues on both sides of the aisle to pass three bipartisan bills to protect public lands from new oil drilling, including our California coastline. She also voted in favor of the Climate Action Now Act, which honors the international commitment we made to fighting climate change in the Paris Climate Agreement. Congresswoman Porter amended this historic legislation to highlight the importance of scientific research and the continued need for clean technology development, including the incredible innovations created in California’s 45th District."100100Congresswoman Katie Porter has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congresswoman Porter introduced the Clean Corridors Act of 2019 alongside California Congressmen Harley Rouda and Mark DeSaulnier. This law would establish a grant program for the installation of electric and hydrogen fueling stations on our national highways, helping to reduce carbon emissions and improve Orange County families’ access to clean energy. Congresswoman Porter also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2021 tweet, the Congresswoman states "Climate scientists found that last week's extreme heat—like the triple digit temperatures in California—would've been "virtually impossible" without human-caused climate change. This is a crisis. We must take action." The Congresswoman makes climate change a top priority issue. According to a 2021 Newsweek article, Rep. Katie Porter (D-CA) on Thursday used jars of M&Ms and bags of rice to attack Big Oil, during a House Oversight Committee hearing about the climate crisis and the fossil fuel industry's role. Porter then broached the subject of carbon-related projects that Shell continues to finance, and poured most of the M&Ms out of the jar. Then she held up the nearly empty jar to demonstrate Shell's spending on renewable energy."100Congresswoman Porter publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. She was not in Congress to vote on a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).100100https://porter.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=14893 https://porter.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=22 https://twitter.com/katieporteroc/status/1413238796397670401 https://www.newsweek.com/katie-porter-uses-bags-rice-mms-attack-big-oil-1643771 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://twitter.com/katieporteroc/status/1540417623351037952?lang=enSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Posey, BillFlorida8RCongressman Bill Posey disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2014 Science, Space and Technology Committee hearing questioning then White House Science Advisor, John Holdren, the Congressman stated, "Obviously we've had global warming for a long time… So that is a natural phenomenon. [Global cooling] was the fear before Gore invented the internet."00According to a 2018 International Business Times article, Congressman Posey introduced to direct the Securities and Exchange Commission to withdraw guidance regarding disclosure related to climate change Act (H.R. 3502), which was "designed to bar federal regulators from forcing companies to better disclose their climate-related risks to their shareholders." Congressman Posey demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Poseymakes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman co-sponsored a 2019 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res 41). 00https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-EHY_uMWYds http://www.ibtimes.com/political-capital/despite-irma-florida-congressman-aims-let-companies-hide-climate-change-risks https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/3502/actions?r=6 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/41/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://sbaprolife.org/representative/bill-poseyOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Pressley, AyannaMassachussetts7DCongresswoman Ayanna Pressley understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. Speaking on the Road to the Green New Deal tour, the Congresswoman stated, "The impacts of climate change are intersectional on our public health, on our human migration, on national security. And so we come here tonight to advance bold, innovative and, yes, unapologetic, aspirational policy.”100100Congresswoman Ayanna Presley has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. On Congresswoman Pressley's campaign site's, 'Issues,' page, it states, "Climate change presents a number of serious threats to public health, including longer heat waves, more frequent extreme weather, and decreased air quality." The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. According to a 2022 press release, "Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley (MA-07)...issued a joint statement on reported delays by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in issuing new disclosure rules regarding climate change risk: 'The climate crisis is here, and it is already having a significant impact on our communities and our economy. We cannot wait for our country’s largest corporations to decide whether they take climate change seriously when extreme floods, heat waves and storms are already devastating our neighborhoods. Just as we must use every tool to prevent climate catastrophe, we must act with strength and urgency to protect our financial system from climate risk. We are alarmed that the Securities and Exchange Commission’s climate-change disclosure rule has been delayed. We urge the Commission to act swiftly and issue a strong rule that holistically accounts for a company’s climate contributions and addresses the urgent need to act on climate-related financial risk.'” Congresswoman Pressley makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2021 press release "Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley (MA-07), a member of the House Financial Services Committee, along with Congressman Mondaire Jones (NY-17) and Rashida Tlaib (MI-13), introduced the Fossil Free Finance Act, legislation to require the Federal Reserve (Fed) to mandate large banks and other Systemically Important Financial Institutions (SIFIs) align their financing of greenhouse gas emissions with science-based emissions targets. The Fossil Free Finance Act requires the Fed to acknowledge the existential threat climate change poses to the core tenants of its monetary policy and supervisory mandates and act to mitigate the financial stability threats of climate risk."100Congresswoman Pressley has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5087.5https://dailyfreepress.com/blog/2019/04/23/ayanna-pressley-ed-markey-speak-about-green-new-deal-in-dorchester/ https://ayannapressley.com/issues/equity-agenda/?fbclid=IwAR26MJ2CtbTUUivdVWD4keVMWZB1UYqsf6u9pj10f0umX6TmrK6wsPhu-MM https://pressley.house.gov/media/press-releases/statement-reps-pressley-garc-bowman-bush-ocasio-cortez-and-tlaib-regarding https://pressley.house.gov/media/press-releases/pressley-jones-tlaib-unveil-bill-require-federal-reserve-mandate-big-banks https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://pressley.house.gov/2022/05/03/rep-pressley-s-statement-draft-supreme-court-opinion-overturn-roe-v-wade/ Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Quigley, MikeIllinois5DCongressman Mike Quigley understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'The Ticking Clock of Climate Change,' page, it states, "An investment in our environment is an investment in our future. Climate change is an urgent threat to everyone on the planet, threatening lives and livelihoods by jeopardizing clean air, clean water, and healthy and diverse ecosystems. We can’t afford to sit back and continue to do nothing. As President Obama said, 'We’re the first generation to feel the impact of climate change, and the last generation that can do something about it.'"100100Congressman Quigley has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. On his 'Energy/Environment' page, it states, "We live in a time of unprecedented threat to our environment. From pollution to habitat degradation to the global crisis of man-made climate change, the evidence all around us is clear that we must act to protect our planet and everything living on it...I believe that climate change represents an existential threat to the lives and livelihoods of millions of Americans and billions around the world and that Congress must act with the urgency and ambition that climate science demands. For these reasons, I was an original cosponsor of the Green New Deal, a bold and aspirational proposal to transition our economy away from reliance on fossil fuels." The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. He is a co-sponsor of the America's Clean Future Fund Act (H.R.2451), legislation that "establishes requirements and incentives to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and assist industries, communities, and workers transition to a low-carbon economy, including by establishing (1) the Climate Change Finance Corporation (C2FC); (2) the America's Clean Future Fund; and (3) a carbon fee on the use, sale, or transfer of certain fuels by covered entities." Rep. Quigley makes climate change a top priority issue. According to a 2021 press release, during a floor speech about reentering the Paris Climate Agreement, the Congressman stated "President Biden’s commitment, necessary as it was, will not itself reduce America’s emissions enough to meet our 2015 promise to the world or stem the climate crisis. For that, Congress must act urgently. We must reject the bad faith talking points about a false dichotomy between environmental stewardship and economic growth and openly embrace the idea that a sustainable economy is dependent upon a sustainable environment."100Congressman Quigley supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. He voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 7593.75https://quigley.house.gov/newsroom/the-ticking-clock-of-climate-change#:~:text=Representative%20Mike%20Quigley%20speaking%20on,on%20climate%20change%20is%20now.&text=Climate%20change%20is%20an%20urgent,and%20healthy%20and%20diverse%20ecosystems. https://quigley.house.gov/issues/energyenvironment https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2451?s=1&r=10 https://quigley.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/quigley-delivers-floor-speech-calling-urgent-congressional-action https://quigley.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/quigley-statement-supreme-court-decision-strike-down-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Raskin, JamieMaryland8DCongressman Jamie Raskin understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's campaign site, 'Climate Change,' page, it states, “Climate change isn’t just an issue. It is the entire context in which we have to make all our public policy decisions. If you get your science from scientists instead of Fox News, you know this is an emergency, not a myth.”100100Congressman Raskin has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congressman co-wrote an editorial for the Baltimore Sun, which stated, "With no time left to debate the delusional dogmas of climate denialism, we must develop policies to break quickly and permanently from the carbon economy and invest in renewable energy and a far more resilient national infrastructure." Rep. Raskin also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a September 2019 press release urging President Trump to prioritize climate change in the renegotiated NAFTA deal, the Congressman stated, "The Paris Agreement represents the type of global cooperation that our trade deals should aspire to, and has the support of 185 countries, including our NAFTA trading partners. This is the most basic lens through which we should negotiate all trade deals.” Congressman Raskin makes climate change a top priority issue. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of Recognizing the duty of the Federal Government to create a Green New Deal (H.Res 109). 100Congressman Raskin publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. On his campaign sites, 'Climate Change,' page, it states, "Jamie will champion a sweeping carbon tax along with market-based solutions to stimulate renewable energy development and steadily and dramatically reduce carbon fuel consumption." Congressman Raskin voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. 100100https://jamieraskin.com/climate-change http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/oped/bs-ed-op-1010-political-climate-change-20171009-story.html https://raskin.house.gov/media/press-releases/raskin-urges-president-trump-prioritize-climate-renegotiated-nafta https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22party%22%3A%22all%22%7D https://www.huffpost.com/entry/jamie-raskin-rachel-maddow-roe-v-wade-full-on-handmaids-tale_n_62709e42e4b01131b1261271Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Reschenthaler, GuyPennsylvania14RCongressman Guy Reschenthaler does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2020 post on 'Twitter,' the Congressman stated, "The reason the global temp is rising is due to China’s disregard for the environment and emissions standards."250In a 2019 press release supporting the president's decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement, Congressman Reschenthaler stated, “This was an unfair deal that put our country at a disadvantage by giving a free pass to the world’s worst polluters while forcing unrealistic demands on our national economy. As our nation reaches its energy dominance and continues to reduce emissions through innovation, House Democrats want us to put our economic growth, jobs, and security at risk by forcing President Trump to implement the Paris Agreement.” According to his website, the Congressman states, "As a member of the House Energy Action Team, I am on the front lines fighting against radical proposals that would kill our coal, oil, and natural gas industries and the family-sustaining jobs in southwestern Pennsylvania that go with them." Congressman Reschenthaler demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Reschenthaler has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5018.75https://twitter.com/greschenthaler/status/1281664989305151490 https://reschenthaler.house.gov/media/press-releases/reschenthaler-opposes-legislation-cripple-us-energy-sector https://reschenthaler.house.gov/issues/energy https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.penncapital-star.com/government-politics/pa-s-toomey-eight-gop-u-s-house-lawmakers-urge-supreme-court-to-overturn-roe-v-wade/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Rochester, LisaDelaware1DCongresswoman Rochester understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2019 Facebook post, the Congresswoman stated, "Climate change is here now. The science is clear – without action, our future is bleak. It’s why Congress must act now to begin reducing carbon emissions and moving toward a 100% clean economy."100100Congresswoman Rochester has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. In a 2020 press release supporting the Moving Forward Act (H.R. 2), the Congresswoman promoted the inclusion of the Mitigate Methane Now Act (H.R. 5422), stating, "I’m also proud that a number of provisions that I’ve championed this Congress have made it into the final package, including replacing leak-prone parts of our natural gas distribution system, investing in public buildings to make them more energy-efficient, and incentivizing our nation’s ports, like the Port of Wilmington, to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and other harmful air pollutants.” The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2018 press release supporting the Clean Power Plan, the Congresswoman stated, "I stand in firm opposition to repealing the Clean Power Plan, which was an important step our country took in combating climate change by reducing carbon pollution from power plants. Looking back at 2017, we can see the impacts of extreme weather events have only increased." Rep. Rochester also makes climate change a top priority issue. From a 2021 press release, "Congresswoman Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-Del.), secured key provisions important to Delaware in the recently-introduced Democratic Clean Energy Package, the CLEAN Future Act of 2021. The new legislation creates a roadmap for the United States to aggressively tackle the climate crisis and reduce greenhouse gas emissions."100Congresswoman Rochester publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman co-sponsored the America Wins Act (H.R. 4142), which aims to put a tax on carbon pollution and reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 52% in ten years. 100100https://www.facebook.com/RepLBR/posts/climate-change-is-here-now-the-science-is-clear-without-action-our-future-is-ble/2345132105800104/ https://bluntrochester.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2493 https://bluntrochester.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=89 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22Connecticut%22%7D https://bluntrochester.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2639 https://larson.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/larson-introduces-bill-address-climate-crisis-head-and-invest-nation-s https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2021385 https://bluntrochester.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2855Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Rogers, HaroldKentucky5RCongressman Rogers does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Congressman Rogers demonstrates a lack of leadership by advocating against the Clean Power Plan. In a 2013 article published by WFPL Hal Rogers was quoted stating, "President Obama’s disastrous climate change plan is the latest job-killing bomb to be dropped on Kentucky and dozens of other coal states already knocked down after four years of anti-coal policies. This War on Coal is a war on middle-class Americans – it’s a war on jobs and it has already put 5,700 Kentucky coal miners out of work since 2011." The Congressman does not mention climate change on his, 'Environment,' or, 'Energy,' pages. Congressman Rogers demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Rogers opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 89). He did not sign the Americans for Prosperity “No Climate Tax” pledge.06.25http://wfpl.org/where-do-kentuckys-congressmen-stand-climate-change-hard-tell/ https://halrogers.house.gov/environment https://halrogers.house.gov/energy https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://halrogers.house.gov/press-releases?ID=BF6A6E32-08FA-47F4-9C5E-0061D1ED2F83Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Rogers, MikeAlabama3RCongressman Mike Rogers disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In response to the 2014 U.S. National Climate Assessment which reported that heatwaves and more intense storms would be exacerbated by global warming, the Congressman was quoted in a press release found on Rep. Roby's page, which stated that, "President Obama and his Administration will stop at nothing to push his radical environmental policies onto our economy. This report is another chapter of the EPA's War on Coal, and lays the groundwork for yet another regulatory end run around Congress. These policies, if not stopped, will cost American families in higher electricity rates and hurt good paying jobs." 00According to the Alabama Political Reporter in June 2021, "Alabama Congressman Mike Rogers, R-Alabama, and Rep. Ken Calvert, R-California, wrote an op-ed Tuesday in Defense News" where they state that "... 'the administration redirects nearly $650 million in critically needed military modernization and procurement funding to climate change and to monitor the social media accounts of our servicemembers,” Rogers and Calvert wrote. "These initiatives have nothing to do with ensuring we have a lethal force ready to “fight tonight”. When we dedicate scarce defense funding to global climate change, biofuels initiatives, and social engineering experiments with military personnel you can almost hear the cheers and laughter of our adversaries.'” Congressman Rogers demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Rogers makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. According to Oanow.com, during a 2019 town hall, when asked if he supported carbon fee legislation the Congressman said he would not. He also voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 00https://roby.house.gov/roby-news/al-representatives-voice-opinions-new-climate-assessment https://www.alreporter.com/2021/06/25/rogers-says-the-budget-should-be-focused-more-on-china-less-on-climate-issues/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://oanow.com/news/local/congressman-constituents-talk-issues-at-town-hall/article_2833d50c-4aba-11e9-afd5-b71b2f531bb4.amp.html https://mikerogers.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1918Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/A
Rose, JohnTennessee6RCongressman John Rose disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a June 2019 article in the Crossville Chronicle, when asked about global warming, the Congressman stated, "Global warming is currently a hypothesis. Climate change is real. It happens, but to what degree does mankind have an impact? The scientific community have to be careful. We live in a complex world and there are lots of causes. Any one may have an effect. The tilt of earth’s axis could have an effect. I try to keep an open mind.” Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change position.00Congressman Rose demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.0Congressman Rose has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5012.5https://www.crossville-chronicle.com/news/glade_sun/congressman-rose-visits-fairfield-glade-pleasant-hill/article_01e5e4f4-92c1-11e9-8660-e76b170ceeab.html https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://johnrose.house.gov/media/press-releases/rose-urges-supreme-court-overturn-roe-v-wadeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Rosendale, MattMontana2RCongressman Matt Rosendale disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2021 'Washington Journal' interview, Congressman Rosendale stated "I also believe we cannot be shutting down businesses and industries across this nation on the chance that possibly we could change the temperature of the climate..."00In a September 2018 interview with 'NBC Montana,' when asked about the "best course of action" regarding climate change, Congressman Matt Rosendale states "...I’m not going to jeopardize thousands of Montana jobs and give us higher electricity prices by supporting disastrous Obama-EPA environmental policies that will devastate our communities and Montana families." Congressman Rosendale demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Matt Rosendale has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5012.5https://www.c-span.org/video/?511073-3/washington-journal-rep-matt-rosendale-r-mt-discusses-biden-climate-policies-amp-freedom-caucus https://nbcmontana.com/news/know-your-candidates/know-your-candidates-matt-rosendale https://rosendale.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=459Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Ross, Deborah North Carolina2DCongresswoman Deborah Ross understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, the congresswoman writes, "Climate change is one of the most imminent threats facing our country, and we must take immediate action to address it. I have been a champion on environmental and climate issues, voting repeatedly to protect our land and water for future generations. As a state legislator, I voted to support clean energy, oppose fracking, and address climate change in North Carolina. We must modernize our electric grid to increase the distribution of renewable energy and we need to create incentives to expedite battery storage for intermittent renewable resources. These measures will reduce our need to use fossil fuels for energy."100100Congresswoman Deborah Ross has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2020 questionnaire from 'Indy Week,' when asked about policies she supports to address climate change, Congresswoman Ross answered "I have been a longtime champion of environmental issues in North Carolina and will continue to be a champion as a member of Congress...I have promoted renewable energy investments in North Carolina and will continue to do so. We must modernize our electric grid to increase the distribution of renewable energy, and we need to create incentives to expedite battery storage for intermittent renewable resources." The congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a tweet posted in July 2021, Congresswoman Ross wrote "Wildfires on the West Coast are spreading smoke all the way to Raleigh. We have to put aside partisan politics and address climate change NOW. We can't wait to act." Congresswoman Deborah Ross makes climate change a top priority issue. According to the 'League of Conservation Voters,' "She understands the urgent need to fight the climate crisis, invest in our clean energy future, and protect the country’s natural beauty. In Congress, Ross will continue this leadership by working to advance the clean energy economy, diversify transportation, and make addressing climate change a top priority."100Congresswoman Deborah Ross supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the 'Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act' (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments.7593.75https://deborahross.com/priorities/ https://indyweek.com/news/elections/candidate-questionnaire-deborah-k-ross-u-s-congress/ https://twitter.com/repdeborahross/status/1418250555563065347 https://www.lcv.org/member/deborah-ross/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22North+Carolina%22%7D https://ross.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-ross-statement-supreme-court-decision-overturn-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Rouzer, DavidNorth Carolina7RCongressman David Rouzer disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In the posted transcript on PBS for the film, "Climate of Doubt," he states on climate change that, "Well, you know, I don't necessarily listen to any one person. And I can't, you know, tick off a whole list of scientists that are pro-sea level rise and a whole list of scientists that aren't. I'm just coming at it from a common sense standpoint. The earth has been warming and cooling since day one. And you know, the effect on sea level change, what do we know about it?" Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change position.00Congressman Roouzer supported executive actions by President Trump, which fast tracked the Keystone and Dakota Access Pipelines. According to his website, in a press release, the congressman stated, "He(Trump) is wasting no time in getting down to business and acting on his promises to Make America Great Again. Already, President Trump has made it clear that he will put America first by clearing the path for approval of the Keystone XL Pipeline and the Dakota Access Pipeline, both of which will create good paying jobs, increase our access to affordable energy and make America an even more dominate energy supplier for the world." The Congressman also supported the President's withdrawal from the Paris Agreement stating in a 2017 press release, "It simply isn’t fair for American manufacturers and other businesses to be held to a standard that their competitors in India and China are not. This was a bad deal for America and as promised during his campaign, President Donald Trump is putting American jobs and growth first." Congressman Rouzer demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Rouzer makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman co-sponsored a 2019 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res 41). 00https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/film/climate-of-doubt/transcript/ https://rouzer.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rouzer-statement-trump-executive-actions https://rouzer.house.gov/2017/6/rep-rouzer-trumps-decision-withdraw-paris-agreement https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/41/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://rouzer.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=318Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Roy, ChipTexas21RAccording to a 2018 Huffington Post article when asked about climate change, Congressman Chip Roy stated, "I don’t know. What I know is that our lives are made so immeasurably better by the availability of affordable, abundant energy.” The same article quoted the Congressman stating that there is a, "hysteria around climate change." Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change position.00In 2017, the Congressman co-wrote an op-ed in The Hill titled, 'Trump should kill the failing Paris agreement.' Congressman Roy demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.0Congressman Roy makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a 2018 op-ed written for Texas Policy, he wrote, "But supporters of a carbon tax are wrong. Carbon isn’t a commodity. And it’s not a form of injustice. It’s a building-block of life. Without it, plants, animals, and humans alike would not exist. Moreover, carbon-based fossil fuels have supported unmatched economic prosperity since the Industrial Revolution.We know what the effects of a carbon tax would be in America because we can already see them happening from such destructive policies in Europe where outrageously high prices of basic goods are forcing people to choose between food on the table and heating in the home." Congressman Roy was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 00https://www.huffpost.com/entry/chip-roy-texas-21-election-lamar-smith_n_5be265e2e4b0769d24c69b14 https://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/energy-environment/335908-trump-should-kill-the-failing-paris-agreement https://www.texaspolicy.com/multimedia/article/life-powered-brooke-rollins-chip-roy-on-carbon-tax https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://twitter.com/RepChipRoy/status/1540352695814561794Opposes RoeN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Ruiz, RaulCalifornia25DOn the Congressman's 'Energy and Environment page,' he states, "Investing in renewable energy is an important part of fulfilling our obligation as stewards of the environment, and it will also help create clean energy jobs in our communities and strengthen the local economy...We need a comprehensive national energy policy that will invest in clean energy and put us on the path to energy independence. This is an environmental, economic, and national security issue." In a 2017 press release celebrating earth day, the Congressman stated, "Climate change is linked with dire health outcome like worsening allergies, asthma, and increased threat of vector-borne illnesses. That is why we must collectively tackle these challenges and ensure our children and grandchildren not only live healthy lives, but also experience the wonder and majesty of our planet in the future.” Congressman Raul Ruiz understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. 75100On Congressman Ruiz's 'Energy and Environment' page, he states, "In 2013, I joined 75 of my colleagues urging support for the Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy to spur innovation in renewable electricity generation, sustainable transportation, and energy and cost-saving technologies for businesses and homes." That said, while he frequently mentions the need for renewable energy, he does not frequently mention the need to mitigate climate change caused by fossil fuel use as part of that discussion. The Congressman does not mention climate change on his energy and environment page. Congressman Ruiz supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it.50Congressman Ruiz publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. He voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).10081.25https://ruiz.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://ruiz.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/dr-ruiz-celebrates-earth-day https://ruiz.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22California%22%7D https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://ruiz.house.gov/media-center/in-the-news/lawmakers-state-positions-possible-end-roe-versus-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Ruppersberger, C.A. DutchMaryland2DCongressman Dutch Ruppersberger understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's Energy and Environment page, he states, "Climate change is real and we must act now to mitigate its effects. Scientific evidence has proven that human activity is contributing to global climate change." In a 2018 press release responding to the 4th National Climate Assessment, the Congressman stated, “Recent assessments completed by both the United States government and the United Nations have determined that bold and immediate action must be taken to mitigate the effects of climate change that are wreaking havoc on our planet. I could not agree more, which is why I have decided to support a select committee to consider solutions including the proposed Green New Deal."100100Congressman Ruppersberger has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congressman alongside Rep. John Sarbanes hosted a March 2019 town hall on climate change in the Towson branch library. Rep. Ruppersberger also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a press release encouraging Speaker Pelosi to give the Select Committee on Climate Change more power, the Congressman stated, "If we are going to have a select committee, we should do it right. I am disappointed the select committee wasn’t given the teeth it needs to address one of the most pressing issues of our time. This includes subpoena and legislative powers, which are granted to all other select committees and are needed to expose information that may be suppressed by our current Administration." Congressman Ruppersberger makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2019 press release announcing his support of the Green New Deal, he stated, "Supporting this resolution to call attention to climate change – which will be one of the greatest challenges of our lifetime – is the easy part. The hard work is ahead in the forthcoming legislation to implement these ideals." 100Congressman Ruppersberger publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. The Congressman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 89). 100100https://https://ruppersberger.house.gov/news-room/press-releases/ruppersberger-votes-protect-americans-access-reproductive-healthhouse.gov/legislative-work/legislative-issues/energy-and-environment https://ruppersberger.house.gov/newsroom/press-releases/ruppersberger-issues-statement-in-support-of-select-committee-on-climate https://www.baltimoresun.com/maryland/baltimore-county/towson/ph-tt-climate-town-hall-0403-story.html https://ruppersberger.house.gov/newsroom/press-releases/ruppersberger-give-climate-committee-more-teeth https://ruppersberger.house.gov/newsroom/press-releases/ruppersberger-to-support-green-new-deal-resolution https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22party%22%3A%22all%22%7D https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Rutherford, JohnFlorida5RCongressman John Rutherford disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2019 article by WJCT, when asked about sea level rise, the Congressman stated, "I agree that climate change is happening, and we certainly have sea level rise. I question what part of that is man made and what part of that is natural phenomenon.”00In a 2017 interview with Jacksonville.com, when asked about the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, the Congressman stated, "Yes, I feel we can negotiate a better one. Climate change has been going on for a long time and not all of it is manmade." Congressman Rutherford demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Rutherford opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 256.25https://news.wjct.org/post/how-green-new-deal-could-affect-storms-floods-and-heat-jacksonville https://rutherford.house.gov/issues https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363\ https://twitter.com/JRutherfordFL/status/1219004067118243841Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Ryan, PatNew York18DCongressman Pat Ryan understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. He has climate change as a top priority on his website, where he states that he "knows the greatest threat to our future is climate change." He has demonstrated this through his commitment to "achieving 100% renewable energy by 2030, putting the county's first electric busses on the road, and starting the Ulster County Green Careers Academy at SUNY Ulster."10083Pat Ryan has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In 2021, he released a plan for a Green New Deal for Ulster County. The plan, which consisted of over 30 goals and targets for Ulster County to reach, was one of the first of its kind in the country. Ryan also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In June 2022, he tweeted, "Climate change is one of the defining challenges of our time," and listed funding the EPA, restoring the Clean Power Plan, blocking dirty energy projects, and building the clean energy economy of the future, as his priorities. He makes climate change a top priority issue.100Pat Ryan has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5083.25https://www.patryanforcongress.com/priorities https://oracle.newpaltz.edu/executive-pat-ryan-welcomes-green-new-deal-to-ulster-county/ https://twitter.com/PatRyanUC/status/1541481493972885506 https://www.prochoiceamerica.org/2022/09/06/naral-endorses-pat-ryan-to-us-house/ Since member was not in Congress for votes in 2022, the vote score was imputed using the average of position, leadership and fee on carbon score.Supports RoeN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Salazar, Maria Elvira Florida27RCongresswoman Maria Elvira Salazar agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On her campaign website, the congresswoman states "Climate change is real, and the evidence is right here in Miami." In a 2021 interview with the Florida Director of the Environmental Defense Fund, Congresswoman Salazar states "...if you're here then you might as well just pay attention to what's surrounding you because you may not be here next time if we don't pay attention..."5029A 2021 'Florida Politics' article reported the congresswoman "back[ed] a resolution reinstating federal limits on methane emissions from oil and gas producers." A 2021 Orlando Sentinel article reported “Rep. Salazar said that ‘climate change is a real threat to South Florida’s coastlines and economic development over the long term.’” According to the 'Miami Herald,' in 2021, the congresswoman "supports Biden's decision to re-enter the Paris Climate Agreement." Congresswoman Maria Elvira Salazar's supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. 50Congresswoman Maria Elvira Salazar supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. In 2018, the congresswoman "told the Miami Herald she would be open to a carbon tax proposal put forward by U.S. Rep. Carlos Curbelo of Florida’s 26th Congressional District," according to a 'Florida Politics' article. The 'Columbia University Center on Global Energy Policy' states "The Curbelo proposal would impose a tax on carbon dioxide emissions that starts at $24/ton of CO2e in 2020, and it repeals the federal excise taxes on gasoline and diesel fuels."7551https://mariaelvirasalazar.com/issues/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnJDEXT6SzU https://floridapolitics.com/archives/440088-edf-action-ad-salazar-methane/ https://www.orlandosentinel.com/opinion/guest-commentary/os-op-gop-must-embrace-environmental-issues-20210701-6ntq7iybuzhgbj2jxmafjl7gwi-story.html https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article248674410.html https://floridapolitics.com/archives/277463-salazar-ad-environment-election/ https://www.energypolicy.columbia.edu/research/report/emissions-energy-and-economic-implications-curbelo-carbon-tax-proposal https://www.miaminewtimes.com/news/miami-politicians-react-to-supreme-courts-roe-v-wade-decision-14754648Opposes RoePro ClimateAnti ClimatePro ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Sánchez, LindaCalifornia38DCongresswoman Linda Sánchez understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "California has long been a leader in the fight against climate change and developing renewable sources of energy is an indispensable tool in our fight. Thanks to innovations in our energy sector, the United States is now a leader in energy production and no longer dependent on foreign energy sources. Maintaining our energy independence is an economic, environmental, and national security priority and I strongly support a clean energy strategy. "100100In a 2020 tweet, Congresswoman Sanchez states "The threat of climate change is real. Updating our nation’s water infrastructure is critical to making our communities more resilient to its effects." According to Solar Power World Online in 2021, "Congresswoman Linda T. Sánchez (D-CA) introduced the Residential Solar Opportunity Act, which would ensure working families and homeowners have the same access as corporations to tax incentives for deploying solar power generation." The Congresswoman’s website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congresswoman Sanchez publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. She voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).10093.75https://lindasanchez.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://twitter.com/RepLindaSanchez/status/1233508547389984770 https://www.solarpowerworldonline.com/2021/07/congresswoman-linda-sanchez-residential-solar-tax-credit-extension-bill/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22California%22%7D https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://lindasanchez.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/s-nchez-statement-supreme-court-decision-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Sarbanes, John P.Maryland3DCongressman John Sarbanes understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his, 'Environment,' page, it states, "Even though 97 percent of scientists agree that human activity is causing dangerous climate change and 80 percent of Americans want Congress to act, special-interest polluters have created a bubble of climate denial in Washington, D.C." In a speech on the House floor Congressman Sarbanes stated, "Climate change poses a significant security threat to the United States and the world at large. But don't take it from me. Our nation's military leaders are saying, we need to prepare for this new threat." 100100Congressman Sarbanes has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congressman alongside Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger hosted a March 2019 town hall on climate change in the Towson branch library. Rep. Sarbanes also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release supporting the passage of the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), he stated, "My colleagues and I will continue to build on the momentum behind H.R. 9 and advance policies that lead us to a clean economy that benefits all Americans and that leaves our children and our grandchildren with a safer, healthier and more sustainable world.” Congressman Sarbanes makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2019 press release supporting the 100% Clean Economy Act, the Congressman stated, "Today, House Democrats are taking an important step forward to address the climate crisis by paving the way for a nationwide push to eliminate dirty fossil fuels from the American economy and fully replace them with clean energy sources by 2050.”100Congressman Sarbanes supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. The Congressman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 89). 7593.75https://www.baltimoresun.com/maryland/baltimore-county/towson/ph-tt-climate-town-hall-0403-story.html https://sarbanes.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/sarbanes-statement-house-passage-climate-action-now-act https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4616798/rep-john-p-sarbanes-climate-change-national-security https://sarbanes.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/sarbanes-statement-on-trump-s-decision-to-abandon-the-paris-climate  https://sarbanes.house.gov/issues/environment https://sarbanes.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/sarbanes-joins-effort-congress-address-climate-crisis-and-transition https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://sarbanes.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/sarbanes-statement-supreme-court-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Scalise, SteveLouisiana1RCongressman Scalise disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2019 interview with CBS This Morning, when asked about climate change the Congressman, stated, "First of all, we do know that the earth's temperature changes -- it goes up and down... In the 1970's, they said we were entering a new cooling period." In a quote published by The Times-Picayune, the Congressman stated on climate change that, "While their global warming agenda continues to lose support, it's ironic that radical environmentalists are at it again, less than a month after NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), announced the Great Lakes had the most widespread ice coverage in over 35 years... Thirty years ago liberals were using global cooling to push new radical regulations. Then they shifted their focus to global warming in an effort to prop up wave after wave of job-killing regulations that are leading to skyrocketing food and energy costs." 00According to the The Times-Picayune, the Congressman supported President Trump's decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement, stating, "The radical United Nations Paris Accord on global warming is more about wealth redistribution than protecting the environment. It's a plan to allow the U.N. to take control of America's purse strings and take billions of dollars a year away from the United States and send it to other countries under the veil of a misguided global warming agenda, and I applaud President Trump for pulling out of this disastrous agreement." In a press release on the Paris Agreement, the Congressman stated, "The Obama Administration needs to finally abandon their radical climate change agenda that is killing jobs and increasing costs for American families.” Congressman Scalise demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0The Congressman demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy and votes against climate action. He is the lead sponsor of a 2021 resolution that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH). He lead the charge for the same resolution in 2016, 2018, 2019. In a press release supporting the 2018 resolution, he stated, ""I think the case is very clear by anybody who's looked objectively at what a carbon tax would do to the economy. It would be devastating to our manufacturing base, it would kill jobs, and I think most devastating, Mr. Speaker, it would rise in increased cost for families all across this country." He also signed the Americans for Prosperity “No Climate Tax” pledge. In 2013, Rep. Scalise proposed an amendment that would have required Congress's approval before passing a carbon tax (H. Amdt. 448 to H.R. 367). In a press release he stated, "President Obama’s plan to impose a tax on carbon would cause household electricity rates to skyrocket while destroying millions of American jobs. The House sent a strong bipartisan message to President Obama that a tax on carbon would devastate our economy and he needs to drop any idea of imposing this kind of radical regulation." 00https://www.cbsnews.com/news/scalise-sidesteps-climate-change-debate-earths-temperature-goes-up-and-down/ http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2014/03/un_global_warming_report_says.html http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2017/06/steve_scalise_paris_climate.html https://www.majoritywhip.gov/news/press_releases_newsroom_scalise-responds-to-reports-of-president-obamas-name-and-shame-climate-agreement/ https://scalise.house.gov/press-release/scalise-anti-carbon-tax-amendment-passed-house https://www.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/24/text https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/89/text https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/41/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://scalise.house.gov/press-release/scalise-carbon-tax-costly-burden-american-families https://scalise.house.gov/media/press-releases/house-republican-leadership-s-statement-dobbs-decisionOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Scanlon, MaryPennsylvania5DCongressman Mary Scanlon understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "Climate change is one of the most serious threats facing our nation and planet, and it deserves a serious response. Changing weather patterns have immediate and long-term consequences and pose grave risks to our national security and economic stability."100100According to the 'Clean Air Council,' “Methane pollution is the single largest human-controlled contributor to climate change and causes disastrous health and environmental impacts for all Americans. In my district, methane pollution contributes to exceptionally high rates of childhood asthma and related health disorders. Restoring the EPA’s New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for oil and gas facilities will go a long way toward protecting vulnerable communities and ensuring a safe, clean world for generations to come.” Congresswoman Scanlon's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congresswoman Scanlon has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5081.25https://scanlon.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=14979 https://cleanair.org/methanecra/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://scanlon.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=397Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Schakowsky, JanIllinois9DCongresswoman Jan Schakowsky understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Climate Change,' page, it states, "Climate change is real and it is in large part the result of human activity. It is the most serious threat to our environment, our health, and our way of life. We have taken some steps to reduce the risks of global warming, but much more can and should be done."100100Congresswoman Schakowsky has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. She did this through combating President Trump's climate change agenda, stating in a press release that, “More pollution, less science – that’s President Trump’s plan. Climate change is real, and it’s happening at an alarming rate. The majority of Americans and the rest of the world are clamoring for more aggressive and decisive action to combat climate change." The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a tweet opposing the President's decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement, the Congresswoman wrote, "Science matters. Climate change is real. We must act now, and you better believe we’re #Stillin — all the way." Rep. Schakowsky makes climate change a top priority issue. She is a co-sponsor of the Green New Deal, a set of laws meant to "wean the United States from fossil fuels and curb planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions across the economy" while also "(guaranteeing) new high-paying jobs in clean energy industries." 100Congresswoman Schakowsky publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. She also voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 100100https://schakowsky.house.gov/issues/climate-change https://schakowsky.house.gov/press-releases/schakowsky-statement-on-president-trumps-dirty-power-plan/ https://twitter.com/janschakowsky/status/930477778750922752 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/21/climate/green-new-deal-questions-answers.html https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://schakowsky.house.gov/media/press-releases/schakowsky-statement-49th-anniversary-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Schiff, AdamCalifornia30DCongressman Adam Schiff understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Energy and Environment page, it states, "Rep. Adam Schiff believes climate change is an urgent and existential crisis with immense consequences for our environment, food supply, global economy and national security. Schiff is a cosponsor of the Green New Deal and supports decisive action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, lessen our dependence on fossil fuels, protect clean air and water, and invest in green infrastructure jobs."100100Congressman Schiff has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating climate action. According to a 2019 Washington Post, Congressman Schiff led a probe into the White House’s suppression of climate testimony. The Congressman makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2020 tweet, the Congressman wrote, "To combat climate change effectively, we need to be able to trust the information coming from our government. Science doesn't lie — but people do lie about science. When it concerns the established scientific consensus, that’s incredibly dangerous. Truth is truth." Congressman Schiff has made climate change a top priority issue. In a 2021 tweet, the Congressman stated "Too many impacts from climate change are now “irreversible,” says a new UN report. But that doesn’t mean we give up. Far from it. It means we act. Right now to ensure action on climate is part of any infrastructure investment. Right now to include it in any budget. Right now."100Congressman Schiff publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. He voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH))100100https://schiff.house.gov/issues/energy https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2019/06/11/schiff-demands-intelligence-agencies-provide-documents-white-houses-suppression-climate-testimony/ https://twitter.com/repadamschiff/status/1234644206045540354?lang=en https://twitter.com/RepAdamSchiff/status/1424811545247158281 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://schiff.house.gov/news/press-releases/congressman-schiff-on-supreme-court-decision-to-strike-down-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Schneider, BradIllinois10DCongressman Schneider understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's environment page, it states, "Climate change is a grave threat to the ecological and environmental health of our nation and planet. While some chose to deny the overwhelming scientific consensus, I recognize that the failure to address this challenge will, with certainty, result in further environmental degradation and incalculable damage to the world we pass on to our children."100100Congressman Schneider has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. According to a 2021 press release, "Congressman Brad Schneider (IL-10) led 142 original cosponsors in introducing a resolution expressing support for the upcoming 2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Glasgow, also known as COP26, as well as reaffirming American support for global cooperation in combatting climate change." Rep. Schneider also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2022 press release responding to SCOTUS's decision to limit the EPA's ability to regulate carbon emissions, he states, "In today's ruling in West Virginia v. EPA, the Supreme Court is fundamentally hampering the EPA's ability to fulfill its mission. Climate change poses an existential threat that requires urgent federal and global cooperation. By restricting the authority of the EPA to regulate dangerous greenhouse gas emissions and protect public health, this decision takes away a critical tool in our fight against climate change. The clock is ticking on our window to take meaningful climate action. We cannot, and I will not, allow this set back to deter our efforts to protect the environment and secure our future from the dangers of climate change." Congressman Schneider makes climate change a top priority issue. In 2020 the Congressman introduced The Greener Transportation for Communities Act (H.R. 7318), stating in a press release, "Our country needs to get serious about transitioning to and ultimately achieving net-zero emissions. Transportation is a key contributor to emissions so we need to rapidly move to electrify our car and truck fleets."100Congressman Schneider publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. When asked on whether he supported a carbon fee (which he called a carbon tax) during a forum hosted by the Tenth Congressional District Democrats, he stated that, “I think a carbon tax is an example of a market mechanism and I think there are ways we can use the market that will create incentives for companies and consumers to lower their emissions. Yes.” Congressman Schneider voted against 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 100100https://schneider.house.gov/issues/environment https://schneider.house.gov/media/press-releases/ahead-cop26-climate-change-conference-schneider-leads-resolution-142-house https://schneider.house.gov/media/press-releases/schneider-statement-scotus-decision-curtail-epa-s-authority-regulate-carbon https://schneider.house.gov/media/press-releases/schneider-introduces-bill-promote-cleaner-vehicles-fight-climate-change https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUldDdcuJuQ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://schneider.house.gov/media/press-releases/schneider-statement-scotus-decision-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Schrier, KimWashington8DCongresswoman Kim Schrier understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's campaign website, it states, "Climate change is real and we need to take immediate action. Dramatic, destructive weather systems and forest fires have grabbed the attention of our nation and the world, while the impacts of climate change run exponentially wider than that. From species extinction to oceanic ecosystems collapse, communities across America deserve to understand how their region’s forests, water resources, agricultural industries, and native species held dear will be impacted. Here in the 8th, we will see more wildfires, earlier growing seasons, reduced snowpack, warmer temperatures in our tributaries, a spike in waterborne infectious diseases affecting fish, and species extinction. We have the unique opportunity to champion policies that will create new, sustainable, clean energy jobs and grow our economy." Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congresswoman’s climate change position.100100Congresswoman Schrier has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. On her campaign website, Rep. Schrier states, "As we face the increasing threat of climate change, significant investments in forest management, wildland firefighting and mitigation, and agriculture research will allow for better wildfire preparedness and help specialty crop farmers. This legislation (The Build Back Better Act) also includes electric vehicle tax credits and other rebates that help save families money while moving our country toward a cleaner, more energy efficient future." The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 op-ed in The Hill, the Congresswoman wrote, "There is no denying it: climate change is one of the biggest public health threats facing our country and planet. From increased air pollution to worsening extreme weather disasters, to greater risks for diseases, climate change impacts every aspect of our health and safety. Americans need action on climate change, and they need it now." Rep. Schrier makes climate change a top priority issue. In a speech on the House floor supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), the Congresswoman stated, "In order to combat the effects climate change, we are all going to have to work together. Ours is a country that has always banded together to take on the greatest challenges of our times, and this is no exception. This is a time for the U.S. to not just partner, but lead the world in protecting this planet for our children and future generations."100Rep. Kim Schrier publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. In an August 2018 interview with the Seattle Times, Rep. Schrier expressed support for the 2018 Washington State ballot initiative that would have implemented a fee on carbon. Rep. Schrier was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 89). 100100https://www.drkimschrier.com/issues/climate-change-and-the-environment/ https://schrier.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-schrier-votes-pass-historic-build-back-better-act https://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/energy-environment/447011-to-protect-our-health-we-must-act-on-climate https://schrier.house.gov/media/press-releases/house-climate-bill-passes-rep-schrier-s-amendment https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/podcast-talking-taxes-trump-and-dino-rossi-with-kim-schrier-the-doctor-trying-to-flip-rep-dave-reicherts-seat-for-dems/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/3671 https://schrier.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-schriers-statement-draft-decision-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Schweikert, DavidArizona1RCongressman David Schweikert disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2010 interview with Hill Heat, when asked his thoughts on climate change, Congressman Schweikert responded, "Well I don't see the data now...I have not sat there with pages and pages of data but think about the complexity of a worldwide system and the amount of data you would have to capture and then how do you adjust for a sunspot, do you adjust for hurricane this and that? I think it's incredibly arrogant for you know the Al Gores of the world to stand up and say the world is coming to an end because as a kid I remember the flip side when they were telling me we're going into an ice age in the 1970's." 00In a 2019 tweet on the Green New Deal, the Congressman wrote, "If we are going to talk about a green agenda, we must look at how technology & science can help us. There are tech solutions available already that would not crash our economy, or require all straws to be taken out of restaurants." In 2014, according to a press release, the Congressman co-sponsored an amendment to the Electricity Security and Affordability Act that would limit the EPA's ability to curb greenhouse gasses (H.Amdt.576 to H.R. 3826). Congressman Schweikert demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Schweikert opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119).256.25https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MO6QCQ30f24 https://schweikert.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-schweikert-co-sponsors-amendment-curb-epa-overreach-power-plant https://schweikert.house.gov/issues/energy-environment https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://schweikert.house.gov/2013/01/22/schweikert-roe-v-wade-anniversary-my-fight-unborn/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Scott, AustinGeorgia8RCongressman Austin disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview with NPR, when asked if he denied the scientific consensus that climate change is human caused, the Congressman responded, "Absolutely." 00On his energy page, he states, "That is why I believe in an energy policy that includes increased domestic oil exploration, increased refining capacity within the United States and increased production of domestic oil, natural gas and clean coal." Congressman Scott demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Scott opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 256.25https://www.npr.org/2013/09/05/219177442/rep-scott-tired-of-the-u-s-getting-involved-in-others-disputes https://austinscott.house.gov/issues/energy https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://austinscott.house.gov/2022/6/rep-austin-scott-responds-to-scotus-decisionOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Scott, DavidGeorgia13DCongressman Scott understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Agriculture, Energy & Environment,' page, it states, "Also, as climate change worsens, I have worked closely with my colleagues in the House of Representatives to support evidence-based approaches in protecting our environment for the benefit of future generations of Georgians. Climatologists and environmental advocacy organizations predict Georgia will face an increase in droughts and extreme heat days as a result of worsening climate conditions. These conditions will pose a public health risk to vulnerable populations, including the elderly, pregnant women, and children. These conditions also pose risks to wildlife, oceans and air quality. Unfortunately, the Trump Administration has shown a lack of concern and action toward worsening climate conditions. That’s why, with the environment and economy in mind, I was proud to support and vote in favor of H.R. 9, the Climate Action Now Act, which requires the U.S. to rejoin the Paris Agreement—an international movement to combat the effects of climate change."100100In a 2020 press release supporting the House Select Committee on Climate Change's climate solutions report, the Congressman stated, "No one is more affected by climate change than our farmers and rural communities. We must continue to create energy from renewable sources rather than relying on only fossil fuels. At the intersection of the energy conversation and the climate conversation is the work we do on my subcommittee. The pursuit of plant-based renewable fuels and biobased products help us reduce our carbon footprint, while also supporting the agriculture market that keeps our farmers economically sustainable too. I’m excited to see how we can keep that conversation going in a way that makes sure we’re giving producers of these innovative green energy sources the support they need.” Congressman Scott's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congressman Scott supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. He voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 7587.5https://davidscott.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=2120 https://davidscott.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=399407 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://davidscott.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=399765Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Scott, Robert C.Virginia3DCongressman Robert Scott understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's energy and environment page, it states, "Congressman Scott believes that human activity has contributed to climate change and has been a consistent advocate of efforts to mitigate global warming. Scott has co-sponsored legislation in the House of Representatives that would promote investment in renewable energy, and is a supporter of the Green New Deal." Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change position.100100Congressman Scott has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 press release supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9) the Congressman stated, "By recommitting the United States to the Paris agreement and calling for the necessary planning to meet our nation’s pollution reduction goals, the House of Representatives has taken an important first step. I look forward to continuing to work with my colleagues to mitigate and adapt to climate change and, by doing so, avoid the worst of its consequences.” Rep. Scott also makes prominent public statements on the issue. While touring flood-prone peninsulas, the Congressman, stated, "If we don’t do something today a lot of the areas that are now populated will be underwater.” Congressman Scott makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2017 press release supporting the Clean Power Plan, he stated, "We have an obligation to reduce the impacts of climate change. That is why I supported the Clean Power Plan to reduce carbon emissions, the Climate Action Plan and other efforts to ensure that climate change is taken into account in federal planning." Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman's climate change leadership.100Congressman Scott supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. The Congressman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 7593.75https://bobbyscott.house.gov/issues/energy-environment https://bobbyscott.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/scott-statement-on-house-passage-of-legislation-to-combat-climate-change https://bobbyscott.house.gov/media-center/in-the-news/scott-tours-flood-prone-peninsula-neighborhoods-with-house-climate-crisis https://bobbyscott.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/scott-statement-on-president-trump-s-anti-environment-executive-order https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://bobbyscott.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/scott-statement-on-reported-draft-supreme-court-decision-to-overturn-roeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Sempolinski, JoeNew York23RJoe Sempolinski does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.2533Joe Sempolinski does not oppose climate action. He has said nothing about the issue other than a vague tweet, where he declared, "We need American energy independence!"25Joe Sempolinski has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5033.25https://mobile.twitter.com/JoeSempo/status/1499095391308025860 https://joesforcongress.com/issues/ Since member was not in Congress for votes in 2022, the vote score was imputed using the average of position, leadership and fee on carbon score.Opposes RoeN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Sessions, PeteTexas17RCongressman Pete Sessions does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2020 interview with the 'Waco Tribune-Herald,' Congressman Sessions states "And I will tell you that you would have to, in my opinion, think long and hard to ignore that there’s change going on."250In a 2020 interview with the 'Waco Herald-Tribune,' Congressman Sessions states "I will tell you that some of the answers [to climate change] that are out there would disable America and our economy." Later in the interview, the congressman says "But I think that there are realistic things to do, but one of them is not killing our economy." Congressman Pete Sessions demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Pete Sessions has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5018.75https://wacotrib.com/opinion/interviews/negotiating-controversy-while-looking-to-return-to-the-fray-q-a-with-republican-congressional-candidate/article_154f9feb-c958-5bf7-9c9a-f405127f9c76.html https://www.kagstv.com/article/news/politics/national-politics/abortions-are-changing-pharmacists-give-medicine/499-5573966e-634c-41ba-ac15-ed7a3fcdce70Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Sewell, Terri A. Alabama7DCongresswoman Terri Sewell understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In an August 2021 tweet, the Congresswoman stated, "Extreme tornadoes. Raging wildfires. Unprecedented heat waves. Severe droughts & floods. We’re seeing the disastrous effects of climate change play out before our eyes & we cannot afford to wait. The #ClimateCrisis is urgent and requires bold action. NOW." 10085In a 2014 press release introducing the Carbon Capture and Sequestration Extension Act (H.R. 5156) Congresswoman Sewell stated, “It is critically important that Congress supports innovative approaches to reduce emissions, and carbon capture technology is essential to that fight.” But In a 2014 press release supporting coal, she stated, "Although we must prepare to diversify our energy production, I am committed to supporting coal as a viable source of energy in Alabama until alternatives become more economically feasible.” She also does not list climate change as an issue on her website. Congresswoman Sewell supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it.50Congresswoman Sewell supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. She voted against of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 7577.5https://twitter.com/repterrisewell/status/1424823378616242182 https://sewell.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/statement-congresswoman-sewell-conversion-alabama-power-facility-greene https://sewell.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-sewell-introduces-legislation-incentivize-carbon-capture-projects https://sewell.house.gov/issues-legislation https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://sewell.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-sewell-statement-supreme-court-decision-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimateAnti ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Sherman, BradCalifornia32DCongressman Sherman understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Protecting our Environment,' page, it states, "I co-sponsored the Climate Emergency Act, which will require the President to declare a national climate emergency under the National Emergencies Act, and take active steps to mitigate the climate crisis."100100Congressman Sherman has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. On the Congressman's, 'Protecting Our Environment,' page he advocates for protecting the Environmental Protection Agency, stating, "This administration and the EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt have shown time and time again that they do not fully believe in climate change or man’s contribution to it... It is a dangerous precedent to have an EPA Administrator that ignores decades of scientific research and studies." The Congressman makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 tweet defending the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) he writes, "Ignoring #ClimateChange won't make it go away. The Trump Admin’s latest effort to undo vital environmental protections would let federal agencies move forward with projects without factoring in the #ClimateCrisis. I joined 140 of my colleagues demanding that we #ProtectNEPA." Rep. Sherman makes climate change a priority issue as well. In a 2019 tweet, the Congressman stated "I’m proud to stand and work with them to solve the #ClimateCrisis by co-sponsoring the #GreenNewDeal, the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act of 2019, and many other vital pieces of legislation that will help safeguard our environment."100Congressman Sherman publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. He voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)). 100100https://sherman.house.gov/issues/environment https://twitter.com/bradsherman/status/1220502072283541505 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/cosponsors?q https://twitter.com/BradSherman/status/1175160489921458176?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://sherman.house.gov/choiceSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimateN/APro Climate
Sherrill, MikieNew Jersey11DCongresswoman Mikie Sherrill understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a press release in response to the IPCC's 2021 report titled 'Climate change 2021: The Physical Science Basis,' Congresswoman Sherrill stated, "The report released yesterday makes clear how critical it is to act now on the climate crisis. We need to increase our efforts to drastically cut greenhouse gas emissions and move towards a clean energy economy. We have only just begun to see the devastating effects of climate change. Increased warming will result in more frequent and severe weather events, hazards to human health, and threats to our national security."100100Congresswoman Sherrill has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. She is a co-sponsor of the 100% Clean Economy Act of 2019 (H.R.5221), a bill that "sets a national goal of achieving a 100% clean economy (economy-wide, net-zero greenhouse gas emissions) by no later than 2050." Rep. Sherrill also makes prominent public statements on the issue. According to a 2019 Well News article, when asked about climate change, the Congresswoman stated, "as a resident of New Jersey and a member of both the Armed Services Committee and the Science, Space, and Technology Committee, it is clear to me that climate change poses a serious national security threat... Across the world, our critical military bases face the threat of rising sea levels, the impacts of climate change and the accompanying food and water scarcity create unrest, and the impacts on the global economy can trigger conflicts.” Congresswoman Sherrill makes climate change a top priority issue. She is a co-sponsor of the Climate Action Now Act (H.R.9), legislation that "requires the President to develop and update annually a plan for the United States to meet its nationally determined contribution under the Paris Agreement on climate change."100Rep. Sherrill has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. Congresswoman Sherrill was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5087.5https://sherrill.house.gov/media/press-releases/sst-environment-subcommittee-chair-rep-sherrill-statement-ipcc-climate-report https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5221?s=6&r=3 https://www.thewellnews.com/citing-threats-to-national-security-representative-mikie-sherrill-n-j-11-takes-climate-change-head-on/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/9 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Simpson, MikeIdaho2RCongressman Mike Simpson disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On the Congressman's climate change page, it states, "Many scientists agree that the earth’s climate is changing, and these assertions are backed up by land managers who are witnessing changes in plants and animal behavior as the climate shifts. While scientists cannot explain the climate changes of the past few decades without including the effects of elevated greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations resulting from the use of fossil fuels, there is widespread disagreement as to the magnitude of human influence on the climate and the degree to which any effort by humanity to reduce carbon output would slow or reverse the effects of climate change."00In a 2019 press release opposing the Green New Deal, the Congressman stated, "Proposed as an economic and environmental transformation, the Green New Deal is an irresponsible ploy that should have our nation green with nausea rather than envy... The crusade against “farting cows” might be considered noble or a bit funny by some in the Bronx, but to the ranchers who are up before the sun feeding cows, this isn’t a joke." Congressman Simpson demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Simpson makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. On his climate change page, he states, "I am concerned, however, regarding efforts to tax carbon output or to layer so many regulations on top of carbon-based energy sources that it they become unfeasible. I don’t think this is an answer to the energy crisis facing our nation—not only does it make energy production so expensive that American families will see their energy bills increase to unsustainable rates, but it also forces us to continue depending on foreign sources of energy." Congressman Simpson voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119).00https://simpson.house.gov/issuestatements/climatechange.htm https://simpson.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=398766 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://simpson.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=399657Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
Slotkin, ElissaMichigan7DCongresswoman Slotkin understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Environment,' page, it states "I recognize the consequences of climate change and the threats to our environment, globally and in Michigan. The science is clear: we cannot continue on our current trajectory without causing irreversible harm to our environment."100100While serving as the Assistant Secretary of Defense under President Obama, Congresswoman Slotkin helped lead the Pentagon's first study on how climate change threatens. On Rep. Slotkin's campaign website, it states, "I believe climate change is an issue that must be taken seriously, and prudent planning should be undertaken to prepare for and mitigate its negative impacts." Congresswoman Slotkin's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congresswoman Slotkin has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5081.25https://slotkin.house.gov/issues/environment https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/09/03/climate-change-democratic-candidates-2020-227910 https://elissaforcongress.com/priorities/preserving-our-environment/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://twitter.com/repslotkin/status/1540376338871324672 Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Smith, AdamWashington9DCongressman Adam Smith understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's campaign website, the 'Energy and Environment' page states, "It is an indisputable fact that the earth’s climate is warming and changing, and poses a grave threat to the entire world. Over the last century, the global temperature has risen and research suggests that the global average temperature today is among the highest since human civilization began flourishing. Over the course of human development, the use of fossil fuels, increased deforestation, agricultural production, and other types of human activity have increased the concentrations of greenhouse gases (GHG), such as carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and tropospheric ozone in the atmosphere. Carbon dioxide levels, for example, have risen by almost 40 percent over the last 150 years and are contributing to a 30 percent increase in ocean acidification. Two thirds of global GHG are produced by ten primary emitters: China, the United States, the European Union, India, Russia, Japan, Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico, and Iran."100100Congressman Smith has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2020 press release tying climate change to the Great American Outdoors Act (H.R. 1957), the Congressman stated, "As the impacts of climate change increasingly harm communities around the country, this bill is an enormously important investment in our children, our environment, and our quality of life that will help protect the great outdoors for generations to come.” The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In support of the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis climate action plan, the Congressman stated, “The climate crisis is an existential threat that requires a comprehensive and drastic mobilization of resources." Rep. Smith makes climate change a top priority issue. He demonstrated this by becoming a co-sponsor of the Green New Deal.100Congressman Smith supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. The Congressman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman's position on a fee on carbon.7593.75https://adamsmith.house.gov/energy-environment https://adamsmith.house.gov/press-releases?ID=50986B68-C735-46F9-B872-34F558C12322 https://adamsmith.house.gov/press-releases?ID=A677791F-8454-42A7-BBCD-E19139C9856B https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://adamsmith.house.gov/2022/5/rep-smith-statement-on-supreme-court-draft-opinion-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Smith, AdrianNebraska3RCongressman Adrian Smith does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250In a May 2019 Newsletter titled, 'Leading the Way,' Congressman Smith wrote, I have long supported an “all of the above” approach to increase American energy production and efficiency, which in turn boosts our economic activity and keeps rates affordable for American families and businesses." Congressman Smith demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Bacon makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a June 2019 Newsletter titled, 'Taxing More is not the Answer,' Rep. Bacon wrote, "Americans are being taxed enough already; it is well past time to get serious about reining in spending. Unfortunately, some in Congress have reached a different conclusion... There have been proposals to raise taxes on Social Security, gasoline, firearms, carbon emissions, and even to repeal the Tax Cut and Jobs Act of 2017." The Congressman voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119).06.25https://adriansmith.house.gov/newsroom/columns/leading-way https://adriansmith.house.gov/newsroom/columns/reducing-carbon-emissions-right-way https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://adriansmith.house.gov/media/column/restoring-culture-life Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Smith, ChrisNew Jersey4RCongressman Chris Smith understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Issues,' page, it states, "As a member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, I believe it is equally imperative that we address environmental issues—such as climate change—on a global scale. Global warming is a real threat and an increasing danger to our environment. All major greenhouse emitting countries need to cooperate in reducing and stabilizing atmospheric concentrations of these gases, and the United States must play a leadership role in bringing nations together for a global solution to climate change."750Congressman Smith supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. The last time the Congressman advocated for a truly productive climate change bill dates back to the 2007 'International Climate Cooperation Re-engagement Act' (H.R. 2420), legislation that reduces fossil fuel dependence and ensures "a healthy environment for future generations."50Congressman Smith opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 2537.5https://chrissmith.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=3744 https://chrissmith.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=70883 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Smith, JasonMissouri8RCongressman Jason Smith disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2019 tweet, featuring a picture of cows, the Congressman wrote, "Saw these Missouri cows this morning. I didn’t have the heart to tell them their gases are the cause of climate change, at least that’s what the radicals in Washington with their Green New Deal think!"00In a 2019 newsletter opposing the Green New Deal, Congressman Smith wrote, "Newly elected radicals in the U.S. House of Representatives say the world will end in twelve years unless we pass their “Green New Deal.” Candidates for President have lined up to endorse the plan, which would completely overhaul our entire economy and ban affordable energy options. They say the climate is “our World War II,” but their plan is a war on working families and the American economy." Congressman Smith demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Smith opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted for a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 256.25https://twitter.com/repjasonsmith/status/1102333032298614784 https://jasonsmith.house.gov/newsroom/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1130 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://jasonsmith.house.gov/newsroom/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=4127 Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Smucker, LloydPennsylvania11RCongressman Lloyd Smucker disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2018 debate reported on by the York Dispatch, the Congressman attempted to cast doubt on climate science, stating, "there's still some disagreement on how much human activity has led to that." In a 2017 candidate survey published by WGAL, when asked about climate change, the Congressman stated, "Climate change is too often politicized to advance the agendas of special interests and centralize power within the federal government, this should not be the objective. We must utilize science and be prudent to remain good stewards of our environment by working to achieve measurable environmental and health benefits. I support an 'All-of-the-Above' energy policy. We need a combination of shale, coal, nuclear, wind, solar, etc. to best position our country to not rely on foreign sources of energy." Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change position.00In a debate reported on by State Impact, Congressman Smucker was quoted supporting pipelines. He said, "If the process has been followed, if landowners have been adequately compensated, then I would support that project.” In a 2019 tweet on the Green New Deal, the Congressman wrote, "The #GreenNewDeal isn’t energy and climate policy. It's a plan for government control over each American’s economic life. #GreenNewDisaster." Congressman Smucker demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.0Congressman Smucker opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 256.25https://www.yorkdispatch.com/story/news/local/2018/10/09/jess-king-rep-lloyd-smucker-clash-over-campaign-finances-first-debate/1574335002/ http://www.wgal.com/article/lloyd-smucker-vs-christine-hartman-see-where-the-candidates-in-the-16th-congressional-district-stand-on-the-issues/8050280 https://stateimpact.npr.org/pennsylvania/2016/10/11/congressional-candidates-weigh-in-on-pipeline/ https://twitter.com/RepSmucker/status/1100463395491463169 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.penncapital-star.com/government-politics/pa-s-toomey-eight-gop-u-s-house-lawmakers-urge-supreme-court-to-overturn-roe-v-wade/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Soto, DarrenFlorida9DCongressman Darren Soto understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's campaign website, it states, "America should be at the forefront of the effort to reduce fossil fuel emissions and confront the threat of climate change. That's why I'm fighting in Congress to invest in renewable energy, protect our environment, and reduce the financial burden on students who graduate with degrees in science and technology. We have the opportunity to build a clean energy economy and drastically reduce our fossil fuel emissions; we can't afford to lose the progress we've made."100100Congressman Soto has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. During a 2020 town hall, the Congressman introduced the Climate Leadership and Environmental Action for our Nation’s (CLEAN) Future Act, which would ensure the United States achieves net-zero greenhouse gas pollution no later than 2050. The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 Energy & Commerce Committee Hearing on climate change, the Congressman described what needed to be done to protect future generations, stating, "To avoid surpassing 1.5 degrees Celsius global carbon dioxide emissions would have to drop around 45% below 2010 levels by 2030 and reached zero emissions by around 2050... This challenge is not about the folks behind the dais it's not about most of the folks in the audience it's about Lincoln and his generation and what we're gonna do in 2050 we're gonna look back and say did we do what we needed to get done." Rep. Soto makes climate change a top priority issue. The Congressman introduced the Ban Fracking Act (H.R. 5857), a federal bill to phase out fracking nationwide in the United States. In a 2020 press release introducing the bill, he stated, "We cannot deny the overwhelming scientific consensus any longer—fracking is a threat to our health, safety and environment. If we want to transition from fossil fuel emissions as we work towards building a 100 percent clean economy, pulling back from fracking is a critical first step. Failure to act will only make the crisis at hand even more detrimental for future generations of Americans.”100Congressman Soto supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. He voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 7593.75https://www.darrensoto.com/climate-change/ https://soto.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-soto-unveils-clean-future-act-climate-change-town-hall https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1PhYFhApnc&feature=emb_logo https://soto.house.gov/media/press-releases/soto-ocasio-cortez-sanders-merkley-unveil-bill-ban-fracking-nationwide https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://twitter.com/RepDarrenSoto/status/1540348797720481792Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Spanberger, AbigailVirginia7DCongresswoman Abigail Spanberger understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy & Environment,' page, it states, "Climate change is a severe threat to the safety and strength of nearly all aspects of our society—our economy, our environment, and our national security. Rep. Spanberger knows that the science on the potential effects of climate change is settled—and elected officials must heed the warnings of scientists and work together to develop a long-term strategy to counteract this escalating ecological crisis." Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congresswoman’s climate change position.10086Congresswoman Spanberger has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 House floor speech supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), she stated, "Our military and intelligence communities agree that climate change exacerbates conflict and instability. It weakens fragile governments, contributes to food and water insecurity, and perpetuates poverty. These are threat multipliers, and they present real risks to U.S. interests around the globe—especially in areas vulnerable to extreme weather, such as the Middle East and Sub-Saharan Africa." Rep. Spanberger also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release on the UN Climate Summit, the Congresswoman stated, "At this key moment, we cannot afford to retreat in this battle—and we cannot afford to abandon our allies. America’s leadership in the worldwide effort to combat the climate crisis is more than a moral imperative—it should be viewed as a top national security priority,” Congresswoman Spanberger makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2019 Tweet, the Congresswoman wrote, "Climate Change. The science is real & I believe climate change is a threat to our economy & national security. Congress should lead the way fighting climate change by researching & investing in renewable energy; huge opportunity to grow this sector & create well-paying jobs." Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congresswoman’s climate change leadership.100Congresswoman Spanberger has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5084https://spanberger.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=15210 https://spanberger.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1523 https://spanberger.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2025 https://twitter.com/SpanbergerVA07/status/972936858081611777 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://spanberger.house.gov/posts/spanberger-statement-on-supreme-court-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimateAnti ClimatePro Climate
Spartz, VictoriaIndiana5RCongresswoman Victoria Spartz disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2020 interview with the IndyStar, Congresswoman Spartz did not acknowledge the scientific consensus on climate change, saying that "there is real debate among scientists about how much climate change is natural and how much is man-made".00Congresswoman Spartz demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. In a August 2022 tweet, the congresswoman likened the Inflation Reduction Act's spending to "Russian propaganda calling an invasion - liberation". In August 2021, Representative Spartz criticized additional spending programs, including climate mitigation programs, arguing that "we’re spending so much money right now that we need to have a serious conversation" about overspending.0Congresswoman Spartz has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5012.5https://www.indystar.com/story/news/politics/2020/09/15/indiana-5th-congressional-district-candidate-victoria-spartz-stands-issues/5761497002/ https://twitter.com/RepSpartz/status/1556613675930329095 https://wibc.com/114639/spartz-on-spending-were-already-overspending-how-can-we-promise-more/ https://www.indystar.com/story/news/politics/2022/06/24/supreme-court-roe-vs-wade-indiana-politicians-react-abortion-ruling/7580330001/Opposes RoeN/AN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Stansbury, MelanieNew Mexico1DCongresswoman Melanie Stansbury understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, she wrote, "New Mexico and our planet are facing a climate crisis. Historic drought is amplifying water insecurity throughout our country and more frequent fires are devastating our public and private lands."100100Congresswoman Melanie Stansbury has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. According to the Washington Post, "climate hawks in the House say that Stansbury has earned a reputation as an unusually active freshman on climate and water issues. They describe her as a policy wonk with a staffer-level knowledge of these issues and a determination to tackle pressing environmental problems, from America's aging electric grid to the historic drought gripping the West." The article continues, stating that "In December, Stansbury introduced the WaterSMART Access for Tribes Act, which seeks to help tribes access clean drinking water amid a 'megadrought' that scientists say is fueled by the climate crisis. "100Congresswoman Melanie Stansbury has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She has not spoken publicly on the topic. 5087.5https://melaniefornm.com/en/issues https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/01/19/this-super-freshman-is-making-mark-climate-policy-house/Supports RoeN/AN/APro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Stanton, GregArizona4DCongressman Greg Stanton understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2019 press release he said, "Climate change is ravaging the American Southwest,” Stanton said. “Arizona is getting hotter and drier and more vulnerable to disaster. It is screaming out for Congress to do something, for those of us in a position of power to take action.” According to a 2021 Facebook post, the Congressman stated, "As climate change continues to impact the southwest with rising temperatures, forest fires and drought, protecting our water supply remains one of my top priorities.”100100Congressman Stanton has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 press release in support of the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), the Congressman stated, "Arizona is already experiencing the effects of climate change—extreme heat, prolonged drought, stress on our water sources, dangerous wildfires—we have to do our part and take bold action to reverse this trend.” The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. According to a press release supporting The 100% Clean Economy Act of 2019 (H.R. 5221) Congressman Stanton, stated, "Climate change is ravaging the Southwest, and Congress has an obligation to take bold action to combat it." Rep. Stanton makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2018 interview with Green Living when asked about his top priorities in his then-upcoming run for Congress, he stated, "We need to better support cities on the climate change action that they are taking."100Congressman Stanton has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5087.5https://stanton.house.gov/media/press-releases/stanton-calls-bold-action-tackle-arizona-s-rising-temperatures-drought-stricken https://stanton.house.gov/media/press-releases/house-passes-bill-act-climate-change https://stanton.house.gov/media/in-the-news/4-az-dems-back-plan-100-clean-energy-2050 https://www.nytimes.com/video/climate/100000005337296/greg-stanton-on-fighting-climate-change.html https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1273880406368949 https://stanton.house.gov/2022/6/stanton-statement-on-supreme-court-ruling-in-dobbs-v-jackson-women-s-healthSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Stauber, PeteMinnesota8RCongressman Pete Stauber does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250In a 2019 press release supporting President Trump's withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, Congressman Stauber stated, "President Trump made the right choice to withdraw from the Paris Agreement. This flawed accord tied the hands of American energy innovation, and ignored the strides made by the United States to reduce emissions without interference, and empowered the worst actors in the world to continue being the biggest polluters with little accountability. Instead of prioritizing foreign nations over our own, I stand with the President’s decision to put our workers and country first." In a written statement from October 2021, according to The Ripon Advance, the Congressman said 'We need a reliable and resilient energy grid that provides low-cost energy to American families. This can only be accomplished by supporting an all-of-the-above approach, not picking winners and losers from Washington, D.C.'" Congressman Stauber demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Stauber makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. The Congressman was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). Congressman Stauber co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).06.25https://emmer.house.gov/2019/11/au-revoir-paris-climate-accord https://riponadvance.com/stories/stauber-gop-colleagues-urge-democrats-to-drop-carbon-tax-policy-proposal/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/34/cosponsors?r=1&s=1 https://www.weau.com/2022/06/24/minnesota-lawmakers-react-overturning-roe-v-wade/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Steel, MichelleCalifornia45RCongresswoman Michelle Steel does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Speaking in regards to protecting the environment on her campaign website, Congresswoman Steel claims she is "fighting for common-sense and science-based policies."250Congresswoman Michelle Steel supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. In response to receiving an endorsement from the 'American Conservation Coalition,' as a candidate in August 2020, Congresswoman Steel stated, "We need the leaders in Congress that understand the threat of climate change and will work towards science-based solutions that protect our environment."50Congresswoman Michelle Steel has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She was not in Congress to vote on a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).5031.25https://www.michellesteelca.com/issues/ https://www.michellesteelca.com/2020/08/american-conservation-coalition-endorses-michelle-steel-for-congress/ https://twitter.com/MichelleSteelCA/status/1296967855976484864 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://sbaprolife.org/representative/michelle-steelOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Stefanik, EliseNew York21RAt first glance, Congresswoman Elise Stefanik appears to understand the importance of climate action as a top priority issue, but it's all a lie. In an interview with Mountain Lake PBS, the Congresswoman when asked about climate change stated, "It is urgent and it's a generational issue. I'm one of the younger members of Congress no longer the youngest but this is something that my generation is going to inherit. I've been a leader when it comes to not only the acknowledgment of climate change but also the focus on science-based solutions. I've been a leader when it comes to promoting renewable energy both nationally but specifically in the district." According to Adirondack Daily Enterprise, "Elise Stefanik is funded by gas, oil, fracking, coal interests, Koch brothers and Karl Rove’s American Crossroads, yet she claims she takes climate change seriously. She invokes her 'all-of-the above' position – a phrase as uninforming as it was when President Obama used it. It indicates nothing about priorities."00Congresswoman Stefanik misrepresents everything about her position and action on climate change. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the 2021 Growing Climate Solutions act, legislation that she says would "help solve technical entry barriers that prevent farmers and private landowners from participating in carbon markets." This is beneficial, because, as stated by the Congresswoman herself, "farmers play a critical role in reducing global greenhouse emissions and creating sensible climate policy, and we must equip them tools and resources to be successful." Over 200 farmer, farmworker, environmental justice, climate, environmental, faith-based, animal welfare, and other groups rejected ‘Growing Climate Solutions Act.’0Congresswoman Stefanik makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 00https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmA8VucMk4Q https://stefanik.house.gov/press-releases?ID=30909EB9-3674-4955-A0BA-81F6E56768F5 https://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/2020/10/15/over-200-organizations-reject-growing-climate-solutions-act/ https://www.nny360.com/news/oswegocounty/congresswoman-elise-stefanik-responds-to-president-biden-s-state-of-the-union-address/article_cd3413ca-4718-501a-8714-95cc1cfea639.html https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=POoT_3DbdjoOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Steil, BryanWisconsin1RCongressman Bryan Steil agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, he states, "I believe we can create opportunity, protect the environment, and address climate change at the same time." According to a 2018 E&E News article, during a 2018 forum, the Congressman stated, "I believe that climate change is real and I believe humans are a key component in that." Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change position.500In a 2019 press release following his vote against the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), the Congressman stated, “Global climate change is real. To reduce carbon emissions, we must hold China and India accountable. We also need a technology-based approach. The Paris Agreement fails to hold China and India accountable, making the Agreement unworkable. Heavy-handed federal regulations drive up energy costs. Instead, we must encourage technology developments to address climate change.” During a 2019 listening session, reported on by the GazetteXtra, "Steil stuck with his support of President Donald Trump on a border wall but seemed to differ from the president slightly on climate change. While Trump has expressed skepticism of climate change theory, Steil said he believes it’s real and that human actions have caused it." Congressman Steil does not oppose climate action. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.25Congressman Steil has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s position on a fee on carbon.5031.25https://steil.house.gov/issues/energy https://www.eenews.net/special_reports/2018_midterms_powershift/stories/1060107423 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://twitter.com/repbryansteil/status/1540348850837258245Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Steube, GregFlorida17RCongressman Steube disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2019 article by the Florida Phoenix, when asked about climate change, the Congressman stated, "I think the climate has been changing since God created the Earth. I don’t think there are solutions that we as legislators can necessarily do. You’re obviously not going to change what’s happening on our climate with changing carbon emissions because there’s other partners in the world that aren’t doing that.”00In a 2021 tweet, the Congressman stated "Liberals want to use deadly weather events to justify their ridiculous climate spending when in fact the evidence shows the opposite. As the climate has been warming, tornadoes have actually dramatically decreased." Congressman Steube demonstrates a lack of leadership with public state'ments, advocacy, or votes against climate action.0Congressman Steube has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5012.5https://www.floridaphoenix.com/2019/05/02/with-leadership-by-tampa-u-s-rep-kathy-castor-u-s-house-spurns-trump-on-global-climate-accord/ https://mobile.twitter.com/gregsteube/status/1470769533010989071 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://steube.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-steube-celebrates-the-end-of-roe-v-wade-applauds-courageous-supreme-courtOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Stevens, HaleyMichigan11DCongresswoman Haley Stevens understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Protecting Our “Pure Michigan Environment,' page, it states, "I believe climate change is a serious problem and needs to be addressed immediately before it is too late. When an overwhelming number of scientists around the world have cited the realities and dangerous implications of climate change, this is not a partisan issue, but the global challenge of our generation that requires dedicated leadership to tackle."100100Congresswoman Stevens has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2020 tweet, the Congresswoman stated, “Climate change is real. The evidence is all around us. It’s time to take action to combat climate change and save our planet for future generations.” Rep. Stevens also makes prominent public statements on the issue. During a Science, Space, and Technology, Subcommittee on Energy hearing pertaining to climate change, the Congresswoman stated, "Climate change is not just an environmental challenge. Unless we act now, we are putting our infrastructure, our economy, our public health, and our national security at risk." Congresswoman Stevens makes climate change a top priority issue. In a press release supporting the Coastal and Great Lakes Communities Enhancement Act (H.R. 729), the Congresswoman stated, “Coastal communities in Michigan and around the country are especially vulnerable to severe weather events, chronic flooding, and coastal erosion as the climate crisis worsens. The Coastal and Great Lakes Communities Enhancement Act will help coastal communities plan and prosper for a resilient future while preserving natural habitats and biodiversity.”100Congresswoman Stevens hpublicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. 5087.5https://www.haleystevensforcongress.com/priorities/environment/ https://twitter.com/rephaleystevens/status/1231942811915882497 https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=250307222557225 https://stevens.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-stevens-votes-bipartisan-bill-protect-great-lakes-communities-climate https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22party%22%3A%22all%22%7D https://twitter.com/haleylive/status/1545031021745291266 Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Stewart, ChrisUtah2RCongressman Chris Stewart does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change position.250Congressman Stewart demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.0Congressman Stewart opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 2512.5https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://twitter.com/RepChrisStewart/status/1540343544820424709Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Strickland, Marilyn Washington10DCongresswoman Marilyn Strickland understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. According to the 'Suburban Times,' in a 2021 press release, Congresswoman Streickland stated, "As our planet warms and climate change takes hold, these extreme weather events are only becoming more common, costing lives, crippling our infrastructure, and destroying the great state of Washington. We have a once-in-a-generation opportunity to create tens of thousands of jobs and build a brighter, more sustainable future. My state, our country, and our world, depends on it." " On her campaign website, the congresswoman writes, "Climate change is one of the most serious long-term threats to our nation and the world. As Mayor, Marilyn committed Tacoma to the Paris Climate Accord and supported the creation of an Environmental Action Plan. She launched a citywide community gardens initiative, which expanded into a county-wide program now with dozens of community gardens throughout the region."100100Congresswoman Marilyn Strickland has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. According to the 'Suburban Times,' in an October 2021 press release, "Congresswoman Marilyn Strickland (WA-10)...deliver[ed] remarks on the House floor today urging Congress to address the climate crisis with historic investments in sustainable infrastructure, citing the damaging impacts of June and August’s unprecedented heat domes on Washington State. With several consecutive days well into the 100s, temperatures in the region soared to record highs, crippling the Pacific Northwest’s infrastructure and environment and costing hundreds of lives." Congresswoman Strickland also makes prominent public statements on the issue. According to the 'KNKX Public Radio' in 2021, "...Strickland favors...those of the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis — that would get to net-zero emissions electricity production in the U.S. in 20 years." The congresswoman makes climate change a top priority issue. According to a 2020 article from 'The Intercept,' "Strickland, meanwhile, supports reentering the Paris climate agreement, and said in a statement to The Intercept that she 'supports impactful plans to address climate change that are attainable and effective to reduce carbon emissions, while creating and maintaining family-wage jobs, and ensuring a just and equitable transition to clean energy source.' She added that she supports the recommendations of the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis..."100Congresswoman Marilyn Strickland has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5087.5https://thesubtimes.com/2021/10/02/strickland-calls-for-transformational-climate-action-on-house-floor/ https://stricklandforwashington.com/priorities/climate-change/ https://www.knkx.org/environment/2020-10-29/contrasting-views-on-climate-action-in-the-race-for-washingtons-10th-congressional-district https://theintercept.com/2020/09/24/congress-marilyn-strickland-beth-doglio-environment-fires-climate-crisis/ https://strickland.house.gov/media/press-releases/strickland-statement-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Swalwell, EricCalifornia15DCongressman Eric Swalwell understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On Congressman Swalwell's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "I am working to encourage innovation in the field of renewable energy and energy conservation. Addressing the climate crisis is imperative for our national security, the ecosystems that feed us, our public health and safety, and our future economic well-being."100100Congressman Swalwell has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In 2019, according to The Independent, the Congressman urged students to take action on climate change, stating, "How much you are going to feel and be able to live with the consequences, (depends on) decisions other leaders make today. Where you can make the most change is where we take personal responsibility to care about everyone and everything around us." The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 article in Axios profiling the Congressman, on climate change, he stated, "Most Americans agree that to address climate chaos, to make sure your house doesn't end up underwater or on fire, we should do something about it but make sure we're not pitting workers against their job," Rep. Swalwell makes climate change a top priority issue. He is a co-sponsor of the Green New Deal, a set of laws meant to "wean the United States from fossil fuels and curb planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions across the economy" while also "(guaranteeing) new high-paying jobs in clean energy industries." 100Congressman Swalwell publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon.The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. He voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).100100https://swalwell.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://www.independentnews.com/news/swalwell-urges-students-to-take-on-climate-chaos/article_4dd25e90-d4f9-11e9-bd4b-6b2b2c67a379.html https://www.axios.com/eric-swalwell-2020-presidential-election-factsheet-e4d16242-d053-4df4-840e-b54e182e1268.html https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-resolution/332/cosponsors?q=%7B%22search%22:%5B%22The+Green+New+Deal+Resolution+of+2021%22%5D%7D&r=2&s=2&searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/21/climate/green-new-deal-questions-answers.html https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://swalwell.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/congressman-swalwell-supreme-court-decision-strike-down-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Takano, MarkCalifornia39DCongressman Mark Takano understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On Congressman Takano's 'Energy and Environment,' page it states, "Climate change is real and is one of the most serious issues we face as a global community. According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Earth’s average temperature has risen by 1.4 degrees Fahrenheit over the last century and is projected to rise between 2 to 11.5 degrees Fahrenheit over the next century. Though small, these changes in temperature can have a tremendous effect on our planet. We have already seen the impact. From changes in weather patterns, to an increase in droughts, floods, and superstorms, we know that the ice caps will continue to melt and water levels will continue to rise if we do nothing to combat climate change."100100Congressman Takano has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 press release condemning President Trump's state of the union, the Congressman stated, "While they continue to attack immigrants and women’s rights, ignore the realities of climate change, and fail the middle class, I am committed to working with my Democratic colleagues on an inclusive vision for America that delivers real, positive results for the people." Congressman Takano also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 Facebook post supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), he stated, "Climate change is real — it is hurting our communities and it is threatening our future. There is no time to waste when it comes to fighting climate change, that’s why we are making the #ClimateActionNow Act a legislative priority. As a sponsor of the Green New Deal, I believe that we must rise to the challenge and lead the world in addressing the climate crisis." Rep. Takano makes climate change a top priority issue. The Congressman demonstrated this by co-sponsoring the Green New Deal, a set of laws meant to "wean the United States from fossil fuels and curb planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions across the economy" while also "(guaranteeing) new high-paying jobs in clean energy industries.100Congressman Takano supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. He voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 7593.75https://takano.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://takano.house.gov/newsroom/press-releases/rep-takano-statement-on-state-of-the-union https://www.facebook.com/RepMarkTakano/photos/a.265096313619446/1934117533383974/?type=3&theater https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/21/climate/green-new-deal-questions-answers.html https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://takano.house.gov/newsroom/press-releases/rep-takano-statement-on-the-supreme-court-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Thompson, Bennie G.Mississippi2DCongressman Bennie Thompson understands the importance of climate action but does not see it as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "To create the next generation of clean energy jobs, make our nation more secure and reduce the pollution that causes global warming, Congressman Thompson and Congressional Democrats are committed to investing in our nation’s clean energy future."75100Congressman Thompson supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it.50Congressman Thompson publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. Rep. Thompson co-sponsored the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act of 2019 (H.R. 763). The Congressman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 10081.25https://benniethompson.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://twitter.com/benniegthompson/status/1540442317231882241?lang=en Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Thompson, Glenn W.Pennsylvania15RCongressman Glenn Thompson disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to the Congressman's website, Thompson states, "...I will remain committed to providing resources and outreach in the community, while continuing to advocate for... increases in domestic production of fossil fuels. Lands onshore and offshore contain significant amounts of natural gas, petroleum, and coal that can fuel our energy needs for centuries."00In a 2020 press release, the Congressman condemned calls to ban fracking, stating, "As we look ahead to future relief and recovery measures, we must continue to stand up against Democrat calls to “ban fracking” or incorporate extreme Green New Deal policies. We should instead support proposals to strengthen our supply chains, enhance our national security, and provide more Americans with access to affordable natural gas.” Congressman Thompson demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.0Congressman Thompson opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 256.25https://thompson.house.gov/issues/energy https://thompson.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/congressman-thompson-quizzes-agriculture-undersecretary-anf https://thompson.house.gov/issues/energy https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.penncapital-star.com/government-politics/pa-s-toomey-eight-gop-u-s-house-lawmakers-urge-supreme-court-to-overturn-roe-v-wade/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Thompson, MikeCalifornia4DCongressman Thompson understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Energy & Environment,' page, it states, "Climate change is the gravest threat we face today. Unfortunately, the current Administration has abdicated American leadership on this issue. The President has withdrawn the United States from the Paris Climate Agreement, repealed bedrock environmental regulations and continued to deny the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made. This President’s reckless decisions will leave our children and grandchildren a dramatically warmer, more unstable planet. "100100Congressman Thompson has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 press release supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9) the Congressman stated, "If we do not address climate change with bold and immediate action, we will not have the same world to pass on to future generations. The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. During a 2019 Congressional hearing discussing climate change, the Congressman stated, "Climate change is real and the consequences are impacting our district. All of the expert witnesses in today’s hearing – Democrats and Republicans – agreed that this crisis is real and worsening. From the more devastating fires, to more frequent flooding, our communities face increased health and economic effects." Rep. Thompson makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2019 press release co-sponsoring the Green New Deal, the Congressman stated, "Climate change is the most existential threat we face today. I have long said that if we do not act now nothing else we do matters because there won’t be a planet to pass on to our children. That’s why I am a proud, original cosponsor of the Green New Deal, a resolution stating the steps we must take to address climate change."100Congressman Thompson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. On the Congressman's, 'Energy & Environment,' page, it states, "That’s why I voted for legislation to require the Administration to draw up a plan to reduce emissions and why I support market-based solutions to regulating carbon emissions." He was not in Congress to vote on a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)) 5087.5https://mikethompson.house.gov/issues/environment https://mikethompson.house.gov/newsroom/press-releases/thompson-votes-for-climate-action-now-act https://mikethompson.house.gov/newsroom/press-releases/thompson-highlights-health-impacts-of-climate-change-and-green-tax-code https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://mikethompson.house.gov/newsroom/press-releases/thompson-statement-on-assault-on-womens-rightsSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Tiffany, TomWisconsin7RTom Tiffany disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In 2022, he stated, “There is some slight warming that’s going on. But it is that caused by man. Because the policy makers are saying, let’s make these changes like the EPA in this case, they’re saying we have to make these changes. Let’s make sure that man is causing it.”00Tom Tiffany demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Earlier in 2022, Tiffany "sent EPA Administrator Michael Regan a letter urging him to support the proposed natural gas plant after the agency said a Supplemental Environmental Assessment failed to properly account for carbon emissions." Tiffany also "lobbied Gov. Scott Walker to cut funding for scientific research at the Department of Natural Resources, pushed to make thousands more acres of state forest eligible for logging, and supported a failed bid to boost the power of the governor by taking away the policy-setting powers of the state Natural Resources Board."0Tom Tiffany has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5012.5https://www.kfiz.com/tiffany-wants-to-make-sure-that-climate-change-is-man-made/ https://tiffany.house.gov/media/editorials-letters-and-articles/epas-climate-games-wisconsin https://archive.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/tom-tiffany-has-been-a-lightning-rod-on-environmental-issues-b99547320z1-320987941.html/ https://www.waow.com/news/politics/congressman-tom-tiffany-praises-supreme-court-roe-v-wade-decision/article_bc1d6186-f8b1-11ec-9f96-f79b5e32f177.html Opposes RoeN/AN/AN/AAnti ClimateN/AAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Timmons, WilliamSouth Carolina4RCongressman William Timmons disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. During a 2018 Congressional debate, when asked about climate change, the Congressman stated, "It is not a United States issue. It is a global issue, and we are not going to be the one to solve it. The planet has to solve it." Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change position.00Congressman Timmons demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.0Congressman Timmons has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5012.5https://www.greenvilleonline.com/story/news/local/2018/10/26/highlights-4th-congressional-district-candidate-forum/1772435002/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://timmons.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=148Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Titus, DinaNevada1DCongresswoman Dina Titus understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In 2022, the Congresswoman spoke on the House Floor regarding Build Back Better, saying that "We must wake up to the realities of climate change, and the increasing intensity and cost of natural disasters. This (Build Back Better) will help to make our nation more resilient, and I ask my colleagues to support it."100100Congresswoman Titus has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2021 tweet, she stated, "Climate change is the existential threat of our time...Let's get to work." Rep. Titus also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a letter with other House Dems to President Biden regarding forming better climate provisions in Build Back Better, she stated, "The need to act on the climate crisis while centering environmental justice and creating and sustaining millions of good-paying union jobs has never been more important. In communities across the country, we are already seeing staggering climate damages. Climate change is driving more severe drought and wildfires in the West, larger and more frequent floods in the Midwest, and sea level rise and greater storm damage along our coasts." Congresswoman Titus makes climate change a top priority issue. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Climate Action Now Act (H.R.9), legislation that "requires the President to develop and update annually a plan for the United States to meet its nationally determined contribution under the Paris Agreement on climate change."100Congresswoman Titus publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. The Congresswoman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 100100https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvM3PIKXJdw https://twitter.com/repdinatitus/status/1354503844076597252 https://mikelevin.house.gov/imo/media/doc/2022-01-31%20Frontline%20Letter%20on%20BBB%20Climate%20Provisions.pdf https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/9?r=12&s=3 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/34/cosponsors?r=1&s=1 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Tlaib, RashidaMichigan12DCongresswoman Rashida Tlaib understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2019 press release, supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), the Congresswoman stated, "Families have been harmed and many have died due to federal government inaction – President Trump must realize this and work on behalf of the American people to create a plan to curb carbon emissions and safeguard the health of people and our environment. The Climate Action Now Act is a needed step to take bold action against climate change and I look forward to working with my colleagues to protect frontline communities and ensure a just transition to a green economy happens swiftly and is as comprehensive as possible.”100100Congresswoman Tlaib has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. During a 2019 House Committee on Financial Services hearing, in which several executives from big banks were in attendance, the Congresswoman stated, "But for the sake of this hearing, I'll say that you are greenwashing your own track record and duping the American people into believing that you are helping address climate change. On the record, will any of your banks make a commitment to phase out your investments in fossil fuels and dirty energy?" Rep. Tlaib also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 interview with Jamal Simmons, when asked about climate change, the Congresswoman stated, "I don't think people understand the true impact of doing nothing." Congresswoman Tlaib makes climate change a top priority issue. During an April 2019 rally in Wayne County, Michigan, the Congresswoman in support of the Green New Deal, stated, "A Green New Deal is not bold or radical. This is our life. If there is anybody who deserves a seat at the table it is us in Wayne County! We can’t sit back and let corporate greed tell us this is not possible!”100Congresswoman Tlaib has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5087.5https://tlaib.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-rashida-tlaib-s-statement-passage-climate-action-now-act https://www.newsweek.com/rashida-tlaib-banks-gaslighting-americans-funding-fossil-fuels-1391824 https://www.kolormagazine.com/lifestyle-culture/2019/8/21/krxcms1wsthdgeqhf58x4buaftmgdo https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/439841-tlaib-rallies-in-support-of-green-new-deal-at-detroit-town-hall https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://twitter.com/reprashida/status/1485086013470957568Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Tonko, Paul D.New York20DCongressman Paul Tonko understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Climate Change,' page, the Congressman lays out a 'Framework for Climate Action in the U.S Congress,' stating, "We agree that climate change is real. We agree humans are driving it. We agree that we need to build solutions that meet the scale and urgency of the crisis we face. The principles outlined in this document are meant to provide a framework that moves the lines of our agreement forward and helps us build a comprehensive national climate action plan together."100100Congressman Tonko has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congressman voted against the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) due to its failure in addressing climate change, stating in a 2019 press release, "The United States must get serious about the challenge of a changing climate and build international cooperation and commitments through all vehicles available to us, including our trade agreements. Trade negotiations do not happen frequently, but their impact is felt for generations. I cannot support a deal which fails to even acknowledge the global climate crisis that future generations will be left to bear.” The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release supporting the Paris Agreement, the Congressman stated, "While the Trump Administration wastes precious time denying the scientific realities of climate change, Americans are fleeing its devastating effects in the form of wildfires, flooding and storms unlike anything we have seen before. Decades of science-based evidence have made clear that bold action is necessary to prevent the deadliest and most costly effects of climate change." Rep. Tonko makes climate change a top priority issue. The Congressman led an amicus brief opposing the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) replacement of the Obama Administration’s Clean Power Plan (CPP) with the Trump Administration’s Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) Rule. 100Congressman Tonko supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. He voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 7593.75https://tonko.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=15252 https://tonko.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2947 https://tonko.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2923 https://tonko.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=3038 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://tonko.house.gov/news/documentquery.aspx?IssueID=15237Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Torres, NormaCalifornia35DCongresswoman Norma Torres understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "I have demonstrated a commitment to taking on challenges like drought and climate change that are impacting California. I’m proud to work hard to ensure that the land, air, and water are kept clean through supporting sensible legislation aimed at preventing pollution while balancing economic development and environmental conservation. My priorities include promoting energy efficiency, renewable energy sources like solar, as well as increasing investments in water infrastructure and funding development of new technologies that have the capacity to expand water recycling and desalination capabilities." 100100Congresswoman Torres has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 press release, the Congresswoman announced a legislative proposal that would have prevented President Trump from limiting cities and states, like California, from taking ambitious actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2021 tweet, the Congresswoman stated, "Fighting climate change is about our kids and grandkids. If we don't do our job, they're expected to live through three times as many wildfires, floods, and droughts. We're in a crisis—and we've got to take it seriously." Rep. Torres makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2020 Facebook post the Congresswoman stated, "#ClimateChange is real whether the Trump Administration likes it or not. Inserting false information into environmental reports is dangerously misleading, undermines our government’s credibility, and worst of all, puts the future of younger generations at risk. This all-out attack on our environment for the sake of higher profits must end!."100Congresswoman Torres publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 763). This bill would put a $15 per metric ton price on carbon emissions. She voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 100100https://torres.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://torres.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/torres-proposal-stop-president-trump-sabotaging-california-s-climate https://twitter.com/Norma4Congress/status/1443421500137115652 https://www.facebook.com/RepNormaTorres/posts/climatechange-is-real-whether-the-trump-administration-likes-it-or-not-inserting/3041103052581266/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://torres.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/torres-statement-overturning-roe-v-wade-supreme-courtSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Torres, Ritchie New York15DCongressman Ritchie Torres understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. Under 'justice' on the issues page of his campaign website, Congressman Torres writes "We have to radically restructure the American economy and society around renewable energy. Black and Brown communities are on the frontlines of the environmental crisis, and they must be prioritized in our agenda to fight climate change."75100In response to a 2020, the 'League of Conservation Voters Action Fund' endorsement, Congressman Torres said, "In Congress, I look forward to fighting alongside them to address the greatest global environmental challenges including replacing fossil fuels with renewable energy, limiting carbon emissions, enacting a Green New Deal and righting the wrongs of environmental racism that have hurt Bronx residents.” In response to a tweet regarding a severe rainstorm in September 2021, the congressman replies saying "The climate has changed. And New York needs to change along with it." Under 'justice' on the issues page of his campaign website, Congressman Torres writes "The Green New Deal is not only an agenda for environmental justice, but it is also one for economic justice and racial justice. Severe pollution is lethal in communities like the Bronx, where 20% of children have asthma -- 12% higher than the national average. We have to radically restructure the American economy and society around renewable energy. Black and Brown communities are on the frontlines of the environmental crisis, and they must be prioritized in our agenda to fight climate change." This is the only mention of climate action on his campaign website. Congressman Ritchie Torres’ website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congressman Ritchie Torres’ has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5075https://torres.nyc/issues/realizing-justice https://www.lcv.org/article/lcv-action-fund-endorses-ritchie-torres-congress/ https://twitter.com/ritchietorres/status/1175101011389833216?lang=en https://twitter.com/ritchietorres/status/1521296083506417665?lang=enSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Trahan, LoriMassachussetts3DCongresswoman Trahan understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a press release the Congresswoman stated, "Climate change is real. It is an existential threat to our country and our planet. Every day that passes without Congress taking swift, bold action to tackle this issue is a day wasted, and a detriment to our children and grandchildren."100100Congresswoman Trahan has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "Lori understands that climate change will affect low-income and minority communities, tribal nations, and Alaska Native villages. Lori will work towards comprehensive climate change policies that do not leave any demographic — including former mining communities — behind." Rep. Trahan also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), she stated, "Combating the climate crisis is a moral imperative that should compel us – regardless of political party -- to act to create a clean energy economy that can provide good-paying jobs to millions of Americans, cleaner air for everyone, and a sustainable future for our children and grandchildren to grow and thrive." In a 2019 tweet condemning the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, the Congresswoman wrote, "This is a step in the complete wrong direction. Our children, our families, and our communities deserve so much better. Climate change is happening, it’s urgent, and it demands action."100The Congresswoman has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. .The Congresswoman was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5087.5https://trahan.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=35 https://loritrahan.com/energy-and-the-environment/ https://trahan.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=91 https://twitter.com/RepLoriTrahan/status/1191490502111182851 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://trahan.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=15046 Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Trone, DavidMaryland6DCongressman David Trone understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Environment,' page, it states, "Protecting our environment is crucial. Climate change is real and it’s a serious threat to our economy and our way of life. Unfortunately, the United States does not have a leader who takes the threat seriously. Trump’s shortsighted decision to withdraw from the Paris Accord made us the only country in the world that is not a signatory to the agreement. Whatever short-term economic benefits Trump may think we gain from withdrawing from this agreement are nothing compared to the long-term costs."100100Congressman David Trone has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a September 2019 tweet, Congressman Trone wrote, "It's our job to listen to young people, who will face the consequences if we don't take action against #ClimateChange. We must rise up and find a long-term plan to create a more sustainable future. #ActOnClimate." The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a September 2021 tweet, Congressman David Trone wrote "I am working to pass the #BuildBackBetter Act because we are in the middle of a climate crisis. By investing in critical renewable energy sources, we will finally be able to #ActOnClimate. Climate change is happening NOW and we can't ignore it. The Congressman makes climate change a top priority issue. According to an August 2021 press release, " U.S. Congressmen David Trone, Steny H. Hoyer...(all D-Md.) today announced $93,289,392 in federal funding from Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to strengthen Maryland’s ability to prevent and respond to climate change related natural disasters. "Climate change is here,” the lawmakers said. 'As we see an uptick in extreme weather-related emergencies, such as storms and coastal and inland flooding, this new federal funding will ensure our communities can withstand and mitigate the impacts of climate change. We must confront the urgent demands of a changing climate, and Team Maryland will continue working to secure additional funding to meet the immediate needs of our state’s infrastructure.'”100Congressman Trone publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. In a June 2019 Tweet, responding to a proposed bipartisan carbon fee by Rep. John Delaney, the Congressman wrote, "Strong performance tonight from @JohnDelaney. His bipartisan carbon tax plan is the kind of policy we need to move our country forward, and he’s got a realistic plan to tackle the addiction crisis. NBC should give his ideas more time." Congressman Trone was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 89). The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. 100100https://www.davidtrone.com/issue/environment/ https://twitter.com/repdavidtrone/status/1174339516552929286 https://twitter.com/RepDavidTrone/status/1438890540863528973 https://trone.house.gov/2021/08/11/maryland-delegation-announces-93-million-to-fight-climate-change-as-landmark-report-warns-of-devastating-global-impacts/ https://twitter.com/davidjtrone/status/1144079287634599937 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22party%22%3A%22all%22%7D https://trone.house.gov/2022/06/24/dobbs/ Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimateN/APro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Turner, MichaelOhio10RCongressman Turner does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250The Congressman published a 2013 op-ed advocating the expansion of fossil fuel usage in Europe, writing, "That’s why our public policies should encourage two developments that are increasing Europe’s energy security. First, the Southern Gas Corridor will bring natural gas to Europe from the Caspian Sea region in central Asia. Second, American natural gas production is booming, creating opportunities to increase exports and create jobs." Congressman Turner demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.0Congressman Turner opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 2512.5https://turner.house.gov/media-center/columns/more-natural-gas-for-europe-is-good-for-us-alliances-and-jobs https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.miketurner.com/issues.phpOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Underwood, LaurenIllinois14DCongresswoman Lauren Underwood understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Environment and Energy,' page, it states, "The science is clear: we are on an alarming trajectory in which our climate is changing, presenting an existential threat to our environment, our national security, our health, and our economy."100100Congresswoman Underwood has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. She introduced the 2021 'Farmers Fighting Climate Change' act, legislation that would "establish region-specific climate change mitigation bundles within CSP to support and promote agricultural practices that reduce greenhouse gas emissions and increase carbon sequestration," which would help "producers expand their climate stewardship practices and empower more farmers to be leaders of America's response to climate change." Rep. Underwood also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 testimony in front of the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis, the Congresswoman stated, "I am committed to ensuring Congress upholds its responsibility to communities like mine who are demanding meaningful, long-term solutions to climate change." Congresswoman Underwood makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2019 letter to the Secretary of Agriculture, the Congresswoman wrote, “Ignoring the link between climate change and extreme weather presents a direct threat to our national security, food security, and to the livelihoods of Illinois farmers and farmers throughout the country. Undermining public discourse on climate change by obfuscating research is dangerous.”100Congresswoman Underwood has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5087.5https://underwood.house.gov/issues/environment_energy https://underwood.house.gov/media/press-releases/underwood-gallagher-introduce-bipartisan-climate-change-legislation-support https://underwood.house.gov/media/press-releases/underwood-advocates-climate-change-solutions-house-select-committee-climate https://underwood.house.gov/media/press-releases/underwood-works-prevent-administration-hiding-climate-change-information https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://underwood.house.gov/media/press-releases/underwoods-statement-supreme-court-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Valadao, DavidCalifornia22RCongressman David Valadao does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview with CNN in September 2021, the congressman acknowledged that "that he “is a person who thinks that the climate is changing” and admitting that his party could do more to push on the issue."250Congressman Valadao does not oppose climate action. According to his official house website, Representative Valadao believes that "we need a diverse, “all of the above” energy plan that includes nuclear and clean coal power plants as well as oil and natural gas exploration, wind, solar, and hydro energy". In a September 2021 tweet, the congressman lauded the economic benefits of solar energy, writing that "renewable Solar continues to create opportunities for businesses and families in our community to convert to solar, and I look forward to seeing their continued innovation bring more projects like this to the Valley".25Congressman Valadao opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. Congressman Valadao voted for a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.119).2518.75https://www.cnn.com/2021/09/18/politics/drought-climate-change-california-21-congressional-district/index.html https://valadao.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=10177 https://mobile.twitter.com/RepDavidValadao/status/1437502666041561089 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2018363 https://www.politico.com/news/2022/07/10/david-valadao-abortion-election-00044719Opposes RoeN/AN/AN/AN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Van Drew, JeffNew Jersey2RCongressman Jeff Van Drew agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2019 press release discussing the Green New Deal, he stated, "I believe that climate change is real, is driven mainly by human activity and that it is driving real-world changes such as extreme weather events, hotter temperatures, rising sea levels and ocean acidification. I believe that the United States has a moral and economic imperative to mitigate the impacts of climate change. However, I do not think that H.J. Res. 109, the Green New Deal is the right solution.”5014According to a 2020 Insider NJ Article, the Sierra Club revoked their previous endorsement, saying "Van Drew claims that he will protect our lands and is against offshore drilling, but voted in support of Trump’s Executive Order (EO 13817) which would ease safeguards and protections for leasing and mining on public lands. He also claims that he believes in climate change and supports our nation staying in and abiding by the Paris Climate Agreement, but he voted to strip federal funding to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the UN Convention on Climate Change." He demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Van Drew has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5028.5https://vandrew.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-jeff-van-drew-s-nj-02-statement-green-new-deal https://www.insidernj.com/sierra-club-revokes-van-drew-endorsement-backs-kennedy-cd2/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimatePro ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Van Duyne, Beth Texas24RCongresswoman Beth Van Duyne does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In the 'Dallas Morning News- Voter's Guide,' the congresswoman states "The fact that our climate is changing is undeniable. Indeed it has been changing since the end of the last Ice Age and on a warming trend since the end of the little ice age hundreds of years ago. As a person who believes in conservation... I want our country to continue making advances in technology that reduce emissions, have a smaller footprint for energy generation, and contribute to cleaner air, water, and soil.”250According to a 2020 'Grist' article, "[Congresswoman Van Duyne] is not pro-regulation, calling Environmental Protection Agency rules 'crippling' for Texas’ cities." Congresswoman Beth Van Duyne demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. In a July 2021 tweet, the congresswoman wrote "Joe and the Socialists say electric vehicles & climate change are 'infrastructure!' Help me stop their unfocused, wasteful, and insane spending spree!" Congresswoman Beth Van Duyne demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congresswoman Beth Van Duyne has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5018.75http://dccc.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/200514-Beth-Van-Duyne-Book-ONLINE.pdf https://grist.org/politics/climate-change-could-tip-the-scales-in-these-6-toss-up-house-races/ https://twitter.com/Bethvanduyne/status/1418727882826858496 https://twitter.com/repbethvanduyne/status/1540340622875185152Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Vargas, JuanCalifornia52DCongressman Juan Vargas agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2019 tweet, he wrote, "Carbon dioxide is on the rise & experts report that it is “the most significant driver of climate change.” We need immediate action to address the effect of #climatechange!!"50100Congressman Vargas has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 press release introducing the ESG Disclosure Simplification Act of 2019 (H.R. 4329), the Congressman stated, “Access to better ESG disclosures allows investors to direct capital toward more sustainable companies, ultimately encouraging companies to reduce their carbon footprints and address important issues like climate change, diversity, and labor rights.” The Congressman’s website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congressman Vargas publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. He voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)). 10081.25https://twitter.com/repjuanvargas/status/1150850882969526272 https://vargas.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-juan-vargas-introduces-esg-disclosure-simplification-act-of-2019 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://vargas.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-vargas-votes-to-enshrine-reproductive-rights-into-federal-lawSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Veasey, MarcTexas33DCongressman Marc Veasey understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a 2021 press release supporting the Build Back Better Act (H.R. 5376) he stated, “Today, I was proud to join my colleagues on the Energy and Commerce Committee to advance the historic Build Back Better Act. With today’s passage by the Committee, we are one step closer to making significant investments to American families and workers, revitalizing our economy, creating millions of new jobs, combatting climate change, and ensuring that no community is left behind.”75100In a press release in support of the United States Mexico Canada Agreement (USMCA), Congressman Marc Veasey stated, "While I praise today’s passage of this legislation, I know that no deal is perfect. This deal alone will not solve the problems of outsourcing, income inequality or climate change. Therefore, USMCA is not a model moving forward, but it establishes important principles we can build from in future trade deals." Congressman Marc Veasey’s website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman's climate change leadership.75Congressman Veasey supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. The Congressman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 7581.25https://veasey.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-veasey-tx-33-on-energy-and-commerce-committee-passage-of-build-back https://veasey.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/congressman-marc-veasey-tx-33-statement-on-passage-of-the-united-states https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://veasey.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/congressman-marc-veasey-tx-33-statement-on-the-supreme-court-decision-toSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Velázquez, Nydia M.New York7DCongresswoman Nydia Velázquez understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Climate Change and Environment,' page, it states, "She also recognizes that climate change presents an existential threat to our nation, our planet and our future. She supports bold, meaningful action to address this problem... As our climate changes, New York may see additional flooding and storms in the future and it is important our City and neighborhoods be prepared."100100Congresswoman Velázquez has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. She is a co-sponsor of the Fracking Ban Act (H.R.5857), legislation that "prohibits federal agencies from issuing permits for the expansion of fracking or fracked oil and natural gas infrastructure, including infrastructure intended to extract, transport, or burn natural gas or oil." Rep. Velázquez also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2021 press release addressing the effect of climate change on people, she stated, "When it comes to combating climate change, we must all be in this together, as Americans and as global citizens living on this planet." Congresswoman Velázquez makes climate change a top priority issue. She is a co-sponsor of the Climate Justice Act of 2021, legislation that "requires the President to establish a Climate Justice Working Group that must advise federal entities on a just and equitable transition towards a clean, climate-resilient, and zero-emission economy."100Congresswoman Velázquez supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. The Congresswoman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119).7593.75https://velazquez.house.gov/issues/environment https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5857/cosponsors?r=10&s=1 https://velazquez.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-vel-zquez-senator-markey-reintroduce-legislation-aid-people https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2394/cosponsors?r=4&s=1 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://velazquez.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/vel-zquez-scotus-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Wagner, AnnMissouri2RCongresswoman Ann Wagner disagrees with the scientific consensus that that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to the Riverfront Times, Rep. Ann Wagner was quoted stating, "The field of climate science is in its relative infancy and it appears that some within the public policy world have made dubious assessments of scientific information in order to further their own political agenda. Our policy response to this dilemma should not be based on inconsistent and unsound science or driven by the fear of a supposed catastrophe."00On Congresswoman Wagner's, 'Energy,' page, it states, "I believe we must fully cultivate our oil resources by ending drilling moratoriums, increasing onshore and offshore production, and approving permits that would assist in transporting oil from North Dakota's Bakken." Congresswoman Wagner demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congresswoman Wagner opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman was a co-sponsor and voted for a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). The Congresswoman co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)). 00https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/9a4dyp/missouris-climate-change-deniers https://wagner.house.gov/issues/energy https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/34/cosponsors?r=1&s=1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-3YK-dI08o Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Walberg, TimMichigan5RAccording to a 2017 Time Magazine article, during a town hall when asked his stance on climate change, the Congressman stated, "I believe there’s climate change. I believe there’s been climate change since the beginning of time. Do I think man has some impact? Yeah, of course. Can man change the entire universe? No... Why do I believe that? Well, as a Christian, I believe that there is a creator in God who is much bigger than us. And I’m confident that, if there’s a real problem, he can take care of it.”00In a September 2019 interview on the Steve Gruber Show, the Congressman stated when asked about climate change, "These last several weeks of August it has been a huge issue especially when you see the Democratic candidates talking about it and the Green New Deal, but that is not going to work." Congressman Walberg demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Walberg makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a 2016 press release, after voting to oppose a national carbon tax, the Congressman stated, "For the Michigan families struggling each month to pay their bills, a new $10 oil tax would be yet another blow to their pocketbooks. During a time of sluggish economic growth, the last thing we need is a misguided tax that will increase energy prices and hurt job creation. America's energy policies should encourage more innovation and production, not try at every turn to make energy more expensive for consumers." Congressman Walberg was a co-sponsor and voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). The Congressman co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).00https://time.com/4800000/tim-walberg-god-climate-change/ https://stevegruber.podbean.com/e/tim-walberg-climate-change-the-green-new-deal-and-the-bacon-tax/ https://walberg.house.gov/media/press-releases/walberg-opposes-higher-energy-prices-new-oil-tax https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/34/cosponsors?r=1&s=1 https://walberg.house.gov/media/press-releases/walberg-statement-supreme-court-decision-dobbs-case Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Waltz, MichaelFlorida6RCongressman Michael Waltz understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. According to a 2019 article in the Woodwell Climate Research Center, "Rep. Michael Waltz (R-Florida) said that climate change impacts are indisputable, and that he wanted the United States “to lead this effort … with rapidly growing clean energy markets.”750In a 2017 article of E&E News, the Congressman was quoted stating, "We do need to — from a military standpoint, even a national security standpoint — deal with the effects of a warming Earth... The Defense Department [and] a number of admirals and generals [and] even [Defense] Secretary [Jim] Mattis in his confirmation testimony pointed to drought, famine, natural disasters and other effects of a warming Earth — of climate change — as a national security issue. Those issues led to failed states that terrorist groups are taking care of that we have to deal with. So I'd like to see the United States continue a leadership role." Congressman Waltz supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. 50Congressman Waltz has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5043.75https://www.woodwellclimate.org/woodwell-climates-dr-jennifer-francis-testifies-to-congressional-hearing-on-climate-change/ https://www.eenews.net/stories/1060096339 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://waltz.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=629Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Wasserman Schultz, DebbieFlorida25DCongresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Environment,' page, it states, "As a senior member of the Energy and Water Appropriations Subcommittee, I use my unique position to advocate for South Florida and Everglades restoration, take bold action on climate change and renewable energy, and improve the quality of our air and water. It is imperative, now more than ever, that we adequately fund ecosystem restoration and clean energy initiatives as Florida deals with the full effects of our global climate crisis."100100In 2017 Congresswoman Wasserman Schultz published an op-ed in the Miami Herald condemning the president's decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement, writing, "Sadly, the decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement is only the latest anti-science, anti-conservation policy to emerge from the Trump administration. This is a president who appointed a vocal climate science denier to head the Environmental Protection Agency, then removed a majority of scientists from the EPA’s Board of Scientific Counselors. This is an administration that has worked to erode the safeguards protecting clean air and clean water at every opportunity — including gutting key funding for Everglades protection and restoration." Congresswoman Wasserman Schultz’s website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congresswoman Schultz supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. The Congresswoman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 7587.5https://wassermanschultz.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=15058 http://www.miamiherald.com/opinion/op-ed/article154343914.html https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://wassermanschultz.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2850Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Waters, MaxineCalifornia43DCongresswoman Waters understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In response to the World Bank President David Malpass’s denial of climate change, she stated, "President Malpass’s refusal to accept the overwhelming scientific consensus that human activity, specifically, the burning of fossil fuels, is the main driver of climate change is appalling...President Malpass’s unwillingness to acknowledge the central role that fossil fuel emissions play in climate change calls into question the Bank’s commitment to meeting the climate challenge, including efforts to help ensure a just transition away from fossil fuels in developing countries." In a 2017 press release rebuffing President Trump's decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement Congresswoman Waters stated, "If Trump withdraws from the Paris agreement, it could cause the entire agreement to collapse, accelerating climate change and exacerbating its impacts on human communities, impacts which include deadly hurricanes, severe droughts, and rising sea levels."100100Congresswoman Waters has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 press release condemning President Trump's decision to slash California transportation funding, the Congresswoman stated, "We will continue to resist his heartless, corrupt, and cruel administration. We will win our lawsuit and protect our right to enforce strong emissions standards, fight climate change, and protect public health.” The Congresswoman makes prominent public statements on the issue. During the nomination of Secretary of State, Rex Tillerson, the Congresswoman released a statement stating, "Rex Tillerson’s record of misinformation on climate change is also a reason for grave concern about his ability to be a credible and effective Secretary of State. Recent evidence indicates that Exxon deliberately misled government agencies and the American public regarding the threat posed by climate change." The Congresswoman makes climate change a top priority issue. In 2021, "Congresswoman Maxine Waters (D-CA), Chairwoman of the House Committee on Financial Services, gave the following statement at a Subcommittee on Consumer Protection and Financial Institutions hybrid hearing entitled, 'Addressing Climate as a Systemic Risk: The Need to Build Resilience within Our Banking and Financial Institutions.'” The Congresswoman stated "Over the past year, we have witnessed examples of how climate change can disrupt our financial system. Meanwhile, the hundreds of bankruptcies in the oil and gas sector as a result of the economic fallout from COVID-19 has provided a preview of the type of pain our economy will likely face as climate change becomes worse. I am pleased that President Biden, Treasury Secretary Yellen, and policymakers at the Fed and elsewhere have listened to those of us who have raised concerns about urgent financial stability risks of climate change, and that they are beginning to take action."100Congresswoman Waters supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. She voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 7593.75https://financialservices.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=409853 https://waters.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-waters-statement-reports-suggesting-president-trump-will-withdraw-us https://waters.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-waters-statement-trump-intimidating-california-slashing https://waters.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/congresswoman-waters-statement-nomination-rex-tillerson-secretary-state https://financialservices.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=408104 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://financialservices.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=409591Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Watson Coleman, BonnieNew Jersey12DCongresswoman Bonnie Watson Coleman understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "Climate change is a crisis that affects everyone. For this reason I have co-sponsored the Green New Deal. It is crucial that the United States demonstrates to the international community that many Americans still support the Paris Climate Agreement even though our President may not. We must reaffirm our commitment to the agreement and our effort to combat climate change." The Green New Deal is a set of policies that aim to fight climate change while also investing in the economy.100100Congresswoman Coleman has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congresswoman is the co-sponsor of H.Con.Res.31, legislation that "recognizes the need for the departments and agencies of the executive branch with delegated authority over energy and climate policy to prepare a climate recovery plan that puts the United States on a trajectory consistent with reducing global atmospheric carbon dioxide to below 350 parts per million by the year 2100." Rep. Coleman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a joint letter to President Biden with 59 of her colleagues, the Congresswoman called for change, saying that the "climate catastrophe is no longer some distant threat...it is here and now." Congresswoman Coleman makes climate change a top priority issue. She is a co-sponsor of the Fracking Ban Act (H.R.5857), legislation that "prohibits federal agencies from issuing permits for the expansion of fracking or fracked oil and natural gas infrastructure, including infrastructure intended to extract, transport, or burn natural gas or oil."100Congresswoman Coleman publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. The Congresswoman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 100100https://watsoncoleman.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=14894 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/31?s=1&r=11 https://www.insidernj.com/press-release/two-n-j-members-congress-join-letter-calling-transformational-climate-investments/ xhttps://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5857?s=1&r=18Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Weber, RandyTexas14RCongressman Randy Weber disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an article on 'Vice,' they refer to Congressman Weber as a "climate change denier," and quote him saying, "I may want to get your cell phone, because if we go through cycles of global warming and then back to global cooling, I need to know when to buy my long coat on sale. I just don't know how y'all prove those hypotheses going back fifty, hundred, what you might say is thousands if not millions of years, and then postulate those forward." Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change position.00In a 2019 press release supporting the withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, Congressman Weber stated, "This legislation would bind us to the Paris Climate Accord and would be a step backwards. Staying in the Paris Climate Accord could mean losing 2.7 million American jobs and losing over $250 billion in GDP by 2025. Money funneled into the Paris Climate Accord is better spent investing in the private sector, which leads the way in technology and emissions reduction. Withdrawing from the Accord is not about seeking to do harm to the environment. Far from it. Instead, this is about investing in people and innovation. Regulation and false promises serve only to stifle real progress.” Congressman Weber demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.0Congressman Weber opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman was a co-sponsor and voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 256.25https://weber.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=526 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://kfdm.com/news/local/randy-weber-releases-statement-praising-supreme-court-decision-to-overturn-roe-v-wadeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
Webster, DanielFlorida11RCongressman Daniel Webster disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. During a 2017 Committee on Space, Science, and Technology hearing on climate science, the Congressman stated, "So when I first ran for office, which is many years ago, long before this issue was an issue, there was another issue, and it was called the coming Ice Age. There was a big article in one of the magazines, I think it was Time magazine, when I was running for office... So you kind of wonder, we had some charts up here that started in late 1979. I don’t know, maybe those before that were the other way, and so the only growth in the temperature was a re-energizing what the temperature used to be before it was cooling. And so it just seems like there is such a short period of time. We’re looking at this data. It’s calculated within, you know, down to maybe four-tenths of a degree, and if we look back thousands of years, there might be a better pattern to see, and granted, we may not have that data but it seems like we’re basing a lot of things on current data, not on necessarily what’s happened in the world in general, and we’re blaming it on one set of circumstances, which may or may not have been the case for other things that occurred and in some cases there weren’t any humans."00Despite his lack of leadership, Congressman Webster introduced the PREPARE act, which would make sure Americans are prepared for extreme weather events, such as hurricanes. In a 2019 press release, the Congressman stated, "The PREPARE Act builds on the initiatives Florida pioneered. It is a thoughtful approach to improve disaster preparedness across federal agencies to better identify and proactively mitigate risk.” Congressman Webster demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Webster opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119).256.25https://www.hsdl.org/?view&did=800987 https://webster.house.gov/press-releases?ContentRecord_id=6D7BAC75-709B-4389-AF24-EDA3EA0972EC https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://webster.house.gov/2022/6/statement-on-supreme-court-decision-overturning-roe-v-wadeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Wenstrup, BradOhio2RCongressman Brad Wenstrup disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his energy page, the Congressman stated his opposition to the EPA regulating carbon, saying, "I also believe the EPA’s unilateral pursuit of regulatory action without congressional oversight, including the unaccountable attempt to regulate carbon, has created tremendous uncertainty for businesses and consumers at a time when we can least afford it." 00On Congressman Wenstrup's energy page he supports policies expanding fossil fuel production, stating, "I support policies that will expand access to all forms of American-made energy, which will create jobs and provide increased energy supplies, and increased American energy exploration on private and federal lands." According to a 2014 press release, the Congressman in a radio address criticized, "Obama for his stand on net neutrality, for his deal with the Chinese government on global warming, and other Obama environmental policies." Congressman Wenstrup demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.0Congressman Wenstru opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 256.25https://wenstrup.house.gov/priorities/issue/default.aspx?IssueID=126808 https://wenstrup.house.gov/updates/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=398542 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://wenstrup.house.gov/updates/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=405735Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Westerman, BruceArkansas4RCongressman Westerman does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2016 interview with CSPAN, Congressman Westerman who is the only professional forester in Congress was asked his views on climate change and responded, "On the global warming or climate change issue, the climate is changing, whether that is man made or not, but we do know that healthy forests sequester carbon and the better trees grow and the faster they grow, the more carbon they sequester... Regardless of how you feel about climate change healthy forests are part of the solution." In another interview with CSPAN he stated, "Climate change happens. The question is, what causes it to happen? You have natural vents… Forest fires put millions of tons of carbon into the air every year. Volcanic eruptions put millions of tons of carbon in the air. And when it happens, it's minute changes. So, you can't deny the fact that climate change happens. The question is, what causes climate change to happen?... It's a very complicated subject you hear talked about a lot in platitudes, and not as much in details of science."250Congressman Westerman supported President Trump's announcement to leave the Paris Agreement, stating in a 2017 press release, “I applaud the Administration's decision to lead like America has historically led...by example. The United States can be more effective illustrating to the rest of the world what sound environmental stewardship looks like by innovating and continuing to be the best when we lead and set the standard versus signing agreements with foreign governments and allowing others to direct how we operate.” During a 2017 Congressional hearing, Rep. Westerman doubted climate change stating, “I assume if the climate’s changing, it’s changing in Arkansas, as well as other places. So I did a little research and found out the number of forest fires in Arkansas has actually decreased over the past 20 years. It’s either held level or slightly decreased as our management has continued to increase. So apparently the climate change isn’t affecting forest fires in my state. You would think even though it’s a more moderate or temperate climate if climate change was causing more fires we would see a lot more of them than what’s in the baseline.” Congressman Westerman demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Westerman opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 2512.5https://www.c-span.org/video/?414800-102/washington-journal-representative-bruce-westerman&start=394 https://www.c-span.org/video/?326975-5/washington-journal-representative-bruce-westerman-r-ar https://westerman.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/western-caucus-members-praise-paris-climate-agreement-withdrawal-potus https://westerman.house.gov/media-center/videos/bruce-westerman-questions-wildfire-prevention-house-subcommittee-federal-lands https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://westerman.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/westerman-reacts-reversal-roe-v-wadeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Wexton, Jennifer Virginia10DCongresswoman Jennifer Wexton understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. According to the Congresswoman's website, "In Congress, Jennifer has and will continue to stand firm against climate threats. She has been vocal in her support of the scientific evidence laid out in the Fourth National Climate Assessment, which displays the dire, man-made consequences facing our nation. Taking action, Jennifer co-sponsored and voted to pass the Climate Action Now Act to fight the withdrawal from the Paris Climate Agreement and advocate for the nation to move toward meeting important greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals."100100Congresswoman Wexton has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 press release supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9) the Congresswoman stated, "I believe in science, and it’s clear that climate change is an urgent threat to our public health, infrastructure, economy, and national security. This bill honors our commitment to the Paris Agreement, and lays the groundwork for further action to address this crisis.” Rep. Wexton also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2018 Facebook post, the Congresswoman wrote, "Mr. President, climate change is real, and caused by humans. For our children's sake we must take action. #VA10 voters can choose: a candidate with a record supporting clean energy and coastal resiliency planning, or a candidate bought and paid for by the fossil fuel industry." Congresswoman Wexton makes climate change a top priority issue. According to a tweet, In a 2020 speech during a climate change hearing, the Congresswoman, "spoke about the importance of sustainable land management and why we need to incentivize our farmers to adopt more climate-friendly practices—many of which have substantial economic payoffs as well."100Congresswoman Wexton has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman was not in Congress for a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5087.5https://jenniferwexton.com/?issues=environment https://wexton.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=81 https://www.facebook.com/JenniferTWexton/posts/mr-president-climate-change-is-real-and-caused-by-humans-for-our-childrens-sake-/2066582460031297/ https://twitter.com/RepWexton/status/1218243736079085568 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://wexton.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=715Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Wild, SusanPennsylvania7DCongresswoman Susan Wild understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2019 press release announcing her inclusion in the New Democrat Coalition’s Climate Change Task Force, she stated, "Climate change is an existential crisis that affects every aspect of our societies." According to her website's 'Issues' page, Congresswoman Wild states, "Climate change is the existential threat of our time and it must be treated with the urgency it demands. I, along with my colleagues, passed the Climate Action Now Act, which was the first congressional vote in over ten years to address the threats to our climate. This landmark legislation would bring America back in line with the Paris Accord, which aims to reduce worldwide carbon emissions, and it would require the President to detail to Congress his plans to meet emissions reductions."100100Congresswoman Susan Wild has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. According to a 2020 post on 'Twitter,' the Congresswoman stated, "Climate Change is real and we need #ClimateActionNow." On Congresswoman WIld’s website's 'Defending the Environment' page, it states, "It’s an embarrassment that we are the only nation on Earth not to sign the framework deal which aims to reduce carbon emissions. The Trump Administration’s disregard for basic science is putting America last on the global stage." On her website's 'Issues' section, the Congresswoman states, "Climate change and the influence of Big Oil are decimating our remaining natural wonders and seashores. I was proud to vote to protect our national resources and lands from offshore drilling, and I will vote against further attempts to ruin our national parks, the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, and offshore areas." Congresswoman Susan Wild's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congresswoman Wild has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5081.25https://wild.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-wild-lays-out-climate-change-priorities https://wildforcongress.com/environment-0 https://twitter.com/repsusanwild/status/1228102784198889475 https://wildforcongress.com/defending-environment https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://wild.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-wild-statement-supreme-court-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Williams, NikemaGeorgia5DCongresswoman Nikema Williams understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, Williams states "If we do not take bold action now to halt the harmful effects of the climate crisis, we are facing irreversible and life threatening changes - especially for those in Black and Brown communities." She continues, "With time, air and water pollution will continue to increase, temperatures will continue to rise, and the climate crisis will wreak havoc on our communities."100100On her campaign website, Congresswoman Nikema Williams states that she "support[s] the aggressive target of transitioning to 100% clean energy by 2050, and the bold proposals of affordable public transit, good-paying environmentally friendly jobs, while providing for futures to come." Congresswoman Williams' website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congresswoman Nikema Williams has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5081.25https://www.nikemaforcongress.com/issues-new https://nikemawilliams.house.gov/issues/environment https://nikemawilliams.house.gov/posts/congresswoman-nikema-williams-statement-before-voting-for-reproductive-rights-legislative-packageSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Williams, RogerTexas25RCongressman Roger Williams does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250Congressman Roger Williams demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. According to an article in 'Politi Fact,' Congressman Williams has undermined climate change solutions. The article states, "In a one-minute speech on Oct. 28 in Congress, Rep. Roger Williams, R-Austin, claimed: 'U.S. households are on track to spend $19 billion more on energy by 2030.'"0Congressman Williams opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman was a co-sponsor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119).06.25https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/nov/30/roger-williams/williams-presents-estimate-based-biden-campaign-pr/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://williams.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-williams-statement-on-the-supreme-court-s-decision-to-overturn-roe-vOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
Wilson, FredericaFlorida24DCongresswoman Frederica Wilson understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "I am also convinced that climate change poses a serious threat to our state and our nation. As President Obama said in his Second Inaugural Address, we can no longer ignore devastating fires, crippling drought, dangerous storms, and rising sea levels. I am committed to smart energy policies that fight climate change by cutting carbon emissions and boosting renewable fuel production. As the solar industry has demonstrated, by investing in new clean technologies, we can not only protect our planet but also create new high-wage jobs."100100Congresswoman Wilson has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. According to a 2020 press release, the Congresswoman was able to include provisions in The Moving Forward Act (H.R. 2), which would, "establish several new programs that will reduce emissions, invest in new technologies, and improve resiliency." The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2017 press release condemning the president's withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, the Congresswoman stated, "And, denying the obvious and claiming that global warming is a hoax is especially disconcerting for Floridians, where issues like the greenhouse effect on water levels and flooding are a major concern." Rep. Wilson makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2018 tweet, Congresswoman Wilson stated "Warmer temperatures from #ClimateChange are expected to expand the range of mosquitoes and ticks that carry diseases like Zika, yellow fever and West Nile virus. Congress must #ActOnClimate to protect the health and wealth of the American people. #ClimateFriday" 100Congresswoman Wilson publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbonThe Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. She voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 100100https://wilson.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://wilson.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/wilson-secures-florida-priorities-in-500-billion-infrastructure-bill https://wilson.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/congresswoman-frederica-s-wilson-s-statement-on-the-united-states https://twitter.com/RepWilson/status/1068582228286935040?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://wilson.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-wilsons-statement-supreme-courts-abortion-decisionSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Wilson, JoeSouth Carolina2RCongressman Joe Wilson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250On Congressman Wilson 'Energy,' page, it states, "I fully support domestic production of our natural resources. I believe we must continue to explore offshore, in locations where natural resources are abundant, for even more opportunities that may support American efforts to reduce dependency on foreign oil. A key energy project which would directly support our desire to wean ourselves of foreign oil while at the same time adding hundreds of thousands jobs here at home is the Keystone XL Pipeline. The Trump Administration has supported the Keystone XL Pipeline, a project that would transport crude oil from Canadian oil sands to refineries along the Gulf Coast." Congressman Wilson demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Wilson opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 2512.5https://joewilson.house.gov/issues/energy https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363Unclear Position on RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Wittman, Robert J.Virginia1RCongressman Robert Wittman agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, Congressman Wittman states, "We need to focus on ways we can address climate change."500In a press release on the Green New Deal, Congressman Wittman stated, "The Democrats have put forth policies like the Green New Deal. These policies have me gravely concerned. Proponents of this proposals say it would address climate change and economic inequality by getting the United States to zero carbon emissions in 10 years. I see it as a gross abuse of government power that will pose disastrous damage to our economy, impose substantial costs on everyday Americans, and threaten our energy dominance and national security, all for little to no difference on global temperatures." Congressman Wittman demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Our latest, 2022 research shows no updated information on the Congressman’s climate change leadership.0Congressman Wittman opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 2518.75https://wittman.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=128027 https://wittman.house.gov/forms/form/?ID=112 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://wittman.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=4263Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Womack, SteveArkansas3RCongressman Steve Womack disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2018 article by the Times Record when asked about climate change the Congressman stated, "The climate changes — it has throughout history. The real debate is who or what is causing it?... We have yet to find an exact answer, but there are a range of arguments and research to support varying views. Our goal should always be to put forth novel, market-based solutions that protect our environment and balance economic interests. America has been a leader of innovation in this sector, and it’s important that other countries also do their fair share. By being good stewards and advancing an all-of-the-above energy plan, we can support productivity and sustainability for the future.”00In a 2017 article by Talk Business on President Trump's withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, Congressman Womack was quoted stating, "I’m not sold on the philosophy that man is the sole contributor of climate change- but we have to be careful that the United States doesn’t take a disproportionate amount of responsibility and monetary commitment for this issue.” Congressman Womack demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Womack opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 256.25https://www.swtimes.com/news/20181028/is-global-climate-change-man-made-or-not-arkansas-3rd-district-congressional-candidates-respond https://talkbusiness.net/2017/06/arkansas-congressional-delegation-applauds-trumps-withdrawal-from-climate-treaty/ https://womack.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=398483 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://womack.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=405221Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate

U.S. House Challengers

NameStateDistrictPartyPositionPosition ScoreCarbon FeeCarbon Fee ScoreClimate CalculationSourcesSupport/Oppose Roe
Aadland, Erik Colorado7RCandidate Erik Aadland disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, the candidate states "carbon dioxide or CO2 emissions in the United States are down significantly in the last three decades. Fossil fuels such as Natural Gas provide clean energy, orders of magnitude more efficient and less harmful to the environment than many so-called renewables." Candidate Aadland also writes on his campaign website that "...radical left policies are threatening to destroy [agriculture], predicated on pseudo-scientific concerns about global warming."0Candidate Erik Aadland has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://aadlandforcolorado.com/positions/ https://twitter.com/AadlandforCO/status/1540406614372470784Opposes Roe
Abahsain, Jill Minnesota7DFLOn votesmart.org, Candidate Abahsain's position on climate change is as follows- "Climate change is a serious issue that effects not only our generation but the generations that come after us. The best way to combat this crisis is to strengthen the MPCA to enforce environmental laws and to encourage cleaner energy use along with environmentally friendly manufacturing process, in order for this to happen, this technology needs to be affordable, which MN should make happen." The source from which this quote was derived seems to have been taken down. Candidate Jill Abahsain agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.50Candidate Jill Abahsain has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee.5050https://justfacts.votesmart.org/public-statement/1479956/issue-position-environmentclimate-change-8203 Unclear on Roe
Adeimy, Deborah Florida22RCandidate Deborah Adeimy does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Deborah Adeimy has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75 Unclear on Roe
Adkins, Amanda Kansas3RCandidate Amanda Adkins does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On her campaign website, the candidate states "Under the auspices of limiting America’s climate impact, the Biden Administration has stressed the U.S. economy by forcing an energy transition that is costly to American families and businesses, while actually doing very little to protect the environment...we must pursue policies that increase U.S. energy supply, encourage innovation – including clean energy options – and contribute to American security...Nuclear energy is a great answer for those worried about the environment. It is clean, reliable, and cost effective. It is also safer than public perception alludes."25Candidate Amanda Adkins has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5028.75https://www.amandaadkins.com/energy-security-healthy-environment/ https://fox4kc.com/video/4star-politics-amanda-adkins-and-new-legislative-maps/7700814/Opposes Roe
Akana, Joe Hawaii2RCandidate Joe Akana understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue. In a questionnaire for 'Civil Beat,' Candidate Akana was asked, "Is the U.S. on the right path when it comes to mitigating climate change and growing renewable energy production? What specific things should Congress be considering?" He responded, saying, "As an immediate action, we’ll plant 100 trees in the first 100 days, statewide. There’s an ‘Olelo No‘eau, Hahai no ka ua i ka ululā‘au, rains will always follow the forest. It’s all of our kuleana to be good stewards. Nationally we need a holistic approach for each state, not a cookie-cutter plan. Each state has its own unique ecosystem. We must identify communities in Hawaii, and across the U.S., which are the most vulnerable. Then we build a grassroots movement to educate, advocate and empower people to implement long-term and short-term common sense solutions." 100Candidate Joe Akana has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee.5092.5https://www.civilbeat.org/2022/09/candidate-qa-2nd-congressional-district-joe-akana/ https://www.staradvertiser.com/2022/08/03/election/2022-election-joe-akana/ Opposes Roe
Alexander, Tim New Jersey2DCandidate Tim Alexander understands the importance of climate action, but not as a top priority issue. On his official campaign website, Candidate Alexander states, "Tim fully supports President Biden’s environmental and infrastructure plans and he will fight to ensure that South Jersey is not forgotten in Congress. As climate change affects our neighborhoods and businesses, we need to make sure both get their fair share in any piece of legislation." 75 Candidate Tim Alexander has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5071.25https://www.timalexanderforcongress.com/issuesSupports Roe
Alford, Mark Missouri4RCandidate Mark Alford does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Mark Alford has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://www.columbiamissourian.com/news/elections/4th-district-candidate-discuss-abortion-other-social-issues/article_2836fa1a-d0e6-11ec-aeec-7fd9fa032aa1.html Opposes Roe
Allen, Brad California24RCandidate Brad Allen does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Bradley Allen has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon5028.75https://www.drbradallen.com/the-issues https://newspress.com/determined-to-make-america-better/Supports Roe
Almonord, ValGeorgia 3DCandidate Val Almonord understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states "Climate change is one of our country’s most significant challenges. Addressing this imperative danger could make America the world’s clean energy leader and create prosperity with millions of good-paying jobs. The collaboration of the everyday people, the scientific community, and the public and the private sector is key to confronting our most significant environmental challenges and paving the way to a more sustainable America."75Candidate Val Almonord has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://almonordforcongress.com/vals-vision/ https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/political-courage-test/189752/valbrun-almonordSupports Roe
Ambrose, Mark Michigan11RCandidate Mark Ambrose does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2022 survey from WDET, the candidate stated "? I believe that there will eventually be a time and a place to shift towards alternative energy, but with the cost of fuel rapidly increasing, the United States must use any means necessary to alleviate the pain that U.S consumers are facing. This would include additional drilling and a regulatory environment that does not harm U.S oil production. We must achieve energy independence once again."25Candidate Mark Ambrose has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://wdet.org/2022/07/25/michigan-primary-2022-candidate-guide-11th-congressional-district/ https://voteambrose.com/issues/Opposes Roe
Ambrose, Nicolee Maryland2RCandidate Nicolee Ambrose does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On her campaign website, the candidate states "It’s time for the government to stop picking winners and losers—America needs an all-of-the-above approach to powering our nation, from fossil fuels to nuclear energy...We need representatives in Congress who will bring clean energy production home so we can end dependence on other nations while creating high-paying jobs, growing our economy, and preserving our environment."25Candidate Nicolee Ambrose has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5028.75https://ambroseforcongress.com/issues/ https://hucoaction.org/advisory-board/nicolee-ambrose/Opposes Roe
Andrews, AnnieSouth Carolina1DAnnie Andrews understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, it states, "Climate change is real and it is human-made. The science is settled. That is a reality that our current representative will not admit. The Lowcountry cannot afford to have a climate denier as our representative in congress. We should be leading on this issue."100Annie Andrews has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.drannieandrews.com/issues https://www.drannieandrews.com/post/dr-annie-andrews-releases-statement-on-leaked-supreme-court-rulingSupports Roe
Andrews, NaomiOklahoma2DNaomi Andrews does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Naomi Andrews has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://twitter.com/NaomiForOK/status/1546686443166261248Supports Roe
Armendariz-Jackson, Irene Texas 16RIn an interview for the El Paso times, Candidate Armendariz-Jackson stated, "Science does not support climate change allegations. It was Al Gore who predicted 12 years ago the North polar ice cap would be gone and yet, it is still there." Candidate Irene Armendariz-Jackson disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 0 Candidate Irene Armendariz-Jackson has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 507.5https://www.elpasotimes.com/story/news/2020/10/12/el-paso-times-questionnaire-irene-armendariz-jackson-candidate-congressional-district-16/5952524002/Opposes Roe
Arroyo, Marcos New Jersey 8RCandidate Marcos Arroyo does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Candidate Marcos Arroyo has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee.5028.75 Unclear Position on Roe
Asencio, Robert Florida28DOn Candidate Asencio's official campaign website, under the 'Priorities' section, it states, "Combat climate change with investments in green technology and protect our environment and waterways." Candidate Robert Ascencio understands the importance of climate action, but not as a top priority issue.75Candidate Robert Ascencio has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5071.25https://www.voterobertasencio.com/prioritiesSupports Roe
Ausbrooks, JimmyKentucky1DCandidate Jimmy Ausbrooks uagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2019 Demcast survey, the candidate stated "Climate Change" was one of many of the "biggest issue[s] facing [his] community" and said "I want to address each and demand accountability for those that refuse to address them..."50Candidate Jimmy Ausbrooks has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://demcastusa.com/2019/11/20/meet-the-candidate-jimmy-ausbrooks-kentucky/ https://www.facebook.com/jimmy4ky/posts/pfbid02sxeJbXtzfbJufqBY3WTzecmfSGCEJbAc5wYjguNNqDSmiQK2UT5kbawaSbDVRhP2lSupports Roe
Ausman, Richard Wisconsin7DIn a questionnaire for 'Vote411 Voter's Guide,' Candidate Ausman wrote, "I will continue supporting subsidies to encourage alternative energy programs including wind and solar, my opponent would like to eliminate them. Friends of mine who have scientific minds are more excited about the potential of hydrogen powered cars vs. electric and the resulting benefits. I support nuclear fusion efforts, it is no longer a dream. It is a matter of when it will provide a long-term, sustainable, economic and safe energy source for electricity generation. Fuel is inexpensive and abundant in nature, and the amount of long-lived radioactive waste and greenhouse gases produced through fusion are minimal. I will continue to support our science community as they tackle how to further reduce carbon dioxide and methane emissions." Candidate Richard Ausman understands the importance of climate action, but not as a top priority issue.75Candidate Richard Ausman has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5071.25https://onyourballot.vote411.org/candidate-detail.do?id=3740594#Supports Roe
Balderramos Robinson, Corinna Florida21DOn her official campaign website, Candidate Robinson Balderramos states, "In our district, environmental pollution is of the utmost importance, and the health of our neighbors is dependent on the health of our ecosystem...We must restore the mission of the Department of Interior and other Federal Agencies to ensure the health of our water, marine life, and economy. Fines should be increased for environmental lawbreakers, especially those which are agriculturally based hazards, and our officials should be held accountable for failing to practice environmental risk mitigation processes." Candidate Corinna Robinson Balderramos understands the importance of climate action, but not as a top priority issue.75 Candidate Corinna Robinson Balderramos has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5071.25https://www.corinnaforflorida.us/issuesSupports Roe
Banyai, Cindy Florida 19DAs part of her 'vision' on her official campaign website, Candidate Banyai writes that she dreams of "Clean water and land where our businesses can thrive and our children can play today and tomorrow." Her plan involves supporting the Green New Deal, encouraging Congress to adopt policies such as carbon offsetting, and "Align federal policy to international collaborative efforts on the environment." Candidate Cindy Banyai understands the importance of climate action, but not as a top priority issue.75Candidate Cindy Banyai has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5071.25https://www.cindybanyai.com/environment https://www.winknews.com/2022/06/30/swfl-congressional-candidate-cindy-banyai-arrested-during-abortion-protest-in-dc/Supports Roe
Barkley, Mike California5DCandidate Mike Barkley understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states a 'high point' of his platform is to "solve climate change ." He also lists "move towards an understanding that climate-change deniers are unfit for public office" and "support the EPA's Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS)" among multiple bullet points to combat climate change. The U.S Department of Energy states "the RFS requires renewable fuel to be blended into transportation fuel in increasing amounts each year, escalating to 36 billion gallons by 2022. Each renewable fuel category in the RFS program must emit lower levels of greenhouse gases (GHGs) relative to the petroleum fuel it replaces."100Candidate Mike Barkley publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. On his campaign website, the candidate states that regarding 'Energy,' he would "Phase in cap & trade, or better yet carbon fee and dividends."100100http://www.mjbarkl.com/run.htm https://afdc.energy.gov/laws/RFS https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/political-courage-test/145992/mike-barkleySupports Roe
Barrett, Tom Michigan7RCandidate Tom Barrett does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Tom Barrett has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.tombarrettforcongress.com/issuesOpposes Roe
Bashir, Aaron Pennsylvania2RCandidate Aaron Bashir does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, the candidate states "PROMOTE AND SECURE THE ENERGY JOB: Optimize and utilize our resources to create and secure our energy-related jobs since Pennsylvania is the nation’s second-largest natural gas producer."25Candidate Aaron Bashir has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5028.75https://bashirforcongress.com/vision/ https://frcactionpac.org/get.cfm?i=PR20J02&f=Opposes Roe
Basler, Doug Washington9RCandidate Doug Basler does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a candidate survey for Coalition for American heritage, Candidate Basler stated 'no' in response to the question, "Do you believe that climate change considerations should continue to be part of the federal permitting process?"25 Candidate Doug Basler has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://heritagecoalition.org/candidate-spotlight-doug-basler/ https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/political-courage-test/152951/doug-baslerOpposes Roe
Baugh, Scott California47RCandidate Scott Baugh agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, the candidate states "Scott Baugh opposes drilling off of the California coast. He believes government and businesses need to respect the legitimate science behind the challenge and reject the science manipulators in order to work together to effectively deal with climate change in ways that do not cost jobs or harm the economy."50Candidate Scott Baugh has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://baughforcongress.com/positions/ https://dccc.org/scott-baugh-will-be-rubber-stamp-on-nationwide-abortion-ban/Opposes Roe
Beach-Ferrara, Jasmine North Carolina11DCandidate Jasmine Beach-Ferrara understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, the candidate states "climate change is real and we’re seeing its impact with wildfires, hurricanes and the flooding that has recently ravaged our communities here in Western North Carolina. We can’t wait to act. Addressing climate change must be a top priority and I will approach this with the urgency it deserves, as I have done on the County Commission. This is about protecting our planet, protecting public health, and generating economic opportunities for our region by creating green jobs."75Candidate Jasmine Beach-Ferrara has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.jasmineforcongress.com/issuesSupports Roe
Bean, Aaron Florida4Rc does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Aaron Bean has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee.5028.75https://twitter.com/AaronPBean/status/1540401785483005954 Opposes Roe
Beard, Jimmy Kansas1DCandidate Jimmy Beard does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Jimmy Beard has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.facebook.com/JimmyForKansas/posts/pfbid02bWpEoFbKdrEJYLSpyD4JKhFumzqnLtq9Hbzbt2P66yExmX7CbNzLnSJYTEnJPkSslSupports Roe
Becker, April Nevada 3RCandidate April Becker does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Candidate April Becker has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://voteaprilbecker.com/issue/the-constitution-and-rule-of-law/ Opposes Roe
Benjamin, Leon Virginia4RIn a 2020 tweet addressing climate change, Leon Benjamin stated, "The Climate Change argument has not benefited Americans but other nations who can’t mine the vast resources like we can as Anerica can. To pretend we don’t have energy independence is like taking us back 100 years. Not good for a capitalistic society." His statements regarding climate change have been very sparse and show zero understanding of the issue at hand. Candidate Leon Benjamin does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25In a 2022 tweet alluding to carbon fees, Leon Benjamin wrote, "Taxing people and corporations into oblivion does NOTHING to mitigate climate change! You cannot tax Mother Nature." Candidate Benjamin makes public statements, advocates, or votes against putting a U.S. fee on carbon.021.25https://twitter.com/search?lang=en&q=climate%20(from%3Aleon4congress)&src=typed_query https://twitter.com/Leon4Congress/status/1490069157714575364 https://twitter.com/Leon4Congress/status/1551630568936333312Opposes Roe
Bergmann, Charlotte Tennessee9RCandidate Charlotte Bergmann does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels25Candidate Charlotte Bergmann has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://electbergmann.com/issues.htmlOpposes Roe
Bivings, Martell Michigan13RCandidate Martell Bivings does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Candidate Martell Bivings has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://bivingsforcongress.com/issuesUnclear on Roe
Black, Dianne Mississippi1DCandidate Dianne Black agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On her campaign website, the candidate states "I will be the person to give voters a seat at the table, where decisions are made about...how to address the climate crisis."50Candidate Dianne Black has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://www.diannedodsonblackforcongress.com https://www.facebook.com/dianneblackforuscongress/posts/pfbid02pVoqMmVrkmezY2wYhBHAZ6LzmX4YQTnvnHnaSmRDxiNuemKRyoUhZHcTgsw78Fcpl https://desotocountynews.com/mississippi-news/dodson-black-speaks-with-abortion-supporters-in-oxford/ Supports Roe
Bognet, Jim Pennsylvania8RCandidate Jim Bognet does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2022 tweet, the candidate stated "Real infrastructure is finishing President Trump’s border wall and restarting the Keystone XL Pipeline!"25Candidate Jim Bognet agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.5028.75https://twitter.com/Bognet4congress/status/1462226044220579840 https://www.timesleader.com/news/1562521/pa-lawmakers-candidates-weigh-in-on-rulingOpposes Roe
Bohannan, ChristinaIowa1DCandidate Christina Bohannan understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a letter to the editor in Little Village Magazine, the candidate states "Water quality, climate change and gun violence need our attention, even as we continue to cope with COVID-19."75Candidate Christina Bohannon has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://littlevillagemag.com/letter-to-the-editor-from-christina-bohannan-why-im-running/ https://twitter.com/BohannanIowa/status/1540398073188327427Supports Roe
Brannon, Mary Oklahoma4DCandidate Mary Brannon does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Mary Brannon has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://m.facebook.com/Brannon4Congress/posts/243720196228756 Supports Roe
Brecheen, JoshOklahoma2RJosh Breechen does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Josh Breechen has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5028.75https://joshbrecheen.com/issues/#tab-1948Opposes Roe
Brewer, Eric Ohio11RCandidate Eric Brewer does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Eric Brewer has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5028.75https://twitter.com/EricJBrewerCle/status/1553143798162755584Opposes Roe
Briscoe, John California42RCandidate John Briscoe does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate John Briscoe has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://johnbriscoe.us/key-issues/ https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/political-courage-test/179398/john-briscoeOpposes Roe
Brock, MattCalifornia 4RCandidate Matt Brock does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, the candidate writes "the left has been pushing the green narrative for years now and it is beginning to show its colors."25Candidate Matt Brock has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.brock4congress.com/issuesUnclear on Roe
Brower, Douglas California2RCandidate Douglas Brower does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Douglas Brower has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S fee on carbon.5028.75http://04861d0.wcomhost.comUnclear on Roe
Brown, Kathleen Texas13DCandidate Kathleen Brown does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Kathleen Brown has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://kathleenfortx.com/on-the-issues/ https://twitter.com/Kat4District13/status/1551891494595854337Supports Roe
Buckner, Duke South Carolina6RCandidate Duke Buckner does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Duke Buckner has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Duke_BucknerUnclear on Roe
Budd, Joe Florida23RIn a 2022 tweet, Candidate Budd wrote, "The Democrats believe Climate Change is the biggest threat to humanity. But we know the high gas prices are directly related to and needed for us to pay for their green new deal initiative." Candidate Joe Budd disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 0Candidate Joe Budd has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 507.5https://mobile.twitter.com/VoteJoeBudd/status/1537780621388484613 https://www.yahoo.com/now/joe-budd-congress-jubilee-unborn-142200127.htmlOpposes Roe
Budzinski, Nikki Illinois13DCandidate Nikki Budzinski understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, the candidate states "...climate change remains an existential threat to all of us, and to our ability to maintain our way of life. But it is also a challenge that comes with the opportunity to reimagine what our economy, our energy systems, and our environment can and should look like." Commenting on her endorsement from the League of Conservation Voters Action Fund, Candidate Budzinski said "there is much work that needs to be done to ensure we are responsibly transitioning to a 21st century economy while making sure that working families are at the center of the conversation. I am eager to work with LCV as partners and get to work on these important issues.'"100Candidate Nikki Budzinski has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://nikkiforcongress.com/issues/environment-and-climate-change/ https://www.lcv.org/article/lcv-action-fund-endorses-nikki-budzinski-for-congress/ https://nikkiforcongress.com/issues/choice/Supports Roe
Burau, Justin Illinois3RCandidate Justin Burau understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states "Justin would work hard building consensus with the other representatives to help pass meaningful climate change initiatives. Justin would: Provide financial incentives to companies which invest in Green Energy. Provide assistance for research and development for climate change initiatives. Support those working with natural resources and support them if they take advantage of research and development credits that promote environmentally friendly resources."75Candidate Justin Burau has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5071.25https://www.burauforcongress.com/issue/climatechange https://twitter.com/JustinBurau/status/1522294594439888902Opposes Roe
Burlison, Eric Missouri7RCandidate Eric Burlison does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Eric Burlison has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://www.ericburlisonforcongress.com/conservative-record Opposes Roe
Burns, RobertNew Hampshire2RRobert Burns does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Robert Burns has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.burns4nh.com/on-the-issuesOpposes Roe
Butler, Darrius Georgia 8DCandidate Darrius Butler understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states "It is imperative that we: ​Push for investment in resources, infrastructure, and education in communities of color to benefit in energy cost savings. Protect against the attack on the Environmental Protection Agency and standards for clean air and water. Set goals for carbon reduction and robust climate standards for newly manufactured cars and infrastructure. Encourage investment in clean energy and commit to transitioning to a clean economy by 2050."100Candidate Butler has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.darriusbutler.com/georgia-s-infrastructure https://twitter.com/RevDButler/status/1540408314466639872Supports Roe
Canepa, David California15DCandidate David Canepa understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2022 tweet, the candidate stated "as the only corporate-PAC-free candidate I will work towards moving away from fossil fuels. I will also invest in renewable infrastructure to ensure a sustainable future for generations to come." According to a 2022 article from The Almanac, Candidate Canepa stated "the Green New Deal and heralded technology as a key tool for addressing climate change, calling on Congress to innovate to create “commercially viable carbon capture” as one of "his top three priorities."100Candidate David Canepa has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://twitter.com/davidcanepa/status/1511937295603027974?s=20&t=FYS5K7gxq4hYTA_aaXO7JA https://almanacnews.com/news/2022/04/12/climate-issues-heat-up-during-district-15-congressional-forum https://twitter.com/davidcanepa/status/1540393776127954944Supports Roe
Cao, Hung Virginia10RIn a 2022 tweet, Candidate Cao wrote, "I believe in god and...why we have a rainbow is because that's god's covenant to us...he'll never wipe out the world again, so it's kind of arrogant for us to believe we can we can destroy god's creation." Hung Cao disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 0Candidate Hung Cao has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 507.5https://twitter.com/bluevirginia/status/1528354966246723584?lang=en https://dccc.org/new-hung-cao-compares-abortion-to-atrocities-of-the-holocaust-and-pushes-misinformation/ Opposes Roe
Caplan, StanCalifornia51RCandidate Stan Caplan agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2022 interview with the San Diego Union Tribune, the candidate stated "and before the Biden administration suspended new oil and gas leases on federal lands, increases in natural gas production as a substitute for coal resulted in 62 percent of the CO2 level reductions from 2005 to 2019." On his campaign website, Candidate Caplan states his priorities include "REDUCE GAS PRICES AND LOWER ENERGY COSTS: Stop tax and regulation policies that punish everyday Americans. Produce more U.S. oil and natural gas. Restore energy independence. Increase reliable and affordable renewable resources."50Candidate Stan Caplan has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/opinion/story/2022-04-27/2022-election-q-a-with-stan-caplan-51sth-congressional-district-candidate https://www.caplanforcongress.com/prioritiesUnclear on Roe
Caraveo, Yadira Colorado8DCandidate Yadira Caraveo understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. Commenting on her endorsement from the League of Conservation Voters, the candidate stated "in the state legislature, I’ve worked to create clean energy jobs, hold corporations accountable to keep our air and water clean and address the disparate impacts of climate change on the working class and communities of color. I look forward to continuing that work in Congress.'” The candidate also said that "as a pediatrician, I see the effects of climate change on the health of our children and families every day.'”100Candidate Yadira Caraveo has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.lcv.org/article/lcv-action-fund-endorses-dr-yadira-caraveo-for-congress/ https://twitter.com/YadiraCaraveo/status/1541588436301258753Supports Roe
Cargile, Mike California35RCandidate Mike Cargile does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, the candidate states "I love the idea of clean, green energy. In fact, I have solar panels on my house...However, most of what we see being pushed as “environmentally friendly” energy sources are anything but… Most of what is currently being sold to the public is driven by dark sources of corporate greed." In a 2020 Youtube video, Candidate Cargile says "I don't use the word, the term everyone's using. It's so politicized-climate change."25Candidate Mike Cargile has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5028.75https://www.cargileforcongress.com/environment https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_5dUk5hAPmA&t=1s https://www.cargileforcongress.com/lifeOpposes Roe
Carlson, Eric Illinois1RCandidate Eric Carlson disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, regarding 'The Environment,' the candidate states "1) Historically the Climate Always Changes." 0Candidate Eric Carlson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://www.ericcarlsonforcongress.com/projects https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/political-courage-test/204278/eric-carlsonOpposes Roe
Casar, GregTexas35DOn Candidate Casar's official campaign website, it states, "Our planet is burning, flooding, and freezing all at the same time. Fighting the climate crisis must be a top priority for every country in the world. We can create good paying-union jobs while we become the global leader in renewable energy." Candidate Greg Casar understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue.100Candidate Greg Casar has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://www.casarforcongress.com/issues Supports Roe
Castelli, ChristianNorth Carolina6RCandidate Christian Castelli agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Christian Castelli has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.castelliforcongress2022.com/issues-Opposes Roe
Castelli, Matt New York 21DCandidate Mike Castelli understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In an extended interview for 'Mountain Lake PBS,' Mike Castelli was asked, "is addressing climate change a major priority for you? How big of an issue is that for you?" The Candidate responded, saying, "it's a big issue for our district. It's not just a question about the threat it imposes to our planet, it's also a question of the threat it imposes on our economy...our farms, our agriculture rely on avoiding some of these severe weather patterns that could lead to flooding and actually...reduce or undermine our crops...combating climate change presents a challenge that we need to address in order to protect our economy but also an opportunity to invest in economic growth."100Candidate Mike Castelli has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://www.castelliforcongress.com/prioritiesSupports Roe
Cavaleri, Vincent Washington1RCandidate Vincent Cavaleri does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a questionnaire for the ivoter guide, Candidate Cavaleri was asked, "Which comes closest to your view? A) Stricter environmental laws and regulations cost too many jobs and hurt the economy. B) Stricter environmental laws and regulations are worth the cost." The candidate responded, writing, "A) Stricter environmental laws and regulations cost too many jobs and hurt the economy. Though important, we cannot rely solely on the renewable resources that are currently available to us. I strongly support the use of both natural gas and oil and other renewable resources in order to ensure the future of American energy independence." 25Candidate Vincent Cavaleri has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://ivoterguide.com/candidate?elecK=899&raceK=2688&canK=59648& Unclear on Roe
Chavez, JonathanGeorgia 4RCandidate Jonathan Chavez does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, the candidate states "We Believe...The Environment Can Be Better. This is a very serious issue that has been impacting civilians worldwide. The current plan we see only bankrupts our system without the cost benefit that we need now. What we have seen are states that implement alternative energy only to have its citizens pay the price for the lack of energy supplied."25Jonathan Chavez has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.jonathanchavezforcongress.com/donate https://www.jonathanchavezforcongress.comOpposes Roe
Chavez-DeRemer, Lori Oregon5RCandidate Lori Chavez-DeRemer does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Lori Chavez-DeRemer has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.lorichavezderemer.com/issuesOpposes Roe
Chen, JayCalifornia45DCandidate Jay Chen understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a 2021 tweet, the candidate wrote "spent yesterday evening with Citizens’ Climate Lobby members in Brea talking bipartisan climate solutions that are market friendly and will protect our air and water for future generations. We must do more to hold corporate polluters accountable." In another, Candidate Chen stated "climate change is making droughts more common and more severe. California must address long-term water resiliency by funding emergency drought relief projects, drinking water and wastewater infrastructure, and water-recycling systems."75Candidate Jay Chen has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://mobile.twitter.com/jfchen/status/1412840836123951106 https://twitter.com/jfchen/status/1453179552998453250 https://chenforcongress.com/on-the-issues/womens-rights/Supports Roe
Ching, Eric California38RCandidate Eric Ching does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Eric Ching has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ericchingforcongress.com/solutions.htmlUnclear on Roe
Christian, Bob Georgia 6DCandidate Bob Christian understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a June 2022 tweet, the candidate replied to a tweet about cost-efficiency and renewable energy saying "Further proof that we don't need to choose between our environment and the economy--we can save both. Anyone who tells you otherwise is selling something. #energytwitter #climatechange"75Candidate Bob Christian publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. According to a 2022 article from the Forsyth County News, "Christian said climate change is a big factor for young voters because they are more likely to experience the changes and a market-based way to take on was to support the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act, introduced by Rep. Ted Deutch of Florida’s 22 Congressional District."10078.75https://mobile.twitter.com/ChristianForGA6/status/1542510873117216769 https://www.forsythnews.com/news/politics/kiwanis-host-forum-democratic-congressional-candidates/ https://twitter.com/ChristianForGA6/status/1541134298681589762Supports Roe
Ciampoli, John New York16RCandidate John Ciampoli does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Candidate John Ciampoli has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75 Unclear on Roe
Ciarrocchi, Guy Pennsylvania6RCandidate Guy Ciarrocchi does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2022 op-ed published by Broad and Liberty, the candidate states "For those focused on greener energy, remember that natural gas is needed to make solar panels, and it’s a bridge from fossil fuels to cleaner sources of energy like hydrogen. We can be a leader in those products, too. That’s why Pennsylvania can be the No. 1 energy state in the nation and become the leader once again in manufacturing."25Candidate Guy Ciarrocchi has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://broadandliberty.com/2022/02/09/guy-ciarrocchi-its-time-to-become-the-leader-in-providing-the-nations-energy-needs/ https://twitter.com/guyciarrocchi/status/1540727986151981057?cxt=HHwWgoC84Zb84eEqAAAAOpposes Roe
Ciscomani, JuanArizona6RCandidate Juan Ciscomani does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, the candidate states "Our country’s dependence on foreign energy must be eliminated. We need to secure America’s energy independence."25Candidate Juan Ciscomani has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.juanciscomani.com/issuesOpposes Roe
Clark, BenNorth Carolina9DCandidate Ben Clark does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Ben Clark has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.benclarknc.com/priorities/ https://twitter.com/BenClarkNC/status/1540361036229910529Supports Roe
Cohn, Alan Florida15DIn a 2020 press release, LCV announced that they were endorsing Candidate Cohn for congress. LCV action fund senior Vice President stated, "Alan Cohn understands the urgency of the climate crisis and will put the safety of Florida communities over the interests of corporate polluters, listening to the experts and trusting the science." Cohn, too, has made some impressive statements regarding his support for climate action. In response to recieving LCV's action fund endorsement, he proclaimed, "Climate change is an existential threat that demands bold and immediate action to prevent the most devastating effects to our planet. It doesn’t just impact our environment – it threatens our economy, national security, food supply, health, and disproportionately hurts communities of color..." Candidate Alan Cohn understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue.100When running for Congress in 2020, Candidate Cohn came up with a comprehensive agenda, that goes as follows- "How to combat climate change: Transition to a 100% clean energy economy by 2035 Put a price on carbon and enact a carbon tax......" It is not know why he has not mentioned climate change at all in his 2022 campaign, especially considering his previous track record as a climate action champion. Candidate Alan Cohn has an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://www.lcv.org/article/lcv-action-fund-endorses-alan-cohn-congress/ https://justfacts.votesmart.org/public-statement/1473824/issue-position-tackling-the-climate-crisis https://www.cohnforflorida.com/issuesSupports Roe
Colarusso, Caroline Massachussetts5RCandidate Caroline Colarusso disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2020 interview with WCVB 5, the candidate stated "I do acknowledge that the climate is changing but I still think there is a debate on why it is changing."0Candidate Caroline Colarusso makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a 2019 Facebook post, the candidate writes "Folks the Transportation and Climate Initiative also known as the Carbon Tax being pushed by Massachusetts politicians and will result in ridiculously high gasoline prices...Beware of the Transportation and Climate Initiative or this will be us soon !!"00https://www.wcvb.com/article/what-candidates-in-5th-congressional-district-believe-should-be-done-to-deal-with-global-climate-change/34456245 https://www.facebook.com/CarolineColarussoMA/videos/403121493943043 https://twitter.com/CarolineforMA5/status/1540350384333475840 https://www.metrowestdailynews.com/story/news/politics/elections/local/2020/10/15/clark-and-colarusso-debate-national-issues-take-center-stage/114419002/Opposes Roe
Coll, Gregory Maryland8RCandidate Gregory Coll agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, the candidate states "Gregory Coll believes climate change is real and needs to be addressed rationally and with an associated risk-and-return posture."50Candidate Gregory Coll has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://www.gregorycoll.com https://www.nrlc.org/uploads/records/MD08CollComparison2020.pdfOpposes Roe
Collier, Scott Maryland7RCandidate Scott Collier does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Candidate Scott Collier has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Scott_M._CollierUnclear on Roe
Collins III, Joe California36RCandidate Joe Collins III does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Joe Collins III has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://joeecollins3.com/cpt_services/five-point-plan/ https://twitter.com/joeecollins3/status/1540423846926266368Opposes Roe
Collins, Mike Georgia 10RCandiate Mike Collins does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Mike Collins has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://mikecollinsga.com/issues/Opposes Roe
Conole, Francis New York22DCandidate Francis Conole understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue. On his official campaign website, Candidate Conole states, "we are facing a global existential crisis. The science is clear — climate change is the biggest short and long-term threat to social justice, economic stability, national security and public health. Some scientists are stating we have until roughly 2030 before we cross over the horizon of catastrophe, and irreversible damage is done to our planet...This simply can’t continue. It’s time for new ideas and fresh leadership that is not beholden to dark special interest money and will fight to protect our planet as well as our communities here in Central New York." 100Candidate Francis Conole has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://conoleforcongress.com/issues/environment/ https://conoleforcongress.com/issues/womens-health/Supports Roe
Cooper, Kelly Arizona4RCandidate Kelly Cooper does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2022 tweet, the candidate wrote "Yes, you're reading that correctly. Migrant encounters have skyrocketed, as the Biden administration prioritizes climate change over the ongoing border crisis."25Candidate Kelly Cooper has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://twitter.com/KellyCooperAZ/status/1481303964738015238 https://www.kellycooperarizona.com/issuesOpposes Roe
Cooper, Randal Tennessee6DCandidate Randal Cooper does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Randal Cooper has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://twitter.com/cooperfortn6 Supports Roe
Crane, Eli Arizona2RCandidate Eli Crane does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Eli Crane has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon5028.75https://eliforarizona.com/issues-eli-crane/ https://www.azvoterguide.com/candidate/us-house/crane-eli/Opposes Roe
Crockett, JasmineTexas30DOn Candidate Crockett's official campaign website it states, "Jasmine has worked closely with constituents in North Texas who are directly impacted by environmental inequality in our district. From shingle mountain to the concrete plants in south and west Dallas, Jasmine has been fighting to clean up our community from pollution" Candidate Jasmine Crockett agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.50Candidate Jasmine Crockett has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5050https://www.jasmineforus.com/issues/ Supports Roe
D'Esposito, Anthony New York4ROn his official campaign website, Candidate D'Esposito states, "To restore our energy independence and lower costs for hardworking families, we need an all of the above strategy that leverages both our natural resources and American innovation to fuel our country and ensure we are never again reliant on hostile countries like Iran, Venezuela and Russia." He does not explicitly address climate change, however his support for an 'all of the above' strategy is counterproductive to reaching zero carbon emissions and ultimately hurts the environment. Candidate Anthony D'Esposito does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Candidate Anthony D'Esposito has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee.has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee.has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee.5028.75https://despositoforcongress.com/issues/ https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/political-courage-test/174091/anthony-despositoOpposes Roe
Daniels, Shamaine Pennsylvania10DCandidate Sharmaine Daniels understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, the candidate states "When we deny climate change and the need for strong environmental protection, we do so at our own peril and at the expense of future generations – our own children and grandchildren. Simultaneously, by refusing to take action to address environmental protection and climate change, we deny the economic opportunity represented by the development and deployment of clean and renewable energy...I will support strong environmental protection measures that make sense, and I will be an outspoken advocate for investing in the type of clean and renewable energy that will benefit the agricultural community, grow the economy, create jobs and make our nation more secure by reducing our reliance on foreign oil."100Candidate Sharmaine Daniels has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://danielsforcongress.org/issues/ https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=pfbid0oAAjV8J5E3Zn2J7RA5bA7GioXac5YYcSLVq5QY3oLfevfz7n4uhc8Ga7CQnhVCcwl&id=100058246502031&__cft__[0]=AZWqhfIrDi2SBRwibwRR-Lvs4xE2TJ_pDMKO8HaBjr_bMS3RFxbC445tvzhy5AKX1hBxe0Ap0IO6CYlwkpu8LHPLzVTsqqvo_uJyWPwgxioHyCMrw_pZxPVeoWWAAIKhod6lVI7RsdvF7uTqNbWca_O4c85VXZTDyQrQ_4KefBfwEq8E_k7mypTQBZDDIo4whGlkGTmTR1QBMAXhcWx4DzMv&__tn__=%2CO%2CP-RSupports Roe
Dargis, Chris Illinois8RCandidate Chris Dargis does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2022 op-ed, the candidate states "instead of focusing on environmental justice, we should be working on finding solutions to the energy challenges facing our country. Short-sighted policies such as the closing of critical pipelines and the Administration’s relentless attacks on the energy sector, there is a strong possibility that Illinois residents could face rolling blackouts this summer...One such real world solution is nuclear energy...Alternative energy such as wind and solar can be part of the mix, but we are a long way from reaching a point where we can completely abandon traditional sources of power."25Candidate Chris Dargis has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5028.75https://www.votedargis.com/op-ed-americans-deserve-energy-solutions-not-empty-words-and-promises/ https://www.dailyherald.com/news/20220504/gop-congressional-hopefuls-for-8th-district-address-leak-of-supreme-court-abortion-decisionOpposes Roe
Darling, Katie Louisiana 1DOn her official campaign website, Candidate Darling states, "To achieve a sustainable future, Louisiana needs improved policies and increased funding dedicated to reinforcing flood protection around Lake Pontchartrain, increasing cleanup efforts, providing tree maintenance programs, creating more evacuation support, and working with insurance companies to offer homeowners affordable policies they can count on. We live on the front lines of climate change, which means we need to prioritize legislation focused on storm preparedness and disaster relief." Candidate Katie Darling agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.50Candidate Katie Darling has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee.5050https://www.katie4louisiana.com/issues Supports Roe
Dashevsky, Yuri New York8RCandidate Yuri Dashevsky does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Yuri Dashevsky has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee5028.75 Unclear on Roe
Davis, Cicely Minnesota5RIn a 2022 retweet discussing the increasing aggression of the Chinese military, Candidate Davis wrote, "My opponent, Ilhan Omar, still believes climate change is a greater threat." Candidate Cicely Davis does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Candidate Cicely Davis has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://twitter.com/CicelyDavisMN/status/1551965149149515777Unclear on Roe
Davis, DonNorth Carolina1DCandidate Don Davis understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states "The climate crisis poses a massive threat to eastern North Carolina — especially our farmers who face increasingly unpredictable weather patterns due to global climate change...Air and water pollution and the impacts of the climate crisis disproportionately impact our poorest families, working class communities, and communities of color who are more likely to live in areas where air and water pollution exceed national standards. Don will fight for our community’s right to in safe and health communities."75Candidate Don Davis has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://votedondavis.com/priorities/Supports Roe
Dawson, MarshallColorado2RCandidate Marshall Dawson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Dawson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://dawsonforcongress.com/dawson-for-congress-platform/ https://dawsonforcongress.com/statement-on-the-overturn-of-roe-v-wade/Opposes Roe
Day, RogerIndiana4DCandidate Roger Day does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Roger Day has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon5028.75https://www.facebook.com/roger.day.737Unclear on Roe
Daza-Fernandez, Antonio Georgia 11DCandidate Antonio Daza-Fernandez understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a 2022 Facebook post, the candidate writes "In Congress I will never stand down from the fight for climate action and equitable policies."75Candidate Daza-Fernandez has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.facebook.com/votedaza/posts/338935681670478 https://twitter.com/VoteDaza2022/status/1540346448491036672Supports Roe
Deering, Regan Illinois13RCandidate Regan Deering agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Regan Deering has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://regan4congress.com/issues/ https://regan4congress.com/issues/#1592225601200-915422d0-777fOpposes Roe
DeGroot, Paul New Jersey11RCandidate Paul DeGroot does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels25Candidate Paul DeGroot has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://www.insidernj.com/degroot-sherrill-wants-to-use-abortion-as-a-wedge-issue/ Opposes Roe
Della Pia, Max New York23DCandidate Max Della Pia understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue. On his official campaign website, Candidate Della Pia states, "fortunately, choosing between a clean environment and arresting climate change is not an “either/or” question. It can also be answered “both/and.” Even if you don’t believe in climate change, it’s easy to believe in preserving our forests, lakes, and our air for our health and that of our kids and grandkids... By calling protections “needless restrictions to business,” we began to reverse that progress almost overnight. We can and must do better because our Finger Lakes and Great Lakes are the envy of the world and some of our country’s most precious resources." 100Candidate Max Della Pia has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://www.dellapiaforny23.com/issues Supports Roe
Deluzio, Chris Pennsylvania17DCandidate Chris Deluzio understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states "...to meet our climate goals to reduce carbon emissions, we need to invest in the clean energy sources of the future, protecting and creating union jobs in places like western Pennsylvania...And to get to the future where the world is free of greenhouse gas emissions – which we must do for the sake of humanity...fight for tougher environmental standards around natural gas (like methane emissions controls)... but we need natural gas in our electrical grid to provide reliable baseload power while we build out capacity for non-fossil fuel sources..." According to a 2022 article from Inside Climate News, "[Candidate Deluzio] said that there are two crises in America right now: one about climate and one about democracy. “We can’t fix one without fixing the other,” he said... Deluzio spoke about extreme weather events and the need to be net carbon zero by 2050...Deluzio’s platform doesn’t mention climate or the environment....Neither Deluzio...named climate or the environment when asked to list the top three issues that concern voters in the 17th."75Candidate Chris Deluzio has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://chrisforpa.com https://insideclimatenews.org/news/09052022/in-pennsylvanias-hotly-contested-17th-congressional-district-climate-change-takes-a-backseat-to-jobs-and-economic-development/Supports Roe
DeNardis, Lesley Connecticut3RCandidate Lesley DiNardis does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Lesley DiNardis has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://lesleyforcongress.com/#issues https://www.newhavenindependent.org/article/denardis https://www.ctinsider.com/politics/article/CT-Republicans-weigh-in-15-week-abortion-ban-17447033.php Unclear on Roe
Dennis, John California 11RCandidate John Dennis does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate John Dennis has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.johndennisforcongress.com https://twitter.com/RealJohnDennis/status/1540453087080488960Opposes Roe
Diemer, MatthewOhio7DCandidate Matthew Diemer does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Matthew Diemer has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://diemerforcongress.com/priorities/abortion-womens-access-to-healthcare/Supports Roe
Duarte, JohnCalifornia 13RCandidate John Duarte does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate John Duarte has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.johnduarteforcongress.com/john-fightsUnclear on Roe
Dueñas, Angelica California29DCandidate Angelica Dueñas understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, the candidate states "WE must move towards 100% clean renewable energy by 2030, PERIOD. Our reliance on fossil fuels and natural gas have moved us to the edge of extinction, no hyperbole. The debate has long been over. We know that fossil fuels, and other burned gasses, rises into the atmosphere where it gets trapped, thus creating a "green-house effect," which warms up the planet. We know that this global warming creates a vicious cycle; extreme droughts, rising oceans, and collapsing ecosystems all paint a picture of unimaginable suffering, which we are now only beginning to experience. Climate disruption is a human-made disaster, and a Green New Deal is the necessary start to warding off the worst effects of it."100Candidate Angelica Dueñas has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.angelica4congress.com/gnd https://twitter.com/Angelica4CA/status/1540366172444426240Supports Roe
DuPree, Johnny Mississippi 4DCandidate Johnny DuPree agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, the candidate states "Climate change, global warming, and melting polar ice caps have pushed Tornado Alley further south into Mississippi and made the Gulf of Mexico a hotbed for seasonal hurricanes and tropical storms. This all puts in jeopardy our safety and economic stability. Finding a sustainable energy source and becoming energy independent is imperative to controlling and protecting our future."50Candidate DuPree has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://www.johnnydupree.com/issues https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2011/11/why-d-the-media-expect-personhood-to-pass.html Opposes Roe
Edwards, ChuckNorth Carolina11RCandidate Chuck Edwards does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, the candidate states "we don't need to put our country and our livelihoods at risk for liberal energy and climate experiments like the Green New Deal that reward China while hamstringing America. Each of us can do our part, but I will fight any efforts to add more regulations on our businesses and our way of life."25Candidate Chuck Edwards has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.chuckedwardsforcongress.com/fighting-the-status-quo/energy-independence https://www.chuckedwardsforcongress.com/fighting-the-status-quo/pro-life-valuesOpposes Roe
Ehasz, Ashley Pennsylvania1DCandidate Ashley Ehasz understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, the candidate states "As a combat veteran, I view the climate crisis as a national security issue. The Department of Defense has identified climate change as a direct threat to the national security of the United States and stability around the world. Future conflicts could be caused by climate change’s effect on political and resource instability...I also know that one immediate way...is to work to reduce the carbon emissions of the U.S. military, who currently emit more carbon than 140 countries. Working with defense manufacturers, research institutions, and Commanders, we could produce new technologies to not only reduce the carbon emissions of the U.S. military, but do so without sacrificing our ability to rapidly respond to conflict in the field."100Candidate Ashley Ehasz has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.ehaszforcongress.com/protecting-our-land https://www.ehaszforcongress.com/healthy-communities https://twitter.com/ashley_ehasz/status/1521826031262384129Supports Roe
Elliott, Steven Michigan12RCandiate Steven Elliott does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Candiate Steven Elliott has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://stevenelliottforcongress.com/#issuesUnclear on Roe
Else, DavidNebraska3DCandidate David Else agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2022 Facebook post, Candidate Else stated "[Nathan Lewis] is a strong supporter in fighting climate change. We all need to wake up to this. While we have drinking water."50Candidate David Else has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://www.facebook.com/DaveElseforCongress/posts/pfbid02gnhoLDp3CsLTbGAjHbPdnLXfM659tPcdnpVD1zMjWLt2gBoPgqPxvo6NerMJtep2l https://www.facebook.com/DaveElseforCongress/posts/pfbid0nVHSYvHzp8QoYMBwoYLFWMmjmhtkWee6w7kduDsVmE9SkrBgpcDoTi7cqzdKEf4QlSupports Roe
Enoch, Vanessa Ohio8DCandidate Vanessa Enoch understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, the candidate states "Rising sea levels, extreme heat and drought, more extreme weather events, increased fires, and other adverse effects will disrupt everyone’s lives if we do not transition from fossil fuels like coal, oil and gas to renewable energy sources...As your representative to Congress, I will promote expanded use of renewable energy like solar, wind and geothermal. I will work to end unnecessary tax breaks for oil and gas companies, hold these companies accountable for damaging the environment, and no longer allow them to hide evidence of climate change in Ohio and elsewhere." Candidate Enoch also says "At the risk of missing the next great opportunity for advancement and progress, we have to look toward the future and identify new clean energy sources that will take into consideration the health and well being of our children and their children."100Candidate Vanessa Enoch has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://enochforcongress.com/issue/climate-change-the-environment/ https://enochforcongress.com/issue/jobs-economic-growth-and-opportunity/ https://enochforcongress.com/2022/06/24/protect-a-womans-right-to-choose/Supports Roe
Erickson, MikeOregon6RCandidate Mike Erickson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2022 Facebook post, the candidate stated "It’s now clear that no matter how high prices rise, Biden won’t stop his effort to "end fossil fuels." On his campaign website, Candidate Erickson wrote "I will be a strong advocate to increase US oil production so that we can create jobs, lower costs for families, and increase security."25Candidate Mike Erickson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5028.75https://mikeericksonforcongress.org/about/ https://www.facebook.com/EricksonForCongress/posts/115441964447509?__cft__[0]=AZVWDV0-VjUOj-KeWjMSKhvBF4vEVk602PSy8SoslM3-tgAHRtPg-R4QkYgoNhQx-AZ0kiTgz_TXLJyYoIZByH69LowZNQ64BOPU0Z0HUDPVQ8X4pP2JfxFVWRnc44Dds8c&__tn__=%2CO%2CP-RUnclear on Roe
Esrati, David Ohio10DCandidate David Esrati understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states "The environment matters. I believe in clean energy, emission free vehicles, free public transit, recycling, electric high-speed rail, ending sprawl, and locally grown organic food."75Candidate David Esrati has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. From a 2009 post on the his blog, the candidate stated "Great opinion piece in the NY Times today about carbon tax," linking a 2009 New York Times article advocating for a carbon tax.5071.25https://electesrati.com/esrati-platform/ https://esrati.com/dayton-grassroots-daily-copenhagen-and-climate-change-v-14/3864Supports Roe
Ettinger, Jeffrey Minnesota 1DFLIn a 2022 tweet, Candidate Ettinger stated, "Folks all over Southern Minnesota are feeling the effects of climate change, from flooding to extreme heat. It’s unfortunate that my opponent voted against measures that will help keep our district’s climate, and people’s lives, stable for the long term."cCandidate Jeffrey Ettinger agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.50Candidate Jeffrey Ettinger has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5050https://mobile.twitter.com/SouthernMN4Jeff/status/1559237911438049281 https://www.ettingerforcongress.com Supports Roe
Ezell, Mike Mississippi 4RCandidate Mike Ezell does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Mike Ezell has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.mikeezell.ms/issues https://www.mikeezell.ms/issues/protect-our-unborn-childrenOpposes Roe
Falakos, James Illinois4RCandidate James Falakos does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate James Falakos has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/James_FalakosUnclear on Roe
Fallon, PatTexas 4RCandidate Pat Fallon does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Candidate Pat Fallon has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://twitter.com/reppatfallon/status/1416077958918324225 Opposes Roe
Fleming, Bridget New York1DCandidate Bridget Fleming understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue. On her official campaign website, Candidate Fleming states, "as a coastal community, Long Island is on the front lines of the climate change crisis...In Congress, I will work with members on both sides of the aisle to support the goals of the Paris Climate Accords, ensure that EPA is fully funded, and support policies that are grounded in accepted climate science, as well as to continue to restore environmental protections that were eliminated by the Trump Administration." 100Candidate Bridget Fleming has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee.5092.5https://www.bridgetforcongress.com/issuesSupports Roe
Flood, MikeNebraska1RCandidate Mike Flood does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, the candidate states "We must support energy exploration and the use of reliable, affordable energy sources like ethanol, coal, and natural gas. Only an all-of-the-above approach will ensure Americans secure access to affordable energy for our vehicles, homes, and businesses."25Candidate Mike Flood makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. On his campaign website, the candidate states "I oppose the Green New Deal, mileage taxes, carbon taxes, and any other radical effort to shackle our economy."021.25https://mikefloodfornebraska.com/issues/Opposes Roe
Flores, Mayra Texas34RCandidate Mayra Flores does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Candidate Mayra Flores has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://www.mayrafloresforcongress.com/issues/ Opposes Roe
Flowers, Brian Mississippi2RCandidate Brian Flowers does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, the candidate states "Greens know that renewable energy sources such as solar and wind cannot power bourgeoning and flourishing human societies. The success of our species is not their concern. They insist that fossil fuels must be kept in the ground, otherwise the carbon released will be ruinous to our planet."25Candidate Brian Flowers has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://flowersforcongress.com/green-war-on-energy-and-humanity/ https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/political-courage-test/188869/brian-flowersOpposes Roe
Flowers, MarcusGeorgia 14DCandidate Marcus Flowers understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a 2022 interview with the Cobb County Courier, the candidate states that '..if you think about it, when I talk to a lot of national security experts, they cite climate refugees as being a big threat with our rising sea levels. We could have a situation where we have millions of people on all of our borders because of climate change. So I think we need to be doing everything that we can to protect our environment.'”75Candidate Marcus Flowers has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://cobbcountycourier.com/2022/01/marcus-flowers-interview/ https://twitter.com/Marcus4Georgia/status/1540348708512059399Supports Roe
Ford, MikeGeorgia 9DCandidate Mike Ford understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states "Agriculture not only is highly vulnerable to climate change, but it also produces about 10% of our nation’s greenhouse gas emissions which means that not only must it be prepared to adapt to a changing climate, but it also must prepare to mitigate emissions."100Candidate Ford has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://mike4georgia.com/blog/climate-change-and-agriculture https://twitter.com/Mike4Georgia/status/1540344256409354240Supports Roe
Forte, Tina New York14RCandidate Tina Forte does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Tina Forte has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://twitter.com/TinaForteUSA/status/1540367524356935680 Opposes Roe
Foushee, ValerieNorth Carolina4DCandidate Valerie Foushee understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, the candidate states "Valerie believes that we must do more to protect our planet for our children and the generations to come. She supports increased environmental regulations and funding for the EPA and increased investments into green transit. She knows that we must reduce our dependence on coal and oil and prioritize more sustainable alternatives like solar and wind energy. Passing the Green New Deal into law will be one of Valerie’s top priorities in Congress. Valerie will also continue her fight against environmental racism..."100Candidate Valerie Foushee has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://valeriefoushee.com/issues/Supports Roe
France, Mike Connecticut 2RCandidate Mike France does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Mike France has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://votemikefrance.com/about-me/ https://tennesseestar.com/2022/03/25/connecticut-pro-life-leader-whose-mother-chose-life-the-place-that-could-have-been-my-graveyard-is-now-my-battleground/ https://dccc.org/mike-france-says-yes-to-national-abortion-ban/Opposes Roe
Franzese, Daniel Florida22RCandidate Daniel Franzese does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Daniel Franzese has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://danforfl.com/issues/Opposes Roe
Frisch, AdamColorado3DCandidate Adam Frisch agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, the candidate writes "we need lower carbon emissions without destroying our local economy" as well as "in Congress, I will support the transition to clean renewable energy sources and will work to provide those living in gas and coal communities what they need to thrive."50Candidate Adam Frisch has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon5050https://www.adamforcolorado.com/issuesSupports Roe
Frost, Maxwell Florida10DOn his official campaign website, Candidate Frost states, "The greatest challenge facing our country and the world is the climate crisis. The effects of climate disasters are compounded by already existing inequalities of class and race. Frankly, the continuity of the species depends on whether or not we transition from a carbon-dependent economy to one which is powered by green technologies and green jobs. If there is a future, it is a green future. We cannot hesitate and we cannot let big-oil, big-business, and the 1% decide our fates for us." Candidate Maxwell Frost understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue.100Candidate Maxwell Frost has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://www.frostforcongress.com/issues#environmentaljustice https://www.frostforcongress.com/meet-maxwell Supports Roe
Fry, RussellSouth Carolina7RRussell Fry does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Russell Fry has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://russellfrysc.com/about/Opposes Roe
Fulford, Robin Texas 2DOn Robin Fulford's official campaign website, it states, "Democrats have an opportunity to lead on energy policy while addressing climate change, and there's no better place to lead on that than right here in TX-CD2...The renewable sector is really the new frontier in energy, and much of the groundbreaking innovation is happening right here in Texas." Candidate Robin Fulford understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue.100On the Candidate's official campaign website, it states, " I support policy that incentivizes investment in lower carbon energy resources, and I support pricing carbon to create a competitive market for carbon trade." Candidate Robin Fulford publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon.100100https://www.fulfordforcongress.com/policies https://www.fulfordforcongress.com/blog/abortion-rightsSupports Roe
Fung, AllanRhode Island2RAllan Fung agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview with POLITICO, he blamed climate change on a series of floods in Rhode Island.50Allan Fung has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://www.politico.com/news/2022/08/09/gop-allan-fung-trump-new-england-00050344 https://www.golocalprov.com/politics/gop-congressional-candidate-allan-fung-talks-inflation-trump-guns-and-abortOpposes Roe
Fyfe, MatthewIndiana9DCandidate Matthew Fyfe does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Matthew Fyfe has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://mattfyfe.com/why/ https://twitter.com/Hoosiers4Fyfe/status/1542601053300002816Supports Roe
Galluch, David Pennsylvania 5RCandidate David Galluch does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2022 tweet, the candidate stated "#Energy costs remain through the roof, squeezing working families & fueling #inflation. I’m committed to strengthening our domestic energy sector, protecting jobs here in #PA5, & paving the way for a sensible “all of the above” energy approach."25Candidate David Galluch has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://twitter.com/DaveGalluchPA/status/1553031409530507268?cxt=HHwWiMC4odb1vI0rAAAAUnclear on Roe
Garcia, Cassy Texas28RCandidate Cassy Garcia does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels25Candidate Cassy Garcia has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://www.cassyforcongress.com Unclear on Roe
Garcia, Robert California42DCandidate Robert Garcia understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states "during my time as mayor, Long Beach has worked locally to invest in green jobs and lower emissions drastically, ahead of state standards. We have lauded a citywide youth climate corps, electrified our buses and fleet, and expanded multimodal bike and transit. I have also signed the No Fossil Fuel Money pledge." In an April 2022 tweet, Candidate Garcia wrote "in Congress, I plan to be a strong advocate for urbanism, multimodal transit, bike infrastructure, and linking our climate and housing goals."100Candidate Robert Garcia has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://robertgarcia.com/what-im-fighting-for/ https://twitter.com/RobertGarcia/status/1514083275450437634 https://twitter.com/LongBeachMayor/status/1540381792091312129Supports Roe
Gaskins, BarbaraNorth Carolina3DCandidate Barbara Gaskins understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a 2021 tweet, the candidate stated "my name is Barbara Gaskins, and I'm running for Congress. I am here to restore our climate, restore justice, and to restore our communities." According to the Political Courage Test from Vote Smart, Candidate Gaskins stated "As we move into the future it is very important to find alternatives to gas such as renewable energy."75Candidate Barbara Gaskins has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon5071.25https://twitter.com/barbara4nc/status/1428804365561724930 https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/political-courage-test/202596/barbara-gaskinsSupports Roe
Geels, CourtneyNorth Carolina4RCandidate Courtney Geels does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Courtney Geels has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://courtneygeelsforcongress.com/right-to-life/Opposes Roe
Geffeney, Tyler California52RCandidate Tyler Geffeney agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2022 interview with the San Diego Union Tribune, the candidate stated "anthropogenic climate change should continue to be investigated and further understood.At the same time, we must wisely exercise great caution to avoid allocating sweeping authority to government to pick winners in the race for providing clean and cheap energy."50Candidate Tyler Geffeney has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/opinion/story/2022-04-29/2022-election-q-a-with-tyler-geffeney-52nd-congressional-district-candidate https://tyler4congress.comOpposes Roe
Genant, Pam North Carolina10DCandidate Pam Genant understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, the candidate stated "the future of energy should be made here in America. The United States must be a leader in renewable energy, protecting our environment, combating the climate crisis, and setting our country up for true energy Independence". Candidate Genant also states "there is undeniable consensus on the existence of man-made climate change. Scientists also agree that there is a narrow window in which we can reverse the worst of the crisis. 100Candidate Pam Genant has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://pamgenant.com/issues/ https://pamgenant.com/environment/ https://pamgenant.com/healthcare/Supports Roe
Gesiotto Gilbert, MadisonOhio13RCandidate Madison Gesiotto Gilbert does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On her campaign website, the candidate states "The Biden Administration’s reckless and progressive energy policies have hurt our economy and increased energy costs on every Ohio family. Energy prices are at historic levels because we are no longer energy independent. I will work tirelessly to promote American-made energy to lower prices, create American jobs and eliminate our dependence on foreign oil."25Candidate Madison Gesiotto Gilbert has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.madisongesiottogilbert.com/energy https://www.madisongesiottogilbert.com/pro-lifeOpposes Roe
Gibbs, John Michigan3RCandidate John Gibbs does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, the candidate states " Instead we must focus on real environmental issues, such as the consolidation of ownership of American farmland and open spaces into fewer and fewer hands, the contamination of the food supply due to harmful chemicals and additives, and the negative impacts of large-scale immigration on urban sprawl and traffic."25Candidate John Gibbs has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5028.75https://www.votejohngibbs.com/issuesOpposes Roe
Gillen, Laura New York4DCandidate Laura Gillen understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue. On the her official campaign website, Candidate Gillen wrote, "climate change is wreaking havoc around the globe and in our local communities...As a Member of Congress, I will continue these efforts to preserve and protect our shorelines and our Earth." 100 Candidate Laura Gillen has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://www.lauragillenforcongress.com/issues/ Supports Roe
Gillespie, Patrick Texas33RCandidate Patrick Gillespie does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Patrick Gillespie has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://patrickgillespie4congress33.com/about-2/ Opposes Roe
Girl, Maebe A. California30DCandidate Maebe A. Girl understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, the candidate states "environmental justice is the only path forward for current and future generations. The time to act was yesterday, so we must act now to drastically curb our impact on climate change and planetary impact...ow is the crucial time to take action, and further reason to elect grassroots, government officials who do not have corporate ties to pollution-inducing industries. Radically just programs such as the Green New Deal can and will positively affect climate change while addressing economic inequities and racial injustice."100Candidate Girl agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.5092.5https://maebeagirlforcongress.org/issuesSupports Roe
Goldberg, Bart Michigan5DCandidate Bart Goldberg understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states "He is confident that we don’t have to choose between fighting climate change and building a strong economy with reliable energy sources. To that end, Bart will work for: Dramatic increases in energy efficiency, especially in terms of homes and buildings, in order to...reduc[e] our carbon footprint. Continued and expanded tax incentives for renewable energy, both for consumers and households as well as for American manufacturers of solar, wind, and other renewable technologies. Substantial investment in economic transition for worker and communities undergoing shifts away from coal, oil, and other fossil fuels."100Candidate Bart Goldberg has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5092.5https://www.bart4mi.com/issues-2Supports Roe
Goldman, Dan New York10DCandidate Dan Goldman understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue. On his official campaign website, Candidate Goldman states, "climate change is an urgent, existential threat that must be addressed immediately and comprehensively. There is no time for half-measures; we must transition to renewable energy as quickly as possible. Dan supports the principles and goals of a Green New Deal to transition to clean energy, which will also create millions of good-paying union jobs."100Candidate Dan Goldman has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://www.dangoldmanforny.com/climate-change-green-new-deal https://www.dangoldmanforny.com/protecting-reproductive-rightsSupports Roe
Gonsalves, Mark Georgia7RCandidate Mark Gonsalves does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Mark Gonsalves has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://markforgeorgia.com/issues/ https://markforgeorgia.comOpposes Roe
Gonzales, CaesarGeorgia 13RCandidate Caesar Gonzales does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, the candidate states "the free market will naturally phase in viable and practical alternative or “green” equipment and infrastructure, while phasing out archaic and obsolete technologies. Witness the success of Tesla automobiles. In the meantime, I will support exploiting the energy sources and infrastructure that we currently have."25Candidate Gonzales has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://caesargonzalesforcongress.us https://www.facebook.com/CaesarforCongress/posts/pfbid08sbYsdnsp4e9mjPmxnLHDjhBjt2zr9jZz7fVGXPUc5YTceHXcqbyzbAPhMSGBVyBlOpposes Roe
Gonzales, Christopher California46RCandidate Christopher Gonzales does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Christopher Gonzales has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://gonzalesforcongress.com/goals/ https://twitter.com/gonzalesforCA46/status/1520155239575265280Opposes Roe
Gonzalez, JesusNew York6RCandidate Jesus Gonzales does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Candidate Jesus Gonzales has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Jesus_Gonzalez_(New_York_Senate)Unclear on Roe
Gonzalez, VicenteTexas36DOn Candidate Gonzalez's official campaign website, it states, "Congressman Gonzalez supports an all-the-above approach to energy and understands the importance of American energy not only to power our cars and homes, but also as a national security issue and a job creator." He also "supports the development of sources of renewable energy, acknowledging the potential in wind and solar energy for both the South Texas economy and American energy independence." Candidate Vicente Gonzalez agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels, but does not understand the severity of this issue, which is evident from his support for an 'all of the above' strategy. 50Candidate Vicente Gonzalez has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5050https://gonzalez.house.gov/issues/energy https://gonzalez.house.gov/media/in-the-news/house-votes-disavow-carbon-tax https://thehill.com/latino/559941-communion-vote-puts-spotlight-on-hispanic-catholics/Supports Roe
Gordon, Jackie New York2DCandidate Jackie Gordon understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue. On her official campaign website, Candidate Gordon states, "it is no secret climate change is a threat to our economy and our way of life. In Congress, I will push for a clean energy plan that will blunt the impact of climate change and create jobs on Long Island. Alternative energy sources will also help lower our energy costs, bolster our energy security during natural disasters and pandemics, and sustain our environment for future generations. And I will always fight to protect clean air and clean water, including addressing the growing presence of toxic plumes in the Great South Bay and across Long Island waterways." 100Candidate Jackie Gordon has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://jackiegordonforcongress.com/#issues Supports Roe
Gorman, Jeff California 19RCandidate Jeff Gorman does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2020 KSBW 8 Action News Article, Candidate Gorman stated 'I am not all in about the alarm about the climate but I am for conservation." In a 2020 interview with 90.3 KAZU, the candidate stated "well, you know, regardless of the magnitude and causes of climate change there is a need to manage forest fires...So what has happened, in my opinion, is that global climate change has been the scapegoat to let Democrats off the hook.'"25Candidate Jeff Gorman makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. From a 2020 KSBW 8 Action News Article, "Gorman said he would not vote for a carbon tax unless it was put in with a corresponding tax cut."021.25https://www.ksbw.com/article/two-candidates-for-congress-debate-climate-change-in-santa-cruz/31032304 https://www.kazu.org/local/2020-10-20/republican-jeff-gormans-first-run-for-the-house https://twitter.com/JeffGormanMRY/status/1181354916519923712Opposes Roe
Gorman, Meg Tennessee3DOn the candidate's official website, it states, "Climate change is real, it’s happening now, and our failure to act is already resulting in devastation. But it’s not too late for America to lead the world in climate change initiatives...On this new path, we would incentivize environmentally sustainable alternatives to fossil fuels and make those alternatives available, practical, and affordable for all people...we would ban fracking and offshore drilling and put an end to fossil fuel lobbying, which for too long has allowed oil and gas companies to steer our nation’s environmental policies." Candidate Meg Gorman understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue.100Candidate Meg Gorman has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://www.meg2022.com/planning-for-the-future https://www.meg2022.com/people-over-profits Supports Roe
Grabovsky, AngelaIndiana7RCandidate Angela Grabovsky does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Angela Grabovsky has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://angelaforindiana.com/issues/Unclear on Roe
Graham, CharlesNorth Carolina7DCandidate Charles Graham does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Charles Graham has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5028.75https://twitter.com/CharlesGrahamNC/status/1540382853439045632Supports Roe
Gray, Adam California13DCandidate Adam Gray does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Adam Gray has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.adamgrayforcongress.com/districtissuesUnclear on Roe
Green, Jennifer-Ruth Indiana1RCandidate Jennifer-Ruth Green does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Jennifer-Ruth Green has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://jennifer-ruthgreen.com/issues/Opposes Roe
Green, Karen Florida7DOn her official campaign website, Candidate Green states, "Many of our environmental resources are important parts of our economic lifeblood that attract tourists to the region, however, several of these ecological treasures such as the Indian River Lagoon, including Mosquito Lagoon, Wekiva River State Park, and the St. Johns River have been put under increasing strain from pollution. Thus, for economic and moral reasons, I will work tirelessly to provide federal aid to protect these critical parts of our local landscape and to promote development that is smart and sustainable." Candidate Karen Green understands the importance of climate action, but not as a top priority issue.75Candidate Karen Green has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5071.25https://www.karengreenforflorida.com/our-prioritiesUnclear on Roe
Grey Bull, Lynnette Wyoming1DOn her official campaign website, Candidate Lynette states, "What does science tell us? What do our indigenous elders tell us? And, what is best for working families and communities? The answer to all of these questions is the same: Coal, oil, and gas are not viable energy sources in the long-term, environmentally or economically. On the other hand, we can make Wyoming into the most competitive renewable energy producer in the nation, while taking care of our working families and the communities who have, up until now, relied on the fossil fuel industry for their security. I will not leave a single worker, family, or community behind as we push forward for a prosperous and clean future." Candidate Lynette Grey Bull understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue.100Candidate Lynette Grey Bull has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://www.greybullforcongress.com/platformSupports Roe
Gryder, Scott Illinois14RCandidate Scott Gryder does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. When asked in a 2022 questionnaire from the Daily Herald about climate change, the candidate stated "change can be due to natural and human causes."25Candidate Scott Gryder has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.dailyherald.com/news/20220528/scott-gryder-2022-candidate-for-us-house-14th-district https://www.shawlocal.com/news/election/2022/05/03/scott-gryder-us-house-2022-primary-election-questionnaire/Opposes Roe
Gunby, Trish Missouri2DCandidate Trish Gunby understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue. On her official campaign website, Candidate Gunby states, "By expanding investment in renewable energy and green technologies, the United States can do what it’s always done: Set the global standard for innovation." She believes America should "Become a global leader in green technologies and renewable energy production to reverse the effects of climate change and future-proof our economy." 100Candidate Trish Gunby has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://www.trishgunby.com/gunby-for-congress-issues Supports Roe
Gustafson, Claire New Jersey 1RCandidate Claire Gustafson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Claire Gustafson has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://twitter.com/ClaireGForNJRep/status/1540356231218577410Opposes Roe
Gustafson, CoreyCalifornia 50RCandidate Corey Gustafson agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2022 interview with the San Diego Union Tribune, the candidate stated "the larger greenhouse gas problem of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere we face today will not be solved any differently. Congress must empower and support American innovation in the private sector to help create technologies that reduce carbon emissions and help make our environment cleaner... America needs to pursue an “all the above” energy solution to reduce both gas prices and Russia’s geopolitical leverage."50Candidate Corey Gustafson makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a 2022 interview with the San Diego Union Tribune, Candidate Gustafson stated "cleaning the environment, however, cannot happen with excessive taxation and job-killing regulations.042.5https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/opinion/story/2022-04-25/2022-election-q-a-with-corey-gustafson-50th-congressional-district-candidateUnclear on Roe
Hageman, Harriet Wyoming1RCandidate Harriet Hageman does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Harriet Hageman has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://www.hagemanforwyoming.com/post/harriet-hageman-statement-on-supreme-court-abortion-rulingOpposes Roe
Halbleib, ConorKentucky5DCandidate Conor Halbleib understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states "The land we live on is a part of our history and identity. It must be protected. A Green New Deal creates a path forward for a sustainable future."75Candidate Conor Halbleib has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://conor4kentucky.com https://conor4kentucky.com/rvw/Supports Roe
Hallman, Wes California28RCandidate Wes Hallman does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Wes Hallman has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://weshallmanforcongress.orgUnclear on Roe
Hamdan, Benine New York10ROn her official campaign website, Candidate Hamdan states, "While Climate Change brings a new threat everyday – the West Coast burns, while sea levels rise and poor preparation for the next hurricane foretell heartache and loss, I remain an optimist. We face these and so many more issues that are an endless scroll on our news channels. Yet I believe in the American Dream, I believe in the promise of new leadership and new voices, and I believe in my neighbors, my community and my parents’ vision. Most importantly, I believe in you." Candidate Benine Hamdan agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.50Candidate Benine Hamdan has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5050https://www.beninehamdan.com/?page_id=8 Unclear on Roe
Hamilton, Tamika California 6RCandidate Tamika Hamilton does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Candidate Tamika Hamilton has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://votetamika.org/issues/ https://twitter.com/TamikaGHamilton/status/1141346032468369409Opposes Roe
Hanson, Tommy Illinois5RCandidate Tommy Hanson disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2020 questionnaire from the Chicago Sun Times, the candidate stated "CLIMATE CHANGE IS ABOUT AS REAL AS THE EASTER BUNNY AND SANTA."0Candidate Tommy Hanson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://chicago.suntimes.com/2020/1/22/21062959/tommy-hanson-congress-house-rep-5th-district-republican-nominee-candidate-2020-election-illinoisUnclear on Roe
Harbour, Joanna Oregon3RCandidate Joanna Harbour does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Candidate Joanna Harbour has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://joanna4oregon.com/issues/Opposes Roe
Harmon, Mark Tennessee2DOn the Candidate's official campaign website, it states, "We should emphasize green jobs as we prepare our economy for the future, and combat climate change." Candidate Mark Harmon agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.50Candidate Mark Harmon has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5050https://markharmonforcongress.com/the-issues/Supports Roe
Harrigan, Pat North Carolina14RCandidate Pat Harrigan does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, the candidate states "we need an all-of-the-above approach to energy that aggressively puts America on the fast-track to independence. That includes domestic oil exploration, pipeline construction, fracking, nuclear energy development, solar, wind, coal, and all other forms of energy that America has proven we can produce cleanly, safely, efficiently and effectively."25Candidate Pat Harrigan has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.harriganforcongress.com/issues/ https://twitter.com/PatHarriganNC/status/1547988805067497474Opposes Roe
Harris-Till, Joshua Oklahoma5DCandidate Joshua Harris-Till agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2021 Facebook Post from DNC Environment and Climate Crisis Council, the candidate was quoted saying "The time to start investing in the future has long since passed...billionaires made from the fossil fuel industry [must too]...if they really want to give back, they'll start transitioning their companies to renewable energy manufacturers."50Candidate Joshua Harris-Till has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://ne-np.facebook.com/DNCClimate/photos/a.116058119765493/557069088997725/?type=3 https://twitter.com/JHTforCongress/status/1540368830085468160?cxt=HHwWgMCgxcXSvuAqAAAASupports Roe
Harvey-Hall, PhyllisAlabama2DCandidate Phyllis Harvey-Hall agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In 2020, an article from the Montgomery Advisor stated that "Harvey-Hall also supports investments in renewable energies to combat climate change."50Candidate Phyllis Harvey-Hall has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/story/news/2020/02/26/phyllis-harvey-hall-focuses-education-development-race-congress/4863052002/ https://twitter.com/PhyllisDHHall/status/1540415218593009664Supports Roe
Hathaway, QuintessaArkansas2DDr. Quintessa Hathaway does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a letter from Dr. Hathaway to the Tennessee Tribute, she states, "stop attacking every institution (i.e....the environment)." 25Dr. Quintessa Hathaway has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://tntribune.com/a-message-from-dr-quintessa-hathaway-candidate-for-congresswoman-arkansas-district-2/
Hawk, Danielle Florida3DIn an article discussing Candidate Hawk securing the Democratic nomination for the House, the author states, "Hawk’s platform includes defending voting rights, reducing gun violence, protecting reproductive rights, mitigating climate change and supporting the right to repair, which allows farmers, ranchers and business owners to fix their own equipment without requiring a third party to repair it." Candidate Danielle Hawk understands the importance of climate action, but not as a top priority issue.75Candidate Danielle Hawk has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee.5071.25https://www.daniellehawk.com/issues https://www.alligator.org/article/2022/08/danielle-hawk-will-face-incumbent-kat-cammackSupports Roe
Hawkins, Brian California25RCandidate Brian Hawkins does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Hawkins has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.hawkinsforcongress2022.com https://www.instagram.com/p/CfUBuUrLTlx/Opposes Roe
Hayden, Allison California 14RCandidate Alison Hayden does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On her campaign website, the candidate states regarding 'Environment & Healthcare' as a priority, she will "develop and expand environmental and healthcare technologies through private sector initiatives to maximize dynamic responses to challenges with high-quality low-cost results."25Candidate Alison Hayden has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://alison4congress.com https://alison4congress.com/meet-alisonOpposes Roe
Healey Jr., BobNew Jersey 3RCandidate Bob Healey Jr. agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Candidate Healey Jr.'s official campaign website, it states, "Bob knows it is critical that we foster a healthy environment, support sustainable fisheries, and promote strong marine habitats, but not strictly via excessive environmental regulations that threaten our economy and destroy jobs. In Congress, Bob will use his experience to ensure the EPA is using the best science to make regulatory decisions, and bring government and business together to promote research and development incentives for reducing our carbon footprint."50Candidate Bob Healey Jr. has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5050https://www.bobhealeyfornj.com/issues/Opposes Roe
Hendricks, JeanneMinnesota6DCandidate Jeanne Hendricks understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, the candidate states "Climate change is real; we must be good stewards of our environment, not only for economic and national security issues, but also for the existential threat to all humanity. Our future generations are counting on us to leave them a world with clean water and air; free from climate-induced natural disasters and excessive weather events, such as wildfires and flooding. We must transform the climate change discussion from the anti-business narrative of excessive regulation to one that creates partnerships which will lead to economic incentives and policies to protect our environment. Our defense of the environment needs to be stronger than those that choose to ignore facts and science about our changing world."75Candidate Hendricks has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://hendricks2022.com/climate-change-our-environment/ https://hendricks2022.com/womens-rights-pay-equity/Supports Roe
Hernandez, Bob Kansas4DCandidate Bob Hernandez does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Bob Hernandez has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5028.75https://www.hernandezforkansas.comUnclear on Roe
Hernandez, Peter California18RCandidate Peter Hernandez does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Peter Hernandez has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5028.75https://hernandezforcongress.com/the-issues https://www.facebook.com/peterhernandezforcongress/posts/pfbid0j21ausbZWKK6PTTcXCcWhbaJLm5Ap11qU9shgwejnkcFKmDJtspKGey5q9KFkW1rlOpposes Roe
Herring, Wade Georgia 1DCandidate Wade Herring understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate writes " The debate about the reality of climate change is over. We know firsthand it’s real, and now is the time to act. Our future depends upon it...It’s time to invest in clean energy jobs, ban offshore drilling, and reduce carbon emissions." In a 2022 interview with The Brunswick News, Candidate Herring states "Climate change is the No. 1 environmental issue facing Americans today. As sea levels continue to rise and storms increase in intensity and frequency, coastal Georgians already see and feel the reality of climate change. Congressional legislation should incentivize investment in clean energy and set standards to reduce emissions."100Candidate Wade Herring has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.wadeherringforcongress.com/issues https://thebrunswicknews.com/special_sections/voters_guide/wade-herring/article_6343664e-f869-5af7-bfcb-7d60b6d37342.htmlSupports Roe
Hill, Ken South Carolina4DCandidate Ken Hill does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Candidate Ken Hill has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.kenhill4america.com/issuesUnclear on Roe
Hill, Natasha Washington 5DCandidate Natasha Hill understands the importance of climate action, but not as a top priority issue. On the candidate's official campaign website, it states that one of her primary objectives is to "invest in renewable and sustainable energy, like wind farms and clean fuel, while we transition away from fossil fuels to reduce emissions and pollution." 75Candidate Natasha Hill has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5071.25https://www.natashaforcongress.com/issues https://www.spokesman.com/grids/2022/jun/28/wa-congress-5-ontheissues-2022/ Supports Roe
Hill, Tartisha Texas5DOn the Candidate's official campaign website, it states, "Climate change is the single most important issue of our lifetime. It is the existential threat to humankind that Washington has, for far too long, kicked down the road. I support passing the Green New deal because, in order to solve an extreme crisis, we need a bold solution. There is no “middle of the road” when it comes to the future of our planet." Candidate Tartisha Hill understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue.100Candidate Tartisha Hill has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://tartishahillforcongress.com Supports Roe
Hill, Tony Florida4DCandidate Tony Hills does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Tony Hills has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75 Unclear on Roe
Hilliard, Jerry Michigan2DCandidate Jerry Hilliard understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states "If WE do not address Climate Change immediately, the temperature will continue to rise above normal. We will then see more glaciers melting, more forest fires, and more devastating consequences from our blatant disrespect for our planet. I pledge to work alongside the Nation’s top environmental experts from our 2nd Congressional District and nationally recognized experts to combat climate change. My main policy agenda will be to block all subsidies to any corporation that is not a net positive in their impact on the environment."75Candidate Jerry Hilliard has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://jerryhilliard.com/whats-at-stake/Supports Roe
Hines, BoNorth Carolina13RCandidate Bo Hines does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Candidate Bo Hines has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://secure.winred.com/bo-hines-for-congress/mm_splash_petition_prolife_090921Opposes Roe
Hodge, Jevin Arizona1DCandidate Jevin Hodge understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states "Climate change is an existential threat to our planet. It can also be a huge opportunity for Arizona to lead the way in developing clean energy sources, especially solar. We must recommit to the Paris Climate Accords and establish American leadership in developing the next generation of energy independence...We must achieve net-zero carbon emissions by 2050 at the latest. I will be a leader for pro-climate, pro-market policy solutions to achieve that goal." In a July 2022 Instagram post, Candidate Hodge states "When I am in congress, I will fight every single day for climate action, environmental justice, and clean energy jobs in #AZ01."100Candidate Jevin Hodge has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.jevinhodge.com/issues/ https://www.instagram.com/p/Cf4ePrFPns-/?hl=en https://www.instagram.com/p/CfMaXqpr1bO/?hl=en https://twitter.com/JevinHodge/status/1574821931932684303 Supports Roe
Hodges, MonteArkansas1DDoes not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75 Unclear Position on Roe
Holden, Steven New York24DCandidate Steven Holden agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.On his official campaign website, Candidate Holden states, "From Lake Ontario to the Finger Lakes, water is the lifeblood of our district for farms, forests, and fishing. Landfills need to be safe, with oversight. I will fight to keep our lands and lakes safe and clean." 50Candidate Steven Holden has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5050https://www.nystevenholden.com/platformSupports Roe
Hollister, Bob Pennsylvania11DCandidate Bob Hollister agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, the candidate states "Protection of the environment and addressing climate issues while maintaining highly skilled trade jobs, creating new, high paying jobs, and restoring our middle class," as one of his priorities. 50Candidate Bob Hollister has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://www.hollisterforcongress.com/issues https://twitter.com/Hollister4PA/status/1540344712615313408?cxt=HHwWgICysdzWs-AqAAAASupports Roe
Holloway, LaShonda Florida 4DCandidate LaShonda Holloway does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Candidate LaShonda Holloway has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://twitter.com/Lj4CONGRESS/status/1568232443391496192Supports Roe
Holmes, Michelle Garcia New Mexico1RCandidate Michelle Garcia Holmes agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. From a 2022 interview with the Albuquerque Journal, when asked about climate change, the candidate stated "The U.S. leads the world in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. I support advancing energy by utilizing scientific methods, we can create new technologies and new streams of energy to balance our needs. As a global problem; we must encourage other nations to be more aggressive in protecting the environment as well."50Candidate Michelle Garcia Holmes has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://www.abqjournal.com/2497468/qa-1st-congressional-district-republican-candidate-michelle-garcia-holmes.html https://twitter.com/GarciaHolmes4NM/status/1540422084320706560Opposes Roe
Houchin, ErinIndiana9RCandidate Erin Houchin does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Candidate Erin Houchin has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.erinhouchin.com/about/Opposes Roe
Houlahan, Stephen California 48DCandidate Stephen Houlahan understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate writes "...the market is moving away from fossil fuels – coal fired power plants are closing left and right, the price of solar and wind power is dropping every day, and if we don’t jump on this train, it’s going to leave without us (with China at the helm). California can be the global leader in solar energy. Early investments here can lead to huge returns. As a clean energy champion, I led the way to establish Community Choice Aggregation (CCA) in California’s 48th." In a 2021 tweet, Candidate Houlahan wrote "We need national and international climate action and we need it now. That's why I'm running for Congress in 2022!"100Candidate Stephen Houlahan has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://electhoulahan.com/on-the-issues/ https://twitter.com/electhoulahan/status/1454570938230616073 https://mobile.twitter.com/electhoulahan/status/1545114950611349505Supports Roe
Hoyle, ValOregon4DCandidate Val Hoyle understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, the candidate states "Climate change and environmental degradation isn’t a future threat: it is an immediate emergency that we are experiencing today in the form of wildfires, extreme heat, drought, contaminated water, and more. In the legislature, Val helped expand Oregon’s Clean Fuels program to reduce carbon emissions, worked to move Oregon off of coal power, and increased renewable energy standards for utilities. In Congress, she will work to reestablish the United States as a global leader in addressing climate change, fight for clean air and water, and protect Oregon’s natural treasures. Val’s plan to tackle the climate crisis includes: Moving America to a 100% Clean Electricity standard. Fighting for a just transition to a renewable energy future that provides good jobs for Oregonians and protects families from high energy costs. Halting new fossil fuel leasing on our federal public lands. Pushing for the federal investments necessary to make Oregon a leader in renewable energy generation."100Candidate Val Hoyle has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://valhoyle.com/priorities/Supports Roe
Huffman, Scott North Carolina8DCandidate Scott Huffman understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states "we must break our addiction to fossil fuels or we'll destroy our planet & children's future. We have the ability to make 80% of our energy use clean within a decade. This means developing more solar & wind power systems, among other infrastructure. I will fight to: Make electric vehicles more affordable for working families."75Candidate Scott Huffman has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.scotthuffman.com/issues.html https://twitter.com/HuffmanForNC/status/1525192914191716356Supports Roe
Hundley, Evangeline South Carolina5DCandidate Evangeline Hundley understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, the candidate states "Global warming is real. Climate change is happening, like it or not. We must enact the legislation that is in the Democratic House passed Build Back Better plan that reduces gas house emissions and lessens greatly our dependance on fossil fuels. This can start our transition to 100% clean energy, create more than 10 million new, green jobs, and commits us to ending environmental injustice too. I will be a vote for the Green New Deal. It is past time to take bold actions. And we need to act now before it’s too late."100Candidate Evangeline Hundley has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.ehundleyforcongress.com/issues/Supports Roe
Hunt, TreyTexas12DCandidate Trey Hunt does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Trey Hunt has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://twitter.com/VoteHunt2022/status/1555560350979952642Supports Roe
Hunt, WesleyTexas38DCandidate Wesley Hunt does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels- he does not explicitly state his disbelief in climate change, but he makes his apathy towards climate action clear. On his campaign website, Candidate Wesely Hunt states that "The reality is that our country would look like something out of the Flintstones if Biden eliminated oil and gas...This energy crisis was self-inflicted and there will be no resolution until Biden and his radical allies step away from their fantasy of zero carbon emissions by the next decade," referring to the rising prices in gas due to the war in Ukraine and lack of domestic energy production. He seems more fixated on the idea of American energy independence by drilling for oil rather than switching to clean energy methods. 25The Green New Deal encompasses multiple policies to tackle climate change and reach net, one of them being a carbon fee. On his campaign website, Candidate Wesely Hunt makes his disapproval for the Green New Deal evident: "Democrats are married to the Green New Deal, and will say anything, besides the truth, to pass the blame for record energy prices. Joe Biden and Jen Psaki’s current fairytale is that oil and gas companies are price gouging to line their greedy pockets." It is clear that he would not be in favor of holding corporations responsible for their emissions by employing a tax on carbon. Candidate Wesely Hunt makes public statements, advocates or votes against putting a U.S. fee on carbon.021.25https://www.houstonchronicle.com/opinion/endorsements/article/Wesley-Hunt-GOP-primary-Congress-16839916.php https://wesleyfortexas.com/an-open-letter-to-joe-biden-the-war-on-american-energy-is-killing-the-middle-class/ https://wesleyfortexas.com/wesley-on-the-issues/ https://www.foxnews.com/media/wesley-hunt-blasts-kamala-harris-comparing-end-roe-v-wade-slavery-strawman-argumentOpposes Roe
Ivey, Glenn Maryland4DCandidate Glenn Ivey understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states "Increased severe weather events are only one indication of the effects of the changing climate caused by the use of fossil fuels...Fundamental changes are required..That is why I support the concept of the Green New Deal...We should move as quickly as possible to generate virtually all our nation’s electricity from renewable and zero-emission power sources, and replace fossil fuels as quickly as possible. The power grid needs to be updated, digitized, and hardened; buildings need to be retrofitted for energy efficiency; and new construction should be mandated to meet high-efficiency standards. We also need to upgrade our public transportation systems and rails, and move to all-electric vehicles."100Candidate Glenn Ivey has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5092.5https://glennivey.com/prioritiesSupports Roe
Jackson, JeffNorth Carolina14DCandidate Jeff Jackson understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states "to start, we should approach climate change with a sense of urgency and confidence...So how do we do that? What are the absolutely essential tasks? 1. Decarbonize our sources of electricity 2. Electrify as much of the economy as possible 3. Aggressively reduce methane emissions 4. Enlist the agricultural community as allies 5.Scale-up R&D to speed-up the entire process." Candidate Jackson also says "right now, we’re importing natural gas and coal from other states instead of building on the renewable potential we have here at home. We have the solar infrastructure, the rivers for hydroelectric, the capacity for offshore wind development, as well as untapped potential for wind in the western part of the state – all ready to drastically scale up our renewable energy production."100Candidate Jeff Jackson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.jeffjacksonnc.com/climate https://www.jeffjacksonnc.com/jeffs-record#climate-action https://twitter.com/JeffJacksonNC/status/1541461882120409090Supports Roe
Jackson, Jonathan Illinois1DCandidate Jonathan Jackson understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states "protecting the environment for generations to come must be more of a priority. Climate change is real and the climate crisis is affecting everyone but will have devastating effects on the health, economic opportunity and fundamental rights of children who deserve better."75Candidate Jackson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://jonathanjacksonforcongress.com/issues/environmental-justice/ https://twitter.com/CongressJackson/status/1540385431027519488Supports Roe
Jacobs, Matt California26RCandidate Matt Jacobs does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Matt Jacobs has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://mattjacobsforcongress.com/principles/Unclear on Roe
James, John Michigan10RCandidate John James does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2022 tweet, the candidate stated "Our gas prices aren’t rising because of Putin. Our gas prices are rising because of socialist Green New Deal policies that sacrificed our energy independence."25Candidate John James has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://twitter.com/JohnJamesMI/status/1509873977824628764?s=20&t=YXaTGh_RDk6wGrcgewfpvQ https://www.mlive.com/public-interest/2019/11/michigan-democrats-hit-john-james-for-anti-abortion-comments.htmlOpposes Roe
Jaye, Brian Michigan9DCandidate Brian Jaye understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states "I will make sure anyone guilty of corporate polluting suffers consequences. I will also work with experts to make sure climate change is stopped in it's tracks. I fully support the Green New Deal, the fight against utilizing fossil fuels as a source for energy in America to other renewable and sustainable energy sources. The Green New Deal will create new green energy jobs within the District, and the United States. I will work hard to make sure our county continues to stay energy independent."75Candidate Brian Jaye has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.brianjayeformichigan.com/issuesSupports Roe
Jefferson, JrmarTexas 1DCandidate Jrmar Jefferson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Candidate Jrmar Jefferson has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75http://www.jeffersonforcongress.comUnclear on Roe
Jenkins, Matthew New Jersey4DCandidate Matthew Jenkins understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue. On his official campaign website, Candidate Jenkins states, "America has a once-in-a-generation opportunity to invest in our collective climate future." His objectives include-investing in clean transportation, infrastructure, and wind energy in NJ, and working towards achieving the Department of Energy's carbon emissions reduction goal by 2035.100Candidate Matthew Jenkins has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://mattjenkinsforcongress.com/issues/ Supports Roe
Johnson, LizGeorgia 12DCandidate Liz Johnson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Liz Johnson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.lizjohnsonforus.com/meet-liz-johnson https://twitter.com/lizjohnsonforus/status/1540447262417080326Supports Roe
Johnson-Green, Tabitha Georgia10DCandidate Tabitha Johnson-Green understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, the candidate states " Climate change is a real issue with real costs that should no longer be ignored. I support transitioning the United States to a fossil fuel free, 100% renewable energy system and fully modernized electrical grid." Later on, Candidate Johnson-Green writes "The effects of lax environmental regulations are life-threatening and especially detrimental to low-income communities, furthering the cycle of poor health and poverty."100Candidate Tabitha Johnson Green has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.tabithaforcongress.com/climate-changeUnclear on Roe
Jones Jr., Herbert Virginia1DOn his official campaign website, Candidate Herbert Jones Jr. states, "I want my grandchildren and their children to grow up in a habitable and safe environment. We will consume most, if not all, mineable fossil fuels by the end of this century. It is essential that we invest in clean energy to power our future. We can encourage this by providing tax incentives for clean energy companies and revoking the tax breaks that the fossil fuel industry benefits from." Candidate Jones understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue.100 Candidate Herbert Jones Jr. has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://herbjonesforvirginia.com/priorities/ https://twitter.com/herb4virginia/status/1552410348656934913?cxt=HHwWgoCylZa_oosrAAAASupports Roe
Jones, Andrew Missouri1RCandidate Andrew Jones does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Candidate Andrew Jones has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5028.75https://www.andrewjonesforcongress.com/issuesOpposes Roe
Jones, Kermit California 3DCandidate Dr. Kermit Jones understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states "climate change is a challenge we must rise to, and an opportunity we can’t pass up. With the drought and fires getting worse every year, we see the devastating impacts of climate change every day in California." In a questionnaire with Ballotpedia, Candidate Dr. Jones wrote that "the climate crisis is at our doorstep. In Congress, I'll fight to combat climate change while creating millions of high-quality jobs by investing in American-made clean energy."100Candidate Dr. Kermit Jones has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.kermitjonesforcongress.com/what-i-believe https://ballotpedia.org/Kermit_Jones https://twitter.com/DrKermitJones/status/1540355139126497280Supports Roe
Jones, Laura Texas8DIn a 2022 tweet, Candidate Laura Jones posted an image of a YaleClimateComm survey that showed that "61% of Americans think that increasing production of clean energy in the US will produce more new jobs than will increasing fossil fuel production." She captioned the tweet, saying, the "US needs to increase #cleanenergy and not #FossilFuel production." Candidate Laura Jones understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue.100Candidate Laura Jones has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://twitter.com/CongressLaura/status/1555317273069584384 https://www.laurajonesforcongress.com/my-policies https://twitter.com/CongressLaura/status/1556325075770548226Supports Roe
Jones, Paul California44RCandidate Paul Jones does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Answering a question from League of Women Voters of California, the candidate stated "cleaner burning fossil fuels" as 'legislation to reduce American greenhouse gas production.' Candidate Jones also said "we are far from being ready for the supposed Green New Deal as there isn't even a practical infrastructure, nor an public education to understand the non-recyclable components of solar panels and wind turbines, as of 2022 the United States has the cleanest air quality in the world, the green new deal with not have any effect based on the solar and wind turbine effects. America cannot control China, India etc. as the biggest polluters in the world, we can invent ways to burn cleaner with fossil fuels including exporting cleaner fuel to other countries."25Candidate Paul Jones has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://votersedge.org/en/ca/ballot/election/2022-06-07/u.s.-house-of-representatives-district-44/paul-jonesUnclear on Roe
Jones, Rebekah Florida1DOn her official campaign website, Candidate Jones states, "As a scientist who has spent more than a decade studying the Earth, its systems, and the friction between the human and natural worlds, the environment will be one of my focus areas. Environmental issues encompass a wide range of issues, from addressing climate change and comprehensive infrastructure funding, to localized problems like protecting timber forests from the Southern pine beetle and emergency planning and response." Candidate Rebekah Jones understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue.100Candidate Rebekah Jones has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://www.rebekahjonescampaign.com/issuesUnclear on Roe
Jones, Rick Utah1DOn the candidate's official campaign website, it states "Climate change needs to be a priority as it affects our quality of life for us and future generations." Candidate Rick Jones understands the importance of climate action, but as a top priority issue.75Candidate Rick Jones has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5071.25https://www.electrickjones.com/work-1/project-three-96kst Unclear on Roe
Jordan, Jamie Texas22DCandidate Jamie Jordan does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Jamie Jordan has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee.5028.75 Unclear on Roe
Josephson, Gary Ohio15DCandidate Gary Josephson agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, the candidate states "Rebuild U.S. industry. • private sector green jobs"50Candidate Gary Josephson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://www.josephson4rep.org/issuesUnclear on Roe
Joy, Liz New York 20RCandidate Liz Joy does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels25Candidate Liz Joy has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://joyfornewyork.com/explore-issues/Opposes Roe
Judge, James Florida14ROn his official campaign website, Candidate Judge responded to a various set of questions presented by the Tampa Bay Times. When asked, "What role should the federal government play in confronting the climate crisis and sea level rise?", he responded, saying, "None...“climate crisis” is a term loved by the media, as it helps to sell newspapers and get eyeballs on television, which results in ratings and higher advertising prices. Using terms like “climate crisis” is purely hyperbolic, and it’s truly a disservice to your readership. Plenty of scientists disagree with climate change or the alarms that claim that there is a crisis. The earth’s climate changes over time and it has done so throughout history with glacial periods and interglacial periods occurring naturally." Candidate James Judge disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 0Candidate James Judge has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 507.5https://judgeforcongress.com/platform-and-qa/ Unclear on Roe
Junge, Paul Michigan8RCandidate Paul Junge agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, the candidate states "I support an all-of-the-above approach to meet our energy needs to ensure America remains energy independent. In order to reduce carbon emissions, we must encourage the private sector to continue innovating renewable energy sources, including hydropower, nuclear, wind, and solar...By encouraging research and development of new technologies that reduce emissions and grow our economy, we can ensure Michigan families continue to have access to clean, reliable, and affordable energy."50Candidate Paul Junge has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5050https://pauljunge.com/issues/Opposes Roe
Kale, Andrea Florida17DOn the Candidate's official Ballotpedia profile, she stated, "I am not an Environmental Specialist either but I would have to be asleep not see the damage Climate Change has done to the U.S. and our Planet. Hotter temperatures, more severe and frequent storms causing flooding destroying communities and taking lives, drought, more frequent wildfires destroying millions of acres of land and killing wildlife, global temperature increases from human-made greenhouse gases just to name a few effects of the Climate Crisis." Candidate Andrea Kale understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue.100Candidate Andrea Kale has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee.5092.5https://floridapolitics.com/archives/553093-andrea-doria-kale-to-challenge-greg-steube-on-a-womans-right-to-choose/ https://ballotpedia.org/Andrea_Doria_KaleSupports Roe
Kamlager, Sydney California 37DFrom The Davis Vanguard in 2022, "a bill package for the 2022 Legislative Session was released this week by Los Angeles Senator Sydney Kamlager (D-Los Angeles) with goals “to stop criminalizing poverty and start prioritizing economic stability." The Kamlager legislative package also includes two bills aimed at fighting climate change and encouraging sustainability."100Candidate Sydney Kamlager publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. On her campaign website, the candidate states she "is focused on: A Green New Deal and immediate climate action." 100100https://sydneykamlager.com/accomplishments/ https://www.davisvanguard.org/2022/02/ca-lawmaker-announces-bill-package-with-goals-ranging-from-criminal-justice-to-climate-change-reform/ https://twitter.com/sydneykamlager/status/1541551297236570114Supports Roe
Kean Jr., Thomas New Jersey 7RCandidate Thomas Kean Jr. agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an opinion special for 'North Jersey,' Candidate Kean Jr. talks about the importance of bipartisan co-operation and efforts to combat climate change. He states, "I have long been passionate about protecting the environment...climate change is a battle we can’t wait to fight. I believe that the best solutions to our greatest challenges are found when we put partisan politics aside and work together towards a common goal. Our fight to combat climate change is no exception. There is a large middle ground here; let’s work together and put a healthier planet first." However, a 2022 article from the 'NJ Spotlight News' challenges this: it states, "In his past four years in the state Senate, Kean voted against bills to establish a renewable solar energy certificate program, authorize offshore-swind projects, require solar panels on new warehouses and require New Jersey to join the U.S. Climate Alliance and uphold the Paris climate accord for lowering greenhouse-gas emissions." 50Candidate Thomas Kean Jr. has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5050https://www.northjersey.com/story/opinion/2020/09/03/tom-kean-jr-climate-change-demands-bipartisan-combat/5702903002/ https://www.njspotlightnews.org/2022/09/tom-malinowski-tom-kean-jr-7th-congressional-district-democrat-republican-incumbent-social-justice-gun-rights-abortion-climate-change-voting-elections-inflation-economy/ Opposes Roe
Kelly, Odessa Tennessee7DOn the candidate official campaign website, it states, "The climate crisis is already damaging communities like our own and we must act boldly to combat its devastating impacts. While our planet suffers and working-class communities battle pollution-related diagnoses like asthma, corporations and those at the top continue to pollute our water and air, and profit off our suffering. It’s time to cut a new deal for America’s working and middle class — one that ensures everyone shares in the dream of shared American prosperity." Candidate Odessa Kelly understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue.100Candidate Odessa Kelly has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://odessaforcongress.com/gnd/ https://twitter.com/OdessaKellyTN/status/1551266212566401027Supports Roe
Kent, Joe Washington 3RCandidate Joe Kent does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On the candidate's official campaign website, it states, "energy independence is non-negotiable and essential to securing our sovereignty. I will pursue an all-of-the-above strategy that utilizes our natural gas and oil reserves while accelerating the development of clean and safe breakthrough nuclear reactor technology." 25Candidate Joe Kent has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://joekentforcongress.com/issues/Opposes Roe
Kiggans, Jen Virginia2RCandidate Jen Kiggans does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Jen Kiggans has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://jenforcongress.com/about/ https://jenforcongress.com/our-priorities/Opposes Roe
Kilboy, Matt Ohio14DCandidate Matt Kilboy agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, the candidate states "We are already behind the curve when it comes to addressing climate change. We are seeing more severe weather more frequently, and our infrastructure in place to manage the effects of those changes is grossly inadequate and in desperate need of repair. As your Congressman, I will: Improve public transportation in suburban and rural areas."50Candidate Matt Kilboy has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://www.kilboy4ohio.com/issues#page-section-61f3bac323d9271968e313e1 https://twitter.com/mattkilboy/status/1554100434540937216Supports Roe
Kiley, Kevin California3RCandidate Kevin Kiley does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Kevin Kiley has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S fee on carbon.5028.75https://electkevinkiley.com/about/ http://www.californiaprolife.org/2022-endorsements/Opposes Roe
Kiley, Sue New Jersey 6RCandidate Sue Kiley does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Sue Kiley has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75 Unclear on Roe
Kim, David California34DCandidate David Kim understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states "despite knowing these harmful consequences of climate change for decades, the dirty energy industry runs climate disinformation campaigns, lobbies to preserve tax breaks and subsidies, and pours money into political campaigns — all for the sake of maximizing profits at the expense of people and the environment. Studies have shown that failing to take the necessary climate action now will actually cost us far more than taking climate action now. I’m running for Congress because we need bold leadership to break free from dirty energy pushed by corporations and to heal our communities and the planet."100Candidate David Kim has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.davidkimforca.com/green-new-deal-environmental-justice/ https://twitter.com/DavidKimForCA/status/1541157472416608256Supports Roe
King, Esther Joy Illinois17RCandidate Esther Joy King does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Esther Joy King has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://estherforcongress.com/priorities/Opposes Roe
King, Paul New York5R Candidate Paul King understands the importance of climate action, but not as a top priority issue. On the his official campaign website, Candidate King states, "It is indisputable that global temperatures and sea levels are rising. While good scientists can disagree over how much impact human activity has on these phenomena, it is logical for humans to both reduce potentially harmful activities and research solutions that would remove greenhouse gases from our atmosphere. The second strategy is an essential “moonshot.” The first strategy is a leap of faith. However, it is a leap worth making if every industrial country makes an equal effort. It is pointless for the United States to take radical action if China, India, etc. continue to pollute at current or increasing rates. Such feel-good strategies are not supported by science. They would devastate our economy without saving the planet. Paul’s policies to turn the tide on climate change and to protect our coastal infrastructure will be posted here in September."75Candidate Paul King has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5071.25https://paulkingforcongress.com Unclear Position on Roe
Kirkmeyer, Barbara Colorado8RCandidate Barbara Kirkmeyer disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2022 interview with the Colorado Sun, the candidate stated "the climate is always changing, and the Earth has been gradually warming since the Little Ice Age. To what extent any warming is a result of man-caused activity is unknown.'"0Candidate Barbara Kirkmeyer has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S fee on carbon.507.5https://coloradosun.com/2022/06/07/colorado-8th-congressional-district-republicans-issues/ https://www.kirkmeyerforcongress.com/conservative-fighterOpposes Roe
Kistner, Tyler Minnesota 2RIn a 2020 debate against his opponent, incumbent Angie Craig, Candidate Kistner gave his view on climate change legislation- "You’re going to hear everyone say Republicans are against climate change and we don’t believe in science, but it’s completely false. I believe in the science and I see the climate is changing, but I’m not here to sacrifice the American economy on the altar of climate change.” Candidate Tyler Kistner agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.50Candidate Tyler Kistner has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5050https://minnesotareformer.com/briefs/rep-angie-craig-and-gop-challenger-tyler-kistner-clash-in-first-debate-on-health-care-climate-change/ https://www.mprnews.org/story/2020/09/22/voter-guide-where-the-2nd-district-candidates-stand-on-the-issues#h3_abortion Opposes Roe
Klussmann, DuncanTexas38DCandidate Duncan Klussmann does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Candidate Duncan Klussmann has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://duncanfortexas.com/the-issues/ Supports Roe
Krause, Elizabeth Nevada2DIn a 2022 tweet which announced that the smoke from the Mosquito Fire was spreading rapidly to faraway areas, Candidate Krause wrote, "Once again, climate change is real and only we can fix it. My opponent regularly votes against helping the environment. This is a result of those votes." Candidate Elizabeth Krause understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue.100 Candidate Elizabeth Krause has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://mobile.twitter.com/mercedes4nevada/status/1569172725322907648 https://mobile.twitter.com/mercedes4nevada/status/1571547203659010048Supports Roe
Kreiselmaier, Elizabeth Washington6RCandidate Elizabeth Kreiselmaier does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2022 tweet discussing the repercussion of sanctioning on Russia, Candidate Kreiselmaier stated, "while Russia needs to be hit with sanctions, it's also true that Russia’s war on Ukraine proves the U.S. must be energy-independent. Biden, Kilmer & their progressive allies must immediately open federal lands to oil and gas drilling & get the Keystone XL Pipeline flowing again." However, she has also previously voiced her support for investing in renewable energy sources.25Candidate Elizabeth Kreiselmaier has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://twitter.com/cleanupthehouse/status/1498788080358100993 https://twitter.com/cleanupthehouse/status/1550179816162308096Opposes Roe
Kress, Conrad Hawaii 1ROn his official campaign website, Candidate Kress states, "Hawaii must protect our ocean and our culture of; surfing, paddling, kiting, fishing, boating, and tourism for future generations. At the same time, we must have low cost energy so we can all afford to continue to live here. Many people believe that respecting the environment, and caring about climate change are incompatible with the use of fossil fuels, and other low cost energy sources. This is simply not true. It is a narrative pushed by the “clean energy” lobby, and supported by retired politicians making millions of dollars telling the rest of us that the only way to save the planet is to reduce carbon emissions to zero." Candidate Conrad Kress does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Conrad Kress has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://conradkressforhawaii.com/energy/ Unclear on Roe
Kumar, Rishi California16DCandidate Rishi Kumar understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states "climate change is the most urgent issue of our time. The science is clear: global temperatures continue to rise, and the world is already experiencing more intense hurricanes, deadly heat waves, wildfires, and droughts." Candidate Kumar also writes "we can’t afford to wait — we must take immediate, bold action to limit the effects of climate change. The United States must lead the world in reaching net-zero emissions by 2035. We must promote and create jobs in a clean-energy economy and build green-energy infrastructure."100Candidate Rishi Kumar has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5092.5https://rishikumar.com/priorities--climate-change https://rishikumar.com/priorities--pro-choiceSupports Roe
Lake, Jeanine LeeIndiana 5DCandidate Jeanine Lee Lake understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, the candidate states "Democrats know that combatting the existential threat of the climate crisis is a public health decision to safeguard our clean air and clean water; an economic decision to create jobs and ensure America’s global preeminence in green technology; a national security decision to prevent global instability; and a moral decision to be good stewards of God’s creation."100Candidate Jeanine Lee Lake has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://jeannineleelakeforcongress.com/issues https://www.wthr.com/article/news/local/indiana-congressional-candidate-jeannine-lee-lake-abortion-scotus-decision-to-overturn-roe-v-wade/531-ca2bf429-aca8-4555-8040-267d1c893e9bSupports Roe
LaLota, Nick New York1RCandidate Nick LaLota does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Nick LaLota has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://www.nicklalota.com/pro-life-vs-pro-choiceOpposes Roe
Landsman, Greg Ohio1DCandidate Greg Landsman understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states "Greg is committed to making sure the world we pass down to his children and ours is one that is sustainable, safe, and equitable. On City Council, Greg pushed to strengthen the Green Cincinnati Plan, a historic environmental justice ordinance that placed Cincinnati at the forefront of the environmental policy movement. He also supported the largest municipally-led solar project in America...In Congress, he’ll fight to...hold polluters accountable for damages that disproportionately impact our already marginalized communities."100Candidate Greg Landsman has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.landsmanforcongress.com/the-issuesSupports Roe
Lange, Paul Illinois15DCandidate Paul Lange does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Paul Lange has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5028.75https://paullange2215.com/#action https://spectrumlocalnews.com/mo/st-louis/news/2022/07/06/lange-touts-big-ideas-in-uphill-congressional-race-against-u-s--rep--mary-miller-Supports Roe
Langworthy, Nick New York23RIn a 2022 tweet, Candidate Langworthy writes, "High energy prices are the result of the Biden-Pelosi-Hochul radical climate agenda. They are trying to nationalize CA's energy policy and it spells DISASTER for NY. We need safe, affordable energy & that will be one of my top priorities." While he does not outrightly disagree with the existence of climate change, his hostile tone and language towards climate change policy speak to his indifference and disbelief in climate change. In a an interview for '2 On Your Side' dated nearly a month before, however, Candidate Nick has a slightly different take. When asked if he was an environmentalist, he stated, "absolutely, I want the cleanest environmental situation that we could have but we also have to balance that with progress and jobs and opportunities." Candidate Nick Langworthy does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Nick Langworthy has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://twitter.com/NickLangworthy/status/1574490875404730370 https://www.wgrz.com/article/news/politics/nick-langworthy-sits-down-for-1-on-1-interview/71-cf4940f4-9bfa-49d2-a0fb-6e6d35878702 Opposes Roe
Larkin, Matt Washington8RCandidate Matt Larkin agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On the 'Jason Rantz show,' Candidate Matt Larkin was asked, "do you view climate change as an [existential threat]." The Candidate responded, saying, "I've got four little kids, and I want to pass them on an environment that we're all proud of...but it's not the priority...people are hurting right now, and it's not because of a warming environment- it because they can't fill their gas tank, they can't afford groceries, they don't feel safe going to their local park. These are the issues people care about. As much as the Democrats want to make the environment and climate change the top issue, it's just not." 50Candidate Matt Larkin has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5050https://omny.fm/shows/the-jason-rantz-show/matt-larkin-wa-08#description https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iu3kFZm7TT0 Opposes Roe
Larkins, Juddson South Carolina2DCandidate Juddson Larkins understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states "To combat climate change and meet our commitment to net-zero emissions no later than 2050, we need to eliminate fossil fuel usage by the mid-2040s while maintaining our energy independence and creating a seamless transition from clean energy sources. Possible Solutions: Creating a green energy jobs ecosystem that will bring thousands of well-paying jobs to the Midlands and all of South Carolina." Candidate Larkins also writes "There is so much more to talk about as it relates to climate change. This is just my plan for offshore drilling. I plan to address additional climate change concerns with additional platform releases in the coming months." In a 2021 tweet, the candidate said "Folks, we have to protect our planet. Billions in damages every year and rising due to Climate Change related weather disasters. We can’t ignore this problem, only we can solve it. This should be a bipartisan effort. #JuddforSC"75Candidate Larkins has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://juddlarkins.com/environment https://twitter.com/JuddForCongress/status/1474024293398982670 https://juddlarkins.com/reproductiverightsSupports Roe
Lauf, Catalina Illinois11RCandidate Catalina Lauf disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to the Daily Herald, in a 2022 questionnaire completed by the candidate, "Lauf questioned whether mankind has affected the global climate, too. "I'd like to see more evidence and data to see human's role in causing 'climate change' before betting our entire economy on ridiculous policies like the Green New Deal," she wrote in her questionnaire."0Candidate Catalina Lauf has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://www.dailyherald.com/news/20220605/11th-district-gop-candidates-divided-on-humans-climate-impact https://www.catalinaforcongress.com/issuesOpposes Roe
Lawler, Michael New York17RCandidate Micheal Lawler agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On the candidate's official campaign website, it states, "as a strong proponent of expanded domestic energy production, including clean natural gas, Mike believes America must pursue an “all-of-the-above” energy policy that strikes a balance between a push for renewable and alternative energies, with the reality that pie-in-the-sky promises to end the use of all fossil fuels within the next 10-15 years threaten to drive energy costs even higher, representing a regressive tax on those who can least afford it at a time when inflation is surging to its highest levels in 40 years." 50Candidate Micheal Lawler has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5050https://www.lawlerforcongress.com/issues/ Unclear on Roe
Lawson, Al Florida2DCandidate Al Lawson understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. From the League of Conservation Voters, the candidate states " I will aggressively support policies to address climate change." On his campaign website, Candidate Lawson also wrote that he "Sponsored the Climate Action Now Act to fight for a clean and healthy environment, clean energy jobs and promote environmental justice."100Candidate Al Lawson publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. Candidate Lawson is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments.100100https://www.lcv.org/environmental-facebook/al-lawson/ https://www.allawson.com/a-protecting-our-environment/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22Florida%22%7D https://lawson.house.gov/media/press-releases/-us-rep-lawson-statement-on-the-supreme-court-overturning-roe-v-wade-Supports Roe
Lazor, Larry Connecticut 1RCandidate Dr. Larry Lazor does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Dr. Larry Lazor has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://lazorforcongress.com/larrys-priorities/ https://www.courant.com/opinion/op-ed/hc-op-lazor-roe-republican-abortion-20220624-nkt3mur2qbfcjh6x6i3esmjley-story.html https://www.stamfordadvocate.com/columnist/article/Haar-Lazor-Larson-Republican-party-reform-17505945.php?src=sthppromostripSupports Roe
Leavitt, KarolineNew Hampshire1RKaroline Leavitt does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a debate, she stated "Leavitt said she believes we face environmental challenges but opposes federal taxes to fight global warming, saying efforts can be made at the “state and local level.” She said she would support more domestic energy production from fossil fuels."25Karoline Leavitt has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://indepthnh.org/2022/10/20/pappas-and-leavitt-disagree-on-almost-everything-at-conway-debate/ https://www.karolineforcongress.com/let-s-fightOpposes Roe
Lee, Laurel Florida15RCandidate Laurel Lee does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Laurel Lee has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee.5028.75https://votelaurel.com/the-issues/Opposes Roe
Lee, SummerPennsylvania12DCandidate Summer Lee understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, the candidate writes "In Congress I will fight for a Green New Deal to transition to a 100% clean and renewable energy economy. This includes ending fracking, which poses a disproportionate threat to communities like ours. The Green New Deal centers frontline and marginalized communities facing the brunt of environmental racism - communities with poisoned water, high rates of asthma, etc - communities like ours." In a 2022 interview with Teen Vogue, Candidate Lee states "There is no future in fossil fuels, not for our planet and not for any industry. No matter how much planet-destroying drilling and fracking you do, those fossil fuels will run out. We can either be leaders in the movement toward 100% renewable energy, pass a Green New Deal, and create millions of green union jobs and infrastructure investment here — or we can be left behind again."100Candidate Summer Lee agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.5092.5https://summerforpa.com/issues/ https://www.teenvogue.com/story/summer-lee-congress-pennsylvania-interviewSupports Roe
Lee, Tyler North Carolina12RCandidate Tyler Lee does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Tyler Lee has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://twitter.com/votetylerlee/status/1540383236995661827Opposes Roe
Lehman, MatthewKentucky4DCandidate Matthew Lehman does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, the candidate states "Coal and coal miners have powered Kentucky’s economy and the nation’s growth for over 200 years. But environmental concerns are forcing us to look at the future of energy differently. Kentuckians cannot ignore the future and we need to prepare."25Candidate Matthew Lehman has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://lehman4kentucky.org/matt-on-the-issues/ https://twitter.com/lehman4kentucky/status/1540401179099860995Supports Roe
Leon, Jimmy Texas9RCandidate Jimmy Leon does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Jimmy Leon has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75 Unclear on Roe
Lewis, Jennifer Virginia6DOn the Candidate Lewis' official campaign website, it states, "Jennifer supports reforming FERC, prioritizing clean and renewable energy, rejecting contributions from Dominion Energy and Appalachian Power and other fossil fuel industries. Our priorities should be removing our dependency on fossil fuels and moving towards a clean energy future. Jennifer supports achieving 100% clean and renewable energy by 2050." Jennifer Lewis understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue.100Candidate Lewis has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://www.nvdaily.com/nvdaily/jennifer-lewis-is-democratic-candidate-in-6th-congressional-district/article_58dfdb47-5e0d-5dd1-9e90-ea6e8767666a.html https://www.friendsofjenniferlewis.com/issuesSupports Roe
Linderman, HankKentucky 2DCandidate Hank Linderman understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a 2019 tweet, replying to a tweet about climate change, the candidate wrote "No better place to start than in Kentucky, no better time than now..."75Candidate Hank Linderman publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. According to Vote Smart, the candidate stated "Biodiversity is disappearing, this is a very bad sign of things to come. I will support policies to address #climatechange including ending the use of non bio-degradeable plastics, renewable energy, and a carbon tax. #biodegradeable #RenewableEnergy #renewables #carbontax"10078.75https://twitter.com/hank4ky/status/1174527493228945408 https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/political-courage-test/177886/hank-linderman https://twitter.com/hank4ky/status/1540393816439627776Supports Roe
Lipsman, KarinaVirginia8ROn Candidate Lipsman's official website, she states, "I will push for electric vehicles and renewable energy parts to be made right here in America, ending our reliance on China and other adversarial countries. I support policies promoting clean air, water, and near-zero or zero emissions technologies, but I will never do so at the expense of raising taxes on families in this country, or hurting our businesses." She makes it clear that she supports an 'all of the above strategy' while transitioning to a cleaner economy. Karina Lipsman agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.50On Candidate Lipsman's official website, she states, "Addressing environmental concerns should not mean raising taxes on American families and businesses while the rest of the world continues to operate under business as usual." It is unsure if she is referring to the carbon tax in this statement, but she makes her disapproval of taxes for environmental benefit clear. Karina Lipsman has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5050https://www.karinaforcongress.com/energy-and-environment https://www.karinaforcongress.com/lifeOpposes Roe
Lira, John Texas23DOn the Candidate's official campaign website, he states, "I am committed to making Texas and Texas-23, leaders in the global energy production by expanding investments in clean-energy innovation and technology alongside oil and gas production. Hydraulic Fracking provides great jobs in TX-23 and I will support safer policies like incentivizing the use of recycled water in oil and gas operations that ensures the safety of their workers and of our natural resources." Despite his support for climate action, his desire for an 'all of the above' strategy is not productive to the overarching goal of stopping climate change. Candidate John Lira agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.50Candidate John Lira has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5050https://liraforcongress.com/issues/jobs-energy/ Supports Roe
Logan, George Connecticut 5RCandidate George Logan does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate George Logan has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5028.75https://www.georgeloganforcongress.com/priorities/ https://www.wtnh.com/news/politics/will-abortion-be-a-ballot-box-issue-in-the-5th-district-congressional-race/ https://dccc.org/100-days-without-roe-george-logan-wants-to-make-it-worse/ Opposes Roe
Lorinser, BobMichigan1DCandidate Bob Lorinser understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states "Global temperature increases pose existential threats to our lives. As climate change worsens, human health, livelihood, food security, water supply, and economic growth will be endangered. The United States can address the global climate threats of greenhouse gases while creating stable, good-paying jobs and boosting our economy. It is not one or the other but a win-win. Dr. Lorinser will support initiatives to achieve a 100% clean energy economy and reach net-zero emissions no later than 2050 by working with local, state, regional, and national partners."100Candidate Bob Lorinser publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. On his campaign website, the candidate states "Dr. Bob supports carbon fees that place a monetary price on the "real costs" imposed on our economy by greenhouse emissions and the global warming they cause."100100https://www.votedrbob.com/post/environmental-protection https://www.votedrbob.com/post/women-s-healthcareSupports Roe
Luna, Anna Paulina Florida13ROn Candidate Anna Paulina's official campaign website, it states, "Anna Paulina Luna is determined to ensure our community continues to capitalize on the robust tourism economy. She will fight to protect our beaches, coastlines, and preserve our natural environment, without raising taxes." Candidate Luna Anna Paulina does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels25 As mentioned in the 'position' section for this candidate, she makes it clear that she intends to "preserve our natural environment, without raising taxes." She may be alluding to a carbon tax, among many other things, in this statement. Candidate Luna Anna Paulina has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://www.voteannapaulina.com/platform https://floridapolitics.com/archives/543876-sba-pro-life-america-endorses-anna-paulina-luna-in-cd-13/ Opposes Roe
Luttrell, Morgan Texas8RCandidate Morgan Luttrell does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Morgan Luttrell has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://www.morganluttrell.comOpposes Roe
Lux, Dan Louisiana2ROn his official campaign website, Candidate Luz states, "We need to do everything possible to preserve the purity of our soil, water, oceans, and air for our health today and the survival of the planet tomorrow. We need to implement measures locally, statewide, nationally, and internationally, to undo harmful damage and pollution while taking the time to plan and care for future generations." However, he also makes his support for oil and natural gas industry clear, emphasizing, "I’m a lover of nature and conservationist and will support domestic energy policies including hydropower, nuclear, coal, solar, oil, wind, natural gas, geothermal, and a responsible pursuit of renewables." An 'all of the above' approach to energy production is detrimental to achieving zero net carbon emissions. Candidate Dan Lux agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.50Candidate Dan Lux has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5050https://www.votedlux.com/issues Unclear on Roe
Lynch, Thomas Illinois 2RCandidate Thomas Lynch does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, the candidate states "it's just common sense for our nation and the environment that the United States be the leader in energy production. I believe in renewable energy and I believe I'll see a day when it becomes the number 1 source of energy in this country. But we're not there yet and though it gets a little closer every year, we need to focus on what we have and continue innovating the renewable energy sector."25Candidate Thomas Lynch has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.electthomaslynch.com/policies https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/political-courage-test/204298/thomas-lynchOpposes Roe
Lynn, Eric Florida 13DOn his official campaign website, Candidate Lynn states, "We face a climate crisis that is as dire as it is preventable. False denials fail because the evidence is obvious and tragic. We continue to witness increasingly larger and more frequent storms and more severe forest fires out west. We must face this crisis head-on and immediately address the ways we are damaging our planet. There is no future if we do not reverse the effects of climate change, protect our wildlife, waterways and ecosystems, and implement greener practices across industry." Candidate Eric Lynn understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue.100Candidate Eric Lynn has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://ericlynnforcongress.com/priorities/Supports Roe
Lyras, Louis Ohio6DCandidate Louis Lyras understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a 2022 Ballotpedia questionnaire, the candidate states "Energy Independence involves much more than simply burning fossil fuels in our country with no regard to our environment - it involves building Nuclear Power Plants, developing solar and wind farms, building hydrogen and electric vehicles - all of these will also produce good paying jobs."75Candidate Louis Lyras has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://ballotpedia.org/Lou_Lyras https://louislyras.com/2022/06/24/roe-vs-wade-overturned-where-are-we-going-with-this/Supports Roe
Madden, Liam Vermont1RCandidate Liam Madden agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his official campaign website, Candidate Madden states, "This is not just a feel-good sentiment. Returning health, diversity and stability to our ecology is a survival imperative. Simply switching our industry and society to renewable fuel sources is: A) not able to support the economic output we expect given the structure of our economy and B) not enough to prevent the likely scenario of ecological systems collapse caused by continued patterns of resource use and waste streams...Healthy ecosystems are the real thing to achieve, carbon emissions are just a clumsy proxy" 50Candidate Liam Madden has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. On his official campaign website, Candidate Madden states, "Carbon emissions are relevant, but not the most important factor in whether our civilization can create a mutually beneficial relationship with the earth. Healthy ecosystems are the real thing to achieve, carbon emissions are just a clumsy proxy." 5050https://rebirthdemocracy.com/new-page-39 https://rebirthdemocracy.com/reproduction https://vtdigger.org/2022/10/05/liam-madden-vermont-congressional-run/Opposes Roe
Magaziner, SethRhode Island2DSeth Magaziner understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, it states, "too many Rhode Islanders are making difficult choices between paying for gas and groceries, while billion-dollar energy companies are making record profits and climate change remains an immediate threat to our way of life."100Magaziner has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://sethmagaziner.com/issue/protecting-the-environment-and-combating-climate-change/ https://sethmagaziner.com/issue/defending-reproductive-rights/Supports Roe
Maher, Michael California21RCandidate Michael Maher does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Michael Maher has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.michaelmaher.comOpposes Roe
Mahmood, Asif California40DCandidate Asif Mahmood understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states "I believe in science, and that climate change is a very real threat to our way of life. I will fight attempts to expand offshore oil drilling in Orange County and protect our beaches so that future generations can enjoy everything our planet has to offer."75Candidate Asif Mahmood has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://drasifmahmood.com/on-the-issues/environment/ https://drasifmahmood.com/on-the-issues/reproductive-rights/Supports Roe
Majewski, J.R. Ohio9RCandidate J.R Majewski disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2022 interview with E&E News, the candidate stated "I haven’t really gotten into the science. I’ve heard from various people, politicians and others. But I like to look into things myself. I think the climate is changing. But is it changing because of the human population, and how big of an impact are we having? I really don’t know. But we should be as responsible as we can be."0Candidate J.R Majewski has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://www.eenews.net/articles/qa-ohio-gop-hopeful-talks-nuclear-qanon-and-scrapping-doe/ https://jrmajewski4congress.com/issues/Opposes Roe
Mallett-Hays, LaurenArkansas3DCandidate Lauren Mallet-Hays does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Mallett-Hays has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.laurenforarkansas.com/priorities https://twitter.com/Lauren4Arkansas/status/1540347069608742914Supports Roe
Mann, Bethany Missouri3DCandidate Bethany Mann understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue. On her official campaign website, Candidate Mann states, "Climate change will impact Missouri’s farmland significantly. We must protect against this environmental threat that shows up as drought, floods, invasive insect and fungal species...We should adopt green initiatives that foster energy efficiency and reduce waste, which will not only create jobs but also save taxpayer dollars. Simple actions like updating building codes, examining power grids, and shifting to purchasing clean energy vehicles can amount to savings for taxpayers. We will also increase energy efficiency by offering financial incentives for meeting high public construction energy standards." 100Candidate Bethany Mann has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://bethanymannforcongress.com/environment/ https://mobile.twitter.com/DeatonForMO/status/1567277697025310721Supports Roe
Mann, Christopher Oregon1RCandidate Christopher Mann does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to the Political Courage Test from Vote Smart, the candidate stated "We are not even close to being able to run on all renewable energy. The current hyper plan will further damage this country and the people that are trying just to stay afloat financially."25Candidate Christopher Mann has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/political-courage-test/202778/christopher-mannOpposes Roe
Maria Montiel, Carmen Texas18RCandidate Carmen Maria Montiel does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Carmen Maria Montiel has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://carmenforcongress.com Unclear on Roe
Markel, Chip Illinois12DCandidate Chip Markel agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, the candidate states "we must have a comprehensive energy plan. Since the 1970s, energy has been a critical issue for many Americans, from gas prices to our carbon footprint. We must act and invest in renewable energy, cancel government subsidies for the Big Oil Companies, and work towards a carbon-neutral footprint."50Candidate Chip Markel has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://chipmarkelforcongress.com/issues/Supports Roe
Marlinga, Carl Michigan10DCandidate Carl Maringa does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Candidate Carl Maringa has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.marlinga4congress.com/projects-3Supports Roe
Marshall, Derek California23DCandidate Derek Marshall understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states "here in California, we already knew this. We’re on the front lines of the climate crisis. Wildfires and droughts have become more and more frequent, with very little hope in sight. We have to get serious about climate change. We can guarantee a better, cleaner, safer future (and present) by passing a Green New Deal. Bringing sustainable industry and public solar and wind projects will not only help protect our communities from further environmental damage, but will bring good high-paying union jobs to every corner of our district and our country."100Candidate Derek Marshall has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.derekmarshallca.com/issues/ https://twitter.com/DerekMarshallCA/status/1541934653602496513Supports Roe
Martilli, Dean Massachusetts 1RCandidate Dean Martilli does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Dean Martilli has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Dean_James_MartilliUnclear on Roe
Martin, Adam Oklahoma1DCandidate Adam Martin agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, the candidate writes "Empower farmers, foresters, and ranchers to address climate change and protect ecosystems."50Candidate Adam Martin has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://www.martinforcongress.com/issuesUnclear on Roe
Martin, Henry Missouri6DOn his official campaign website, Candidate Martin states, "As stated by the Department of Defense, our greatest enemy right now is climate change as is a matter of 100 years or less, with no action, we will have seaports underwater due to a rise in sea levels, we will see an increase in droughts and unfarmable land. We have a responsibility to be good stewards of the planet and as we see technology evolve to enable us to change, we need to change." Candidate Henry Martin understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue.100Candidate Henry Martin has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://henrymartinforcongress.com/issues/ Supports Roe
Martinez Johnson, AlexisNew Mexico3RCandidate Alexis Martinez Johnson agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On her campaign website, the candidate states "Alexis believes we should take an “all of the above” approach to energy. As we continue to produce oil and clean natural gas in the United States, we should also continue to invest in researching effective long-term energy solutions, including solar, wind, hydro, nuclear, and others, as well in carbon reduction technologies necessary to reduce the current build up of greenhouse gases. The free market creates solutions to climate change, not the Green New Deal."50Candidate Alexis Martinez Johnson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://electalexis.com/issues/energy/ https://twitter.com/alexisjohnsonnm/status/1540348664828178432Opposes Roe
Martinez, Daniel California31RCandidate Daniel Martinez agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, the candidate states "if we want a reduction in Greenhouse gases and/or a reduction of dependence on despotic petro-states with horrendous human rights records, we need a long term plan towards energy independence."50Candidate Daniel Martinez has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://danmartinez4congress.com/environmental-policyUnclear Position on Roe
Maryott, Brian California 49RCandidate Brian Maryott agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2022 interview with the San Diego Union Tribune, Candidate Maryott stated "innovation is America’s strong suit and will enable our nation to simultaneously reduce greenhouse gas emissions while promoting economic prosperity."50Candidate Brian Maryott makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a 2022 interview with the San Diego Union Tribune, the candidate stated that "we cannot burden taxpayers and businesses with staggering taxes and overbearing regulation. Instead, we should encourage individuals and businesses to make environmentally friendly decisions through market incentives."042.5https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/opinion/story/2022-04-22/2022-election-q-a-with-brian-maryott-candidate-for-californias-49th-congressional-district https://twitter.com/brianlmaryott/status/1540537482311127040Opposes Roe
Mathis, LizIowa2DCandidate Liz Mathis understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, the candidate states "The science is clear – Iowa is already experiencing the damaging effects of climate change today. From worsening storms to hotter temperatures to more frequent flooding events along our rivers, communities across our state are dealing with the effects of climate in more extreme ways each year." Candidate Mathis also writes "In Congress, I will fight to: Address the threat of climate change, particularly its impact on extreme weather that is making farming all the more challenging in Iowa today."100Candidate Liz Mathis has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://lizmathis.com/issue/climate-change-environment/ https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/politics/2022/06/24/iowa-roe-v-wade-overturn-reactions-kim-reynolds-chuck-grassley-supreme-court/7723096001/Supports Roe
Matthews, Dan Washington2RCandidate Dan Matthews does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Candidate Dan Matthews has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://ivoterguide.com/candidate?elecK=899&raceK=2689&canK=6925& Unclear on Roe
May, BobMassachussetts6RCandidate Bob May does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Bob May makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a press release, the candidate states " Increasing taxes on gas and carbon will cause additional financial burden on working class families in Massachusetts."021.25https://www.may4congress.com/post/transportation-climate-initiative-bill-h4912-strongly-oppose https://www.may4congress.com/the-issuesUnclear on Roe
Mayfield, Darius New Jersey12RCandidate Darius Mayfield does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2022 tweet, Candidate Mayfield wrote, "according to the Left climate change is out of control, so we can't increase oil production here. We have to ship it in from across the globe on a dirty barge. That's how we save the planet." 25Candidate Darius Mayfield has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://twitter.com/MrMayfieldUSA/status/1548343359768387584 https://www.facebook.com/dariusmayfieldforamerica/photos/a.110264104384048/116818383728620/?type=3 Opposes Roe
McCallian, Randi Missouri8DCandidate Randi McCallian does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Randi McCallian has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://www.randimccallian.com/valuesSupports Roe
McCorkle, Ike Colorado4DCandidate Ike McCorkle understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states, Climate change is the ultimate threat to our existence, and its first effect is the increasing scarcity of water, which is already at the center of conflict between rural and urban Coloradoans. In addition to water scarcity, farmers have been challenged by heat and cold extremes and increased severe weather." Candidate McCorkle also writes "As your representative, Ike will support the Climate Change National Security Act and work with its co-sponsors to ensure that it incorporates the far reaching recommendations of the Climate and Security Advisory Group." The Climate Change National Security Act " would establish an interagency working group within the Executive Branch to develop a national strategy for addressing the impacts of climate change."100Candidate Ike McCorkle publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. On his campaign website, the candidate states "We have to: ban drilling and mining on federal lands and begin to tax the carbon those extractive industries produce."100100https://ike4co.com/platform/ https://ike4co.com/issues/climate-security/ https://ike4co.com/issues/green-new-deal/ https://twitter.com/Ike4CO/status/1540347201766817792Supports Roe
McCormick, RayIndiana8DCandidate Ray McCormick understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states "Protecting our abundant natural resources, our critical infrastructure, will directly impact both urban and rural families for many generations." In a June 2022 Facebook post, Candidate McCormick writes "Today the Supreme Court ruled that the EPA did not have the authority to regulate carbon emissions from power plants...These delays of significant action on Climate Change has put the future of our planet and everything that lives on it in jeopardy. Please join my campaign to build a soil carbon sponge that offsets the impact we are having on our climate."100Candidate McCormick has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon5092.5https://www.raymccormickforcongress.com/#Issues https://www.facebook.com/raymccormickforcongress/posts/pfbid0QEX5Ji6ARbXG5jW9GFg1NhChZkKkmsg2wmxHewCMijT7e2Xam6qBJ6LrWm5w1xBol https://www.facebook.com/raymccormickforcongress/posts/pfbid0raPHGy92DetukgQqjSk3YkDVhxK8VhTwHJPixZsCcqXf9GZ7rEuNdArMvHEbSXnNl?__cft__[0]=AZWGNTqCVTiD4G46YbAd6i_YwaVCJXro4QiRsbI9yqJVold-VysH1LdX0icesywjFmAsyWp0myPbbxnRi_qTATNmmAQ7Rw1tv7p_dJ2dyLIjC_z9EofyJTTmu3vX_c5ucLwourX3R-5cFL_4Qqrj9FOU3RP3ykrRro_9FhMWhhHX3dFGqz_dVMb84bpHRbWoVuLHH92QGfgnXkcB1onrXDRf&__tn__=%2CO%2CP-RSupports Roe
McCormick, Rich Georgia 6RCandidate Rich McCormick does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Rich McCormick has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.richmccormick.us/priorities/ https://twitter.com/RichforGA/status/1540346917963632641Opposes Roe
McDonald, Darlene Utah4DCandidate Darlene McDonald does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Darlene McDonald has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://www.sltrib.com/opinion/letters/2022/08/07/letter-conservative-wing-supreme/Supports Roe
McDowell, Jan Texas24DOn her official campaign website, Candidate McDowell states, "Protections safeguarding our planet have a higher priority than the ability of a corporation to make ever bigger profits. And yes, I believe in science. As the late Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan said, "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." It’s time for a new national goal: to become a nation powered by sustainable, renewable sources rather than by fossil fuels." Candidate Jan McDowell understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue.100 Candidate Jan McDowell has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://www.janmcdowell.com Supports Roe
McGarvey, Morgan Kentucky3DCandidate Morgan McGarvey understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states "I am running to address the existential threat of climate change so that future generations have a livable planet and aren’t constantly dealing with natural disasters like last December’s tornadoes that devastated entire communities in Western Kentucky or regular extreme flooding in Eastern Kentucky. We must act now." In a 2021 tweet, Candidate McGarvey wrote "Climate change is the immediate crisis facing all of us. We must act swiftly and boldly to save our planet not just for our kids and grandkids...for ourselves."100Candidate McGarvey agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.5092.5https://www.morganmcgarvey.com/issues/climate-change https://twitter.com/morganmcgarvey/status/1443309462106816518?lang=ar https://twitter.com/MorganMcGarvey/status/1505995754640400390?s=20Supports Roe
McLeod-Skinner, Jamie Oregon5DCandidate Jamie McLeod-Skinner understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, the candidate states "The climate crisis is destroying our homes, crops, and the air we breathe. We must set policies and create incentives to change this trajectory as well as improve our responses to the resulting disasters." In a 2022 tweet, Candidate McLeod-Skinner stated "It's time for the Republican Party to act on climate policy. It's not just Manchin, but all leaders who fail to recognize the urgency of the climate realities Americans face. Lack of action will result in devastating consequences for Oregon homes & farms." In a 2021 Youtube video posted by the candidate, she stated "...I've never taken money from big Pharma or fossil fuel corporate PACs. We're seeing the impacts of climate change all around us from devastating wildfires to ice storms to drought. We need to stop destroying our planet and do a better job of responding to disasters."100Candidate Jamie McLeod-Skinner publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. According to a 2018 article from Citizens Regeneration Lobby, "Jamie came out in support of 'carbon sequestration measures as well as a carbon tax.'”100100https://jamiefororegon.com/priorities/ https://twitter.com/JamieforOregon/status/1549420027228483584 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fj_sNEEX06w https://www.citizensregenerationlobby.org/jamie-mcleod-skinner-for-congress-district-2/ https://twitter.com/JamieforOregon/status/1554905611166294016?cxt=HHwWgIChzciakZQrAAAASupports Roe
McQueen, DanTexas35RCandidate Dan McQueen does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Dan McQueen has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://www.mcqueenforcongress.com Unclear on Roe
Meadows, Samantha Ohio2DCandidate Samantha Meadows agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2022 survey completed for DemCast, the candidate stated "I strongly believe that we need to improve our community’s involvement and understanding of climate and environmental issues. We have not yet fully grasped that our industries can work hand in hand with environmental protections."50Candidate Samantha Meadows has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5050https://demcastusa.com/2022/06/23/meet-the-candidate-samantha-meadows-oh/ https://www.samanthameadowsforcongress.com/abortionSupports Roe
Melton, RyanIowa4DCandidate Ryan Melton understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states "We need to prioritize a move towards clean, renewable energy sources. We need to listen to the science and to our experts, and there is a clear consensus among them that we are running out of time to address climate change. It is an existential threat." Candidate Melton also says "Climate change is threatening our very livelihoods in the district. We see the consequence in our ag sector with regularity, from unprecedented floods, derechos, droughts, and other recent impacts. " According to a 2022 article from the Carroll Times Herald, "Melton condemned Feenstra for not discussing climate change, despite the Congressman calling himself “pro-farmer.” “Our farmers know that — while there may be some disagreements as to the nuance of climate change — long term, farming in a climate change scenario is unsustainable,” Melton said."100Candidate Ryan Melton has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.meltonforiowa.com/the-issues https://www.carrollspaper.com/news/democrat-congressional-candidate-ryan-melton-says-voters-need-to-preserve-democracy/article_a1f3f046-ca1b-11ec-8359-1b9e8632c587.html https://mobile.twitter.com/melton4iowa/status/1540501355155972096Supports Roe
Miller, MaxOhio7RCandidate Max Miller does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2022 tweet, the candidate said "Democrats pushing "climate emergency" hysteria won't rest until gas is $10 a gallon. This won't work for families, rural areas, or farmers. Biden's policies aren't just hurting Ohio’s economy—they’re weakening America."25Candidate Max Miller has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5028.75https://twitter.com/MaxMillerOH/status/1552051657948762112 https://twitter.com/MaxMillerOH/status/1540415272179630080Opposes Roe
Mills, Cory Florida7RCandidate Cory Mills does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Candidate Cory Mills has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://m.facebook.com/watch/?v=4289097371196605&paipv=0&eav=AfaaanysWJD7TQtP5uVIlGBeZf14xigGZfjJj5q8yXixZbqjAjA5pvykYs9WKjEqi3Y&_rdr Opposes Roe
Mitchell, Nick Utah2DOn the candidate's official campaign website, Candidate Mitchell states, "Climate change is real, and it is causing extreme weather to worsen. If you put holes throughout your home, exposing it to the elements, it would get hotter in the summer and colder in the winter. This is happening in our atmosphere. There is no denying this reality. We need concerted action to stem the bleeding. Hopefully, it’s not too late." Candidate Nick Mitchell understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue.100Candidate Nick Mitchell has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://www.nickmitchellforcongress.com/issuesSupports Roe
Mizeur, Heather Maryland1DCandidate Heather Mizeur understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a 2022 questionnaire from The Baltimore Sun, the candidate stated "Along the Bay, we are uniquely vulnerable to the climate crisis...There are many innovative ways we can combat climate change — for example, by partnering with farmers. Farmers stand to lose the most if we fail to act on the threats of climate change, but our agricultural community can benefit greatly when we creatively partner for success. That is why I released an "Agri-Climate Solutions" plan, laying out how farmers can be a part of our climate solutions while benefiting from environmental practices."75Candidate Heather Mizeur has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.baltimoresun.com/politics/elections/voter-guide/bs-2022-candidate-us-congress-mizeurhea-20220518-mspszon4nbh3xhfzpk2yv33c7a-story.html https://twitter.com/heathermizeur/status/1355358204537020420Supports Roe
Molinaro, MarcNew York19RCandidate Marc Molinaro understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In 2018, "Dutchess County Executive Marcus J. Molinaro...announce[d] the formation of the Dutchess County Climate Smart Communities (CSC) Task Force...County Executive Molinaro said, “Dutchess County remains steadfast in our dedication to reduce our carbon footprint and improve the environment we all share. This first step toward being certified a Climate Smart Community further solidifies our commitment to reduce our reliance on fossil fuels, increase our use of renewable energy, and improve our energy efficiency."75Candidate Marc Molinaro has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.dutchessny.gov/Departments/County-Executive/37108.htm https://www.timesunion.com/hudsonvalley/news/article/Marc-Molinaro-vs-Pat-Ryan-Congress-17301845.phpOpposes Roe
Monahan, StevenColorado6RCandidate Steve Monahan does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, the candidate states "regain energy independence by ending “green” energy subsidies and handouts, and let the market create innovations that are either profitable or not. Create a regulatory environment that allows for competing energy sources to have a chance at succeeding. Anyone truly concerned with reducing carbon emissions and having reliable power needs to take another look at 21st century nuclear power production and grid modernization. It is a national imperative that we have clean, reliable power production across a dependable electricity distribution network."25Candidate Monahan has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.monahanforcongress.com/issuesUnclear on Roe
Montez Clark, Drew Florida20RCandidate Drew Montez Clark does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Candidate Drew Montez Clark has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://drewmontezclark.com/the-issues/Opposes Roe
Moon, Cliff Washington7RCandidate Cliff Moon understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue. On the candidate's official campaign website, it states, "we should keep working to ensure we are doing everything we can to protect the environment. However, the policies that are often proposed to address climate change will disproportionately harm working class men and women who can’t afford the electric car or can’t bring all their tools on the bus. The climate change arguments are often used as a tool to promote wealth redistribution rather than protect the environment. I will work to ensure we effectively balance the need for a clean and safe environment with innovation and pro-human policies." 100Candidate Cliff Moon has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://cliff4congress.com Unclear on Roe
Moore, Scotty Florida 9RCandidate Scotty Moore does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Scotty Moore has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://www.scottymooreforcongress.com/policy Opposes Roe
Moran, NathanielTexas1RCandidate Nathaniel Moran does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Candidate Nathaniel Moran has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://nathanielmoran.com Opposes Roe
Morgan, Yuripzy Maryland3RCandidate Yuripzy Morgan does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On her campaign website, the candidate states "Meanwhile, the President’s plan all but ignored nuclear energy which results in zero carbon emissions, and cleaner natural gas production, as well as domestic crude oil. We cannot take an all or nothing approach."25Candidate Yuripzy Morgan has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.ymorgan.com/issuesUnclear on Roe
Moskowitz, Jared Florida23DOn Candidate Moskiowitz's official campaign website, it states, "We’re living through a climate crisis that threatens our way of life, and we must act quickly to mitigate the effects of climate change. Investing in environmental protection isn’t just a long-term plan towards clean air, clean water, and sustainability, it’s also a way to reinvigorate the economy and create jobs in our community. Jared was a consistent advocate for environmental causes as a State Representative, and he will fight for bold policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, convert to clean energy sources, protect the Everglades, and make our community more resilient against environmental threats." Candidate Jared Moskiowitz understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue.100 Candidate Jared Moskiowitz has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://jaredforflorida.com/issues/ Supports Roe
Mullin, Kevin California15DCandidate Kevin Mullin understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2022 tweet, the candidate states "A just transition to a renewable energy economy must be a top priority for Congress. It requires investments in resiliency projects, cleantech innovation, and nationwide culture changes. I’m confident that together, we can rise to the challenge of #ClimateAction #EarthDay2022." In another 2020 tweet, Candidate Mullin wrote "CA must take decisive action to stimulate our economy by investing in infrastructure, with an eye toward a cleaner economy and addressing climate adaptation and resiliency. Investment in California’s infrastructure is way overdue."100Candidate Kevin Mullin publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. According to The Almanac in 2022, "Mullin...endorsed a carbon tax."100100https://twitter.com/kevinmullin/status/1517336087177302016 https://twitter.com/kevinmullin/status/1287832747914850304?lang=en-gb https://almanacnews.com/news/2022/04/12/climate-issues-heat-up-during-district-15-congressional-forum https://www.kevinmullinforcongress.com/prochoiceSupports Roe
Munns, Shante Florida 11DCandidate Shante Munns does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Shante Munns has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75 Unclear on Roe
Murphy, LeeDelaware1RCandidate Lee Murphy does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. The candidate does want to perpetuate the fossil fuel economy, which will exacerbate climate change and related weather extremes. In and interview with ABC, WMDT he said, "“We have to produce our energy in this country using oil and gas and why not look at nuclear also,” says Murphy. He adds, “Let’s get them back to work, get oil flowing, get it refined, and get into cars of Americans all over.”25Candidate Lee Murphy has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://gomurph.com/platform https://www.wmdt.com/2022/04/u-s-congressional-candidate-for-de-lee-murphy-talks-about-his-platform/ https://www.facebook.com/GoMurph/posts/pfbid0bRZtNDfnukm4iKqK9VYmkjisi7QLJ1D6HiqCnjzStrsQoqh8hEPYv4w1UGSymju2l https://ballotpedia.org/Lee_Murphy_(Delaware)Opposes Roe
Myles, James Virginia11RCandidate Jame Myles does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate James Myles has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://mylesforcongress.com https://twitter.com/Myles11CD/status/1540359136101240832Opposes Roe
Namkung, TerryVirginia3ROn Candidate Namkung's campaign website, it states, "Climate change is a real problem deserving of a real solution and conservatism for GOD’s green earth is the solution...The United States must embrace an “All of the Above” approach to energy. We should say YES to wind and solar, but also to nuclear power, natural gas, and other more immediately attainable solutions, while still allowing for robust domestic oil production in order to lower gas prices as we work towards long-term climate solutions." Though he voices his support for investing in carbon sequestration techniques and reaching net zero emissions, his 'all of the above' outlook is not productive to long-term sustainability, thus yielding him a lower score than he could have had. 50Candidate Namkung has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5050https://namkungforvirginia.com/issues/energy/ https://namkungforvirginia.com/issues/constitutional-rights-family-values/Opposes Roe
Nascimento, Christian Pennsylvania4RCandidate Christian Nascimento does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, the candidate states "Canceling pipelines and limiting domestic production are tactics designed to force Americans to adopt EVs...We can protect the environment while still looking after consumers and energy jobs."25Candidate Christian Nascimento has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5028.75https://broadandliberty.com/2022/07/28/all-candidates-spotlight-series-energy/#christian-nascimento https://www.pafamilyvoter.com/candidate/nascimento-christian/Opposes Roe
Navarro, Jesus Florida23RCandidate Jesus Navarro does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Jesus Navarro has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75 Unclear on Roe
Navarro, Omar California 43RCandidate Omar Navarro does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Omar Navarro has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Omar_Navarro https://twitter.com/RealOmarNavarroOpposes Roe
Neighbors, RickAlabama4DRick Neighbors does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75 Unclear on Roe
Nichols, Beatrice Alabama7RDoes not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75 https://www.bfor7thdistrict.com/about-3Opposes Roe
Nickel, Wiley North Carolina13DCandidate Nickel Wiley understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states "In Congress, I’ll support investments in “green” jobs and clean energy infrastructure, funding for sustainable transportation initiatives, and a long-term plan toward energy independence." In a 2022 questionnaire from INDY Week, the candidate said "When I worked for then-Vice President Al Gore, I saw firsthand even then what our legislators could do to tackle the climate crisis... will also support federal funds that are directed toward investments in clean energy transportation infrastructure like low-emission buses, high speed rail, and expanded bike lanes."100Candidate Wiley Nickel publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. In a 2021 tweet, the candidate stated "we need to take serious action to combat the climate crisis. In the NC Senate, I've authored carbon tax legislation to incentivize big polluters to cut their emissions. Large-scale change is overdue." In a 2022 questionnaire from INDY Week, the candidate said "in the State Senate, I also authored the first Carbon Tax bill in the south, which economists agree is the best way to get the forces of the free market behind real investments in clean energy."100100https://www.wileynickelforcongress.com/issues-read-more https://indyweek.com/news/elections/candidate-questionnaire-wiley-nickel-us-house-district-13/ https://twitter.com/wileynickel/status/1451165156243820548 https://twitter.com/wileynickel/status/1440050122591649792?ref_src=twsrc%5EtfwSupports Roe
Norman, WendyIdaho2DCandidate Wendy Norman does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On her campaign website, the candidate states "We must protect and improve the quality of our air and water, we must be good stewards of our public lands, and we must find sensible, collaborative solutions to resource competition, encourage job-friendly conservation, and invest in energy-saving innovation."25Candidate Wendy Norman has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://wendyforidaho.com/issues/Unclear on Roe
Nunn, Zach Iowa3RCandidate Zach Nunn does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2022 interview with the Des Moines Register, the candidate stated "Iowa is a leader in an “all of the above” approach for America’s energy independence. This includes Iowa’s biodiesel and ethanol production, output of wind, solar, nuclear, hydro energy, as well as cleaner domestically produced fossil fuels."25Candidate Zach Nunn has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/politics/2022/06/02/nicole-hasso-gary-leffler-zach-nunn-candidates-3rd-iowa-district-june-7-election-2022/7445642001/ https://zachnunn.com/issues/Opposes Roe
Nuno, Linda Texas10DCandidate Linda Nuno does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Linda Nuno has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://lindanunoforcongress.com/linda-nuno-for-congress-campaign-issues/ Supports Roe
Ogles, Andy Tennessee5RCandidate Andy Ogles does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Andy Ogles has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://andyogles.com/issues/Opposes Roe
Olivo, Christine Florida26DOn her official campaign website, Candidate Olivo writes, "WE CAN ADRESS CLIMATE CHANGE....WE WILL PASS A GREEN NEW DEAL." Candidate Christine Olivo understands the importance of climate action, but not as a top priority issue.25Candidate Christine Olivo has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://www.christineforcongress.org/issues https://www.naplesnews.com/story/news/politics/2022/07/27/mario-diaz-balart-darren-aquino-christine-olivo-run-26th-district/10111499002/Supports Roe
Olsen, Erik Wisconsin 2RCandidate Erik Olsen not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Erik Olsen has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75 https://olsenforliberty.comUnclear on Roe
Omere, Iro Texas4DOn the Candidate's official campaign website, it states, "According to the Union of Concerned Scientist Climate change is one of the most urgent issues of our day. Several recent studies show that acting quickly and decisively to address this challenge and shift our economy to clean energy will bring significant benefits to the United States—while also helping us avoid some of the worst consequences of unchecked global warming." Candidate Iro Omere understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue.100Candidate Iro Omere has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://www.omereforcongress.com/climateaction Supports Roe
Pagan, Juan New York7RCandidate Juan Pagan understands the importance of climate action, but not as a top priority issue. On his official campaign website, Candidate Pagan states, "imagine investing in a new industry called “petroleum” in 1880. John D. Rockefeller did. By 1920 he was a multi-billionaire. Clean energy now offers such opportunities. If New York invests wisely, imagine the wealth and thousands of jobs we can create. My plan foresees cooperation with industry giants like Exxon and Tesla over the next 30 years. The industries of geothermal, tidal, solar and fusion energy are the Microsofts, Googles and Amazons of the future. Do it… before China does." 75Candidate Juan Pagan has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5071.25https://www.paganforcongress.org/issues-plans/clean-energy-jobs-plastic-pollution Unclear on Roe
Pallotta, Frank New Jersey 5RCandidate Frank Pallotta does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Frank Pallotta has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://pallottaforcongress.com/issues/ Opposes Roe
Palmer Jr., Donnie Massachussetts7RCandidate Donnie Palmer Jr. does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Donnie Palmer Jr. has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://donniepalmerforcongress.com/issues/ https://twitter.com/donniepcouncil/status/1540515048128274432Unclear on Roe
Palombi, Chris Maryland5RCandidate Chris Palombi does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, the candidate states "American ingenuity and competitiveness can play a key role in addressing the environment. Doing so while embracing the free market will encourage innovation, energy independence and modernizing our infrastructure, while reducing emissions and promoting a healthy environment. Food waste is a contributing problem to greenhouse gas emissions in America."25Candidate Chris Palombi has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.chrispalombi.com/issues.html#environment https://www.facebook.com/PalombiForCongress/posts/pfbid02h2NLfqyzH7PxCzUUZuRs67CLqqHh5izLBgKe9XQS34mN3usxTWX152Zwtj7ZqTzDl?__cft__[0]=AZUeqNJ5uVE1nZzas9dveniydAS7t8wysWlMlQDB_vRZZPXg8re4bgPzhQYZb028hnyiQ6MeApLVwPwjQkP6gYd0quMj1l1xZoKiUlphWbOcFjtZx1jGVTc7G_Wg34VJLaOla41urWcigF2ut_-qE4eX1bknmqIFGTIgLghwMUOLb97fl-bqUFIPdFl-q1WWxdf2zg_u3523hmmz0ppl9e6V&__tn__=%2CO%2CP-ROpposes Roe
Pansing Brooks, PattyNebraska1DCandidate Patty Pansing Brooks understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2020 tweet, as a State Senator, the candidate stated "Great news! LB283, my bill to create a State Climate Action Plan, has been advanced to the full #NeLeg for debate. As evidenced by the devastating flooding of the past decade, it is imperative we act now to mitigate the damage inaction continues to cause." From a 2019 article from the Unicameral Update, "LB283, introduced by Lincoln Sen. Patty Pansing Brooks, would require the University of Nebraska to develop an evidence-based, data-driven, climate change strategic action plan. Pansing Brooks said the measure would help Nebraska better prepare for the increasing effects of climate change, including pests, soil erosion and extreme weather patterns."100Candidate Patty Pansing Brooks has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://twitter.com/patty4nebraska/status/1230276737122127872?lang=ar http://update.legislature.ne.gov/?p=24906 https://twitter.com/Patty4Nebraska/status/1549472907914608642Supports Roe
Parrish, KyleNorth Carolina5DCandidate Kyle Parrish agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2022 tweet, the candidate stated "@VirginiaFoxx is a climate denier. She doesn’t give a damn what will happen to the world in 20 years because she won’t be here. However, I still have teenage children and I am concerned for their future. I want to protect this world for them."50Candidate Kyle Parrish has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://twitter.com/KP4NC/status/1528171786986311680 https://twitter.com/KP4NC/status/1525849363188273152Supports Roe
Parrott, NeilMaryland6RCandidate Neil Parrott does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, the candidate states "Neil will work to lower your electricity bill and natural gas or propane costs. He will work to restore our energy independence by allowing the US to harvest our own natural resources and allowing us to use the most cost-effective energy."25Candidate Neil Parrott has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.neilparrott.org/issuesOpposes Roe
Parsons, Cameron Tennessee1DCandidate Cameron Parsons does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels25Candidate Cameron Parsons has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://m.facebook.com/watch/?v=409364401037471&_rdrSupports Roe
Pastore, Dan Pennsylvania16DCandidate Dan Pastore agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, the candidate states "Dan knows that we must address climate change while maintaining a strong economy. That is why he supports transitioning to clean energy in a manner that is swift, but not so fast that it disrupts our energy supply or slows economic growth.50Candidate Dan Pastore has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://www.danpastore.com/issues https://twitter.com/DanPastorePA/status/1548262805790281729?cxt=HHwWgsCi4bO0xPwqAAAASupports Roe
Patti, Tom California 9RCandidate Tom Patti does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Tom Patti has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.tompattiforcongress.com/about/Unclear on Roe
Pekau, Keith Illinois6RCandidate Keith Pekau does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to the Daily Herald, in a 2022 questionnaire, "Pekau noted the earth's climate has always changed. Still, he acknowledges that growing human population has played a role."25Candidate Keith Pekau has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.dailyherald.com/news/20220623/where-6th-district-republicans-stand-on-climate-change-humanitys-role-in-it https://www.dailyherald.com/news/20220503/gop-candidates-for-6th-congressional-district-seat-talk-abortion-and-more-in-online-forumOpposes Roe
Perez Jr., Maclovio Texas27DOn the Candidate's official campaign website, it states, "Our environment is not an optional luxury. Without clean air, clean water and healthy soil our future as humans is very much in question. Climate change is real. I have been studding the atmosphere it for 40 years. We know how to fix it and we can start today. But billions of dollars have been spent by the fossil fuel industry to raise “doubts” about the impending doom." Candidate Maclovio Perez understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue.100 Candidate Maclovio Perez has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://www.maclovio4congress.com/platform Unclear on Roe
Perez, Marie Washington3DCandidate Marie Perez understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue. On the candidate's official campaign website, Candidate Perez states, "climate change is real and I believe in practicable, comprehensive environmental stewardship: We know that limiting our focus to just temperature is not sufficient to protect our economy and way of life." 100Candidate Marie Perez has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://marieforcongress.com/platform/ Supports Roe
Perry, Jan California 37DCandidate Jan Perry agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an April 2022 tweet, the candidate states "diverting waste from landfills helps combat climate change by reducing greenhouse gases and decreasing soil and water pollution. Do your part to help #LACounty divert 80% of waste from landfills by 2025."50Candidate Perry has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://twitter.com/JanPerry/status/1519735225793712129 https://twitter.com/JanPerry/status/1540411990639661056Supports Roe
Peters, Sam Nevada4RCandidate Sam Peters does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Sam Peters has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75 https://www.sampeters4congress.com/campaign/Opposes Roe
Peterson, KayleeIdaho1DCandidate Kaylee Peterson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Kaylee Peterson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://kayleeforcongress.com/issues/ https://www.facebook.com/kayleeforcongress/posts/pfbid02Uydfv17i6kw6Lm8pmiCM3TcxmTsVJC4GJezU47DJwRFJzp8VcdRQma8DT6hpvmx5lSupports Roe
Pettersen, Brittany Colorado7DCandidate Brittany Pettersen understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. When commenting on her endorsement from the League of Conservation Voters, the candidate stated "climate change is the greatest threat we face and as a new mom, it’s what keeps me up at night,” said Brittany Pettersen. "We must enact bold legislation to mitigate the current impacts of climate change and protect against the worst consequences.'"100Candidate Brittany Pettersen has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.lcv.org/article/brittany-pettersen-earns-lcv-action-fund-endorsement-for-colorados-7th-congressional-district/ https://twitter.com/pettersen4co/status/1540338985490317314Supports Roe
Pfaff, Brad Wisconsin3DOn the Candidate's official campaign website, it states, "Wisconsin has an opportunity to become a leader in conservation efforts, prevent water contamination, reduce carbon emissions, and lessen the impact of climate change. Brad is committed to restoring environmental protections, investing in sustainable energy production, and pursuing long-term sustainability solutions to ensure access to clean air, land, and water for generations to come." Candidate Brad Pfaff understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue. 100Candidate Brad Pfaff has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://bradpfaff.com/priorities/ https://www.weau.com/2022/08/16/3rd-congressional-district-candidate-brad-pfaff-holds-abortion-rights-roundtable-eau-claire/ Supports Roe
Pinckney, David New Jersey 10RCandidate David Pinckney does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate David Pinckney has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75 Unclear on Roe
Poliquin, Bruce Maine2RCandidate Bruce Poliquin does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2022 interview with News Center Maine, the candidate stated "...increasing our supply of natural gas, which has been a big benefit when it comes to pollution in this country and greenhouse gas gases. What I would support is reopening our supplies of natural gas and oil here at home get back to energy independence." 25Candidate Bruce Poliquin makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a 2018 tweet, the candidate wrote "No Carbon Tax. #mepolitics"021.25https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QvSrxVhPGmg https://twitter.com/RepPoliquin/status/1020004905023688704 https://www.pressherald.com/2022/06/24/maine-leaders-react-to-abortion-ruling/ https://www.wabi.tv/2022/06/28/golden-poliquin-have-differing-opinions-roe-v-wade-reversal/Opposes Roe
Porter, John MarkCalifornia33RCandidate John Mark Porter does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate John Mark Porter has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.markporter2022.comUnclear on Roe
Pozzolo, Luis Arizona7ROn his campaign website, the candidate states "No more than two years ago we as a nation were energy independent...Unfortunately, the same doesn't apply today. Grijalva along with Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden keep a firm grip on the Natural Resources Committee in DC. They are the only thing standing in the way of an oil industry that serves the people."0Candidate Luis Pozzolo has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://luis4congress.com/issues https://ballotpedia.org/Luis_PozzoloOpposes Roe
Prempeh, Billy New Jersey9RCandidate Billy Prempeh does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 50Candidate Billy Prempeh has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5050https://www.billyprempeh.com/beliefs/Opposes Roe
Qualteri, JenniferColorado1RCandidate Jennifer Qualteri does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels24Candidate Jennifer Qualteri has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5027.9https://jq4congressco.com/house-district-one-blog https://jq4congressco.com/house-district-one-blog/f/my-stance-on-abortionOpposes Roe
Radaker-Sheafer, Kristen Missouri7DCandidate Kristen Radaker-Sheafer does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Candidate Kristen Radaker-Sheafer has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://www.kristenforcongress.com/endorsements Supports Roe
Ramirez, Delia Illinois3DCandidate Delia Ramirez understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, the candidate states "Delia understands that we are at a crisis point to act on climate change and that we need swift and decisive action to prevent a climate catastrophe...Delia is clear that future generations are depending on our leaders today to take bold and principled stances to end our reliance on fossil fuels, make a full transition to clean energy, and transform our economy to be greener and cleaner." Commenting on her endorsement from the League of Conservation Voters Action Fund, Candidate Ramirez said 'that future generations are depending on our leaders today to take bold and principled stances to end our reliance on fossil fuels, make a full transition to clean energy, and transform our economy to be greener and cleaner.'"100Candidate Delia Ramirez has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.deliaforcongress.com/issues/climate-change-and-clean-energy https://www.lcv.org/article/delia-ramirez-earns-lcv-action-fund-endorsement-for-illinois-3rd-congressional-district/ https://www.deliaforcongress.com/issues/reproductive-rightsSupports Roe
Ramos, Javier Arizona5DJavier Ramos Agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, it states, "Javier has worked with federal officials in D.C., tribes, and the United Nations (UN) on climate discussions, including his work on the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples’ climate provisions. Javier believes we should have never opened the grand Canyon to uranium mining. Uranium mining continues to cause environmental and health issues for fellow Arizonans." In a 2020 interview with Blog for Arizona the congressional challenger stated, “Paris Climate Agreement; I believe that climate change is a global issue and one that we have to work in partnership with global allies.”50Has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5050https://www.ramosaz.com/issues https://blogforarizona.net/javier-ramos-wants-to-improve-the-lives-of-the-people-of-congressional-district-five-as-their-next-house-representative/Supports Roe
Ray, Stuart Kentucky3RCandidate Stuart Ray does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Stuart Ray has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.stuartrayforcongress.com/issues- https://www.stuartrayforcongress.com/roe-v-wadeOpposes Roe
Recile, Rudy California 8RCandidate Rudy Rencile does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, the candidate states "green power only works when the sun is shining or wind is blowing. When the wind stops and the sun doesn’t shine, there’s no energy."25Candidate Rudy Rencile has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://rudyforuscongress.com/index.php/issues/energy-independence/ https://www.facebook.com/RecileRudy/posts/pfbid0xXGNPQZBmkPBo1PZjJJoY3Aeq6JgR2H5Z1nJvHuMHnz6iMFFXiYXp6eVp6qdXXMxlOpposes Roe
Rice, Max Illinois9R Candidate Max Rice does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, the candidate states "return US to energy independence" as a part of his platform.25Candidate Max Rice has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5028.75https://www.maxriceforcongress.comUnclear on Roe
Riley, JoshNew York19DCandidate Josh Riley understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states "We Are Facing Existential Threats To Our Environment, And They Require Bold Action. We Must Get To Zero Net Greenhouse Emissions, And We Must Do It Quickly. We Need More Environmental Cops On The Beat To Stop Polluters." In a May 2022 tweet, Candidate Riley wrote "climate change is the biggest existential threat for my son’s generation & beyond. We must elect leaders who are up to the task of facing it. In Congress, I will push to eliminate subsidies for the fossil fuel industry while creating good-paying jobs of the future in Upstate NY."100Candidate Josh Riley has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5092.5https://joshrileyforcongress.com/home/#issues https://twitter.com/JoshuaUE99/status/1527281599833731075Supports Roe
Rimensnyder, Nelson District of Columbia1RCandidate Nelson Rimensnyder does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Nelson Rimensnyder has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75 Unclear on Roe
Rippel-Elton, Amy Ohio12DCandidate Amy Rippel-Elton agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. From a 2022 Ballotpedia survey, the candidate states "Green new deal" is something she is passionate about.50Candidate Amy Rippel-Elton has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://ballotpedia.org/Amy_Rippel-Elton#Campaign_themes https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=pfbid0239pHKBHbfrSTS5d5e5hhMWjHLTfz4gXNcHqXbyNFe5okD5GSPNbUHhYYJ1XE71pyl&id=100079573068800Supports Roe
Robertson, Mark Nevada1ROn his official campaign website, Candidate Robertson states, "Climate change is a reality and we can do something about it without limiting the freedom of American citizens. As stewards of this planet, all humankind has a responsibility to do our part to mitigate the effects of climate change – both natural and manmade...As your representative in Congress, I will support an “all of the above” approach to energy. I will vote against subsidies to “clean technologies” that burden American tax-payers while enriching investors." An 'all of the above approach' is not an effective method of combating climate change. Candidate Mark Robertson agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 50Candidate Mark Robertson has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5050https://robertsonforcongress.com/issues/the-environment/ https://robertsonforcongress.com/issues/life-and-abortion/Opposes Roe
Rodgers, JamesTexas30RCandidate James Rodgers does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Candidate James Rodgers has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://jamesrodgersforcongress.comUnclear on Roe
Roe, Ann Wisconsin 1DIn a 2022 tweet, Candidate Roe stated, "I am running for Congress because I see the pathways for our younger generations narrowing between the looming climate crisis, the hardships of our healthcare system, and crippling student debt. I am running to find real solutions to these problems." Candidate Ann Roe understands the importance of climate action, but not as a top priority issue.75Candidate Ann Roe has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5071.25https://twitter.com/AnnRoe4Congress/status/1564640879507374080 https://twitter.com/AnnRoe4Congress/status/1565405095721897985Supports Roe
Rogers, Tim Wisconsin4RCandidate Tim Rogers does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Tim Rogers has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://www.rogersforwisconsin.com/general-5Unclear on Roe
Rollins, Will California41DCandidate Will Rollins understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states "climate change will not only increase global competition for scarce resources, it will make Riverside County more vulnerable to extreme heat and wildfires than it has ever been before." In an interview wit the Desert Sun in 2022, Candidate Rollins stated "climate change is an existential threat and one of the greatest challenges of our generation. I am committed to advancing an ambitious evidence- and science-based agenda to achieve net-zero emissions, leveraging every tool available for a swift transition to a more sustainable and cleaner planet and economy."75Candidate Will Rollins has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://willrollinsforcongress.com/on-the-issues/climate-change-natural-resources/ https://www.desertsun.com/story/news/politics/elections/2022/05/26/california-primary-2022-41st-district-congress-calvert-rollins-lucio-views/9893339002/ https://mobile.twitter.com/WillRollinsCA/status/1540451625399005185Supports Roe
Ronning, Penny Montana2DCandidate Penny Ronning does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2022 questionnaire from the Montana Free Press, the candidate stated "Climate change is an urgent issue...farmers and ranchers have been at the forefront of responsible land stewardship and will continue in that role as we understand more about how to address climate change...Montana can help lead the way through the many opportunities we have for wind and solar power development, biofuels, clean coal technologies, and responsible oil and gas production."25Candidate Penny Ronning has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://apps.montanafreepress.org/election-guide-2022/penny-ronning https://www.pennyronning.com/women-and-familiesSupports Roe
Rose, Max New York11DCandidate Max Rose understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue. On Candidate Max's official campaign website, it states, "to anyone who denies the reality of climate change, Max urges them to come and visit Staten Island and parts of Brooklyn, where you can still see some of the devastation of Hurricane Sandy’s wrath. Max believes that a carbon-free economy must be our North Star. One of the main ways we can reduce pollution and mitigate climate change is to move to a carbon-neutral economy by the year 2040, a goal Max strongly supports." 100Candidate Max Rose has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://maxroseforcongress.com/issues/climate-change-and-the-environment https://maxroseforcongress.com/issues/womens-rightsSupports Roe
Rosendale, Matt Montana2RCandidate Matt Rosendale does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2021 interview with Washington Journal, the candidate stated "On day one, when Biden rescinded the permit for the Keystone Pipeline, by doing that we will not change the climate, but we did change the financial climate of a lot of people in our nation."25Candidate Matt Rosendale has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.c-span.org/video/?511073-3/washington-journal-rep-matt-rosendale-r-mt-discusses-biden-climate-policies-amp-freedom-caucus https://twitter.com/RepRosendale/status/1523656353939542017?s=20&t=BH5CdzkkMaIhw9fRjO8hOAOpposes Roe
Ross, Jeremiah Oklahoma3DCandidate Jeremiah Ross does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Jeremiah Ross has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Jeremiah_RossUnclear on Roe
Ryan, PatNew York18DCandidate Pat Ryan understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states " Pat knows the greatest threat to our future is climate change...As County Executive Pat has been a national leader in taking climate action, committing to achieving 100% renewable energy by 2030, putting the county's first electric busses on the road...In Washington, Pat will bring the successes of Ulster County to Congress, fighting for investments in electric public transportation, job training in green careers, and standing against big polluters..."100Candidate Pat Ryan has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.patryanforcongress.com/priorities https://twitter.com/PatRyanUC/status/1540349018647183362Supports Roe
Salas, Rudy California22DCandidate Rudy Salas does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Candidate Rudy Salas has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://rudysalas.com https://twitter.com/RudySalasCA/status/1540771552647557122 https://www.bakersfield.com/news/elected-officials-others-react-to-historic-leak-on-roe-v-wade/article_6ebf3b78-cb23-11ec-a3d6-1ba167a4deb4.htmlSupports Roe
Salinas, AndreaOregon6DCandidate Andrea Salinas understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, the candidate states "In Congress, Andrea will fight for the urgent action we need to protect our planet and natural resources. She knows we need to address climate change, but also focus on the profound and harmful impacts it has on low-income and BIPOC communities. Andrea wants to ensure that marginalized communities are provided with opportunities to prosper in a new, clean energy economy and not further harmed or marginalized by the impacts of climate change. Her approach to fighting climate change is simple: we must take bold steps, while making sure we create living wage jobs and not leave anyone behind in the process."100Candidate Andrea Salinas has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.andreasalinasfororegon.com/issues/Supports Roe
Sams, Steven New York26RCandidate Steven Sams does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Steven Sams as no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75 Unclear on Roe
Santos, George New York3RIn a 2022 tweet responding to President Biden's new investment in environmental friendly vehicles for the US military, Candidate Santos wrote, "Joe Biden reaches new lows every day. He’s bragging that he’s spending BILLIONS of our money to make military vehicles 'climate-friendly.' Because solar-powered tanks are going to save us from the immigration crisis and economic upheaval he created." His statement completely ignores the fact that the US military is one of the largest polluters in the country. Candidate George Santos disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.0Candidate George Santos has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 507.5https://twitter.com/Santos4Congress/status/1517571322733334529 https://dccc.org/icymi-george-santos-compares-reproductive-freedom-to-slavery/ Opposes Roe
Sapaskis, Stylo New York15RCandidate Stylo Sapaskis does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In the 'Political Courage Test' for votesmart.org, Candidate Sapaskis responded to questions regarding her positions on various political issues and she responded 'yes' to all the environmentally positive questions.25Candidate Stylo Sapaskis has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/political-courage-test/65041/stylo-sapaskisOpposes Roe
Schafranek, RobertTexas29RCandidate Robert Schafranek does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Candidate Robert Schafranek has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75 Unclear on Roe
Scheller, Lisa Pennsylvania7RCandidate Lisa Scheller does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2020 interview with The Brown and White, the candidate stated "First I will tell you what won’t work. I might even tell you that climate change is real and that it’s been going on for the history of time, that climate change does happen and I might even say that some of it has been manmade. But, the way to approach it is through technology, free market enterprise and reasonable regulations."25Candidate Lisa Scheller has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://thebrownandwhite.com/2020/11/01/qa-with-congressional-candidate-lisa-scheller/ https://lisaschellerpa.com/issues/Opposes Roe
Schmidt, PatrickKansas2DCandidate Patrick Schmidt does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Patrick Schmidt has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://patrickforkansas.com/issues/ https://twitter.com/PatrickforKS/status/1540397608124010497/photo/1Supports Roe
Schmitt, ColinNew York18RCandidate Colin Schmitt does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Schmitt has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://twitter.com/colinschmitt/status/1540352557125599232Opposes Roe
Schneider, Jan Florida16DCandidate Jan Schneider does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Candidate Schneider's official campaign website, has no mention of climate change. The singular environmental issue mentioned on her website is offshore drilling, It says, "Like all members of the Florida congressional delegation, Democrats and Republicans alike, Jan Schneider supports a permanent ban on offshore drilling near Florida."25Candidate Schneider has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.votejan.com/issues https://www.votejan.com/women Supports Roe
Scholten, Hillary Michigan3DCandidate Hillary Scholten understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, the candidate states "I’ll fight to curb climate change before it’s too late...I’ll lead the charge to invest in a new energy economy with tax credits for renewable energy innovations to create good paying jobs while reducing our reliance on foreign oil and lowering the cost of energy for all of us." Commenting on her endorsement from the League of Conservation Voters Action Fund, Candidate Scholten stated "I will...work to bring green energy jobs to West Michigan, and help reduce our reliance on foreign oil by promoting electric vehicle production."100Candidate Hillary Scholten has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://hillaryscholten.com/priorities/ https://www.lcv.org/article/lcv-action-fund-endorses-hillary-scholten-for-congress/Supports Roe
Schultz, Jennifer Minnesota8DFLIn a statement responding the the West Virginia v. EPA ruling, Candidate Schultz stated, "Climate change is real, it’s happening now. We feel its increasing effects in northern Minnesota: more extreme temperatures, more intense storms and droughts, more forest fires and floods. I share an urgency to take drastic action to reduce emissions with many people in northern and northeastern Minnesota." Candidate Jennifer Schultz understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue.100Candidate Jennifer Schultz has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://www.jenschultzforcongress.com/news/statement-on-supreme-court-ruling-on-west-virginia-v-epa https://www.jenschultzforcongress.com/news/statement-on-roe-v-wade-being-overturned-by-supreme-courtSupports Roe
Scott, DarylSouth Carolina7DDaryl Scott understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In an interview, he stated, "we must listen to our planet. Natural disasters are becoming more frequent and more severe as our planet continues to warm. These changes are also affecting the growing seasons for the crops we depend on to survive. We must act now to slow the effects of climate change and protect the Earth for future generations."100Daryl Scott has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://demcastusa.com/2022/06/27/meet-the-candidate-daryl-w-scott-sc/Unclear on Roe
Self, Keith Texas3RCandidate Keith Self does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Keith Self has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://keithself.com Opposes Roe
Semenenko, Max California 7RCandidate Max Semenenko does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Max Semenenko has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://max.vote/#ISSUESUnclear on Roe
Severino, Joseph Illinois10RCandidate Joseph Severino does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Joseph Severino has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5028.75https://www.severinoforcongress.com/priorities https://www.lakeforestpodcast.com/podcast/joe-severino-for-illinois-10th-congressional-district/Opposes Roe
Shaffer, Jeremy Pennsylvania17RCandidate Jeremey Shaffer does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, the candidate states "America needs to safely develop our immense natural energy resources and reduce our own and the world’s dependence on hostile countries." According to a 2022 article from Inside Climate News, "Jeremy Shaffer...also called for reining in the EPA and said natural gas as a replacement for “dirty coal” would enable the state to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 50 percent."25Candidate Jeremy Shaffer has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5028.75https://jeremyshaffer.com/issues/ https://insideclimatenews.org/news/09052022/in-pennsylvanias-hotly-contested-17th-congressional-district-climate-change-takes-a-backseat-to-jobs-and-economic-development/Opposes Roe
Sharon, JennyTexas47RCandidate Jenny Sharon does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Candidate Jenny Sharon has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://jennygarciasharon.com/issuesOpposes Roe
Sinclair, Kyle Texas20ROn the Candidate's official campaign website, he states, "Kyle is for Energy Independence with sustainable Oil and Natural Gas and does not support being dependent on Foreign Energy. He also believes in renewal energy when it become sustainable as an addition to Oil and Natural Gas." Candidate Kyle Sinclair agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.50Candidate Kyle Sinclair has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5050https://kylefor20.com Opposes Roe
Singletary, La'RonNew York25RCandidate La'Ron Singletary does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.23Candidate La'Ron Singletary has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5027.05https://mobile.twitter.com/LaRon4Congress/status/1540396005614559233/photo/1Opposes Roe
Skarlatos, AlekOregon4RCandidate Alek Skarlatos agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, the candidate states "I believe in climate change, and support clean air, clean water, and healthy forests....If elected, I will proudly support the bipartisan trillion trees initiatives, to plant more trees and reduce carbon from our air."50Candidate Alek Skarlatos has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://www.alekfororegon.com/on-the-issues/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xP9EY-xszBAOpposes Roe
Slauson, Stephen California 12RCandidate Stephen Slauson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Stephen Slauson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Stephen_SlausonUnclear on Roe
Smith, Aja California39RCandidate Aja Smith does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Aja Smith has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.ajasmithforcongress.com/copy-of-national-defense-1 https://twitter.com/AjaforCongress/status/1430696919370665988Opposes Roe
Smith, Christy California27DCandidate Christy Smith understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, the candidate states "here in the 27th District, we are all too familiar with the emerging threat of the climate crisis—experiencing wildfires in nearly every part of the district, air and water pollution, drought, and more... We must also invest in building a fully renewable and clean energy infrastructure using wind and solar to create good mortgage-paying jobs and combat the climate crisis so we can ensure our community is a place where families can live and thrive for generations to come, before it’s too late." In a 2020 tweet, Candidate Smith wrote "2.3 million acres burned with active fires raging across CA. I’m the only candidate in #CA25 with an environmental platform. Climate change is real and it’s threatening our survival."100Candidate Christy Smith has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.christyforcongress.org/priorities https://mobile.twitter.com/christysmithca/status/1303424134957809664Supports Roe
Smith, SandyNorth Carolina1RCandidate Sandy Smith does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On her campaign website, the candidate states "energy independence is critical to safeguarding our national security. Closing the Keystone pipeline killed thousands of good paying jobs and weakened the United States of America’s energy standing in the world. Socialist dreams like the “Green New Deal” will put America Last."25Candidate Sandy Smith has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://sandysmithnc.com/on-the-issues/ https://sandysmithnc.comSupports Roe
Snyder, GaryIndiana3DCandidate Gary Snyder understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states "Gary is the only candidate that believes Climate Change is an existential threat and supports: *Offer rebates to families as they transition to clean energy *Ensure clean energy technology is built in America with US made steel and materials."75Candidate Snyder has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.snyderforcongress.com/gary-on-the-issuesSupports Roe
Sorensen, Eric Illinois17DCandidate Eric Sorenson understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states "in Central and Northwest Illinois, we know that climate change is real -- whether it was the 2021 summer drought or, the August 2020 derecho with 100 miles per hour winds, or the record-high Mississippi River flood of 2019...Climate change is not a partisan issue... Climate change is real and serious..."100Candidate Eric Sorenson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon5092.5https://www.ericforillinois.com/issues https://twitter.com/ERICSORENSEN/status/1540344280899887105Supports Roe
Sossa-Paquette, JeffreyMassachussetts2RCandidate Jeffrey Sosa-Paquette agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, the candidate states "Climate change is real, and denial of it is not a policy...There are many steps we can take, from placing modest taxes on plastics to fund recycling to holding our trading partners responsible for their contributions to climate change. But we can’t take them alone. Energy independence must be a priority, not just for the environment, but for our national security."50Candidate Sosa-Paquette has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://jeffrey4congress.com/my-issues/ https://www.gazettenet.com/Republican-running-in-2nd-Congressional-District-Jeffrey-Sossa-Paquette-visits-Hadley-47415230Unclear on Roe
Spalding, Carla Florida25RIn response to a 2020 questionnaire from South Florida's 'Sun Sentinel,' Candidate Spalding was asked, "What should be done, if anything, to address climate change?" She responded, saying, "More research from UNBIASED scientists, is needed to ensure this is an actual crisis or a natural occurrence. China and India are the world’s biggest polluters, and curtailing that is the best thing we can do to help Mother Earth." Candidate Carla Spalding disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 0Candidate Carla Spalding has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 507.5https://www.sun-sentinel.com/opinion/commentary/fl-op-com-carla-spalding-questionnaire-20200622-rgvfw4zdhng47hl2rjrx2ypenq-story.htmlOpposes Roe
Srivastava, Sandeep Texas 3DCandidate Sandeep Srivastava does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Sandeep Srivastava has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://sandeepfortexas.com/priorities.aspx Supports Roe
Stahley, Lee Ohio3RCandidate Lee Stahley does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Lee Stahley has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.stahleyforcongress.com/issuesUnclear on Roe
Steele, Wayne Tennessee4DOn Candidate Steele's official campaign website, he makes it clear that he intends to ban fracking, promote recycling, and increase sustainable energy sources such as solar and windmill. Candidate Wayne Steele understands the importance of climate action, but not as a top priority issue.75Candidate Wayne Steele has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5071.25https://steele4congress.us/environment.html https://www.columbiadailyherald.com/story/news/2022/07/15/ut-southern-jason-martin-gubernatorial-tennessee-governor-district-4-candidates/10067413002/ Supports Roe
Steiner, Max California1DCandidate Max Steiner understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states regarding 'Water' as an 'issue' that "We know, given climate change, that we will have these droughts in the future: that means a greater reliance on groundwater."75Candidate Max Steiner has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S fee on carbon.5071.25https://maxsteinerforcongress.com/issues https://twitter.com/MaxSteinerCA/status/1540391127941267456Supports Roe
Steury, PaulIndiana2DCandidate Paul Steury understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states "I have been an environmental educator most of my life and that emphasis is to care for future generations through the care of our air, water, land, and food by promoting efficiency, renewable energy, and incentivizing sustainable initiatives and industry to benefit your and my future grandchildren."100Candidate Paul Steury has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://paulforall2022.com/issuesSupports Roe
Stevenson, JaymeConnecticut 4RJayme Stevenson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Stevenson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://jaymestevensonforcongress.com/project/pro-choice/Supports Roe
Strong, Dale Alabama 5RCandidate Dale Strong does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Dale Strong has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.dalestrongforcongress.com/issuesOpposes Roe
Swad, AntonioTexas32ROn Candidate Swad's official campaign website states, "When we secure our energy future, we can further develop the key nuclear, solar, and other natural energy sources to push into a new century...Democrats in Washington have crushed the energy industry, canceling key pipelines, demonizing Texas oil and gas reserves, and subsidizing expensive and unreliable sources of energy. The answer to America's energy crisis is to utilize our massive advantage in natural resources to not only keep the lights on, but to sell to our friends and allies." Candidate Antonio Swad does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Antonio Swad has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://www.swadforcongress.com/issues Unclear on Roe
Swank, KeithWashington10RCandidate Frank Swank does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On the his official campaign website, Candidate Swank stated, "I believe in a combination of oil, clean coal and renewable energy sources (including nuclear) will ensure our nation remains self-sufficient."25Candidate Frank Swank has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://keithswank.com/issues.html https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/political-courage-test/140235/keith-swank Opposes Roe
Swartz, Craig Ohio5DCandidate Craig Swartz understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states "People will say that the Earth has gone through climate changes many times before but all that really matters is this time not then. Back then, there weren’t hundreds of millions of cars and trucks spewing fumes in the air, 8 billion people building mountains of waste daily or thousands of factories polluting waterways. All the garbage we put into the land, sea and air is on every single one of us...Improving carbon capture methods from extraction and emissions must be one of our major tasks ahead. Cleaning up our air is going to help our land and water resources just making sure the rain and snow that fall on them are that much cleaner."100Candidate Craig Swartz publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. On his campaign website, the candidate states, "A carbon tax on the oil and gas industry will help put money back into communities most affected from oil and gas projects. These funds will also help communities in the long run transition away from fossil fuels."100100https://www.swartzforohio.com/environment https://www.swartzforohio.com/energy https://www.swartzforohio.com/taxes https://www.swartzforohio.com/womenshealthcareSupports Roe
Sykes, EmiliaOhio13DCandidate Emilia Sykes understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In 2020, the candidate stated "As the Democratic Leader of the Ohio House I am committed to fighting for environmental justice, equality, sustainability, and a state where we can live out our American dream. Climate change is one of our greatest threats and combined with systemically racist environmental policies is hindering current and future generations’ ability to fulfill the Ohio Promise," in response to an endorsement from the Ohio Environmental Council Action Fund PAC. According to the League of Conservation Voters in 2022, "While in the state house, [Candidate Sykes] led efforts to repeal House Bill 6 – a disastrous and corrupt energy bill gutting clean energy and energy efficiency programs – and advocated for a proposed alternative Clean Energy Jobs plan that would establish a 50 percent renewable energy portfolio standard by 2050, encourage wind and solar development, expand weatherization programs for low-income communities and create training programs for clean energy jobs."100Candidate Emilia Sykes has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5http://www.theoecactionfund.org/press-statements/esykesendorsement0920 https://www.lcv.org/article/lcv-action-fund-endorses-emilia-sykes-for-congress/ https://www.emiliasykesforcongress.com/issuesSupports Roe
Taddeo, Annette Florida27DOn Candidate Taddeo's official campaign website, it states, "In Congress she'll work to help transition away from fossil fuels, reduce greenhouse emissions, oppose offshore drilling of Florida’s coast, and fight for greater federal funding to support climate resiliency efforts in Florida is 27th congressional district in across Miami." Candidate Annette Taddeo understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue.100Candidate Annette Taddeo has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://annettetaddeo.com/issues/# Supports Roe
Tandon, Ritesh California17RCandidate Ritesh Tandon understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states "I intend to lead environment and climate change efforts by proposing a Congressional Environmental Action Panel (CEAP) to propose a national plan for mitigating the environmental threats. It is a National security issue that needs a 30-50 year plan."75Candidate Ritesh Tandon has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.tandonforcongress.com/policies/climate/ https://www.tandonforcongress.com/ro-khanna-doesnt-deserve-support/Opposes Roe
Teagu, JohnnyTexas7ROn the Candidate's official website, he states, "We are taught to be afraid in our schools, through the media, and our government. We're told that if we don't change our lifestyle and the way we live, that this planet will not be here in 20 years, or at least it won't be able to sustain life." Candidate Johnny Teagu disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 0 Candidate Johnny Teagu has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 507.5https://www.johnnyteague.comOpposes Roe
Terry, Joanne Florida8DOn her official campaign website, Candidate Terry states, "Regardless of what each of us believes about climate change, the increase in extreme weather over the last few years is undeniable...We must continue the transition to clean, renewable energy and away from fossil fuels...I will support government investment and public-private partnerships for research, development, and industry transition of new technologies that help protect our community from further climate change, while providing new opportunities for economic growth." Candidate Joanne Terry understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue.100Candidate Joanne Terry has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://www.joanneterry.com/issuesnewSupports Roe
Thanedar, Shri Michigan13DCandidate Shri Thanedar understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states "The climate crisis is an extenstial threat to our way of life...I am a proud champion of the Green New Deal Pledge... Residents and doctors suspect that exposure to air pollution is causing cancer, yet there is no funding for research. I believe we need to start with securing research funding, then use the results of that research to force companies to reduce pollution levels and pay for health damages they have created...The UAW Local 58 is leading the way for green energy in Detroit with its Net Zero Energy hall...I will work to secure funding for existing businesses to make similar updates and sponsor legislation that requires any new construction to meet stringent emissions standards."100Candidate Shri Thanedar has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://shriforcongress.com/issues/#83-c6Supports Roe
Thelander, EdMaine1RCandidate Ed Thelander does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Candidate Ed Thelander has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://thelanderforcongress.com/issues/ https://www.facebook.com/thelanderforcongress/posts/pfbid02V9uD5EG2ZgQ3DqLmwgLA9jA1YZPA9H8xUU1aTTn2QjqyWqjsb7bFPxC6DfUvM35ul? https://www.pressherald.com/2022/10/11/pingree-faces-thelander-in-her-bid-for-an-8th-term-in-us-house/ Opposes Roe
Throneburg, Joshua Virginia5DOn Candidate Throneburg's campaign website, it states, "It’s time to start treating climate change like the emergency it is: if we have nowhere to live, then nothing else matters. Years of inaction on climate solutions have brought us to a moment where we must take urgent and immediate action to save our planet." Joshua Throneburg understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue.100In an interview for 'Charlottesville Tomorrow', Joshua Throneburg made it clear that "he wants to explore setting up taxes or fines to the nation’s largest carbon emitters," and that the money earned could "go towards other costs related to climate change." He explicitly states, “I think part of what Congress has to do is recognize the costs and then take those who are a part of producing those costs and hold them responsible,” Throneburg said. “Whether that would be a carbon tax or a carbon fee is something that brings money back into our system because those carbon producers are making it.” Candidate Throneburg publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon.100100https://joshforvirginia.com/issues/ https://www.cvilletomorrow.org/articles/democratic-congressional-candidate-josh-throneburg-is-creating-a-people-powered-campaign/ https://twitter.com/JoshforVirginia/status/1546160433870118912Supports Roe
Tokuda, Jill Hawaii2DCandidate Jill Tokuda understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue.On her official campaign website, Candidate Tokuda states, "Hawaii is in crisis. Accelerated sea-level rise is causing our roads and homes to fall into the ocean. We are experiencing extreme weather patterns and rising ocean temperatures that impact our corals and sea life. While we do have unique challenges, it is also our island environment that is our strength. Hawaii is uniquely positioned to be a leader in renewable energy sources like solar, wind, and hydropower. We need clean energy to power us in the future, and we also need the positive economic impacts of clean energy jobs. Environmental policy and economic prosperity should go hand in hand." 100Candidate Jill Tokuda has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://tokudaforhawaii.com/issues/ https://tokudaforhawaii.com/press-release-jill-tokuda-issues-statement-on-the-supreme-courts-decision-to-overturn-roe-v-wade/Supports Roe
Torres, David Colorado5DCandidate David Torres understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states "We are already feeling the effects of global mean temperatures rising right here in the font range. The constant threat of wildland fires and alarmingly low level of our reservoirs and waterways are already making a major impact in our community. Climate change is an issue that demands more than just awareness, it demands action."100Candidate David Torres publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. On his campaign website, the candidate states "Right now, in Colorado, a House Resolution (HJR 22-0283) is calling for an economy-wide carbon price to be enacted. We need Congress to pass legislation that would place fees on fossil fuels being burned. Fees that would contribute to the local economy and incentivize businesses to switch to clean energy."100100https://www.davidtorres4congress.com/platformSupports Roe
Tran, DeanMassachusetts 3RCandidate Dean Tran does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Dean Tran has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.facebook.com/TranforCongressUnclear on Roe
Tranel, Monica Montana1DCandidate Monica Tranel understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, the candidate states "Montana faces a choice between two starkly different futures. We could become a forgotten zone that sees the worst impacts of climate change and misses the benefits of the new clean economy. Or our abundant renewable resources can bring prosperity while well-planned mitigation efforts build the resilient climate we need to protect our natural heritage, and us." The candidate also writes "We must provide needed incentives and resources to build and retrofit our homes and businesses, improve our transportation options, clean up our air, and so much more."100Candidate Monica Tranel has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://monicatranel.com/issues/ https://mtstandard.com/opinion/columnists/monica-tranel-abortion-we-have-the-next-say/article_87ec4ac4-cf4e-56b7-9452-484249305170.htmlSupports Roe
Truman, Jack Missouri4DIn the '2022 Political Courage Test' by votesmart.org, Candidate Truman was if he "support(s) government funding for the development of renewable energy (e.g. solar, wind, geo-thermal)?" and "federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions?" He responded 'Yes' to both questions. Candidate Jack Truman understands the importance of climate action, but not as a top priority issue.75 Candidate Jack Truman has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5071.25https://www.facebook.com/trumanforcongressSupports Roe
Turk, JacobMissouri 5RCandidate Jacob Turk does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Jacob Turk has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://missourilife.org/missouri-right-to-life-political-action-committee-announces-endorsements-for-november-general-election/Opposes Roe
Vallejo, Michelle Texas15DIn a 2022 tweet, Candidate Vallejo stated, "Thousands of South Texans are hurt by devastating floods every year due to climate change & natural disasters. The truth is that it doesn't take a big storm to flood our homes— Our infrastructure often can't even handle mild rain. I will prioritize this in Congress for #TX15." Candidate Michelle Vallejo understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue.100Candidate Michelle Vallejo has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://twitter.com/MichelleVforTX/status/1478860107756752896 https://twitter.com/MichelleVforTX/status/1540436601582632960Supports Roe
Van Orden, Derrick Wisconsin3RCandidate Derrick Van Orden does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Derrick Van Orden has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://www.facebook.com/derrickvanorden/posts/let-me-be-crystal-clear-i-am-unreservedly-unabashedly-and-proudly-pro-lifei-beli/362545701980967/ Opposes Roe
Van Someren, Mike Wisconsin5DIn a 2022 tweet responding to an article discussing the increasing amount of farmers splitting from the Republican Party over climate change values, Candidate Mike stated, "US ingenuity is helping farmers improve their business & their lives while also helping solve a problem facing all of us. Good business & a healthier environment aren’t mutually exclusive." Candidate Mike Van Someren agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels50Candidate Mike Van Someren has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5050https://mobile.twitter.com/mvsforwi/status/1571096037179428865 https://www.mikevansomeren.com/roeSupports Roe
Vargas, TonyNebraska2DCandidate Tony Vargas understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states "Climate change is a serious threat to our children, businesses, and environment, and the need to replace fossil fuels with renewable energy sources is both an environmental and economic necessity." According to GiveGreen, the Candidate Vargas "... he cosponsored a resolution stating the Legislature has a moral obligation to combat climate change. Vargas has also introduced legislation to incentivize energy efficiency and to use the funds the state received from the settlement with Volkswagen to invest in clean school buses and electric vehicles." 100Candidate Tony Vargas has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.vargasfornebraska.com/issues/clean-energy https://www.givegreen.com/candidate/tony-vargas https://www.vargasfornebraska.com/issues/reproductive-freedomSupports Roe
Vasquez, Gabe New Mexico2DCandidate Gabe Vasquez understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states "Ninety-nine percent of scientists, NASA, and the Department of Defense all agree that climate change is a threat – and we’re already seeing its impact in the forms of increasingly severe weather, drought, and wildfires. I’ll work to encourage a transition to clean energy like wind and solar...We can also continue to grow our economy by electrifying our homes, cars, and businesses. New Mexico...should be leading the effort in new energy technologies." In a 2022 interview with the Albuquerque Journal, when asked about climate change, the Candidate Vasquez stated "We must strongly support the renewable energy economy, strengthen and enforce the regulations on polluters, protect our public lands and wildlife, and ensure we are protecting New Mexico’s most precious resource, water, while helping workers in the fossil fuel industry as we transition to a renewable energy economy."100Candidate Vasquez has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://gabeforcongress.com/issues/ https://www.abqjournal.com/2497472/qa-2nd-congressional-district-democratic-candidate-gabe-vasquez.htmlSupports Roe
Veasey, LinAlabama3DDoes not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee.5028.75https://twitter.com/VoteLinIn2022/status/1566772255585177604Supports Roe
Vega, Yesli Virginia7RCandidate Yesli Vega does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Candidate Yesli Vega has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://yeslivega.com https://yeslivega.com/on-the-issues/life-liberty-and-the-pursuit-of-happiness/Opposes Roe
Villaverde, ChristineNorth Carolina2RCandidate Christina Villaverde does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2021 tweet, the candidate said "Green energy is inefficient and costly and not Green. Where does everyone think electricity comes from? Not all from Green sources....."25Candidate Christina Villaverde has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://twitter.com/Villaverde4NC/status/1430316101779460096?s=20 https://votevillaverde.com/issues/prolife/Opposes Roe
Volotzky, Lucie California32RCandidate Lucy Volotzky does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Lucy Volotzky has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.voteforlucie.comUnclear on Roe
Waldman, Amanda Pennsylvania9DCandidate Amanda Waldman understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, the candidate states "I support a transition to renewable and sustainable energy sources and moving our nation toward an environmentally and economically sustainable future. We can protect our natural resources and support a thriving economy at the same time. Every human deserves clean air and drinking water. We must stop the corporate environmental destruction of our vast natural resources, which damages our economy (particularly recreation revenue and tourism in rural areas) and our health."75Candidate Amanda Waldman has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://waldman4pa.com/the-issues/environment/Unclear on Roe
Walker, Kimberly Florida12DOn her official campaign website, Candidate Walker states, "Our economy needs help recovering from the coronavirus pandemic. We also need to quickly create millions of clean energy jobs in order to tackle the climate crisis. Combined, we have the opportunity to create good-paying jobs and put people to work building our clean energy future. Our actionable plan will get us on the right track towards building the green economy that we urgently need: one with investments in clean energy, federal clean standards and climate justice for all." Candidate Kimberly Walker understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue.100Candidate Kimberly Walker has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://kimberlyforcongress.com/issuesSupports Roe
Warner, Jeff Maryland4RCandiate Jeff Warner does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Candiate Jeff Warner has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.jeffwarnerforcongress.com/issuesUnclear on Roe
Warner-Stanton, Kathy Alabama 5DCandidate Kathy Warner-Stanton does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Warner-Stanton has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.kathyforcongress.com/issues https://localtoday.news/al/pro-abortion-or-anti-abortion-alabama-candidates-take-a-stand-1071.html Supports Roe
Waters, Allen Rhode Island1RCandidate Allen Waters does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to the Political Courage test from Vote Smart, the candidate wrote "The best way to establish strong, diverse, and economically rational alternative energy solutions is a market based system built on private sector research, development, and investment. While promoting balanced energy resources, government should minimize it's impact on free enterprise, and especially not be in the business of picking winning and losing industries."25Candidate Allen Waters has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/political-courage-test/154036/allen-waters https://whatsupnewp.com/2022/07/election-2022-gop-endorses-slate-candidates-wont-discuss-trump-congressional-candidates-differ-on-roe-v-wade-next-deadline-for-candidates%EF%BF%BC/ Opposes Roe
Watson, LacyWest Virginia1DIn a questionnaire from the Charleston Gazette Mail, Candidate Watson stated he would immediately "support policies (that) address the immediate needs (of) climate change," such as the Green New Deal, BUILD GREEN Infrastructure and Jobs Act, and more. Lacy Watson understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue.100Candidate Lacy Watson has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://www.wvgazettemail.com/freepass/u-s-house-district-1-candidate-eugene-lacy-watson-d/article_d0304c13-36c6-5144-9239-1a163ab9ec6f.html https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1119264588426547Supports Roe
Weiler, Tom Minnesota3RCandidate Tom Weiler does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Tom Weiler has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://vote.weilerforcongress.com/priorities https://www.minnpost.com/elections/2022/07/phillips-runs-on-optimism-while-weiler-focuses-on-nations-ills-in-minnesotas-3rd-district-race/Opposes Roe
Wendell, Barry Lee West Virginia2DIn a questionnaire from the Charleston Gazette Mail, Candidate Wendell stated that "In West Virginia, it's hard to talk about the role of fossil fuels in climate change without getting slammed. We need to transition our economy away from coal and natural gas, and our cars from gasoline...We need a national policy to help transition to renewable and solar power." Barry Lee Wendell understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue.100Candidate Barry Lee Wendell has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://www.wvgazettemail.com/freepass/u-s-house-district-2-candidate-barry-lee-wendell-d/article_effbee7b-362e-583a-9329-f38fe0742358.html https://mobile.twitter.com/VoteforBarry/status/1551720665866293248 Supports Roe
West, ChrisGeorgia2RCandidate Chris West does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Chris West has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://chriswestga.com/?fbclid=IwAR1S_De5TyHVb58bBluRA528HaeBBXNjtpU7uh_9CuDa1D3mXACVuBghXdo https://www.gpb.org/news/2022/06/17/chris-west-and-jeremy-hunt-find-no-common-ground-in-their-last-meeting-ahead-ofOpposes Roe
White, Doug Washington4DCandidate Doug White understands the importance of climate action, but not as a top priority issue. On the candidate's official campaign website, it states, "this land, in all its diverse beauty and abundance, needs protection so we can continue to enjoy the many ways that it benefits our way of life. We must build resiliency into our economy by facing up to the fact our climate is changing. We are living on what our great grandparents, great-great grandparents and great-great-great grandparents built for us. We must take responsibility for building and protecting our own future." 75Candidate Doug White has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee.5071.25https://www.dougwhite4congress.us/vision https://www.yakimaherald.com/news/local/q-a-district-4-candidates-share-views-on-abortion-policy/article_36fe85d7-132d-5bf2-ba5c-57d3c53a56d3.html Supports Roe
White, JohnArkansas4DCandidate John White does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate White has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/John_White_(Arkansas)Unclear on Roe
Williams, Brandon New York 22RCandidate Brandon Williams does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Candidate Brandon Williams has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee.5028.75https://brandonforcongressny22.com/stances/pro-lifeOpposes Roe
Williams, Lynnette Tennessee8DCandidate Lynnette Williams does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Lynnette Williams has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75 Unclear on Roe
Williams, Mikal Texas14DOn the Candidate's official website, it states, "Presently, allied health solutions and renewable energy technologies are the high-growth job markets in our country and projections are they will remain that way for the foreseeable future. As your Congressman, I would bring energy market leaders from the oil and gas, renewable, environmental, and educational sectors to the table to create good middle-class jobs that will stimulate our economy and increase the quality of life for all residents of the district, while also building the infrastructure, in an environmentally sound manner, that will utilize our renewable coastal resources to support our coastal ecosystem." Though he supports renewable energy, he supports an 'all of the above' approach which is fundamental detrimental to the goal of reaching net zero carbon emissions. Candidate Mikal Williams agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 50Candidate Mikal Williams has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5050https://www.electmikalwilliams.com/platformSupports Roe
Williams, Whittney Michigan6RCandidate Whittney Williams does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Whittney Williams has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5028.75https://www.winwithwhittney.comUnclear on Roe
Wilson, Tamie Ohio4DCandidate Tamie Wilson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Tamie Wilson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5028.75https://www.tamiewilson.com/issues/champion-womens-rights/Supports Roe
Wimbish, Calvin Florida10RCandidate Calvin Wimbishdoes not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Candidate Calvin Wimbish has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://www.votecal2022.org/issuesOpposes Roe
Wirth, CindeIndiana6DCandidate Cinde Wirth understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, the candidate states "We Can Improve Our Environment" by "Work to reduce Indiana’s carbon footprint. Offer incentives for participation in wind and solar programs. Offer incentives to help Hoosiers buy new and pre-owned fuel-efficient vehicles. Support measures to protect our supply of clean water. Encourage investment and practices in sustainable farming, fishing, forestry research, and farmland preservation." 100Candidate Cinde Wirth has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://wirth4congress.com/a-clean-environment-for-indiana/ https://wirth4congress.com/better-healthcare-for-hoosiers/Supports Roe
Wood, Marisa California 20DCandidate Marisa Wood understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, the candidate states "climate change is real and we must meet this issue head on. I am committed to moving our Fossil Fuel dependence toward renewable energy in a manner that is thoughtful and intentional. My number one priority will be to utilize the infrastructure and skilled workforce already in place; keeping workers working while decreasing dependency on fossil fuels."75Candidate Marisa Wood agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.5071.25https://marisawoodforcongress.com/on-the-issues/environment-and-clean-energy-solutions/ https://marisawoodforcongress.com/on-the-issues/reproductive-rights/Supports Roe
Woods, Mary Jo Texas17DIn an interview for 'Living Blue Texas,' Candidate Woods was asked about her thoughts on climate change, and what she thinks America should do about it. Candidate Woods responded, "It does have to be addressed. There is no going back, it's gonna hurt people if we don't address climate change, and if we don't realize the effects that it's going to have on people." She talks about methods such extensive solar paneling in rural areas and investing in green energy. Candidate Mary Jo Woods understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue.100Candidate Mary Jo Woods has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=654881562165112 https://www.facebook.com/MaryWoodsTX17Supports Roe
Wright, Glenn Utah3DIn Candidate Wright's profile on the 'Utahdemocrats' website, he states, "Climate change is having a catastrophic effect on Utah and CD3. Reduced snowpack, wildfires and decreases in the quantity and quality of water are affecting our health and economy state and district wide. Our reactions to Climate Change also can affect foreign policy." Candidate Glenn Wright understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue.100Candidate Glenn Wright has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://convention.utahdemocrats.org/portfolio_page/glenn-wright/ https://www.heraldextra.com/news/local/2022/jul/08/wright-focuses-on-abortion-healthcare-in-campaign-for-congress/ Supports Roe
Xiong, May Lor Minnesota4RCandidate May Lor Xiong does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate May Lor Xiong has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://twitter.com/kayleighmcenany/status/1537033717419495425Opposes Roe
Yetter, Joe Oregon2DCandidate Joe Yetter understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the candidate states "Rural families are suffering from climate change, around the world. Drought, fire, flood, and famine cause entire populations to flee....Renewable energy resources like solar, wind, geothermal, transmission of energy, and others are all land-dependent. Cattle may graze under wind farms; sheep can graze under photovoltaic panels, keeping the lush green grass nicely mowed. Solar panels on irrigation canals cool the water, reduce evaporation, and provide local electricity to move water into fields and pastures. Carbon sequestration in soil will become a boom industry..."75Candidate Joe Yetter has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.joefororegon.com/policy-issuesSupports Roe
Young, GeoffKentucky6DCandidate Geoff Young understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a 2022 interview with The Goldenrod, the candidate stated "Young people are very concerned about climate change, and they’re a lot more concerned about it than most older Americans. It's certainly a real problem. But I think it's problem number two after the biggest problem, which is the threat of World War III and nuclear war." In a 2019 interview with 89.3 WFPL, Candidate Young said "What we do need to do is improve efficiency bringing renewable energy sources like solar energy."75Candidate Young has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://thegoldenrod.substack.com/p/sixth-congressional-district-primary-4b3 https://www.young4ky.com/issues/impeach-the-6-crooked-justices-who-voted-to-overturn-roe-v-wade/Supports Roe
Young, Shuwaski Mississippi3DCandidate Shuwaski Young understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a 2022 questionnaire from the Mississippi Free Press, the candidate states "I will focus on advancing agricultural growth, conservation investment and tax breaks for vertical farming investment. I will advance growth opportunities for underserved communities and low-income residents, through investments in climate opportunities: that means clean energy jobs and investment."75Candidate Shuwaski Young has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.mississippifreepress.org/24303/candidate-questionnaire-shuwaski-young-3rd-congressional-district-democratic-primary https://twitter.com/shuwaskiyoung/status/1553055899178123264 Supports Roe
Zapata, ClaudiaTexas21DIn a 2022 tweet, Candidate Zapata states, "No matter how we ask, plea, or beg for action on climate change nothing happens. Asking that we inherit a livable future and leave behind a livable planet isn’t crazy. Everyone has the right to clean air, clean water, and clean land." Candidate Claudia Zapata understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue.100Candidate Claudia Zapata has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://twitter.com/PoderConClaudia/status/1551644227364323329 https://twitter.com/BexarYD/status/1553110032471822336 Supports Roe
Zimm, ChristianGeorgia 5RCandidate Christian Zimm does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Candidate Zimm has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.christianzimm.com/the-issues https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/political-courage-test/203229/christian-zimmOpposes Roe
Zimmerman, Robert New York3D Candidate Robert Zimmerman understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue. On his official campaign website, Candidate Zimmerman states, "we stand at a New Deal moment to address the existential threat of climate change. Solving the climate crisis is the challenge of our lifetime – a challenge that we must address in order to preserve a future for our children in the United States and the rest of the world. Beyond this, the effects of climate change threaten our country’s national security and undermine the economic stability of American families."100Candidate Robert Zimmerman has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5092.5https://zimmermanforcongress.com/issues/combating-the-climate-crisis/ Supports Roe
Zink, Jeff Arizona3RJeff Zink does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75 https://jeffzinkforcongress.com/services/Opposes Roe
Zinke, Ryan Montana1RCandidate Ryan Zinke agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, the candidate states "For climate change advocates, the amount of CO2 released into the atmosphere by fires cannot be ignored. Dryer and hotter conditions should encourage active management rather than offer an excuse for the destruction of habitat and waste of renewable resources. The good news is, there are common sense solutions that can be quickly enacted if Congress had the resolve and leadership to get it done."50Candidate Ryan Zinke has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://www.ryanzinke.com/issues/healthy-forests-and-wildfire-prevention/ https://www.ryanzinke.com/2022/05/ravalli-republic-zinke-will-fight-for-the-unborn/Opposes Roe
Zmich, Thomas New York6RCandidate Thomas Zmich does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In the 'Political Courage Test' for votesmart.org, Candidate Thomas Zmich responded to questions regarding his positions on various political issues. In response to the question, "Do you support government funding for the development of renewable energy (e.g. solar, wind, geo-thermal)?", he responded saying "no". 25Candidate Thomas Zmich has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/political-courage-test/191244/tom-zmich Opposes Roe
Zumbluskas, Michael New York12RCandidate Micheal Zumbluskas does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his official campaign website, Candidate Zumbluskas states, "There is talk of solar or wind energy replacing oil. It could take land nearly the size of Connecticut filled with solar panels or windmills to power New York City. It will take years to help significantly. Meanwhile, continue using non-carbon producing nuclear power and prioritize energy from inner earth heat (geothermal), ocean tides, and greater efficiency...Let’s vigorously research fusion energy (like the sun merging hydrogen into helium). Fusion would provide infinite clean energy. We must solve nature’s elusive riddle." 25Candidate Micheal Zumbluskas has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://www.electmikez.us/issues-1/clean-energy-fusion-geothermal-tidal https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/political-courage-test/128435/michael-zumbluskasSupports Roe